PRACTICAL WORK REPORT RUBRIC MARKING SCHEME EC302 – ELECTRONIC COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN Item / Score
Theory
Data Analysis Result
Discussion
Conclusion References
Grading 4 Complete definition, explanation, example, table, diagram and practical objectives Complete schematics with label and value Show the correct waveform and point values Answer completely all the questions given with extra content Answering the objectives and waveform result From official reference books, modules and internet
3
2
1
Total
PRACTICAL WORK REPORT RUBRIC MARKING SCHEME EC302 – ELECTRONIC COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN Weight
Total Score
Item / Score
Definition and explanation given but no table or diagram
Mild explanation or definition and no table or diagram
Very poor explanation without any definition
Schematic with poor label and value Waveform / point values with some errors
Schematic with poor label or value Show only correct waveform or point values
Schematic with no label or value Wrong waveform and/or point values
Answering all the questions adequately
Answering the questions with several mistakes
Wrongly answer the questions or no answer
4
Discussion
Mild conclusion
Poor conclusion and no objective
Unpractical conclusion
3
Conclusion
From unofficial books, modules and/or internet
From unofficial modules and/or internet only
Only from internet
2
References
Format
Complete with page numbers, table of content, suitable font/ size
Fulfilled the proper format but overreact with too fancy format
Finishing
Clean, Nice and firm
Clean, nice but missing important information
Teamwork
Cooperatives, functioning and productive
Attendance
Student attend class
Cooperative, functioning but common standard work piece Student not attend class (with permission by KJ)
Pages still have missing format components such as page number and so on Proper binding but failure to produce high quality assignment
Failure to fulfilled the proper format of assignment Failure to bind assignment properly
4
Theory
4
Data Analysis
4
Result
1
1
Grading 4 Complete definition, explanation, example, table, diagram and practical objectives Complete schematics with label and value Show the correct waveform and point values Answer completely all the questions given with extra content Answering the objectives and waveform result From official reference books, modules and internet
Schematic with no label or value Wrong waveform and/or point values
Answering all the questions adequately
Answering the questions with several mistakes
Wrongly answer the questions or no answer
4
Mild conclusion
Poor conclusion and no objective
Unpractical conclusion
3
From unofficial books, modules and/or internet
From unofficial modules and/or internet only
Only from internet
2
Failure to fulfilled the proper format of assignment
1
Failure to bind assignment properly
1
No good cooperation but functioning and fulfill the task
Uncooperativ e, no function with unacceptabl e reason
1
Student attend class but late more than 5 minutes
Not attend class without any excuses
1
Finishing
Student attend class but late more than 5 minutes
Not attend class without any excuses
1
Attendance
Student attend class
25
Schematic with poor label or value Show only correct waveform or point values
Clean, nice but missing important information
Teamwork
Weight
Schematic with poor label and value Waveform / point values with some errors
Clean, Nice and firm
1
Total
Very poor explanation without any definition
Format
Cooperatives, functioning and productive
1
Mild explanation or definition and no table or diagram
Fulfilled the proper format but overreact with too fancy format
Uncooperativ e, no function with unacceptabl e reason
2
Definition and explanation given but no table or diagram
Complete with page numbers, table of content, suitable font/ size
No good cooperation but functioning and fulfill the task
OVERALL TOTAL
3
Cooperative, functioning but common standard work piece Student not attend class (with permission by KJ)
Pages still have missing format components such as page number and so on Proper binding but failure to produce high quality assignment
OVERALL TOTAL
4
4 4
25
Total Score