Fs 5 Episode 5 6mhm
This document was ed by and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this report form. Report 3b7i
Overview 3e4r5l
& View Fs 5 Episode 5 as PDF for free.
More details w3441
- Words: 803
- Pages: 5
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
FS 5
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Episode 5
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
FIELD STUDY
Name ____________________________________________________________ Course & Block ________________________ Resource Teacher _______________________________________________ Signature _______________________________ Date of Observation : Day 1 __________________________________ Time Day 2 __________________________________ Time Day 3 __________________________________ Time
__________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________
1. Study sample Table of Specification (TOS) ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING 2 Course Title
#
ing (Declarative) % Item #
20
33.3
TOPICS Authentic Assessment: Basic Concepts Authentic Assessment: Advance Application Discussion of Behavioral Objectives / Intended Learning Outcomes Portfolio on Authentic Assessment
TOTAL
LEVELS/SKILLS Understanding (Comprehending/Applying) # % Item #
1-4,7-15,20-26 10
20
Thinking (Analyzing/Evaluating/Creating) # % Item #
33
10
17%
17
5,6,16-19,27-30
TOTAL #
%
20
33
10
17
10
17%
31
10
17
20
33%
32-35
20
33
30
50
60
100
Prepared by: ________________________________ Instructor
2. Compare the given TOS with other TOS that you researched on.
Corpuz, Brenda.Field Study 5 Learning Assessment Strategies. (LORIMAR Publishing, Inc., 2015),66-71.
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
FS 5 FIELD STUDY
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Episode 5
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
MY ANALYSIS 1. For a TOS to ensure test content validity, what parts must it have?
2. Among the TOSs that you researched on, which is a better TOS? Why?
3. Can a teacher have a test with content validity even without making a TOS?
4. Explain why the use of a TOS enhances that content validity?
Corpuz, Brenda.Field Study 5 Learning Assessment Strategies. (LORIMAR Publishing, Inc., 2015),66-71.
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
FS 5 FIELD STUDY
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Episode 5
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
MY REFLECTION Read this conversation and reflect on teachers’ assessment practices.
But we only talked about Puerto Princesa for – like 2 seconds last week. “Why would she put that on the exam?” “You know how teachers are..they’re always trying to trick you.” “Yes, they find the most nit-picky little details to put on their tests and don’t even care if the information is important.” “It’s just not fair. I studied everything we discussed in class about the Philippines and the things she made a big deal about, like comparing Philippines And to think all she asked was ‘What’s the capital of Singapore? Really? Grrr.” (Adapted from Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, Vol. 18 No. 3, February 2013) Did you have a similar experience? Reflect on it.
Corpuz, Brenda.Field Study 5 Learning Assessment Strategies. (LORIMAR Publishing, Inc., 2015),66-71.
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
FS 5 FIELD STUDY
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Episode 5
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
MY PORTFOLIO Give an example of TOS that reflects levels of learning either by Bloom or by Kendall and Marzano. Which TOS is better? Why?
Corpuz, Brenda.Field Study 5 Learning Assessment Strategies. (LORIMAR Publishing, Inc., 2015),66-71.
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
FS 5 FIELD STUDY
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Episode 5
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
MY PERFORMANCE Focused on :
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUC. EXEMPLARY SUPERIOR SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY TASKS 4 3 2 1
Observation
Analysis of the Learning Episode
All tasks were done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectations
All or nearly all tasks were done with high quality
Nearly all tasks were done with acceptable quality
Fewer than half of tasks were done; or most objectives met but with poor quality
4 Analysis questions were answered completely; in depth answers; thoroughly grounded on theories.
3 Analysis questions were answered completely.
2 Analysis questions were not answered completely.
1 Analysis questions were not answered.
Clear connection with theories.
Vaguely elated to the theories.
Gramm and spelling are superior.
Grammar and spelling acceptable.
4 Reflection statements are profound and clear, ed by experiences from the learning episode.
3 Reflection statements are clear, but not clearly ed by experiences from the learning episode.
2 Reflection statements are shallow; ed by experiences from the learning episode.
1 Reflection statements are unclear and shallow and are not ed by experiences from the learning episode.
4 Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and all ing documentation are located in sections clearly designated.
3 Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and most ing documentation are available and/or in logical and clearly marked locations.
2 Portfolio is incomplete; ing documentation is organized but is lacking.
1 Portfolio has many lacking components; is unorganized an unclear.
4 Before deadline
3 On the deadline
2 A day after the deadline
1 Two days or more after the deadline
Exemplary grammar and spelling.
Reflection / Insights
Learning Portfolio
Submission of Learning Episode
4
OVER-ALL SCORE:
_________________________________________________ Signature of FS Teacher above Printed Name
3
2
Grammar and spelling are unsatisfactory.
1
RATING:
_______________________________________ Date
Corpuz, Brenda.Field Study 5 Learning Assessment Strategies. (LORIMAR Publishing, Inc., 2015),66-71.
FS 5
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Episode 5
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
FIELD STUDY
Name ____________________________________________________________ Course & Block ________________________ Resource Teacher _______________________________________________ Signature _______________________________ Date of Observation : Day 1 __________________________________ Time Day 2 __________________________________ Time Day 3 __________________________________ Time
__________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________
1. Study sample Table of Specification (TOS) ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING 2 Course Title
#
ing (Declarative) % Item #
20
33.3
TOPICS Authentic Assessment: Basic Concepts Authentic Assessment: Advance Application Discussion of Behavioral Objectives / Intended Learning Outcomes Portfolio on Authentic Assessment
TOTAL
LEVELS/SKILLS Understanding (Comprehending/Applying) # % Item #
1-4,7-15,20-26 10
20
Thinking (Analyzing/Evaluating/Creating) # % Item #
33
10
17%
17
5,6,16-19,27-30
TOTAL #
%
20
33
10
17
10
17%
31
10
17
20
33%
32-35
20
33
30
50
60
100
Prepared by: ________________________________ Instructor
2. Compare the given TOS with other TOS that you researched on.
Corpuz, Brenda.Field Study 5 Learning Assessment Strategies. (LORIMAR Publishing, Inc., 2015),66-71.
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
FS 5 FIELD STUDY
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Episode 5
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
MY ANALYSIS 1. For a TOS to ensure test content validity, what parts must it have?
2. Among the TOSs that you researched on, which is a better TOS? Why?
3. Can a teacher have a test with content validity even without making a TOS?
4. Explain why the use of a TOS enhances that content validity?
Corpuz, Brenda.Field Study 5 Learning Assessment Strategies. (LORIMAR Publishing, Inc., 2015),66-71.
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
FS 5 FIELD STUDY
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Episode 5
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
MY REFLECTION Read this conversation and reflect on teachers’ assessment practices.
But we only talked about Puerto Princesa for – like 2 seconds last week. “Why would she put that on the exam?” “You know how teachers are..they’re always trying to trick you.” “Yes, they find the most nit-picky little details to put on their tests and don’t even care if the information is important.” “It’s just not fair. I studied everything we discussed in class about the Philippines and the things she made a big deal about, like comparing Philippines And to think all she asked was ‘What’s the capital of Singapore? Really? Grrr.” (Adapted from Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, Vol. 18 No. 3, February 2013) Did you have a similar experience? Reflect on it.
Corpuz, Brenda.Field Study 5 Learning Assessment Strategies. (LORIMAR Publishing, Inc., 2015),66-71.
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
FS 5 FIELD STUDY
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Episode 5
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
MY PORTFOLIO Give an example of TOS that reflects levels of learning either by Bloom or by Kendall and Marzano. Which TOS is better? Why?
Corpuz, Brenda.Field Study 5 Learning Assessment Strategies. (LORIMAR Publishing, Inc., 2015),66-71.
CAMARINES NORTE STATE COLLEGE
FS 5 FIELD STUDY
LEARNING ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Episode 5
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUCATION (OBE)
MY PERFORMANCE Focused on :
TABLE OF SPECIFICATION (TOS), CONTENT VALIDITY AND OUTCOMES-BASED EDUC. EXEMPLARY SUPERIOR SATISFACTORY UNSATISFACTORY TASKS 4 3 2 1
Observation
Analysis of the Learning Episode
All tasks were done with outstanding quality; work exceeds expectations
All or nearly all tasks were done with high quality
Nearly all tasks were done with acceptable quality
Fewer than half of tasks were done; or most objectives met but with poor quality
4 Analysis questions were answered completely; in depth answers; thoroughly grounded on theories.
3 Analysis questions were answered completely.
2 Analysis questions were not answered completely.
1 Analysis questions were not answered.
Clear connection with theories.
Vaguely elated to the theories.
Gramm and spelling are superior.
Grammar and spelling acceptable.
4 Reflection statements are profound and clear, ed by experiences from the learning episode.
3 Reflection statements are clear, but not clearly ed by experiences from the learning episode.
2 Reflection statements are shallow; ed by experiences from the learning episode.
1 Reflection statements are unclear and shallow and are not ed by experiences from the learning episode.
4 Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and all ing documentation are located in sections clearly designated.
3 Portfolio is complete, clear, well-organized and most ing documentation are available and/or in logical and clearly marked locations.
2 Portfolio is incomplete; ing documentation is organized but is lacking.
1 Portfolio has many lacking components; is unorganized an unclear.
4 Before deadline
3 On the deadline
2 A day after the deadline
1 Two days or more after the deadline
Exemplary grammar and spelling.
Reflection / Insights
Learning Portfolio
Submission of Learning Episode
4
OVER-ALL SCORE:
_________________________________________________ Signature of FS Teacher above Printed Name
3
2
Grammar and spelling are unsatisfactory.
1
RATING:
_______________________________________ Date
Corpuz, Brenda.Field Study 5 Learning Assessment Strategies. (LORIMAR Publishing, Inc., 2015),66-71.
Related Documents 3m3m1z
Fs 5 Episode 5 6mhm
April 2020 32
Fs Episode 5 mk32
December 2021 0
Fs 5 Episode 9 2d2g1t
November 2019 204
Episode 5 Fs 1 192e30
January 2022 0
Fs-5-episode-3 44384s
October 2019 86
Fs 5 Episode 4 3xg4m
July 2020 2More Documents from "CezLuzarraga" 5i950
''the Story Of An Hour'' And Critical Approaches To Literature Presentation--for Printing.pdf g1z44
November 2022 0
Marzano And Kendall 2007 Taxonomy 6n34n
February 2022 0
What Should Be Observe In Making And Use Of Scoring Rubrics 2u2g51
October 2019 15