A Study On Carbon Credit (ppt) i5xs

SUBMITTED TO: GUJARAT UNIVERSITY

SUBMITTED BY: KOTHARY VAISHAL NAVANI VICKY DATE: 6TH MAY 2009

1

CARBON CREDIT  Carbon credits are an element used to aid in regulation of the

amount of gases that are being released into the air. This is part of a larger international plan which has been created in an effort to reduce global warming and its effects.  The plan works by capping the amount of total emissions that

can be released by one company or business.

2

CARBON CREDIT If there is a shortfall in the amount of gases that are used, there is

a monetary value assigned to this shortfall and it may be traded. These credits are often traded between businesses. However, they also are bought and sold in international markets

at whatever the determined market value for them is. There are also times when these credits are used to

fund carbon partners.

reduction

plans

between

trading

3

CARBON CREDIT There are two types of market in carbon credit: 3. Compliance Market (Annexure I countries) 4. Voluntary Market (Non- Annexure countries)

4

KYOTO PROTOCOL The Kyoto Protocol is a legally binding agreement that arose

out of the UNFCCC to tackle climate change through a reduction of green house gas emissions. Countries (those listed in Annex I) are legally bound to reduce

man-made green house gases emissions by approximately 5.2% Individual countries have their own reduction targets outlined

in Annex B of the Kyoto Protocol

5

KYOTO PROTOCOL It was adopted in Kyoto, Japan, on 11th December 1997

Objective:

“stabilisation of greenhouse gas concentrations in

the atmosphere at a level that would prevent air pollution interference with the climate system”

6

INDIA AND KYOTO PROTOCOL India signed and ratified the Protocol in August, 2002. Since India is exempted from the framework of the treaty, it is

expected to gain from the protocol in of transfer of technology and related foreign investments India maintains that the major responsibility of curbing emission

rests with the developed countries, which have accumulated emissions over a long period of time.

7

KYOTO MECHANISM Kyoto is a 'cap and trade' system that imposes national caps

on the emissions of Annex I countries. On average, this cap requires countries to reduce their emissions 5.2% below their 1990 baseline over the 2008 to 2012 period. The types of Kyoto mechanisms are: 4. Clean Development Mechanism 5. Emissions trading 6. t implementation (JI)

8

KYOTO MECHANISM Both Annex I & non-Annex I Parties must co-operate in the

areas of: Development, application & diffusion of climate friendly

technologies; Research & systematic observation of the climate system; Education, training, & public awareness of climate change; & The improvement of methodologies & data for GHG inventories.

9

CDM MARKET The CDM market is like any other commodity market. Majority of the trading is done in the Primary market. The

secondary market is not as expanded as the primary mainly because of the high volatility of the carbon prices. The Buyers of CERs can be broadly classified into: 5. Compliance Buyers 6. Carbon Funds (e.g.: Carbon Fund of World Bank) 7. Traders

10

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM CDM is a mechanism whereby an Annex I party may purchase

emission reductions which arise from projects located in nonAnnex I countries. The carbon credits that are generated by a CDM project are termed Certified Emission Reductions (CERs), expressed in tonnes of CO2 equivalent

11

CDM PROCESS IDENTIFICATION OF PROJECT AND DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT CONCEPT NOTE

SUBMISSION OF THE PDD AND HOST COUNTRY APPROVAL VALIDATOR

DEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT

MAKE PDD COMPLETELY AVAILABLE FOR 30 DAYS

HOST COUNTRY APPROVAL

VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION

VALIDATION OF PROJECT

SUBMISSION OF VALIDATION REPORT AND PDD REGISTRATION WITH THE CDM

POSSIBLE REVIEW BY CDM EXECUTIVE BOARD ISSUANCE OF CERS TO PROJECT DEVELOPERS

PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING

12

CHALLANGES Procedural delays in the CDM:  2,022 out of 3,188 projects are at validation stage  An average wait of 80 days to go from registration request to actual

registration

Complex rules and the capacity constraint:  DOEs are unable to keep up with a large backlog of projects awaiting

registration  It is difficult to recruit, train and retain qualified, technical staff to apply the complex rules consistently

Impact of delays on carbon payments:  Delays for any reason in a project’s schedule can jeopardize elements of its

financing package, and ultimately its construction and implementation

13

EMISSION TRADING Emissions trading (ET) is a mechanism that enables countries

with legally binding emissions targets to buy and sell emissions allowances among themselves Under an emissions trading system, the quantity of emissions

is fixed (often called a "cap") and the right to emit becomes a tradable commodity. The cap (say 10,000 tonnes of carbon) is divided into transferable units (10,000 permits of 1 tonne of carbon each) 14

EMISSION TRADING V/S CARBON TAXES: THE POLITICS-WHO LIKES WHICH POLICY & WHY? United States is the strongest proponent of emissions trading as

US is energy inefficient and has high per capita carbon dioxide emissions levels. The European Union has been in favor of carbon taxes as the EU is already relatively energy efficient The Russian Federation & the Ukraine are major ers of emissions trading Developing countries are extremely cautious of emissions trading, & view it primarily as a "loophole" that the US & Japan can use to avoid their domestic responsibility 15

T IMPLEMENTATION (JI) t implementation is a project-based mechanism by which

one Annex I Party can invest in a project that reduces emissions or enhances sequestration in another Annex I Party, and receive credit for the emission reductions or removals achieved through that project. The unit associated with JI is called an emission reduction unit (ERU) In simple t Implementation means transfer of

emissions reduction at the project level.

16

T IMPLEMENTATION (JI) There are two approaches for verification of emission

reductions:  Under JI Track 1, a host Party that meets all of the eligibility

requirements may its own JI projects and issue ERUs for the resulting emission reductions or removals.  Under JI Track 2, each JI project is subject to verification

procedures established under the supervision of the t Implementation Supervisory Committee.

17

CARBON TRADING A carbon trading system allows the development of a market

through which carbon dioxide or carbon equivalents can be traded between participants, whether countries or companies. Each carbon credit is equal to 100 metric tons of carbon dioxide, which can be traded or exchanged in market. There are two kinds of carbon trading – Emission trading and

trading in Project-based Credits. The two categories are put together as Hybrid trading System

18

TYPES OF CARBON TRADING 1. EMISSION TRADING: A company can reduce its emission by half the cost of allowance bought from other company On the other hand, a company with higher expenditure for reduction of its emissions buys the required allowance from other company to save its emission cost 2. PROJECT-BASED TRADING: Government & World Bank subsidized credit for project-based trading to the companies calculating how much carbon dioxide equivalent they save/reduces Project-based Credit trading includes ‘baseline-and-credit’ trading and ‘offset’ trading 19

TYPES OF CARBON TRADING 3. HYBRID TRADING SYSTEM: In Hybrid trading system, both emission trading and offset

trading are used and try to make allowance exchangeable for project-based credits. Hybrid trading system is enormously complex as it is not only

difficult to try to create credible ‘credit’ and make them equivalent to ‘allowance’

20

CARBON NETWORK Seller Exchang e Banks Individua ls NGO & Govt.

Trading exchange Banks

Consulta nts

Brokers & Traders

Annex 2 &3 countries Others

Intermedi ary service providers Consultan ts

Buyers Annex 1 country

Banks Individual s Consultan ts Others NGO & Governm ent

21

PARTIES INVOLVED IN CARBON TRADING PROJECT ENTITY: t venture company or a limited partnership that are set up specifically to undertake the project SPONSOR: Individuals, companies or other entities that a project who have a direct or indirect interest in the project. LENDER: If the project is financed through debt, one or more banks may be involved in providing this.

22

PARTIES INVOLVED IN CARBON TRADING EQUITY PROVIDER: Equity may be provided by project sponsors or third party investors who ensure that the project produces a ROI as set out in the business plan or prospectus. CONSTRUCTOR: Who have responsibility for the completion of the works, & often have to assume liability for finishing construction on time and to budget. OPERATOR: Person responsible for the operation and maintenance of the project facilities once completed 23

PARTIES INVOLVED IN CARBON TRADING SUPPLIER BUYER INSURER: If a risk is to be mitigated by purchasing insurance, the lender will need to be satisfied as to the track record and creditworthiness of the insurer. RATING AGENCIES: The rating agencies may be involved if the financing of the project involves the issue of securities

24

PARTIES INVOLVED IN CARBON TRADING EXPERTS: Experts are individuals who give advise on key technical, engineering, environmental and risk aspects of a project. Experts need to be able to demonstrate a track record of expertise in the relevant area HOST GOVERNMENT: The objectives and role of the host government will vary but may involve economic, social and environmental guidelines and issuance of relevant consents, permits and licenses

25

ADVANTAGES OF CARBON TRADING New cash source to companies who are able to maintain their

emission levels well within the permissible limits. The overall ecological balance is preserved The company or country gets rewarded for applying clean

technology in its production process.

26

ADVANTAGES OF CARBON TRADING A much better corporate and social image which wins public

approval Encourages activities like tree plantings which would help

reduce soil salinity, improve water quality and enhance biodiversity

27

KEY RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES The extent to which the Kyoto Protocol guidelines are

implemented & followed The attitude of US which is the biggest polluter and had

refused to sign the treaty The final rules and decisions relating to an emissions trading

market

28

POSITION OF INDIA India is considered as the largest beneficiary, claiming about

31 % of the total world carbon trade through CDM It is expected to rake in at least Rs 22,500 crore to Rs 45,000

crore over a period of time and Indian companies are expected to corner at least 10 per cent of the global market in the initial year If India can capture a 10% share of the global CDM market,

annual CER revenues to the country could range from US$ 10 million to 300 million 29

PRESENT STATUS OF DUMPING GROUNDS IN INDIA In India, due to increased population & commercial

development, cities are facing problems of Municipal Solid Waste disposal. The urban population in larger towns & cities in India is increasing at a decadal growth rate of above 40% Various processes/technologies available to reduce the amount of Municipal Solid Waste are as follows:  Physical (a. Pelletisation)  Biochemical (a. Aerobic Composting b. Anaerobic Digestion)  Thermal (a. Incineration b. Gasification)

30

CARBON TRADING AT MCX The Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd entered into an

alliance with the Chicago Climate Exchange in 2005 to introduce carbon credit trading in India MCX is the futures exchange. People here are getting price

signals for the carbon for the delivery in next five years. The exchange is only for Indians and Indian companies The Indian government has not fixed any norms nor has it

made it compulsory to reduce carbon emissions to a certain level. So, people who are coming to buy are actually financial investors 31

CARBON TRADING AT MCX TRADING BENEFITS:  Sellers and intermediaries can hedge against price risk  Advance selling could help project to generate liquidity and

thereby reducing its cost of implementation  There is no counter party risk as exchange guarantee the trade  The price discovery on the exchange platform ensure the fair price for both the sellers and buyers  Bring players to a single platform

32

OUTLOOK FOR INDIA India is one of the exempted from this protocol as they are

stated as developing countries, but overseas companies can buy carbon credits from these countries. Now companies in India can use Carbon credits to get liberal

loans, incentives by multinationals in their countries and benefits like better social and ecological visibility

33

INDIAN COMPANIES: TAKING ADVANTAGE Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals is amongst first companies worldwide

to get its carbon emission reduction project certified. It is set to reap rewards from the sale of CER credits from this year itself

Tata Steel is believed to have signed a MoU with the Japanese

government agency “NEDO” for sale of credits accruing to it from carbon reduction following the implementation of an over Rs 250 crore modernization and upgradation project

NTPC and several state electricity boards have also applied for

carbon credit benefits. Most of them are replacing coal-based technologies with more environment-friendly processes

34

INDIAN COMPANIES: TAKING ADVANTAGE Of the 15 projects approved by the UNFCCC so far, four are

Indian. These four are:  Gujarat Flurochemicals,  Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd,  The Clarion power project in Rajasthan and  The Dehar power project in Himachal Pradesh

The country ed for 283 CDM projects out of the 819

ed by the CDM Executive Board, the environment ministry, the World Bank and the International Emissions Trading Association

35

CONCLUSIONS There is a great opportunity awaiting for India in carbon

trading which is estimated to go up to $100 billion by 2010. In the new regime, the country could emerge as one of the

largest beneficiaries ing for 25 % of the total world carbon trade, says a recent World Bank report Analysts claim if more companies absorb clean technologies,

total CERs with India could touch 500 million.

36

CONCLUSIONS Of the 391 projects sanctioned, the UNFCCC has ed

114 from India, the highest for any country. There are projects range from cement, steel, biomass power,

bio-gases co-generation and municipal solid waste to energy, municipal water pumping and natural gas power. The ministry has given the host-country clearance, the CDM projects will have to be approved by the executive board of the UNFCCC

37

THANK YOU

38