Karl Lentz Moonshine_14 2jt8

[email protected]

preface This document has been updated 10/31/2015 This is only my opinion as only God can know the Truth… This is an attempt to distill the basics and essential concepts of the Karl Lentz Method. It was gathered mainly from the youtube video series, thanks to Craig Lynch who has so kindly edited down for us all, from the original Karl Lentz talkshoe episodes…. Thank you Karl Lentz!! Craig Lynch’s Youtube Channel-https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDd9cJ5qa3rx2grmZMqGfjQ fsectio And thanks to all who added to this document in any shape or form… Man created Government to secure and protect your rights and property from man. The problem isn’t that governzzment is filled with man but rather the problem lies in that man has forgeten he is the creator of it….. Let’s begin the journey of understanding…There seems to be two camps of thoughts that are out there in society…You either are pro government or you are against it…This seems to be a polarized situation…I believe neither is correct…For the government lovers I would say how dare you not recognize how much harm is being done at arms length with the aid and use of government…As for the other camp Why did you just scream and shout in protest as this is just like saying ‘because I don’t know the rules of the game I will just sit here and pout and spout my angst’ To first get past both mindsets one has to take a closer look at how to play this game..In most case this is the first look at how the system really works for man not against him. Most people have a typical view of just going to court and plead to a judge and hope justice will prevail.. Nothing further from the truth is going to happen….Did you show up with a lawyer? Did you show up say you’re the defendant? Did you answer to your name? Did you accept the title of Mr. or Mrs? all these things little things just gave control over to a legal world inadvertentily accepting duties and obligations for all your god giving rights….confused? we were too… let’s get educated about protecting our rights as a man by becoming a fully realized man.. First thing one has to grasp is that there are basically two types of courts: istrative or common law courts. One court is for legal persons, the latter is for man. The greatest hurdle is getting past your belief that when you are at traffic court, you are not in a normal court.

1 | Page

What is a person? Person can be a legal person (citizen) or man. Where did this legal person come from..It was created the day you were born. You were contracted over not with , by your parents, on that day with the government to you for benefits. I use the word over because you were not capable of contract yourself with the government making the birthcertificate hold over your life non existant because this is not a legally or lawfully binding contract as you truly were not a competent party with full disclosure to all the particulars because you were just a baby. But just as your birthday is really hearsay from your parents because you were just a baby, you trust that the birthday is really true and also that the birthcertificate document only ensure you have a right to the land. Although man is a person one must be clear about what kind of person. Man has duties and obligations to a society of mankind, whose may impose upon them for failures to comply or perform. Similarly but differently a legal person such as a lawyer or a police officer is a legal person and they have duties and obligations to their legal society. This type of person has limited rights (bill of rights or charter of rights and freedom). Note: a police officer is only a police officer when he is working.. when he is done his shift, he instantly regains all his rights as a man. Typically Canadian’s believe they get their rights from the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Well if that is true where do your rights go when you run into problems in the USA because as a Canadian, one can’t file a us civil rights complaint, because we are not a United States citizen? (more on that later) What is a man? Man has the god given right to do anything he wants but he too also has duties and obligations to help his fellow man to not harm his fellow man, in this JudeoChristian society. Man is unlimited in that he can paint a picture and can go fishing, so long as he doesn’t tres or harm another man; a police officer person can't do that because his title only allows him to perform his duties and obligations, he is unauthorized to do anything outside his duties and obligations. Simply answering to your name the wrong way in court will position you as a legal person and send you into the limited rights legal world, giving them control over your body and your life. Karl has shown us a way out of their jurisdiction hence control. Judeo-Christian society you ask? Isn’t there separation between church and state? Nope. Canada and most common wealth nations are under the supremacy of God, with the Holy Bible as the foundation of their laws. A clear hint is the title of MINISTRY OF DEFENCE! Ministry? Minister? Can anyone see those religious titles!! This approach is not for a Napoleonic code land like or Spain (civil law), nor would this work in Saudi Arabia, as their foundation of law is the Koran, not the Holy Bible... The Karl Lentz method is basically to speak as a man, and only to another man... It is sometimes hard to do this when the other man is clothed/cloaked as a judge person or police officer person... the Karl method will show you how to flush out the man from the person so u can hold them able……courteously.

2 | Page

One of my presumptions is that the legal world (bar association) has been presuming us for one of their (a legal person), and applying statutes and codes on us who, unbeknownst to ourselves, we have been accepting a legal obligation that was unnecessary and unbeneficial to us..... But when man does not know himself or his rights, he is often taken for the legal ride of his life... I’m saying that basically we're being taken advantage of, because we do not understand the system but once we get a grasp of it then we will be able to empower ourselves by removing our presumptions and replacing them with facts that we can stand on and move forward through this court system. Everybody’s lawful problems are the generally the same but their suit and cases are absolutely unique in the makeup of the parties and circumstances… Hopefully this book will help you to understand government as well help you mend and grow to love government and its employees down to the police man, more than u ever have before… but this will take a next level understanding of the world we live in, in the year 2015. This document should be printed out and used as study material. When in court and need to consult this document, load it on digital device, require leave of court, search this document for answers with Ctrl+F. Please know everything in the doc beforehand, it should only offer , not be the real-time defense.

With that said….Let’s get drunk on double distilled Karl Lentz …

Section 1 -Fundamentals(person expanded) 24pgs

The constitution of Canada and USA were created not only to not simply to empower government but more importantly to constrain it.

Government was created to secure and protect your rights and property.. With that being said Government is an awesome ideal on paper.. If you hold on to your seats and give me some of your time, in this document i will explain how i can say that “Government can do no wrong!” And have u believe it too!

Now, where in the government’s constitution does it allow for doing wrong to a man. You wont be able to find it!! So government can’t do anything wrong to a man. But a man acting

3 | Page

as a government agent cant operate outside of the scope of their duties and obligations and harm you… What i mean by that mouthful is that is, if a police officer comes into your home commits robbery, we know they aren’t allowed to do this as there is no law permiting this… then what do we do? What is our recourse or remedy? U cant sue a 2D legal fiction called a police officer, who is only there to secure and protect your rights and property, so again what is our remedy?

What u must realize is that it wasn’t the police officer who took your property, it was a man or woman acting as a police officer who did u wrong because again the police officer is just a title that does no wrong… If a government agent/police officer are tresing u just have to let them know…!!! Government would rather ask for forgiveness than to not over step…it is their nature.. so we must simply remind them when they are tresing!!! So never go after a police officer (which is just a 2 dimensionally created entity on paper for your benefit) but rather the man who sometimes acts as a police officer… you must be able to see the difference between those two entities and what they are allowed and not allowed to do. If you don’t know the rules of the game they are going to take adavantage of you , both legally and lawfully.

They are public servants and are you not the public?

All a police officer is going to do is wirte a compliant…as a man you don’t answer complaints u only have to answer to claims! Hence where is the man who says i do wrong!!

Government was created by man to protect our rights and property not from an alien invasion but rather to protect us from other men and women…Government is a “what”, not a “who”. A “who” can lie, harm, tres; a “what” is general description “who” is specific.

If you live in a common wealth country consider yourself very lucky to be able to defend your unalienable rights because you can’t do this is in or Spain as they are Napolionic (Civil law) country as I mentioned earlier. Below is a world map of how few countries that still recognize the Common Law.

4 | Page

Let’s now take a close look at Queen Elizabeth II (Elizabeth Alexandra Mary; born 21 April 1926[a]) is, and has been from her accession in 1952, Queen of the United

5 | Page

Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, and Head of the Commonwealth.

The Queen takes Coronation OathPhoto: PA/PA Archive/Press Association Images Then Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Geoffrey Fisher presided over the Coronation ceremony. These are the words of the Coronation Oath in full. Archbishop of Canterbury: “Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?” Queen Elizabeth II: “I am willing.” Archbishop of Canterbury: “Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?” Queen Elizabeth II: “I solemnly promise so to do.” Archbishop of Canterbury: “Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?” Queen Elizabeth II: “I will.” Archbishop of Canterbury: “Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?” Queen Elizabeth II: “All this I promise to do.”

6 | Page

The Queen then moved from the Coronation chair to the altar of Westminster and, kneeling, with her right hand on a bible, said: “The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.”

Queen Elizabeth II stands as our protector of this common wealth.. read her coriantion as she specifically mentions to“promise and swear to govern the Peoples .....according to their respective laws and customs” and this is a common law land… why is this common law land so important...because you right to face your acc is one of the key principles of the Karl Lentz method..it will be a tool you will use in many different ways form letters to prosecutors or even a court room setting, to exercize your rights and to help call out a frivolous complaint made by a Lawyer/prosecutor.. but we will learn more about that later… My government is i because i am self-governing!! We live in a nation where we can self govern. The queen is also protecting this right by law and custom….and what is customary to this land…well we need not look any further than the customs of the native American population who does self govern…this is the Natives belief and anyone else on this land who chose it too.

The Native American people claim an “inherent right to self-government” either because it is seen as a natural right emanating from prior occupation of the land or because of a gift or covenant with the Creator. In this case the Native people do not seek to be “granted” self-government, but simply to have their pre-existing right recognized in law.

7 | Page

A monument in Jamestown presented by the Virginia State Bar states: “THE COMMON LAW. Here the common law of England was established on this continent with the arrival of the first settlers on May 14, 1607. The first charter granted that the inhabitants of the colony ‘… shall have and enjoy all liberties, franchises and immunities…as if they had been abiding and borne within this our realme of Englande…’ Since Magna Carta the common law has been the cornerstone of individual liberties, even as against the crown, summarized later in the Bill of Rights its principles have inspired the development of our system of freedom under law, which is at once our dearest possession and proudest achievement.” (May 17, 1959) You can now see that the common law protects you from the crown, which is the bar association!! Not the queen!! This is an important piece of the puzzle as we move on… THE CROWN IS NOT THE QUEEN!! It will become even more clear and how important it is to make this distinction, that the Legal bar association ( often called the Crown) is not the Queen (often called REGINA or HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN vs. JOE BLOW) who is taking you to court over statutory laws or codes…

http://www.illinoisattorneygeneral.gov/about/history.html The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have been summarized as follows: 1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and revenues of the crown. 2d. By information, to bring certain classes of persons accused of crimes and misdemeanors to trial. [3rd.] By scire facias, to revoke and annul grants made by the crown improperly, or when forfeited by the grantee thereof. 4th. By information, to recover money or other chattels, or damages for wrongs committed on the land, or other possessions of the crown. 5th. By writ of quo warranto, to determine the right of him who claims or usurps any office, franchise or liberty, and to vacate the charter, or annul the existence of a corporation, for violations of its charter, or for omitting to exercise its corporate powers. 6th. By writ of mandamus, to compel the ission of an officer duly chosen to his office, and to compel his restoration when illegally ousted. 7th. By information in chancery, to enforce trusts, and to prevent public nuisances, and the abuse of trust powers. 8th. By proceedings in rem, to recover property to which the crown may be entitled, by forfeiture for treason, and property, for which there is no other legal owner, such as wrecks, treasure trove, &c. (3 Black. Com., 256-7, 260 to 266; id., 427 and 428; 4 id., 308, 312.) 9th. And in certain cases, by information in chancery, for the protection of the rights of lunatics, and others, who are under the protection of the crown. (Mitford's Pl., 2430, Adams' Equity, 301-2.)

8 | Page

The Statute of Westminster, 1931 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom and separate versions of it are now domestic law within Australia and Canada; it has been repealed in New Zealand and implicitly by subsequent laws in former Commonwealth realms. ed on 11 December 1931, the act, either immediately or upon ratification, effectively both established the legislative independence of the self-governing Dominions of the British Empire from the United Kingdom and bound them all to seek each other's approval for changes to monarchical titles and the common line of succession. It thus became a statutory embodiment of the principles of equality and common allegiance to the Crown set out in the Balfour Declaration of 1926. It thus had the effect of making the Dominions sovereign nations. The Statute of Westminster's relevance today is that it sets the basis for the continuing relationship between the Commonwealth realms and the Crown One can clearly see that even the Statute of Westminster understands the right of self governance….

What is self governance? Basically do what ever you want except Do know harm and cause no loss to oyur fellow man….that is what your Creator fundamentally expects of you. This is what Karl Lentz calls the method more liken to a lifestyle…. The lifestyle is that of an honorable fully realized man… What seems to be lacking in most of our cards keeping us short of being a man, is our inability to stand up for our rights in a court room… this will become clearer as we dig in.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9 | Page

Do you know that coca cola has its own constitution? Every corporation has rules for its employees,,,that is what a constitution is…. Are u confused by the constitution applying to you? Then why do you thinn its different for Canada of the US of A,, a constitution is the structure of the body…the elements of the body..they fought against the bill of rights because they knew people whould be confused by the people for their bill of rights… but for its citizens, that’s a different thing!! But it is a benefit to be part of coca cola at some times.. but if you don’t then u don’t have to be a member of their family!! Chose with the capacity of a man and opt in and out at will…

American’s pledge allegiance to the Republic instead of a democracy.

The person gov created was from your afterbirth..look up after born in black law… they have control over child because they have their definition..but you cant find man in their definitions. Because they cant define their creator..so where do our rights first appear in writing is the bible!! There is no mention of Human once in the bible..thats because god only believes in man rigths..human rightsa was an invention of the legal society.. look up person in 7th edition and you will see person is defined as human. I submit human is not man because it’s a different word..hu is a prefix that means not quite…so hu man mena not quite man… monster in black laws also say monster is a human!! The after borth is the id and the monster..maternity ward delivery… all legal !!

Is the 'STATE OF TEXAS' going to take the witness stand and point you out across the courtroom and your possession of marijuana caused him harm? Him: "No, I don't suppose so , LOL" Me: Then who's going to show up and that claim? Him: "The D.A.?"

10 | P a g e

Me: Does the D.A. have any first hand knowledge? Did you harm him or his property? Does he have ANY skin in this game whatsoever, other than to unjustly enrich himself and the STATE OF TEXAS? Him: "No." Me: Then I guess the D.A. is filing false claims against you in the form of a criminal 'complaint', and you need to file a claim on his sorry ass and drag him into court as a defendant for several treses: 1. Filing false claims in the form of criminal complaints. 2. Committing Barratry. 3. Malicious Prosecution. 4. Extortion. 5. Unjust Enrichment. 6. Wasting your time and money dealing with his silly complaint.

Although USA is not a commonwealth nation it’s a Constitution Republic that operates under the common law so this also applies to them…

So let’s take a close look at the american system…In a republic, which is the United States of America, everybody rights are protected unlike a democracy where a few can control others with a 60 / 40 vote… the 60 can determine the 40 laws and impose on them …..but a republic preserves everyones right with a trial by jury, because if one person on the jury thinks your not guilty that means that someone in that society, one of its will be comprimizeed by this judgement so we must let the man go..in Greece they had 1000 jurors because the thinking was you couldn’t bribe a 1000 people…today we think 12 people can’t be bribed… hence this jury is what protects man’s rights this day!

11 | P a g e

If you are willing to pay the debt and they don’t accept your payment the debt is no longer due..

Babel is how the language was confounded…

Common law is not written anywhere… English common law has a structure but common law doesn’t

There are good Samaritan laws in some states will hold men and women liable for not helping if they can help!!! Like watching people get into a fight and you don’t help!!! Look if you don’t get involved you better call the police asap…don’t just stand and watch u better be doing something proactive to help your fellow man!!!

U are allowed to defend yourself..it called self help…if someone take your child you don’t have to wait for police u can act immediately!!

You can either play the loop hole game by tearing the statute apart just by looking at the words it is made up of…or the common law game….

Felon is as low as u can be (look at shakespear..as means a guy who is going to bj another)

There is probably a government rehabilitation to help your person get in the good graces of the legal society..

12 | P a g e

Our parents contract us over not with the government!!!we never signerd the document!!

Crown is the bar association…there is no queen of Canada It’s a matter of controversy. Guilt in german means debt.. So if u fall under the citizenship of the legal bar association then u have to accept their charge of guilt and pay!!!

U would be hard pressed to find out a unite states birth certificate because that was invited for the slaves..u can find New York state birth certificates..

U need a birth certificate from the place u want to buy land...

Jail is for less than one year… prison is for serious crimes!!! Jail is waiting for trial!! In jail he can file a claim and wait for his court date…

The prosecutors need case law citations and their 300 pg complaint. Man just needs about 8 words!!

We don’t have to believe what the police officer says i did wrong..let them have their belief..in this society we settle our difference in front of a judge…

As a man we are comfortabole being a defendant only if another man is accusing us because we can defend ourselves and speak….that is when u want to be a defendant

13 | P a g e

The solial security number is not for you to give away…u r in naked possession of it… it’s the states creation hence their property…

Just imagine that everything on the government paperwork is written in chinesse..

Since man created government and man doesn’t have jurisdiction of another man…unless they volunteer and if i did volunteer well then now i no longer volunteer.

They can’t testify to what you made and u don’t have to testify against yourself!! I have no clue how much i made last year and there is no law that requires me too keep such an ing!!

The gov can’t force u to be a citizen u can be one or not whenever u want and for however long u want.. until it benefits you!!

If you sign your name to it you are responsible for it!!

Statues of limitation is for statues there is none for man..man is fluid and dynamic

14 | P a g e

Freedom has the right to be wrong not do wrong? And now i speak out to the whole world to forgive me of any debt or any tres if i have done wrong to any man!

u can kill men in the bible but not man...

A congress is a bunch of baboons!!

THE SYSTEM WANTS YOU TO BELIEVE THAT THERE THEY CAN PLAY THIS SYSTEM WITH THE PRESUMPTION THAT YOU ARE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY BUT THE TRUTH IS THE MOMENT THE OFFICER GIVES U THE TICKET U ARE GUILTY… U NEED TO DEFEND YOURSELF FROM THE BEGINNING WITH THE NOOSE ON YOUR NECK…. It’s summary conviction court for traffic offences..u have been convicted… U HAVE TO STOP BELIEVING THAT INNONCENT OR GUILTY ARE SOMETHING DETERMINED LATER.. YOU ARE GUILTY AND THEY ARE TRYING TO GET U IN THEIR COURT TO AUTOMATICALLY CEMENT IT JUST WITH YOUR PRESENCE AND ACCEPTING THE NAME IS INSTANTLY OVER THE TRIAL AND YOU DINT EVEN KNOW IT!!!

People are under the presumption that they can actually be found innocent in an istrative court!!! That’s the fatal mistake!!! They want u to show up to cement their victory and jurisdiction over you the moment u claim the name… its over at that moment!!

Futility of trying to win in the legal system, that system has no power over a man

Before 1875 there were no united states citizen …… civil rights were for freeing the slaves… there were only states citizens….there are no united states citizen until they freed and wandering citizenless slaves because all the states were not giving them citizen ship..

15 | P a g e

because your birth certificate has your state on it…the united states citizen was created to have jurisdicition over the slaves…

We are not member of the coca cola family…the united states i am not an employee of it.. Is it the united states or is it the unites states of America?

I will play the citizen card when it is a benefit to me!!

They may let u play prose but in the end they can pull the rug at any time!!

U could have a killer prose case but a judge can pull the old u don’t have a bar card and deny everything….

Federal is also Canadian court..Federal is universal

We are not practicing law we are simply giving our opinion just like any supreme court judge is doing..i am not practicing anything!!

A total financial collapse could be what they use to set up a code land..the bankers will look for full immunity..

Derogation DEROGATION, noun 1. The act of annulling or revoking a law, or some part of it. More generally, the act of taking away or destroying the value or effect of any thing, or of limiting its extent, or of restraining its operation; as, an act of parliament is ed in derogation of the kings prerogative; we cannot do any thing in derogation of the moral law.

16 | P a g e

2. The act of taking something from merit, reputation or honor; a lessening of value or estimation; detraction; disparagement; with from or of; as, I say not this in derogation of Virgil; let nothing be said in derogation from his merit.

Interfere and interference are two different things one has to do with radio waves…

Suffer, man, claim, wrong, accidental negligence are words to know..

Understand the they, the you and the i covered…..

Its is crucial to understand that ones birth certificate in essence created two of you… the 3d lawful and the 2d legal version. Tyranny through the constitution

It doesn’t matter if you know the codes inside out…ur still the defendant..ur still just a lowest rank in their system.. a punching judy… their codes have nothing to do with a man…

Even if sec. 18 wasn’t amended so what if they did?? the necessary and proper clause..

U go after the man who is the ceo or who is in control of the corporation or government agency for the entity and it's employees that work for him are doing and causing u harm

Common law is not written down…it is what u think is common to you… in there traffic courts it is common to act their way…

17 | P a g e

I believe it is common law that it is common for me to move form point a to point b…

When u ask for forgiveness for acting poorly in public …they have to let you go..not put you in jail…

Wrong means u knew what you doing is wrong way before you did it…it means u conspired and planned it before the moment.

You are bring a civil common law case..

This man caused me harm due to his inactions….(where applicable)

A badge will not save a mam acting as a police officer for a personal injury suit..

Mr. and Mrs. are legal titles avoid them like the plague..they taught us that this is a correct formal way to talk about each other whne in truth it gives the legal society jurisdiction..

Interacting in the public as a man

A man can be a menace to society…u can breach the peace by pulling a fire alarm and cause no harm but its still something u can not do… u are liable for breaching the peace because everyone has the right to be let alone…some one could easily file that claim..

18 | P a g e

Travel vs. move

U can get 800 definitions of what travel could mean…. But only one for the word move..use move not travel to define your action…the other is a crappy title. In one of its many definitions…

If i can’t tell another where to move or interfere with another movement what makes its right for another man to do that to you? They better be stopping me because i am going to harm someone not conjecture…it must be real damage..if there is real damage we will pay for it…

The greatest mistake people make in the common wealth is believing the the church and state are separate….canon law are but of of many ties that makes one aware of the complete tie in…

Dean Clifford was in jail because his was waiting for his trial date because he failed to appear for court… he was on a bond and failed to show up in person to court and thought he could do it with paperwork!!

It is very easy for a civilized man to act evil but it is impossible for an evil man to look civil.. It’s is easy for a man to pretend he is a person but it is impossible for a person to be a man.

This is why it’s a life style!! Being a man is being a responsible!! The more u learn about the law the more lawful i want to be.

19 | P a g e

Man's relationship to the government and the birth certificate

Government if they had a profit would have to share it with the people much like dividents. So that is why they are always claiming a deficit… Khadafy of Libya was actually doing this because they were having profit hence they bought people a lot if wealth cars homes and free education!

Where the statutory world is headed

What if speeding up saved your life because u would have avoided the car crash just simply because of a timing issue? Hence is peeding actually saving my life..it could be easily seen that the speeding limit is just a conjecture on both side. And if safety is the issue i will determine that for myself as i am a man and i have the ability to move form point a to point b . so if the government isn’t liable for anything because u were going 100 miles the speed limit that means it is just a suggestion the decision is ultimately mine. Thank for the suggestion and i will take it under consideration.

Codes and statutes are not being eliminated they are being expanded everyday…time to wake up and rise above and claim your status as a man… If we don’t learn how to be a man they will control you as a legal person!!

We live in a world where 99% of the world wants to be run by legalese in a world where they want to be told what to do..none wants to live in common sense land where the common law is what u think the law is!! The the real problem and there is no end in sight unless u believe in bible…and its says its going to get worse before it gets better..

20 | P a g e

the bible was written either by the roman empire (which the majority of governments fall under to date) and they say they operate under..and its simply a control tool….. or as i see it… It is the word of god and if you study it closer it reveals to you how to win in court and play the lawful game and that it comes from closely examining the way jesus handled his trial… he wons three trials against king herod and potiuos pilot twice and on the last time he washed his hand of the decision of the jury.. and the sacrifice of his life was to show us the power of the jury over the wishes of pilot himself who said jesus was a just man in his trial… its brilliant when u look at it with lawful eyes… jesus truly is the way because he showed us the way!!! even the roman paul showed his errors in claiming himself a citizen of roman and then became subject to their laws and then imprisoned for life..died under house arrest..hence be wary of claiming your citizenship as sometimes it may not be a benefit but sometimes it is!!! Use it wisely!!

If u sign it ur liable..so be wary of wat u sign!

This is a all or nothing life style..it doesn’t work if don’t believe in god!!a judge who knows all of this can smell and detected whether u are a god fearing man!! Faith is a basic requirement..

All anybody can have on code law is an OPINION on it. Bring in 9 Supreme Court judges and all they can do is have an OPINION on the law, they can’t actually tell you what the law means because they didn’t create it. You didn’t write that book, I didn’t write that book, what’s that gotta do with me? I don’t care about anybody’s opinion, opinion is not fact, unless someone is going to be a liability for their opinion as a man to a fellow man.

Man created government and the crown we are at the top of the food chain!we are made in the image of god!!and i man built that court house not a legal society!!!man controls not a legal society!!

A core belief is self governance… we don’t need government but if u believe u need the legal society well good for you..thats your belief and u will live and die by it…man has the right to not contract….

21 | P a g e

All the lawyers paperwork in a common law court is just hearsay. It’s the only way they can get their paperwork in.. Man is my title given to me by God, you, tax collector, have a tittle granted to you by some other public servant. He who grants cant take it away also..

People believe gov and courts are in cahoots if so, why did they destroy evidence on 911! Clinton was drag into court….people need to understand they fear the court system too!! Lawyers cant use the word the word Man… Black’s law defeines PROPERTY. That which is peculiar or proper to any person; that which belongs exclusively to one; in the strict legal sense, an aggregate of rights which are guaranteed and protected by the government. PROPERTY. That which is peculiar or proper to any person; that which belongs exclusively to one; in the strict legal sense, an aggregate of rights which are guaranteed and protected by the government. Fulton Light, Heat & Power Co. v. State, 65 Misc.Rep. 263, 121 N.Y.S. 536. The term is said to extend to every species of valuable right and interest. McAlister v. Pritchard, 230 S.W. 66,67, 287 Mo. 494. More specifically, ownership; the unrestricted and exclusive right to a thing; the right to dispose of a thing in every legal way, to possess it, to use it, and to exclude every one else from interfering with it. Mackeld. Rom. Law, § 265. That dominion or indefinite right of use or disposition which one may lawfully exercise over particular things or subjects. Transcontinental Oil Co. v. Emmerson, 298 Ill. 394, 131 N.E. 645, 647, 16 A.L.R. 507. The exclusive right of possessing, enjoying, and disposing of a thing. Barnes v. Jones, 139 Miss. 675, 103 So. 773, 775, 43 A.L.R. 673; Tatum Bros. Real Estate & Investment Co. v. Watson, 92 Fla. 278, 109 So. 623, 626. The highest right a man can have to anything; being used for that right which one has to lands or tenements, goods or chattels, which no way depends on another man's courtesy. Jackson ex dem. Pearson v. Housel, 17 Johns. 281, 283. The right of property is that sole and despotic dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in total exclusion of the right of any other individual in the universe. It consists in the free use, enjoyment, and disposal of all a person's acquisitions, without any control or diminution save only by the laws of the land. 1 BI.Comm. 138; 2 Bl.Comm. 2, 15; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. The word is also commonly used to denote everything which is the subject of ownership, corporeal or incorporeal, tangible or intangible, visible or invisible, real or personal; everything that has an exchangeable value or which goes to make up wealth or estate. It extends to every species of valuable right and interest, and includes real and personal property, easements, franchises, and incorporeal hereditaments. Samet v. Farmers'

22 | P a g e

& Merchants' Nat. Bank of Baltimore, C.C.A.Md., 247 F. 669, 671; Globe Indemnity Co. v. Bruce, C.C.A. Okl., 81 F.2d 143, 150. CORPOREAL, CORPOREOUS, adjective Having a body; consisting of a material body; material; opposed to spiritual or immaterial; as our corporeal frame; corporeal substance.

Government was scared enough to destroy all its evidence of 1 trillion missing form the pentagon on 911 because even they are afraid of getting caught by the courts!!! So they destroyed the evidence just like john gotty!!! Man has rights..government has authority…

Your car might be ed…that means the state own the title…(they can take the title) ..u are in possession..who ncould claim otherwise? Our law in canada comes from the customs of the people..thats our law not the constitution.. President Obama's Convention Speech---“As citizens, we understand that America is not about what can be done for us. It's about what can be done by us, together — (cheers, applause) — through the hard and frustrating but necessary work of self-government. That's what we believe.” Remarks by President Obama at the 50th Anniversary ---“These are not just words. They’re a living thing, a call to action, a roap for citizenship and an insistence in the capacity of free men and women to shape our own destiny. For founders like Franklin and Jefferson, for leaders like Lincoln and FDR, the success of our experiment in self-government rested on engaging all of our citizens in this work. And that’s what we celebrate here in Selma. That’s what this movement was all about, one leg in our long journey toward freedom. (Applause.)

Learn to play stupid in court!!! Its to lure the man out…get them for their confessions!! Ficticious litigation

From 0 to 18 u lived under somebody elses rule.. 99.995% off the time we self govern… They don’t tell anybody when to drink a coffee!! So wat government did say it hasa monopoly on is driving… instead we say we are moving from point a to point b So we let them have their little words and

23 | P a g e

we remove their presumption that we are driving show them we are moving this eliminates the contraversy and we win..

terrorism is the interference of the function pf government and if u r self governing then a police officer is terrorizing u

Courts are legit…tey forced the president Clinton to appear for his case against pamela jones…u can curn a president if u like…

A complaint must be ed by a private person(so a man) Is REGINA A PRIVaTE PERSON!!!

Ur reading their case to see if they have an actuall claim for harm injury or loss in their suit or not!!

Say they have some doc u signed just say u don’t recall sigin it…who is going to it? has anyone had this document in the possession since the time it was delivered upon the united state ?noooo…i don’t think so!!! i don’t recall!!

Man vs. men, and their ability to own property

24 | P a g e

Nobody (including government) can control you if they don’t have a proper claim.

God gave up the property rights of the child to the mother and father and cannot claim it back? Bible?

Tort is where a man can make a claim.

We are not “men”, just as we are not “you”. I a man am not plural. Mankind refers to our species, not “menkind”.

This code stuff is Babylonian. Uniting the world as one etc.

Government doesn’t have rights, it has a charter or contract or constitution. Which clearly defines its parameters which interacts and intercourses with the public.

The 9th and 10th amendments and how they relate to man

Basically the 9th amendedment means tha just because we wrote this contract it doesn’t negate the fact that any law or rule of law that is anteceded to the constitution no longer exist… U don’t have to rely on the 2nd amendment u can say man has always had the right to defend himself..so the government can get in the way of that..

25 | P a g e

Power means to control another in the 10th …its gives the state power over the individual… who wants that?

The 9th is key not the tenth..because you have the right that predate the constitution!!

Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution The Ninth Amendment (Amendment IX) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, addresses rights, retained by the people, that are not specifically enumerated in the Constitution. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. [1]

Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [3] The 9th amendment is key, not 10th, this is how you would defend yourself if you had an “illegal” weapon in your house for self-defense. Because no one can take away our ability to defend ourself.

What is the Canadian parallel? Is it listed anywhere in the constitution that they can strip rights that were in existence before this doc’s creation?

Article the ninth... In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

26 | P a g e

CONJECTURE is not HARM DONE. In mathematics, a conjecture is a conclusion or proposition based on incomplete information, but for which no proof has been found.

i am a man not sovereign which is god..i bow to no man but i do bow down to god!!

Criminal = 6th, civil = 7th. Sixth Amendment The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accs are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you. It has been most visibly tested in a series of cases involving terrorism, but much more often figures in cases that involve (for example) jury selection or the protection of witnesses, including victims of sex crimes as well as witnesses in need of protection from retaliation. Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Seventh Amendment The Seventh Amendment continues a practice from English common law of distinguishing civil claims which must be tried before a jury (absent waiver by the parties) from claims and issues that may be heard by a judge alone. It only governs federal civil courts and has no application to civil courts set up by the states when those courts are hearing only disputes of state law. Amendment VII In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

“Today’s a lovely day to be arrested, would you like to place that order with me?”

27 | P a g e

“You want my address? Is that an order? Ok I’ll perform that service for you.”

Do not CONform, PERform.

“I have the right under article 9 of the bill of rights to move this case into a common law court of record. Now if it’s criminal it’s article 6, if it’s civil it’s article 7. And I have the right to move to a trial by jury where I get to face my acc. And nobody in a black robe can interpret my beliefs&my claim&my case except for the jury. That person in the black robe, that clerk, can’t interrupt with that process, not allowed to look in our case, not allowed to read it, not allowed to do ANYTHING with it.”

If a fictional character comes after us “You tried to ister my property without any rights? Only man has rights. You have duties and obligations and responsibilities.”

- What a common law courtroom looks like

The jury is central and the magistrate sometimes sits behind everyone.. and these common law courts are never used…court are very unfamiliar…

Evoke vs. invoke

Evoke is to invite to summons.. that’s simple we are evoking …

28 | P a g e

REGINA v. JOHN DOE & HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. JOHN DOE..why do we presume it’s the queen or even why do we presume this the Queen of Canada not Trinidad? Why not simply ask who is REGINA? And shut up.. - Understanding the nature of Queens Bench

Some say in 1875 an act of parliament abolished or merged queens bench. Queen’s bench is a set of rules. Queen’s bench is just one man who appears and requires another man to appear and move their claims. There may come a time when America will say no more claims courts.. but it wont stop karl from making a claim in a court house because he is a man and he is sovereign and man created the court.. it’s like telling god he can’t create any stars or moons any more without governemnets permision with your codes and statutes…but it ‘aint going to mean a thing..it’s nutty..

I don’t care what a piece of paper says from 1875 that person whose there did not contract on my behalf does not act on my behalf, i cant bring that man to court to prove whether or not that is the accurate and true article which he created. I cant tell if it’s a forgery and i don’t really give a damn

The tower of babel is the judeaux belief of how this happenned ..we all came out of the same part of the world why do we have such different languages… This isn’t a lawfull rebellion. This is by lawfull authority were are going to hold the man the judge liable for failing to recognize the common law.

When ur walking into a code world ur generally walkikng into a summary convictions court ..which means your already guilty because you are in breach of a contract for driving or what evre action under a code. So they don’t have to disclose why you are there..they are going to disclose all the and conditions because your are ASSUMED(liable for the debt) not presumed to have known. That’s why they presume the have the authority to control you and have jurisdiction over you…

Common law is the customs of the people and these rules have been around since cave man times.. if i believed my neighbor did me wrong i could to a community elder or gather all the males and females together and we are gonna judge and determine whose bone was that? is it mine or my neighbors , did he steal it, did he get paid or did he unjustly enrich himself…

29 | P a g e

If ur in Saudia Arabia read the Koran ..the cow in particular....here u read king James leviticus and deutorony...

What is property?

Restoration of property hearing/return of property hearing.

Property is defined by what I have made myself personally. What I’ve begotten. My kids, my dreams, anything we put equity into. Our equity is our property. We didn’t build the house/car, but we put sweat equity into it (maintenance, security etc.) The things we buy with our sweat equity (car/house) we make claim for, we have the highest claim to it as our property, but really it’s not our property. I own this property that just happens to be on this land. (we can’t own land.) g the birth certificate is not harmful/doesn’t do anything to you, it’s actually the only evidence that you have claim to the land. It’s the additional benefits after that which messes with us.

If the bank thinks they can give IRS our money and that we’ve given them the right to do that, we didn’t. Tell me specifically where it says that I’ve given you authorization to give my property away to a third party. (in their contract)

Declaration of independence: Men are endowed with certain unalienable rights by their creator life, liberty, pursuit of happiness. To this end, governments are instituted among men with their consent. There is no other purpose to government.

30 | P a g e

Madison: The diversity in the faculties of men, from which the rights of property originate, is not less an insuperable obstacle to an uniformity of interests. The protection of these faculties is the first object of government.

My relationship to my kid is my property, my kid calls me mommy, mommy is the property of the kid. property (n.) Look up property at Dictionary.com c. 1300, properte, "nature, quality," later "possession, thing owned" (early 14c., a sense rare before 17c.), from an Anglo-French modification of Old French propriete "individuality, peculiarity; property" (12c., Modern French propreté; see propriety), from Latin proprietatem (nominative proprietas) "ownership, a property, propriety, quality," literally "special character" (a loan-translation of Greek idioma), noun of quality from proprius "one's own, special" (see proper). For "possessions, private property" Middle English sometimes used proper goods. Hot property "sensation, a success" is from 1947 in "Billboard" stories.

Do not put our person into a trust, we did not create our person so we don’t have the jurisdiction to do that.

To rescind or not to rescind a contract Don’t’ rescind contracts with government (birth certificate/citizenship/drivers license etc.), we didn’t sign it with a man, we signed it with a machine. We are beneficiaries to the government trust, beneficiaries don’t have the right to full disclosure. The government was created for our benefit but we are not the trustees so we don’t have control over it.

Man to agency contracts are not binding; man to man contracts are binding. An agency is not going to hold us liable for what we signed lol. The only way to get out of a man to man contract is to have a judge (jury) judge the contract to be unconscionable.

The judge has a special role to protect both the 2D and the 3D.

31 | P a g e

There are a variety of judges out there, as we go up they get better (smarter judges who know their shtuff)

Note to self: if we start to become a jerk and a well-known face in the courts, they’re going to do their best to set us straight. Be kind. Please.

The number one reason for the judge is to maintain status quo!! Not to make new law but to see is everyone behaving this way then fine..let it remain normal!!

KL dad use to say “an honest man should be able to live his life without once ever g his name to a contract” that’s sage advice!!

If i was black in court i would never say i was a slave at one time because it may move your status to less than a man…have them prove you were property is the better question…who can bring tht evidence?? None because again any contract u didn’t sign carries no obligation to oneself.implied vs expressed

There is a famous slave case where a black man lost his freedom in court because he did understand property rights… he made the mistake (in my opinion) of reminding the court of the sale! This sale clearly indicates property!!! He should have just said he was a man and that there is no contract and they would have to produce it…even if the y produce it he says he is not a party to it and his signature is not on it…. So anything it says is only implied and not expressed as all good law is. So out goes the contract and the property stand and all they are left with is a man who wants to be let alone and now who has the right to enslave another man? And its check mate…no jurisdiction!!

32 | P a g e

That is why your child is your property!!! Don’t define it any other way..that makes you the master!!

This case they say started the civil war! The Marxist came around screaming that no one should one property..KL says “why don’t we just say another man can’t own another man” instead of this communist ideaology!!

Learn to say ”i don’t know what the word son means or what the word daughter means” you only see your property!!! Give the property back to me!! back off the property!! no tres on the property!!

But nothing beats common law!!! But what is to learned from this is that even within statutes there is remedies if you dig deep enough.. heads up to those in Napoleonic countries!!

The creation of man cannot harm man!!!

Lawyers could find this if they wanted and make it short and sweet because government can’t harm man but lawyers make their money using statutes!!

I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. Thomas Jefferson

Important general concept that newbies need to understand is that there are many different types of court…if you are looking for justice you are looking for the highest court in the

33 | P a g e

English common law courts are that on this land and it’s fundamentally the only court that protects your rights as a man. Yes that is the first bubble… how many different courts are there? Well there is tax court, family court, provincial court, federal courts…so which one??? Well not the write question… let me explain… The next concept is why there are different courts?” this is what brings up the person and man concepts to the for front…because all the courts basically see you only in those two general capacities..why?? because one they can control and one they cannot control the other.. a “person” is a citizen or a police officer are some of the title under this category….basically a person is someone who has duties and obligations…man on the contrary is born free of duties and obligations ( man even choses whether they are obligated to their family or not)… but if man choses to where the title of citizen (hence converting himself inot a person) well then the laws ARE written for you …(just look at the statutes real close they use person not man) but if you want to be a man and have all you rights well then you have to look closely at what your rights are..what are you rights?? Can an Australian come to America and file a civil rights complaint? No he cannot because he is not a citizen or person of the united states of America because only a citizen has those (limited) civil rights….so he if he wanted to have justice would have to file a claim. That brings up how you file The claim vs the complaint…the courts will generally try and get you to use their paper work (which we will get into the reason for that later) but u will see they are always trying to frame you as a complainer by making you file a “complaint” you want to file a claim so let’s get started and look at the whole process closer and in more detail…

No matter where I go in the world, the first thing anyone would think is that I am a man, not that I’m Canadian or that I’m Australian etc.

In 1988 1989 there used to be millions of “soviet union citizens”, what happened to them? Did a million people just disappear off the face of the earth? But I bet there’s still a MAN living there, he remained a man, but is he still a soviet citizen? That’s ridiculous. Only on a piece of paper can a citizen exists.

The correlation between common law and common sense should be clear. Logic that is common to the people. 1. We probably haven’t done anything wrong

34 | P a g e

2. We live on common law land 3. No man has come forth claiming we’ve done harm or that we owe any debt. Just presume that everything I do is illegal, but unless you got a man claiming I did something wrong, I wish to be let alone. I don’t answer to complaints, I only answer to claims.

If they point to a piece of paper saying “is that you?” We say “gosh no do I look like I am 8.5 inches tall, 11 inches wide and thin as a sheet? Are you crazy?” Don’t get locked into the paper world.

By believing that it’s US money, we give the US control/jurisdiction over the money.

What law do you have me under? They’ll say “1972 bill of blah blah blah” I guarantee that you’re not going to find my name in signature on that contract. So it neither binds I the man or my person. The law doesn’t have Karl the man, it needs to be expressed, not implied, to be good law.

We can only hold a man liable when he believes, so we try to get them to say. “Do you believe I owe the debt? What do you believe BOB? Oh you do? Then put that on paper and sign it.”

Self governing is all about making up your own rules

35 | P a g e

Understanding statute and common law courts

Statutes courts are for government on citizens and common law courts is for contract between parties

Being a claimant is not a bad title!!

Be precise with your words, and the common laws of different peoples Black’s Law will kill words by misdefining it with synonyms. Don’t use “stolen”, say instead “taken and carried off”, or “larceny” L'ARCENY, noun [Latin latrocinium.] Theft; the act of taking and carrying away the goods or property of another feloniously. larceny is of two kinds; simple larceny or theft, not accompanied with any atrocious circumstance; and mixed or compound larceny which includes in it the aggravation of taking from one's house or person, as in burglary or robbery. The stealing of any thing below the value of twelve pence, is called petty larceny; above that value, it is called grand larceny

Don’t give anyone an opportunity of a loophole, don’t use “stole”, it has many definitions. STOLE, preterit tense of steal. STOLE, noun 1. A long vest or robe; a garment worn by the priests of some denominations when they officiate. It is a broad strip of cloth reaching from the neck to the feet. 2. [Latin] A sucker; a shoot from the root of a plant, by which some plants may be propagated; written also stool.

36 | P a g e

…….what? If a man chops down one of our trees, carries it off and makes a chair out of it, we can only claim for what the tree was worth, the chair is HIS sweat equity, we can only claim for what we lost. We can only claim for what is due. Only God knows the truth and we’re all just guessing, all this fraud is bringing us closer to god.

- Practicing law without a license We’re not “practicing” law. I do not believe I’m practicing law, do you claim/believe I’m practicing law? How do you define “practice”?

They say “in Canada you must blah blah blah” we say “I am not IN Canada, I am UPON the land, also known as Canada. I’m AT Canada, I walk ON TOP of the land. If I’m IN Canada I’d be dead.

You have the right to believe what you want There is a million customs and traditions out there…so u just have to the most important law.. do no harm!!

- Less words say more Don’t say no yes and ask them to put it in the form of an order!! Then send them a bill!!!

The nature of the man, characteristics of the man, reputation of the man, all 3 standing before the court at all times. So we must act honourably.

37 | P a g e

It’s not only my belief it’s also your law states it too. It’s my rights and it’s their laws…they are in violation of their own codes and ordinances..

U.S. Code › Title 42 › Chapter 21 › Subchapter I › § 1983 42 U.S. Code § 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. I am not saying that i ; i am comaparing that their codes say they can’t do it as a public official to a citizen of the united states..

They in violation of their own nonsense that they write

the Constituion Article the ninth .. In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. More correctly.. Bill of rights seventh

38 | P a g e

Seventh Amendment Main article: Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

You can’t sue an istrative hearing officers as he owes u nothing as he works for the state( just as if he was working for coca cola) But when u evoke the common law he owes u his services because u have files a claim and paid for it..your property I had the right to drag anybody before a common law court of record way before the constitution and the unites states existed in 1776 just because u came up with a new constitution in 1793 doesn’t mean we are going to forget about the old ways..

A honest man should be able to go through life without g his name once…

I’m not a freeman, I’m not a sovereign man, I’m just a man. No titles. Titles diminish our capacity. Man creates government, government answer to man.

Using proper language The more words we use the more conditions we put on something, the more it’s diminished. “I love thee” >”I love thee so much today”

Convene your own court even if it’s after hours..

39 | P a g e

Magna carta and the constitution as a defence The 1215 magan carta was signed with a knife to the king’s throat.. so this nullified it… so which one are u going to bring in to court? And are u going to bring the original signers to testify to what its exact meaning is? NO IS THE ANSWER so don’t use it in your arguments but u may put it as an exhibit and adding that this is the way they use to do things way back when and i believe it a good document and a proper way of acting and still holds up as a good way to behave today.. don’t interpret the Magana carta or anyone else document s for that matter

U don’t know if that’s the original one, where is the chain of custody of that document? And how many copies where written? Just like the constitution it was written so that 13 different vertions each colony got ther own one slightly different..

Don’t waste our time with their documents!! They have nothing to do with you as you aren’t a party to them!!

Just because alont time ago they signed the Magana carta or the constitution fo your benefit …guess what you don’t have to take the benefit!! And none can force the benefit on me… so the constitution is just a reference point that at one time they thought this was the way to be..that is all…who cares times change!! Man is not rigid or a statute he is flexible, dynamic, not bound and ever changing that is the only thing that remains the same. You are only crossing swords with word nerds, word masters!!…but know the swords are words… crosswords!! Crossing swords!! Conditional accept anything confusing like the mckeinzei friend titla and baliman Only a man can ask for payment for an order

You must show they never had jurisdiction over you because you are a man.. or else theyhave jurisdiction and can obligate you if you follow the order without compensation.. can’t we ask to be paid upfront

It’s like the wizard of oz once u see there is no government or IRS or CRA its all fictions and u are just setting them up to reveal they are fictions by demonstrating that the fictions can’t appear before an open court in a common law court of record.. checkmate!!!

40 | P a g e

Third party impartial witness protect black men of false rape allegations.. third party impartial(nothignt to gain) is so key that mobster like John Gotti just wacked witness to stay on the streets… So evidence like blood samples dna swab are all circumstanticial and can be manipulated…because of the chain of command isn’t sterile..it could be easily influenced to get whatever result they want… but third party impartial witness isn’t not circumstantial evidence because that is like hearing from god himself….god and your fellow man can judge you because man is in the image of god.. Legalese---Circumstantial evidence is evidence that relies on an inference to connect it to a conclusion of fact—like a fingerprint at the scene of a crime. By contrast, direct evidence s the truth of an assertion directly—i.e., without need for any additional evidence or inference. Legalese--Direct Evidence--Evidence that stands on its own to prove an alleged fact, such as testimony of a witness who says she saw a defendant pointing a gun at a victim during a robbery. Direct proof of a fact, such as testimony by a witness about what that witness personally saw or heard or did.

Common law according to American Jurisprudence [15 American Jurisprudence 2d Com L § 1]. In a broader sense, the common law is the system of rules and declarations of principals from which our judicial ideas and legal definitions are derived, and which are continually expanding; it is not a codification of exact or inflexible rules for human the redress of injury or for the protections against wrongs; but is rather the embodiment of a broad and comprehensive un written principles inspired by natural reason and an innate sense of justice and adopted by common consent for the regulation of government of the affairs of men has been termed the legal embodiment of practical sense whose guiding star has always been the rule of right and wrong and whose principles demonstrate that there is in fact as well as in theory remedy for all wrong; while in one sense the term common law has no fixed meaning, since it varies with time and place; when viewed as a system for deducing from litigated instances, just, reasonable and consistent rules it can be said that the common law never changes

Karl's 5 step process 1. notice cease and desist.. ( if s storms your house and robs your property(child) ignore this step and go straight to court. But if u have time insert this step in to try

41 | P a g e

and be honorable..but it’s your call.. is it an emergency or not…think and be reasonable..it is reasonable to not hesitate a second when it comes to your children. 2. File your claim and set the rules of your court in a preliminary hearing 3. Place your order unless you did it already with your claim

when someone brings a complaint you move on it in less than 3 days… write back… i think i have a piece of paper in front of me for me. I think i see some writing, i think i see some word, i think i might see something that i understand but what i truly don’t understand is if the hand or the proof of man or a woman existing . i don’t see a signature or name on this piece of paper. So you better move your complaint against me now or drop it immediately. Don’t wait 6 month when someone says you do wrong.. move on that immediately and demand the claim from the man or woman so that you can immediately compensate them. They won’t have a real man in reply that’s your evidence that they are making a false claim..make your claim like lightning..

do not waste anytime clearing your good name..

Corporations don't exist The WWF was sued and lost a billion dollar judgement..all they did to avoid is to change the name to WWE… go after the man… 2nd dimension is not real… it’s what u believe….if u think a piece of paper tells u something or how to behave i cant help u…

In court vs. At court

Common law is man on man… that’s why u get to face your acc…it’s the whole purpose for claiming the right to face your acc… Meet in the district court…u agreeing to the istrative rules and codes and statutes

42 | P a g e

Meet in your court..u agreeing to go by the rules you set AT the distric court house

U want to be in ur court so u can play by you rules not in the building with their rules…be at the public court house in your court ..

It's a word game Use believe to public servants “do you believe that? Are you a state agent? Is that your belief?” “Are you denying my belief?” any time a judge denies us he’s saying we’re a liar. You’re saying I’m a liar? This is MY court! Don’t call me a liar I’m gonna call you out. I a man require you to take the witness stand and testify in open court that what I’m saying is not true. You got first hand knowledge of this? Don’t let anyone deny us in our court.

Deny DENY, verb transitive 1. To contradict; to gainsay; to declare a statement or position not to be true. We deny what another says, or we deny a proposition. We deny the truth of an assertion, or the assertion itself. The sense of this verb is often expressed by no or nay. 2. To refuse to grant; as, we asked for bread, and the man denied us. 3. Not to afford; to withhold. Who find not Providence all good and wise, Alike in what it gives, and what denies? 4. To disown; to refuse or neglect to acknowledge; not to confess. 5. To reject; to disown; not to receive or embrace. He hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. 1 Timothy 5:1. DENYing ungodliness and worldly lusts. Titus 2:1.

6. Not to afford or yield.

43 | P a g e

To deny ones self, is to decline the gratification of appetites or desires; to refrain from; to abstain. The temperate man denies himself the free use of spirituous liquors. I denied myself the pleasure of your company. God cannot deny himself. He cannot act in contradiction to his character and promises. He cannot be unfaithful. 2 Timothy 2:12.

President Obama Speaks on Reopening the Government October 17, 2013 | 19:51 | Public Domain “So let's work together to make government work better, instead of treating it like an enemy or purposely making it work worse. That’s not what the founders of this nation envisioned when they gave us the gift of self-government. You don’t like a particular policy or a particular president, then argue for your position. Go out there and win an election. Push to change it. But don’t break it. Don’t break what our predecessors spent over two centuries building. That's not being faithful to what this country is about.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2013/10/17/president-obama-speaksreopening-government#transcript

Sovereign SOVEREIGN, adjective suv'eran. [We retain this babarous orthography from the Norman sovereign The true spelling would be suveran from the Latin supernes, superus.] 1. Supreme in power; possessing supreme dominion; as a sovereign ruler of the universe. 2. Supreme; superior to all others; chief. God is the sovereign good of all who love and obey him. 3. Supremely efficacious; superior to all others; predominant; effectual; as asovereign remedy. 4. Supreme; pertaining to the first magistrate of a nation; as sovereignauthority. SOVEREIGN, noun suv'eran. 1. A supreme lord or ruler; one who possesses the highest authority without control. Some earthly princes, kings and emperors are sovereigns in their dominions.

44 | P a g e

2. A supreme magistrate; a king. 3. A gold coin of England, value 20s or $4.44

Relevance of the constitution We didn’t write the constitution and we can’t bring any of the original founders in the court to testify as to the truth of the documents meaning. Using the constitution is guessing. It has nothing to do with man.it was to set up government.. They had issue setting up the bill of rights because this had nothing to do with man. Waste of time..dont use the constitution or the bill of rights..[cf.] (compare/confer)

Public and private property

No such thing as private property because property is private to begin with.. and public property makes no sense because public is public not private and property is private.

Don’t do “real property”, it’s just property. “real” property gov has control over.

There has to be an eyewitness willing to testify or there is no case. The plaintiff must appear or there is no case.

Need third party impartial witness when no evidence/contract are included in case, plaintiff/defendant are 50/50, someone needs to break the balance.

45 | P a g e

Commercial lien process vs. common law process The istrative process is great and all if you have the time to try and settle the matter on the private. But if someone has kid nap your child you don’t need to wait 21 days to file your claim It’s not adversarial because u doing this in a common law court..ur there to settle the controversy.. that’s is how you become the moving party and u place your claim before a tribunal, you place that into a public court house one has surrendered jurisdiction and control of your paperwork and now its up to the judges to decide the merits of the case..

If a plaintiff does not appear they have no case…this is what we should have in our paperwork..

The three things recognized as being wrong

3 ways to move a come law court… 1. Harming a man or drawing blood 2. u injure his property ( run over his mail box) 3. you break a contract and because of that lie he incurred a financial loss that they can claim

46 | P a g e

Understanding who you're up against We can’t go after a 2D agency/fictional entity. A man can only go after another man. Find the man who is liable for harming us. Even with a contract we are going after a man who signed it. Require the lawyers arguing against us to testify under oath that what they’re saying is true. Oh you’re just reading a piece of paper? Let that piece of paper go and testify then. The paper doesn’t say, it READS but can’t say. Who’s reading it then? Oh you are? Did you write it Mr. Attorney? Who wrote it then? Oh it came out of a computer? Is mr. computer gonna testify to the accuracies of the numbers on that paper? Then who’s gonna come forth and testify to the accuracy of that? Nobody? Then there is no claim.

Public laws are codified by Canadian company Thompsons, because the laws are exceedingly long. The code is not the law. They’re coming after us with the code, not the law. The codes are always going to be written to their favour. Upon close inspection of the LAW, we will discover that the LAW actually does not interfere with the rights of man. (they get around it with words like “shall”, “must”, “persons” etc) Tell them to bring the law before the court. Now is that a law you think I broke? Or is it a code that you believe may be a partial interpretation of the law?

Legal vs. lawful everything karl lentz does is illegal…he counts on it… and guarantees it’s is illegal… Because he doesn’t careless to try and keep up with government codes that you can change overnight And u add to about 803 new codes every day! If you think i am going to read every one of those and see if i will be in compliance with them, is ridiculous and i aint going to do it.

One has to first show me how the code applies to me and you r going to also show me the man or woman i have harmed as a result of my actions causing harm or wrong to them.

The codes are getting more ridiculous every day. One day they will try and control the air u breath…they are already codes put in place to control rain water collection…wise up folks!

47 | P a g e

Who cares about illegal but we care about the law, if i harm a man i want make compensate them in any way i can…who cares about illegal

Ignore their codes…they can’t force u into anything. It’s all voluntary.

because you want to separate yourself from the person n this common law land…and tell them “i am sorry but i am not liable for what that person did. If you want to go after the person go after them but me the man better be let alone. If a man says I do wrong and has a just claim then I would be more than glad to settle with that man and ask forgiveness and write a check out to them right away….

- History of the necessary and proper Whatever I deem necessary and proper for my own survival, no one can judge. ”Under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress has the power "to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or any Department or Officer thereof".” In the constitutional convention Southern of the congregation walked out on the Northern because the north was proposing this tyrannical clause to the constitution. Thus the civil war. North won, thus tyranny rules. Lawyers and attorney have already made their backroom deals…careful they have the monopoly on the system..this happens a lot!!!bricklayers monopolize this way in Modesto apparently!! Lawyers don’t get paid if the job gets done or not..they simply get billable hours!! They are going to try and rack it up on you too!! Its suicide to use their code!! They will change it on you!! Stay clear of codes and statutes!! If they do this to you, they can turn around and n=ban you from court for frivolous filing because you were wasting the courts valuable limited resources!”

It’s a public court house!! You’re the public, so move your case in there!! The legal society didn’t pay for that court house!! The public did!!

48 | P a g e

“the government exceeded its jurisdiction and interfered with my right to move”

”COMMON LAW, lex communis.] Is taken for the law of this kingdom simply, without any other laws; as it was generally holden before any statute was enacted in parliament to alter the same; and the king’s courts of justice are called the Common Law Courts. The Common Law is grounded upon the general customs of the realm ; and includes in it the law of nature, the law of God, and the principles and maxims of the law: it is founded upon reason; and is said to be the perfection of reason, acquired by long study, observation and experience, and refined by learned men in all ages. And it is the common birth-right, that the subject hath for the safeguard and defence, not only of his goods, lands and revenues; but of his wife and children, body, same, and life also. Co. Lit. 97. 142. Treatise of Laws, p. 2. [Cf. 1 Toml. L. D. 523-4 ([originally by Giles Jacob] Thomas Edlyne Tomlins ed., 1st Am. ed. 1811)] Supposedly inscribed across the top of the Justice Department building, on the Ninth Street side, are the words “The common law is derived from the will of mankind, issuing from the life of the people, framed through mutual confidence, sanctioned by the light of reason.”

1) WHAT

IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PERSON AND A MAN?

A man is created in the image of Gød; the Almighty self-existing Creator of the Universe. Man is endowed by his Creator with certain unalienable rights such as life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness and other property. To secure and protect man’s property, Governments (persons) are instituted among men (gentiles). The term person is a generic term and can mean an individual, partnership, t-stock company, trust, estate, association, corporation, partnership, LLC, agency, company, municipality, organization or any other legal or commercial entity of any kind. Governments are persons and a man or woman with an obligation to perform a specific duty according to the title they hold within that government is often called a natural person. Some persons have titles which more obviously carry specific duties such as sheriff, doctor, magistrate, senator, county prosecutor, building inspector, town manager etc… Some persons have titles which do not so obviously carry specific duties or obligations such as teacher, employee, mother, father, student, participant, taxpayer, defendant, driver, citizen, fisherman, child etc …

49 | P a g e

Again, a man or woman ACTING in these roles is often referred to as a Natural Person. A legal fiction is a presumption of fact assumed by a court for convenience, consistency, or to achieve justice. A corporation is a common legal fiction, regarded in many jurisdictions as a “person” who has many of the same legal rights and responsibilities as a natural person.

Offences not to be punishable except under New Zealand Acts No one shall be convicted of any offence at common law, or of any offence against any Act of the Parliament of England or the Parliament of Great Britain or the Parliament of the United Kingdom: provided that— (a) nothing in this section shall limit or affect the power or authority of the House of Representatives or of any court to punish for contempt: (b) nothing in this section shall limit or affect the jurisdiction or powers of the Court Martial, or of any officer in any of the New Zealand forces.

Section 2-Letter writing 15pgs

In our letters During the private istrative process we are removing the controversy by getting their tacit acquiescence to itting that they are causing harm and that silence is tacit agreement with you when you file your claim and you bring that to the magistrate it there's no controversy... u win

[1/4/2016 1:12:23 PM] David Man: Notice: man i, man, [David] declare, Firstly: i, man, am unaware of ever volunteering consent to be treated as a {resident of the United States; [defined as in 26 U.S. Code § 7701 - Definitions]} (see Exhibit A) Secondly: i, man, know of no man who has shown i of such voluntary consent and believe none exists;

50 | P a g e

Thirdly: if ever i, man, have unknowingly volunteered or consented to such a thing, i, man, do not voluntarily consent now; Fourthly: i, man, wish to not be treated as such a designation and do not voluntarily accept any such title; i, man, self-govern, require no title, no representation; (See Exhibit B) Fifthly: i, say all here, and will in open court, that all herein be true; [1/4/2016 1:12:41 PM] David Man: Exhibit A From: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7701 26 U.S. Code § 7701 - Definitions (9) United States The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense includes only the States and the District of Columbia. (10) State The term “State” shall be construed to include the District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out provisions of this title. (1) Person The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation. Exhibit B Obama Speech on Reopening Government 2013: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/10/17/remarks-president-reopeninggovernment So let's work together to make government work better, instead of treating it like an enemy or purposely making it work worse. That’s not what the founders of this nation envisioned when they gave us the gift of self-government. [1/4/2016 1:13:06 PM] David Man: this is a notice i put together and thought i may be helpful but i wanted to see what people think. [1/4/2016 1:44:16 PM] David Man: Greeting: Kathleen Mckeon,

i believe there has been a mistake, i wish to forgive or be forgiven;

On 16 December 2015, i filed claim, not complaint, required it be given to the woman Marian Ryan, acting as Middlesex County Attorney so she can take action,

51 | P a g e

i, require, trial by jury, common law, as indicated in the original paperwork (also again attached here with this letter) so i can press my claim;

On 22 December 2015 at 9AM when i arrived to press my claim, i learned that said paperwork had not been given to said women as required on 16 December 2015, that no court of record, arranged for i to press said claim, so i filed notice requiring sixty days for proper council;

i called on 23 December 2015 to inquire about my notice of proper council, i was informed of a warrant being issued;

i, require to know is said warrant for the legal name or the man so i am able to identify if the man or woman issuing it wishes to order the man to appear;

i require you send a copy of alleged warrant signed by the man or woman who issued it along with a copy of the bond attached to it to the man at the above location listed herein;

i require you give my claim to Marian Ryan, to file my claim of Tres, robbery, theft along with all notices of false statement and rights, so i may press my claim as soon as possible;

i require you to write back so i know that you did or that some man or women me at the above mailing location as soon as you do; [1/4/2016 1:46:58 PM | Edited 1:49:10 PM] barbara novascotia: i guess it would be interesting to understand why you did this notice up? what's it's purpose? [1/4/2016 1:47:45 PM] barbara novascotia: i can see the intent. and it is way to long; and why use statutes and codes, not even [ cf. ] [1/4/2016 1:50:19 PM] barbara novascotia: i wish to forgive or be forgiven; which is it?

52 | P a g e

i, [a] man, aggrieved [party] / [counter] claimer, decree and require: §1. original-acc / [counter] wrongdoer come face to face to press upon the record [viva voce] under oath, or affirmation His first-hand necessary and proper: ––(a ) true findings of facts; ––(b ) points of law; and ––(c ) nature of alleged wrong; or forever hold Your peace;

so you can write up a mandamus requiring an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to compel said toss-pot to perform his duty to you the Claimant in the event he doesn't wanna play ball which means for those of you on US soil you don't even have to flip the court anymore the court is after-all no one else's but the Claimant's as we've said all along • “court” means: [the] Aggrieved–self/Claimant [Cf. person; status/capacity] and claim [Cf. suit] of i, [a] man [Cf. sovereign] [Cf. 5 Black, Law. Dict. 318 (1979)]; • Accused/Wrong Doer: ––(a) has no claim, ––(b) is part of Claimant ’s claim, ––(c) is [the] Claimant's subject; • “Claimant ’s claim” comprises of all who are present; • “all who are present” are "Claimant’s subject(s)"/follower(s);

greetings bob, firstly: i am in receipt of your interference in the matter concerning blah-blah and i quote: "blah-blah, yada-yada..." (see attached Exhibit "A") as a direct result of which i require you forward me verified details of your: ––(a ) status, ––(b ) capacity in relation to this matter as proof of your entitlement to have a say in the matter and so that I may also be able to resolve the matter with you in private, absence that which is required of you coupled with continuance of interference without cause constitutes tres;

Interpretation Act

PROPERTY AND CIVIL RIGHTS Duality of legal traditions and application of provincial law

8.1 Both the common law and the civil law are equally authoritative and recognized sources of the law of property and civil rights in Canada and, unless otherwise provided by law, if in interpreting an enactment it is necessary to refer to a province’s rules,

53 | P a g e

principles or concepts forming part of the law of property and civil rights, reference must be made to the rules, principles and concepts in force in the province at the time the enactment is being applied PART I CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:

Matthew 6:24King James Version (KJV) No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon. 24

[12/15/2015 7:53:39 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: absolutely [12/15/2015 7:53:55 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: did u send it ed mail? [12/15/2015 7:54:56 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: did u get the post master to time stamp and make a copy for them... u keep the original [12/15/2015 7:55:16 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: just put true copy and sign beside it [12/15/2015 7:57:33 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: that way u can make a copy to resend them a remider of the first letter u sent plus the ed receipt(make sure u dont trash it :) ) with a follow up letter asking them to answer or they are in tacit agreement

Dear Leslie: greeting,

54 | P a g e

When did i ever give you permission to ister my property; What evidence exists that you have my consent to use and enjoy my property; What evidence exists that a man or woman came before i in open court, with a verifiable claim to my property; Are you aware that: i, a man did report a tres; robbery; theft of my property, Are you aware that: i, require my property restored immediately to i and only i;

Do as you wish, Leslie Martin, the property owner needs to be compensated at 700 per hour every hour totaling 16,800 per day, every day the property is not restored, i will forward on the bill to You today for the continued used and enjoyment of my property and on this same day every week billed weekly;

i: [a] man David Leslie, greetings; i believe you are the woman who attempts to istrate my property (see exhibit a, photo of dylan) without my consent; i require my property restored unto i post haste or i require fair and just compensation for use of my property.

[cf. So, if asked to swear an oath in court, what should you do? " i object or show me the law that states i must breach Gods Law Matthew 5 v33-36

I have refused oath and taken the affirmation in the Quaker tradition ,it was also the only way the court would have recognised my actual appearance ! yes i did use the bible quotes . They also refused my the right of affirmation or even any oath on the adjournment ,.................totally private hearing . we live we learn .

John: 8. 10. When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accs? hath no man condemned thee? 11. She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more. Bible Offline

55 | P a g e

"Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform your oaths to the Lord.' But I say to you, do not swear at all; neither by heaven, for it is God's throne; nor by the earth, for it is His footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. Nor shall you swear by your head, because you cannot make one hair white or black. But let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No.' For whatever is more than these is from the evil one" (Matthew 5:33-37). This is something i did for my old man for traffic court, but may give you some ideas. HO in traffic court accepted it, even though prosecutor put up a fuss. I, a man say: On this 15th day of October, two thousand fifteen, i a man, John, wish and with my own free will give consent for Barbara, a woman with first hand knowledge [cf. Mark 10:7 "so they are no longer two, but one flesh"], to present on my behalf at this Court; [Cf. Power of Attorney] In the year 2015 of our lord In court... Judge: How do you plead? Ross: I require pen and paper, and leave of court for 15 minutes to prepare my answer. Judge: Granted.

NOTICE TO THE COURT Firstly: i: [a] man; ross william ulbright, am not represented, do not represent myself, am present. Secondly: If any man/woman claim wrongdoing angainst me, i wish, order and demand that man/woman present and his/her claim against me in open court of record. Thirdly: If no man/woman claim against me, and/or; Fourthly: if verified claim is not attached to me, then; Fifthly: i require return of my property, and; Sixthly: i require payment to me in the amount of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) in repayment for enslavement and involuntary servitude, by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Seventhly: i, say here, and will in open court, that all herein be true.

SIGNED DATED

56 | P a g e

notice Change of bond conditions regarding: 'xxxxxxxxx'

i at one time believed it was in my best interest and a benefit to me to have the USA along with its agents to attach this ankle bracelet upon my person. I am sorry that I wasted everybodies time and government expenses to grant my wish to have this placed on my person.

But at this time I know longer feel that it is a benefit to be under house arrest. I wish for the United States or the people that place this upon my person to come back and claim their property or I am going Take control of this property and I am going to remove it from my person because it is trespason my property i, say here, and will in open court, that all herein be true.

signed

notice cancel title regarding: 'xxxxxxxx'

On this day, December 5, 2015, i: [a] man, Ross, hereby cancel all obligation to the title of 'Defendant' or any such title, as i believe being so bound causes harm to i, a man; i believe i am liable ONLY to my fellow man; i wish to settle this matter out of court; who says i do wrong?

i say all herein be true ------notice idiot

57 | P a g e

regarding: 'xxxxxxxx' i: [a] man, Ross, am an idiot to the Legal Society, its practices and procedures, and the language of legal persons, Legalese, all of which i do not understand i say all herein be true ------notice not ready to proceed regarding: 'xxxxxxxxx' i: [a] man, Ross, am not ready to proceed; i require an additional 60 days to settle this matter out of court i say all herein be true ------notice orders regarding: 'xxxxxx' Any man or woman who directs an order to i: a man, Ross, bears liability i say all herein be true ----notice representation regarding: 'xxxxxxx' Any man or woman who acts on behalf of i: [a] man, Ross, bears all liability i say all herein be true

Dear Tracy; u tres by way of foot on mine and do cause harm---please remove said tres so I won't have to take further action for u to stop; PLEASE STOP; God speed, Big Al, a man,

58 | P a g e

2015.

December 6,

[5:01 PM] Vital Rights "rei" [MA]: <<< Greetings Boss Man Thanks for your offer, put it in writing and send it. Thanks

Tracy DATE XXXXVital Rights "rei" [MA], Today 5:01 PM(y)

Conusance CONUSANCE, CLAIM OF, English law. This is defined to be an intervention by a third person, demanding judicature in thecause against the plaintiff, who has chosen to co mmence his action out of claimant's court. 2 Wilson's R. 409. 2. It is a question of jurisdiction between the two courts Fortesc. R. 157; 5 Vin. Abr. 588; and not be tween the plaintiff anddefendant, as in the case of plea to the jurisdiction, and therefore it must be demanded by the party entitl ed to conusance, or byhis representative, and not by the defendant or his attorney. Id. ibid. A plea to the jurisdict ion must be pleaded in person, but aclaim of conusance may be made by attorney. 1 Chit. Pl. 403. 3. There are three sorts of conusance. 1. Tentere placita, which does not oust another cou rt of its jurisdiction, but onlycreates a concurrent one. 2. Cognitio placitorum, when the plea i s commenced in one court, of which conusance belongs toanother. 3. A conusance of exclusive jurisdiction; as that no other court shall hold pica, &c. Hard. 509 Ba c. Ab. Courts, D.

Claim of Consuance..is when u have a common law suit before the court and they are talking about tax code…give the man acting as a judge notice to bring it over the the right side of the court…

Claim of consonance

59 | P a g e

I demand that they respect the fact that this is a common law land and if they don’t like working in a common law land as a common law magistrate that i am going to ask for your oath of office…

1. claim intervention notice 2. claim intervention notice reminder 3. judgment 4. claim sometiems inbetween 1. and 3. you might have 2. 1st claim intervention notice reminder 3. 2nd claim intervention notice reminder 4. 3rd claim intervention notice reminder and maybe even up to 25th claim intervention notice reminder before you hit them with the judgment you hit them with the judment when all the previous communications have provided you with all the info that will allow you to judge based on the facts acquired as a result of all your past commnunicaitons which in turn is what allows you to claim coz you've already won the case before it's even began in court

but if you must take anything with you from what i just posted above it is this concept of the point behind your claim intervention notices: 1. first time it's just a notice; 2. second time it’s a reminder which is not to be ignored but responded to; 3. third time Your failure to respond shows, on and for [my] superior court of record, that there is a certainty that you have no proof contrary to the facts already presented to You for Your undivided attention and judgement; hence the need for this judgment against You ; judgement is You were incompetent to make the stupid order, and are now liable one million % for any loss, harm, or injury, i might suffer as a result of Your insanity; incompetency to put it politely... lol

60 | P a g e

and it is highly unlikely that you will resolve anything via these claim intervention notices, as they will go right over their heads and even if in the unlikely event they should comprehend your notices, they most certainly will not act like it and further comply to anything you say or do, they will roll on as usual as per their corporate charter, and so the only thing one should aim to achieve by these notices is to incriminate them, set traps for them, marinate them prior to roasting them in open court, that’s all;

Hi bobby, i believe you, Bobby may wish to communicate an offer to i . i require any Offer(s) to be in writing with a wet ink signature.

Thank you. Kind regards, Xoxox :-P

[12:38:17 PM] Julz: since i finished transcribing the counterclaim section of BT’s seminar, i’ve been thinking a lot about how i would write up a claim, one thing’s become very-very useful for me and that is to outsource a lot (that i wish to establish) over to the “law of the case” section of my claim, so for example rather than burden the reader with too much right off the bat, i’ve decided to use a similar technique they use when they want to add something extra by way of introducing it as notes, at the bottom of the page, referenced by either a number, or a letter, etc. ------------------------------------------------------------------i (1), Julian (2) (son of Virgil, son of Aurel, ... son of Abraham), is: ––(a) one of the original peoples from the land (3), ––(b) the aggrievedparty/claimer (4) (hereinafter and before: “counterplaintiff” , or “counterclaimant” ) and at this court of record (5) claim against each of the following: [a] man, Jon Doe and [a] woman, Mary Roe (each hereinafter: “Treser” , or “Wrongdoer” and all collectively: “Tresers” , or “Wrongdoers” ); who are each summoned to answer counterclaimant in a plea of: ––(a) tres , ––(b) tres on the case , to wit: ------------------------------------------------------------------so after they read the above ALMOST by the books claim-intro, they can, if they wish, go to the bottom of the page to see why i put a “(1)” after “i” and a “(2)” after my given name and so on and so forth... and the below is what they will see... lol ------------------------------------------------------------------____________________ (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6): See “LAW OF THE CASE”. ------------------------------------------------------------------and if they’re still intrigued, though they’re most certainly not obliged by me to go the extra mile, even though it’s at their own risk if

61 | P a g e

they don’t, then they can go to the section of the claim called the law of the case where the below is what they will see... (lol) -----------------------------------------------------------------LAW OF THE CASE exhibits "P", "Q", "R", "S" and "T" are integrated and included by reference as though completely stated and visible herein; ------------------------------------------------------------------now as you know, you can have as many exhibits as you want and as fooking long as you want each one of them to be and it doesn’t affect the size of your claim and you can woffle on in there about every fucking law in the universe that you wish to decree... (lol) so if and when they do make it to their last destination/the law of the case exhibit(s), to finally satisfy their curiousity, the below is the first thing they’ll see, followed by...: -----------------------------------------------------------------EXHIBIT “P” the law of the case, as well as the meaning of the words used in this case, are decreed as follows, thusly; let it be said, let it be done, and none may add to, nor take away from, what is decreed and expressed herein which renders silent that which is implied, assumed, or presumed [Cf. Expressum facit cessare tacitum. That which is expressed makes that which is implied to cease. … Where a law sets down plainly its whole meaning the court is prevented from making it mean what the court pleases.” Munro v. City of Albuquerque, 48 N.M. 306, 150 P.2d 733-4 [Emphasis added]];

(1) “i ”: “a mere (a) man (b), my own master (c) among mankind and son and heir of Gɸd through Christ (d ), who can serve two masters NOT”, for as it is written: “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.” Matthew 6:24, KJV (1611); “No man can serve two masters: for either he shall hate the one, and love the other, or else he shall lean to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and riches.” Matthew 6:24, Geneva Bible (1599); (a) mere: “nothing less than, complete as one, entire. total, absolute, pure, true, real and genuine” (b) “man”: “a sacred union between consciousness (spirit) and flesh-and-blood (body), both of which were created by the creator of all, the sound of which in the standard English language is commonly translated as “God”, who is sovereign Lɸrd of the universe who made and governs all things by his almighty power and infinite wisdom; (c) “my own master among mankind”: “not above, nor below, but equal to every man; (d ) “son and heir of Gɸd through Christ”: “And if children, then heirs; heirs of Gɸd, and theirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him , that we may be also glorified together”

62 | P a g e

Romans 8:17, KJV (1611); “Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of Gɸd through Christ” Galatians 4:7, KJV (1611) [Emphasis added];

(2) “Julian”: is (as a matter of fact) my one and only given-name, as a result of which i consent to be addressed by an additional name NOT; “3655. kânâh, kaw-naw’; a prim. root; to address by an additional name; hence, to eulogize: –give flattering titles, surname (himself).” James Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of The Bible 56 [of the Dictionary of the Hebrew Bible therein] (1890); an eulogy is a set oration for the deceased and since i am deceased NOT, i consent to my given-name being eulogised NOT; “When a man is made a spiritual peer he loses his surname ; when a temporal, his christian-name” 2 The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary ; 1 The Select Works of Jonathan Swift 300 (1823); “i will not now accept the person of man [Cf. legal person], neither will i give titles [Cf. surnames] to man, For i may not give titles, lest my Maker should take me away suddenly” Job 32:21-22, Geneva Bible (1599); “Let me not, i pray you, accept any man’s person [Cf. legal person], neither let me give flattering titles [Cf. surnames] unto man, i know not to give flattering titles; in so doing my maker would soon take me away” Job 32:21-22, KJV (1611); “And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lɸrd shall name” Isaiah 62:2, KJV (1611) [Emphasis added]; ------------------------------------------------------------------and after that the meaning of the below [12:39:11 PM] Julz: one of the original peoples from the land (3)will be decreed/clarified and then the same for the below [12:39 PM] Julz:

<<< the aggrieved-party/claimer (4)and then the below [12:39 PM] Julz:

<<< court of record (5)and so on and so forth... and thusly i’ll get to say whatever the fuck i want without saying it at first glance that is, if you see where i’m going with this, so that way i won’t raise any alarm bells right off the bat and potentially go under the radar more or less undetected as a freeman type, or whatever lunatic, blah-blah, yada-yada;

G'day bob, I believe, you bob issued this 'ticket' in error, please find enclosed herein.

63 | P a g e

I believe this settles the matter. Thank you.

Kind regards, Signature

I received a notice from the court that I will be charged a civil assessment fee of $300 if I do not pay by November 21st.

Dear Michael,

i, Levi, a man write to You: the man who sometime acts as Court Clerk. In regards to case number xxxxccccxxxx . i require the name and address of the man who says i owe to him a debt which is true do and owe. It is my wish to settle the matter and stay in honor (see attached). I require your response in 7 days.

continuation to the below: –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––i, [a] man, Aggrieved-party/Claimer [Cf. Counterclaimant], decree and require: §1. Original Acc [Cf. Counterdefendant] come face to face to press upon the record [viva voce ] under oath, or affirmation

64 | P a g e

His first hand necessary and proper: ––(a) true findings of facts; ––(b) points of law; and ––(c) nature of alleged wrong; or forever hold Your peace; it is truly astonishing when you think about it properly that if they were to abide by that which is the law no less, 95% of all cases would die right there and then, so i guess your only job is to compel them to abide by the law, or play by their rules; [Wednesday, November 11, 2015 2:55 PM] Spike :

<<< JZ, once you point that out to them, think they are going to have a change of heart? Are there in most court cases 2 courts running at the same time? Their inferior istrative court and yours, court of record?Spike , Wednesday 2:55 PM titles don't rule so it really doesn't matter if you call yourself Plaintiff/Chief Prosecutor in your case caption so long as within the body of your claim you specify you are the Aggrieved-party/Claimer (hereinafter and before “Plaintiff/Countercomplainant/Chief Prosecutor” ) after which you can refer to yourself as Plaintiff , or Countercomplainant , or Chief Prosecutor all throughout your entire claim because that now stands for Aggrievedparty/Claimer and nothing else; though i’ve mentioned this before i find myself needing to mention it again: i’m not a fan of words such as Executor , or Prosecutor , or any other words ending with “or” , because those words are describing a man’s actions NOT, unlike words with an “er” ending, such as Executer , Claimer [for which reason Claimant, or Plaintiff though not ending with “or” can equally be taken for a legalese word], fire fighter, baker etc. which [unlike the former] are words that describe what a man does [as opposed to pretends to be], i.e. performs some executive functions, or claims something, or puts out fires, or bakes something, etc., “or” ending words do not describe a man’s actions, instead they represent legal entities especially for us who are into law; see for yourselves at the following links http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=-er&allowed_in_frame=0 http://www.etymonline.com/index.php? allowed_in_frame=0&search=promoter&searchmode=none where you will find an interesting explanation which goes into the difference between “er” and “or” suffix use, i.e. Prosecutor v. Prosecuter , or Executor v. Executer , the first being legalese/name of a legal entity, whilst the second is saying that a man performs some executive, or prosecuting functions, which in my books is a huge difference aside from the fact that to be the Aggrieved-party/Claimer pisses all over Plaintiff/Chief Prosecutor , or even Prosecuter : “-er The use of -or and -ee in legal language (such as lessor/lessee) to distinguish actors and recipients of action has given the -or ending a tinge of professionalism, and this makes it useful in doubling words that have a professional and a non-professional sense (such as

65 | P a g e

advisor/adviser, conductor/conducter, incubator/incubater, elevator/elevater)”; so there you have it folks: Claimer , or even Prosecuter , do not pertain to legal competency like Claimant/Complainant/Plaintiff , or Prosecutor do. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

Hi Joe I wish to bring attention to the fact that my initial with the office at which you. Joe, act as Managing Director of , has still not attended to my question some 16 months later. Joe, you do understand that every man/woman working at that office is acting in the position of a public servant, which I believe are trustees of the people. Government was formed by man to secure and protect the property of man. Joe, i suggest you read all the correspondence sent to subordinate of the staff by i, a man. i do not have a title. i am just a man that owns property. i also wish to remind you Joe, that the of the payment plan mentioned, is conditional. Up to this point of time, the condition has not been met. Joe, you also mention a sum which includes an amount for fulfilling an order that was not issued by i. Despite repeatedly requiring Chrisxxxxxxxxxxx to forward on to i the name of the man/woman who issued the order (and breeched the duties, obligations and responsibilities of a public servant, therefore causing harm to i, a man,) so i can bill him/her, Chris has not supplied it. Joe, you also mention the following [ the debt that you owe to xxxxxxxxxxxxx] This may be the breakthrough i have been requiring, if you, Joe believe a debt is owed by i, a man,would you Joe, kindly write it in the form of a bill of particulars, sign it and send to i , or if you, Joe still believe a debt is owing by i, but can't send a bill of particulars, just write in in the form of an order, sign it and send to i. Joe, it also appears that a threat has been communicated by writing [ if you fail to make your..........................................will be restricted and your placed into debt collection] and signed it. If you, Joe still believe you have authority over i, a man, i require you, Joe , to show me the law that you. Joe , are relying on for your determination. A fellow man,

or; "Hi Joe: i have not yet received an answer to the letter i wrote to you, Joe on the XXth XXXX, 201X please find a copy enclosed herein."

Dear Joe; I, a man , Allan, believe you act as Managing Director at such n such; I, did send a question some time ago with no response; enclosed is a copy of said letter-I wish for you to reply in a timely manner;-------------------g0d speed----Dear Joe; I have yet to receive any communication back from u; is it not the policy of each man and woman of this office to serve the public? enclosed is the original letter I sent 12 years ago; I will be looking forward to your response;

then start trimming right back your written verbage.

66 | P a g e

i'm shouted at for writing 3 sentences in a letter :P hahaha. not sure what would happen with a essay :) lol.

• i can accept NOT any: ––(a) privileges, ––(c) benefits, or ––(c) advantages, that You may offer i, as such injure i, furthermore, i, [a] man, know of no law that can compel i to accept such;

[Saturday, October 24, 2015 10:12 AM] Dead Beat Dads:

<<< i was under the impression it was one claim and several causes of actionDead Beat Dads, Saturday, October 24, 2015 10:12 AMA CLAIM CONSISTS OF:

CAPTION

PARTIES

CLAIMS

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION – TRES INTRODUCITON/TESTIMONY SPECIFICS

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION – TRES ON THE CASE this is where we can stop the testimony and start our argument based upon the true findings of facts and points of law integrated by our laws of the case

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION – TRES ON THE CASE

67 | P a g e

VICARIOUS LIABILITY [if applicable]

LAW OF THE CASE Exhibits "A", "B", "C", "D" and "E" are integrated and included by reference as though completely stated and visible herein;

LAWFUL RESOLUTION If you've been summonsed to court, tell him you'll be more than happy to show up and listen to him complain, but you are going to require compensation, as you really don't have time to take off work and listen to someone complain about your possession of marijuana, but if he were to file an actual claim using his name vs you, then you'll be more than happy to show up free of charge and attempt to settle the dispute or compensate him for any harm your possession of marijuana may have caused him. folks: America is a Common Law Nation, and unless you have actually harmed another man or his property, no actual LAW has been broken. PS: If they stole your marijuana (tresed by way of theft), then file a claim requiring the immediate restoration of your Property, and require $1.00/second from the commencement of the crime until your property is restored.

'i: a man; claim bob jones tres by way of filing false claims against me; interfering with my rights; extortion; barratry; unjust enrichment; i require compensation of two hundredfifty thousand dollars; i require a court of record; i require a trial by jury; i say here, and will in open court, all herein be true - john doe'.

They have no case…

Edit: As of November 2, 2015 the Notice has been successful at making 6 cases vanish from Pacer without a trace - gone - poof - never happened. Anytime a prosecuting attorney is bringing charges against you for anything pertaining to a code or statute violation such as those found in US Codes or State Statutes, he is operating under thepresumption that you are one of that corporation's own internal employees who

68 | P a g e

is contractually obligated to abide by those internal statutes. It is a con, and they make billions of dollars every year off of unsuspecting Americans because we don't know the difference between a criminalcomplaint and an actual claim. I explain this in more detail here: http://popularliberty.com/9380/2nd-amendment-isnt-under-attack-you-just-... And here: http://popularliberty.com/2207/im-facing-5-years-possession-marijuana-wh... If you are not employed by that corporation, such as the 'IRS', or the 'CITY OF GALVESTON', or the 'STATE OF TEXAS', or the 'UNITED STATES', and being compensated to abide by that corporation's internal rules/codes/statutes/regulations, they simply do not apply to you, as Slavery and Involuntary Servitude are against the Law on American soil (see Amendment XIII), and no man may compel performance (force him to abide by internal corporate statutes) from another man, without fairly and justly compensating that man for his performance. Gov't employees have signed into an employment contract to hold those gov't jobs, and they are being compensated to abide by that corporation's internal statutes, but you and I are not, therefore, they simply do not apply to us. Yes, it is a nationwide con that has been ongoing for years. It is how they control society under corporate statutes; it is how they interfere with your Rights; it is how they make billions of dollars due to our ignorance of the Law; it is how they incarcerate us for victimless crimes where there is no injured party. Anytime a prosecutor brings forth a criminal complaint against you, it reads like this: STATE OF TEXAS vs John Q. Public [illegal possession of cannabis oil, marijuana, automatic weapons, etc.] If he had an actual claim, it would read like this: Bob T. Jones II vs John Q. Public (Bob being the prosecutor himself in his capacity as a man). He's filing a complaint on behalf of some entity that goes by that name (STATE OF TEXAS), but he has no verifiable claim because nothing you may have done harmed HIM or his property, and he cannot produce his Plaintiff to point you out across the courtroom and say,

69 | P a g e

"That man sitting right over there caused me harm by his failure to file an income tax form, or his failure to obtain a concealed carry permit, or his possession of cannabis oil, etc." He's only complaining, because gov't cannot bring forth actual claims against man because man created gov't. All they can do is complain if you are not an employee of that agency who is being compensated to abide by that agencies internal-corporate statutes. But his complaints are causing you harm; they are harming your good name within your community; they are depriving you of your property without due process of law, and they are wasting your very valuable time, money, and resources having to deal with a complaint that no one can take the stand and in open court. Therefore, the prosecutor is filing false claims against his fellow man, and that is an unlawful act in which he most certainly can be held able. To use this Notice in an existing case, Just replace 'STATE OF TEXAS' with 'IRS' or 'CITY OF GALVESTON', or 'CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES', or 'UNITED STATES', etc. depending on your specific situation. If there is no property involved and it's just some prosecutor attempting to bring you up on criminal complaint for something (anything), just take out the parts having to do with property. Handwrite the Notice and make COPIES of the Notice. You'll want to enter a COPY into the prosecutor's case, not the original, as doing so would be surrendering your property to the court. You want to keep the original so they cannot alter it in any way shape or form. The only body that may hold and the original would be a Jury of your Peers. You have to be very vigilant in protecting your property (claims and notices) when dealing with these courts and prosecutors; if they can change or alter it in anyway to get themselves off the hook, bet your ass they will do just that. Protect yourself and only enter a COPY into their case so they know you still possess the original if they decide to tres on your property by altering it in any way-shape or form. : America is STILL a Common Law Nation (as is Canada, England, Australia, and a few others). Common Law is unwritten Law - It is nowhere to be found in codes/statutes/rules/regulations. Basically, you can do anything you damned well please as long as you are not harming your fellow man or his property, and you have the right to face your acc (see Article VI) and settle with him on the private side before it goes public if for some reason you DO tres on your fellow [wo]man. Therefore, If the prosecutor is stating the 'IRS', or the 'STATE OF IDAHO', etc. is the Plaintiff, then make the Son-of-a-Bitch put his Plaintiff on the witness stand so you may cross examine him and

70 | P a g e

compensate him for any harm you may have caused him or his personal property by your failure to file paperwork, or failure to obtain a concealed carry permit, or failure to obtain a Class III weapons tax stamp, or possession of marijuana, etc. If he can't produce the Plaintiff (the Plaintiff MUST Appear), then sue his ass for filing false claims against you and take his house or retirement fund. Someone (a living wo[man]) has to show up and the harm. Here is the Notice: " i: a man; require the STATE OF TEXAS to show up and his/her claim against me so i may cross examine my acc (the plaintiff must appear) and compensate him/her for any harm i may have caused. If this man/woman that goes by the name 'STATE OF TEXAS' cannot show up to his/her claim, i require this matter immediately discharged. It is my belief there is no man/woman named 'STATE OF TEXAS' who can this claim by uttering with his/her voice I've done wrong or caused him/her personal harm, injury, or loss, therefore pressing it upon the record in open court. It is also my belief, that someone is filing complaints (false claims) on behalf of this entity known as the 'STATE OF TEXAS' in an attempt to unjustly enrich themselves and the 'STATE OF TEXAS' (whoever those individuals may be) and deprive me of my property without due process of law. If this matter is not immediately discharged, i will be requiring leave of court so i may bring a proper and verifiable claim before the court to address this tres against me in the proper venue-a court of record (treses being: filing false claims, barratry, malicious prosecution, unjust enrichment, theft, robbery, etc.), in which i will be requiring compensation for the treses and wasting my valuable time, money, and resources having to deal with this complaint, as i do not have time to answer complaints without compensation at this time. If there is an actual verifiable claim before the court, i will be more than happy to show up free of charge and address any proper and verifiable claim against me. i also require and order the immediate restoration of my property (see Exhibit A) and one dollar per second from the commencement of the crime till my property is restored - your name here.' Note: If there is no theft/robbery of property involved, just leave that out of the Notice. Property is anything you enjoy exclusive Right to. If it is a S case involving children, you use the wordproperty, not 'children'. The STATE has no control over property, but they do have control over words they use in their statutes such as 'child', 'infant', 'children', 'motor vehicle', 'marijuana', 'automatic weapons', 'firearms', 'land', 'homes', 'bicycles', etc. You always want to use that word 'property', period! And 'Exhibit A' should be a photo of the property attached to the back of your Notice; a photocopy of that property is fine. Either someone can show up and the claim by pressing it upon the record in open court, or there is no case, period. The prosecutor cannot the claim because he has no first hand knowledge, and nothing you may have done caused harm, injury, or loss to himself or his property.

71 | P a g e

Simply put, he's filing false claims to unjustly enrich himself, and this entity known as the 'STATE OF TEXAS', or 'IRS', or 'UNITED STATES', etc. You're letting the man/woman who's prosecuting this case against you know, that if they don't discharge this nonsense before the next hearing, you are going to stop the next hearing in its tracks by saying "i require leave of court so I may bring a proper and verifiable claim against YOU for filing false claims against me, and I will be requiring compensation for the treses. Your claim supercedes his silly complaint. You can your claim, but he cannot the complaint, as he himself has no first hand knowledge, and nothing you may have done caused harm, injury, or loss to himself or his property, and he cannot produce his Plaintiff because there is no man named 'STATE OF TEXAS' who can take the stand and the complaint, either. Court is a place for man to settle claims, not complaints. You'll want to enter that Notice into an existing case they have against you. If the prosecutor doesn't discharge/dismiss the case after reading that Notice, he's calling your bluff. When you get to the hearing, simply keep your mouth shut and keep referring the judge back to your Notice anytime he's asks you questions because he's more than likely trying to pull you out of the Common Law and back into their jurisdiction (control). If they insist on continuing or ignoring you, then do what you said you would do in the Notice and REQUIRE (to demand by right and by authority) leave of court for a few days so you can perfect your actual claim against the prosecutor and drag his ass into court as a defendant for filing false claims against you. Because the compensation you will be requiring for the tres shall exceed twenty dollars, you'll be able to drag him into a trial by jury (see Article VII) as a defendant for filing false claims against you that no Plaintiff showed up to . Make sure u serve it upon the wrongdoer and give them 21 days to respond… you take your claim and proff of delivery and give it to the court clerk and then both of you can have your trial on the same day…21 days from then...together running parallel…. If a prosecutor is claiming the 'UNITED STATES' is the Plaintiff in his suit against you, then for the love of God make him produce his Plaintiff so you may cross examine your acc. Article VI guarantees you that right (that Right predates the Constitution). He can't produce the Plaintiff, because the 'UNITED STATES' is not a living man who can utter with his voice you've done wrong and caused him personal harm, injury, or loss ..... and this is how you call them out on it and hold them personally able for filing false claims against you.

72 | P a g e

[3:40:12 [3:40:22 [3:40:32 [3:40:46 [3:41:04 [3:41:27

PM] PM] PM] PM] PM] PM]

He He He He He He

isn't isn't isn't isn't isn't isn't

my my my my my my

Prime Prime Prime Prime Prime Prime

Minister...lol: Minister...lol: Minister...lol: Minister...lol: Minister...lol: Minister...lol:

your is not i it your property its your property respond no that property belongs to i.... your is legally tying the person to you

God and owndership. God gives land to a people FOR A POSSESSION, or FOR AN INHERITANCE. the meek shall INHERIT the earth professor-profess-to be received into a religious order, confess professional all these words related to teachers have eclesiastical origins doctor-religious teacher/adviser/scholar MD-medicinae doctor-teacher of medicine PhD-doctor of philosophy-teacher of philosophy

Example letter ”i sent u a correspondence and i haven’t heard back from you. Are you in possession of the correspondence? Maybe the correspondence was lost or delay in the mail. Here is a copy, would you please call or text me at (insert phone number) and let me know that you are in receive of this correspondence. I wish you well and god bless, joe” We consented to have ankle bracelets on us!!! So don’t threaten them!!! They didn’t do anything we did!! U modify the order!! “thank you so much for putting this ankle bracelet on me! It’s a lovely ankle bracelet and i think it probably cost a lot of money to do such a wonderful product. At the time i had it placed on me to see my family as the and condition of my release. Now that i look back at it, that now this hurts my ankle and i realized that this glorious government would never do anything to cause harm to man. Can you please come up with an alternative solution or product that would not be a detriment to man. Kind regards and have a blessed day”

Bxoing in on your letter implies notihgn in it can be altered…plus if you have multiple boxes u in essence are looking at several different pieces of paper…

73 | P a g e

Jurisdicition is “IN” that’s why we are “AT”court We don’t live IN Canada we live upon the ground of a socialized society called Canada and that society agrees to congregate together and and protect each other’s property.

<<< when i signed something by mistake, i sent a notice of mistake along with the copy of the doc with "Signature Rescinded" and the date written on the doc....and signature crossed outrobinz, Today 12:23 PM 1 The majority's reliance on Callahan v. Woods, 736 F.2d 1269 (9th Cir.1984) is, it seems to me, not well taken. The objection on religious grounds in that case was to the requirement of obtaining a Social Security number in order to receive public assistance benefits. No alternative was provided to that requirement 2 Neither of the statements approved by the majority satisfies an important purpose of requiring oath or affirmation, i.e., to insure that the witness makes a conscious commitment to tell the truth. (See Looper, supra; Wilcoxon v. United States, 231 F.2d 384, at 387 (10th Cir.1956), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 943, 76 S.Ct. 834, 100 L.Ed. 1469 (1957); A Reconsideration of the Sworn Testimony Requirement: Securing Truth in the Twentieth Century, 75 Mich.L.R. 1681 (1977).) To say that "I understand that I must tell the truth" or that "I understand I must accurately state the facts" is not a promise to tell the truth nor accurately to state the facts. Appellant was aware of this as shown by his statements at oral argument that ".... Now the scripture says 'Let God be true though every man be a liar.' I'm simply saying that since we've all lied in the past and we've lied once or twice today and we're going to lie in the future, why kid ourselves by saying we tell the truth when in fact we do not. It's my position I would be guilty of perjury the moment I said 'Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth so help you God' and I say 'I do' I'm committing a lie." 3 The majority treats the trial court's action as an abuse of discretion relating to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 which provides for sanctions. The question in this case relates to the interpretation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 43(d) which provides for affirmation. Even if the trial court erred, that would be reversible as an error of law, not an abuse of discretion. The majority, by accepting alternative language as complying with Rule 43(d), imposes no sanction. It simply holds there is no basis for any sanction so long as appellant accepts the language approved by the majority

Basics of letter writing, and mail fraud

74 | P a g e

The first letter is ing that you are writting to the right man or woman.. the whole process of letter writing is too get a man or woman to be able… First letter should go something like… Are you the man or woman i am to communicate with about the matter or is there another man or woman i should talk too about this matter?…… once you have the right man or woman then you tell then they are causing you harm.. if they continue beyond this ..then you give them the fair warning letter that if they continue you that you will seek a remedy for this situation… then when they cross the line you send them a process server with a cease and decist notice Write the notice to the head of the agency dear bob greeetings, I know you are a man and that you are in charge of this agency and your failure to properly train and discipline your employees is causing i a man harm i require you to cease and desist.. thanks, robin and if they continue …file a claim…..

how does he want to be addressed? With his full name john j paul..should it be john james paul?

[email protected]

Sec 1712 deals with falsification..

Take the metered mail and and get the serial number..then go to the post master and ask how for them to look up how much money was on the the day before the letter was mailed to me..if there is no money on the its mail fraud.. as it must be paid postage… if the letter that isn’t cancelled ( 6 lines going through the stamp that means it went through the postal service) and you make a copy of it…show the evidence of it then open the uncancelled first class letter… read it.. then send the letter back with a stamp and that will cancel the letter..then make a copy of that for evidence

75 | P a g e

then send the this all back to them and say can you spell mail fraud? this should let you alone

Basics of letter writing

Stay away from ED and ING …ur not writing “i am writing to you..” but rather u write”i write to you….” “i made a delivery upon you” ”he answers for you” Not response….because a response can be a silly look and and answer is verbal..

Date should be written 27th april 2014,

- Learn how to "paper and pen-up" The chinesse refused to have any contracts written by the united states attorney’s in anything or than present tense because they were getting burned with contract saying “ we will paying you $10,000,000 when you ship 10 million tvs” because the usa were taking the position that they will be PAYING because it’s in the future tense. So they will always be in the future…. Same game with your mom when u say tomorrow ill mow the lawn and tomorrow never comes.. Present tense is key to writing!! Judges don’t have guns ..they just have words and they are word nerds!! Be prepared to have tight language

76 | P a g e

If you in an istrative court…I will appear only if done under oath or affirmation and anybody else who is going to enter any information, evidence or facts must also put it in the form of oath or affirmation so that it may be available for appellate review… Guess who isn’t going to be able to enter anything into the record? LAWYERS!!!

Giving the other side a loophole by using improper grammar

U don’t want your property returned …because RETURNED the ED makes it something in the past.. state it i want the immediate RETURN of property

Their position is sorry it can’t be returned and hold fast because they can’t time travel to fill your order!! Hence it’s impossible and can be denied..

What to do when the other side hides behind their secretary

So they are pretending they didn’t get your process serves notice because the secretary go it.. well what we do is we write her a letter asking her if she gave the letter to the proper man and if she ignores then you file a claim.. this will make say she handed them the envelop right away and ping go you flushed the hiding man into to liable open!!

Where to send your letters

Send a communication in the written form and u send it using a process server. Send the letter to the man not to his attorney unless he stipulates.. u could write that “if you do not wish to communicate with me any further because u have retained proper and competent counsel. If so please forward this on to your attorney and all correspondence will go through him so as to not be a bother to you..

77 | P a g e

Be polite as you go after a cop and this keep the communication short so as to not be seen as stalking a police officer..

Understanding fraud, and how to write a lawsuit 1. Constructive fraud is a legal fiction describing a situation where a person or entity gained an unfair advantage over another by deceitful or unfair methods. Intent does not need to be shown as in the case of actual fraud. fraud in the inducement n. the use of deceit or trick to cause someone to act to his/her disadvantage, such as g an agreement or deeding away real property. The heart of this type of fraud is misleading the other party as to the facts upon which he/she will base his/her decision to act. Example: "there will be tax advantages to you if you let me take title to your property," or "you don't have to read the rest of the contract--it is just routine legal language" but actually includes a balloon payment. Fraud in Factum / Fraud in Making Law & Legal Definition Fraud in factum is a type of fraud that occurs when misrepresentation causes one to enter into a transaction without accurately realizing the risks, duties, or obligations incurred. Fraud in factum occurs when a legal instrument actually executed differs from the one intended for execution by the person who executes it as s/he is induced to sign the instrument without reasonable opportunity to learn of its fraudulent character or essential . For example, a blind person g a mortgage when misleadingly told that it is just a letter. Generally, fraud in the factum voids the instrument under state law and is a real defense against even a holder in due course. Fraud in factum is also termed as fraud in the execution or fraud in the making.

If I’m “on” your foot, I’m tresing; if I’m “in” your foot…it’s a miracle; if I’m standing “at” your foot, I’m beside you; if I’m standing “over” your foot, I’m considered a threat; if I’m standing “under” your foot, you have control over me and might be hurting me.

So we want to be IN our court, and AT their building. We can be operating IN law as long as it’s OUR OWN law, as long as WE CREATE OUR OWN LAWS. I’ll accept some benefits and I’ll not accept some other benefits. These are benefits from my forefathers, you trustee, just hand me the trust the assets the forefathers (the trustor/grantor) created for me, you can’t hold me obligated to a gift. Just because I’m a

78 | P a g e

beneficiary of social security, doesn’t mean I’m obligated to compensate for the gift. Why would he establish this gift for me if it was an obligation?

c.f.“When a man says he is building a house for himself and his posterity, he does not mean to be understood as saying that he has any thought of binding them, nor is it to be inferred that he [*5] is so foolish as to imagine that he has any right or power to bind them, to live in it. So far as they are concerned, he only means to be understood as saying that his hopes and motives, in building it, are that they, or at least some of them, may find it for their happiness to live in it.” -Lysander Spooner, No Treason.

Mother IN law, not AT law. Because wife and husband created law by marriage contract. We are in a marriage contract, that makes the spouse’s mother and father IN laws. We’re IN, embraced, in the law.

No lawyers are allowed IN, they’re AT law. They cannot be party-to the law. A “void judgement” never existed. “I want void judgement” be careful with this, it means we want to void ALL the items on the judgement void. I.E. when someone wants to regain custody of kids, their judgement for custody is lumped together with divorce. When they void the judgement for custody, they also void the divorce.

SEPARATE all our orders into different judgements so we don’t run into this problem.

When we’re in common law we place the orders, not the guy in black. Call the guy in black dress “magistrate [judge]”. Because in the common law court we just want him to sit back and say he witnessed the event, take the rendering from the jury/the verdict, to the district court clerk’s office, let her stamp it and say that he witnessed it this is true verdict from the jury, this is the true bill they handed down, and this is what all parties are supposed to get, and forever hold your peace, no appeals.

79 | P a g e

The more words used, the more limited the subject becomes. We narrow it down by talking more.

First notice them Then a cease and desist Then i give them the order(what this is going to cost) Then i hand them the bill ( if they want particulars they can ask i don’t offer it overtly)

- The proper use of words Most important common law words are “in, at, on, for, upon”, things having to do with location. “in” means contained, being under the jurisdiction of the container. I’m nowhere else except being in my body. “on” if we are on something that doesn’t belong to us, we are tresing. “at” is near to it, close to it, but not tresing. “upon” something implies an aggressive approach, it’s a form of attack. Any tres upon I a man and my person and property etc.

The last word is the subject, the word before it is the modifier.

80 | P a g e

- Karl's fair warning letter I (name) give no entity the right to istrate my property; I say that (car/kid etc) is my property; I say that no man or woman is will make a claim saying my claim is untrue; I want my property returned to me; said property is to be totally under my control post haste within (time limit); I will charge the wrongful holder of said property X amount of dollars for every (day/minute) said property is not returned starting on the twenty-second day after they’ve received this summons and this suit, see attached claim.

21 days are there to try to settle the matter.

Using cf. "compare to" in your court documents

[cf.] The abbreviation cf. derives from the Latin word confer, while in English it is commonly read as "compare". The abbreviation advises readers to consult other material, usually for the purpose of drawing a contrast.

- If someone sending you a bill is off by one penny, it's extortion and fraud Someone sends a bills for $15000 in damages.. the perfect number is a clue that its wrong, possible extortion and fraud.. if they are of by one penny this is called extortion and fraud because they are asking for a debt to be paid that is not due. Extortion because it’s not and fraud because it’s not real..

one should right a letter to them ask 1. Where is the itemized bill of particulars they should send u an exact bill something like $8873.93 is more likely to be seen as its not a round even $15,000 this exposes that they committed both crimes

81 | P a g e

write a letter” thank you for you timely response under Virginia code blah blha blha you committed extortion and under code blalblah blah you committed fraud . because the first bill you sent me $15000 and the second bills says this is absolutely proof of extortion and fraud and anytime you would like to go before any court in Virginia we would be more than glad to place it before a coomon law court of record trial by jury where we will submit our own claim for $60000. So if theire is any more correspondence between that you would like i leave up to you to let us know..” u may not here back from them forever..

The use of i in letters When we get a summons send a letter saying “who’s the man or woman who’s requiring I to appear?” The next letter they send is “you must appear” We send “maybe you didn’t get my first communication but I clearly said I to appear I never used the word you” see exhibit A the previous attached communication between you and I and it clearly stipulates that I’m an I and not a you.

- The three notice process does not apply in common law The process is a waste of time if you don’t have time!!… The only thing one should care about is the immediate restoration of the property. It’s your child.. file your claim immediately.. judges will snap right up when u report a robbery in your claim..every agency is supposed to secure and protect property… Like for instance your child. And child services.. you don’t wait for their court to convene you create your own court on writing and put it before the and there u go your court is created… as soon as u get a stamp from the clerk the whole world takes notices that your court exist..it will be days before you get ur kids back because they have to report a robbery for liability reasons

82 | P a g e

How to write a letter when they won’t respond in writing if an attorney does not do anything in writing then say good..i need that in writing that you don’t do anything is writing signed and sent to me.. It is customary practice around this world to do things in writing and make sure things like “they” are going to do anything about it… respond back with who is this “THEY” and what is the “it” she or he is refferring to? Make them do everything by the letter of the law. Make them do it by the book… “words in the air take wind..”

One must know exactly what the “it” the”they” the” you” and the “i” is

How to write a return letter to an agency Say a game warden is sending you letters to get rid of your chickens in city limits and they are identifying themselves as “agent 10” write back stating that they have a strange name or do you have a real name? and then add “ i don’t know what u want me to do but I would be glad to take your order. but u got to sound like an stupid fool to draw out their name so you can give him a bill. so when he gives you an order send him a bill for $1000 a chicken and the veterinary bill for the next 3 years

One man order another man to do something with his property must be justly compensated. get the name and the order from these Agents 10 folks

MSO and proof of financial responsibility The reason we don’t worry about who has the MSO, is because no one in the state is gonna be able to come into any court and claim that our car has something to do with them.

Write to prosecution and ask 3 questions: “are you making a claim to my property?”

83 | P a g e

“are you making a claim that I owe a debt?” “do you believe I owe a debt to you?”

. Upper and lower case i

Capitalizing the I is diminishing your capacity by decapitating the dot of the i in I ..i am man…not I a man…big dif

Sample letters Is there a claim in Court? Is there a man to that claim? My contention is both the man and the person are here. Before we begin I require the Court establishes jurisdiction over the man. Is there anything you don't understand? Any consent implied or given is rescinded.

After receiving a traffic ticket or summons Send letter to man acting as cop asking forgiveness IF he has suffered due to your actions, and offer to compensate for any loss. (that removes controversy) Jordan Guttuso c/o 10 High Street Butler New Jersey 07405

Greetings Jordan, I wish to ask forgiveness for any harm you may have suffered as a result of my actions on March 8th, 2015. If you had any financial loss, please let me know. Kind regards, Ronald Karl Portz II

84 | P a g e

548 Glen Road Sparta New Jersey 07871

Send Bill to man acting as cop, for your time and carried out orders (reasonable amount, normal daily wage, the bill will be understood as a tort claim and may sway prosecutor to recuse or withdrawal)

Jordan Guttuso c/o 10 High Street Butler New Jersey 07405

notice statement of bill

Greetings Jordan, You, Jordan, owe i, Ron, $1,200.00 (see attached). or I require payment for fulfilment of Your orders on March X, 2015 (see attached). Send full payment to 548 Glen Road Sparta New Jersey 07871. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Kind regards, Ronald Karl Portz II 548 Glen Road Sparta New Jersey 07871

page 2 Itemized list of amount due item 1) $1,200.00 per day, or any portion thereof, for the time period on March 8th, 2015; for my time and labor following orders.

85 | P a g e

(in my case, I am also billing the sheriff...)

Edward V.Rochford c/o P.O. Box 900 Morristown New Jersey 07963

notice statement of bill

Greetings Edward, You, Edward, as a man acting in the capacity of sheriff (liable for the actions of subordinate agents), owe i, Ron, $4,800.00 (see attached). Send full payment to 548 Glen Road Sparta New Jersey 07871. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Kind regards, Ronald Karl Portz II 548 Glen Road Sparta New Jersey 07871

page 2 Itemized list of amount due item 1) $1,200.00 per day, or any portion thereof, for the time period between March 8th, 2015 through March 11th, 2015; totaling $4,800.00; for my time and labor following orders.

Send fair warning notice to prosecutor...(tickets issued in error, not operating under a licence at the time...) Borough of Butler Municipal Court

86 | P a g e

1 Ace Road Butler, New Jersey 07405 [complaint/summons number 1403-BU-062734 through 1403-BU-062738, inclusive] notice i, [a] man, give fair and final notice that: 1) complaint/summons number 1403-BU-062734 through 1403-BU-062738, inclusive, were issued in error. 2) i, [a] man, did not act in the capacity of a person, driver, motor vehicle operator or other such title, at the time said complaints were issued. 3) i, [a] man, gave no entity the right to istrate [my] property. 4) i am not aware of any duty or obligation that I owe to the Legal society. 5) i do not believe this court was created for the purposes of causing harm. Any further action, or inaction, by a man or woman acting in the capacity of court officers, that interfere with property, will be a cause of harm and financial loss to i. 6) i require any wish, order or demand to be signed sealed and delivered upon me. i, say here, and will in a court of record, that all herein be true.

Mo has suggested to send notice (via fax and/or ed mail) of appearance, notice of identity (being that of a man, idiot in regards to legal society) (My version, needs work) i, [a] man, Ron, appear in person, unrepresented, only as a member of the Portz Family without benefit of any other title. A good name and reputation that I have and continue to labor to create; that no state or agent has interest in. i do not wish my capacity diminished and can not, at this time, bear the burden of the title "Defendant", as i am an idiot in regards to the Legal society and do not understand of art used by, nor am i familiar with the process and procedures of the legal society. i am not competent to perform; and, at this time, i do not wish to perform, as a member of the legal society. before court, speak to prosecutor regarding questions... At court hearing, gag yourself, glue your lips together, do not open your mouth. it is a court of RECORD expressed in writing, so no judge, stenographer can switch its meaning to something incoherant ( some words sound the same, but do not mean the same, ex: their, there and they're) Judge asks... Identify and appearance?

87 | P a g e

"I am here to resolve this matter" "has the court received my notice of identity?" notice... i, [a] man, appear before this court solely as man, without representation, without title (defendant, PRO SE, driver, operator), to give notice as follows; i am an idiot in regard to legalese. i do not understand the customs of the legal society nor do i believe any law exists which requires man to know or understand these things; i believe the government exists to secure rights and to protect property of man. Do you understand the charges? i have questions regarding the charges... Who is moving this case? Prosecutors duty to disclose evidence? Who are the parties? What law is before the court? Who is the injured party? to compensate in private.

notice... I require leave of court, 72hours,

What is the der between the parties? notice... I require time to review to make sure there is no error in 'discovery/information' What benefit Is there to me to endorse a plea agreement? What benefit is there to you? Who is the state? Is there a verified claim before the court?

Are you represented? If you are not confident and need more time to learn.. require stay/continuance/adjournment... notice... i require leave of court, 90 days, to seek competent counsel. i require this court provide certified complete copy of the case file (so that counsel can determine the cost). If you [think you] are ready... notice... i require court officers to act accordingly and file notices How do you plea?

88 | P a g e

plea to what? What is the law before the court? notice... Whoever acts on my behalf assumes all liability. notice... I require officers of this court witness without a law before this court plaintiff moves a false claim against I, under pergery and does cause harm to my reputation.

Notices (separately/individualy) i, [a] man, require the judge to move [john henry] from the case due to not have first hand knowledge of this case; I require leave of court, 72 hours, to allow this court to subpoena "the state of xxx" to this court. (I have the right to face and cross examine my acc) I require the point of law you are relying upon that leads you to believe you have control and authority over i, [a] man? I require you to submit your claim authorizes you to communicate a threat. I require all officers of this court to act accordingly, no matter how high or petty, in this public venue. Any physical , aggressive actions or coercion by intimidation will be contempt of court. No istration of property without right. Whoever acts on my behalf assumes all liability. Compensation is required to be paid in advance before any order is carried out. Financial loss due to jail, detainment or other imprisonment I require this court provide verified charges Whoever wish i labor to understand codes, statutes or rules of another society, must pay, in advance, fair and just compensation. I require the public law produced before this court. Harm to i if court proceeds, no harm injury or loss to xxx if adjournment Sweat equity before trial send notice to court notice ... I and my case will be present(court of record) I require the judge/magistrate (all court officers no matter how high or petty) act accordingly in this public venue, and...

89 | P a g e

1) file my claim to be heard on "date such and such" where all parties are already scheduled to be present, to avoid further waste of limited resources. 2) witness that no plaintiff appeared. 3)

Apologize for the contempt, and ask for forgiveness, it is not my intent. Offer to make payments, then challange the debt:

(butler case) Claim: i, Ron, claim wrongdoers tres against my property (Exhibit "A") Cause of action: There is no law that exists between i, and the wrongdoers. The [wo]man acting in the capacity of prosecutor does move a false claim against i, a man, and my person, into the public without der of parties. Order: I require the restoration of my good name and reputation, no later than March 28, 2015. I will place a charge of $1,000.00 per day, per said treser, for any failure in the restoration on said date. If the restore of said property does occur on or before said date, I will forgive those who tres of their debt, as I would wish others to forgive me of my tres.

(Hamburg case) Claim: i, Ronald Karl Portz II, claim wrongdoers tres against my property (see exhibit "A") Cause of action: There is no law that exists between i, and the wrongdoers. The [wo]man acting in the capacity of prosecutor does move a false claim against i, a man, and my person, into the public without der of parties. Wrongdoers did take and carry away property (Exhibit "B")

90 | P a g e

Order: I require the delivery of all said property, to the place of origin at 548 Glen Road Sparta, New Jersey 07871, within and exclusively under my proper jurisdiction, no later than April 10, 2015. I will place a charge of $1,000.00 per day, per said treser, for any failure in the restoration on said date. If the placement of all said property does occur on or before said date, I will forgive those who tres of their debt, as I would wish others to forgive me of my tres. Exhibit "A"' i, Ronald Karl Portz II claim my reputation as my property. No [wo]man has interest, or higher claim, to [my]property.[Cf. ..every Man has a Property in his own Person. This no Body has any Right to but himself. The Labour of his Body, and the Work of his Hands, we may say, are properly his. .... The great and chief end therefore, of Mens uniting into Commonwealths, and putting themselves under Government, is the Preservation of their Property.-- John Locke, "A Treatise Concerning Civil Government"] Exhibit "B" (picture of truck)

Allocution…

Section 3- Police Traffic stops, car impounded, traffic court 12pgs

First thing you do when you see those cherries go off in Your rear window Of the police unit behind you . Is to pull out your phone and press record because you're going to be recording this incident for your protection second thing to do is to roll down your window and try to waive them on to what you soon sorry I presume is an emergency ahead of you and I you are a no other reason he should be pulling you over so you're just waiting on forward but if he insist on staying behind your tail then pull over and take him by surprise by asking him first are you needing help this should throw him off he'll start saying you don't fast you were going the next question you throw at him is why are you talking to me that have clarified you know you're going 25 / 60 you're not going to disagree with me that's fine . And here's the hook quickly asking have I done any harm injury or caused loss or broke a contract with any man or woman.. he will probably more than likely say no that's what you're going to take the court and you're out you're done ..chemate..he itted he just gave you a ticket with no evidence on you that you broke any of God's law and since we don't operate under

91 | P a g e

the statute you don't care about any of the six million statutes code that person stand under because you are not a fiction.

2015-01-19 @ 21;10;21 GMT deadbeatdads - how to deal with traffic stop (2) In my area, the cop wants u to stay in the car unless/until he tells u to get out.i'm sure if by the time they get to you and you're still seated in your car that may well be their usual desired procedure, but I know of know common law points and authorities that would entitle a cop to force you to enter your locked property in the event that you're not already in it, sure you have a right to enter your property but a right cannot be turned into an obligation; besides to be on house-arrest or car-arrest it takes a court order not a cop's say-so, absence of which you have cause for a claim of imprisonment; [1:27:32 PM] Julz: please provide your points and authorities that say otherwise, or let us move on to what it is that you wish to bring to my attention so I may aid you [1:28:30 PM] Julz: for it is he who needs you're help not the other way round [1:28:54 PM] Julz: so you're just being the nice guy [1:31:16 PM] Julz: there are a lot of absolutely ridiculous procedures they wish would go according to plan yet with no basis in law whatsoever and easily sidestepped with simple logic

That time when i got stopped with the police just down the road from me you know, i mean i deliberately sped up to get stopped and you know he said; Copper: good evening, sir; DBD: good evening; Copper: you do know the reason why I’ve stopped you? DBD: i’ve no idea, but obviously you’re here to make some money for the magistrates’ court, so carry on; Copper: well, no, no you, you were speeding down here; DBD: was i...!? Copper: well, do you not know what the speed limit is down here...!? DBD: 30 miles an hour; Copper: well you were doing 37; DBD: yup;

92 | P a g e

Copper: well that’s against the law; DBD: no, no, no your policy is only a guide line; Copper: no-no, it’s the law; DBD: oh ok, well can you point me to the law, that says Fleetwood Road South is actually thirty mile an hour...!? Copper: well, no-no, it’s any road with a lamp post so many yards apart...; DBD: no-no-no-no, you said down here, down here is Fleetwood Road South, right...! so you provide me with a point of law, you’re relying upon that states Fleetwood Road South is a 30 mile an hour zone; and that that is the law; Copper: well, it’s not, it comes under the Road Traffic Act, sir; DBD: does it...!? ok no problem, well what is this Road Traffic Act you’re referring to...!? Copper: well, it comes under the Road Traffic Act; DBD: ok, can you please recite it for me? Copper: yes, it is an offence if you do this blah, blah, blah, and he went into bullshit mode; DBD: thank you for that officer, well, unfortunately when i applied for me driver’s license, the DVLA didn’t inform me of the Road Traffic Act because obviously they weren’t legally qualified, my driving instructor didn’t tell me about the Road Traffic Act because he wasn’t legally qualified, and my driving examiner didn’t tell me about the Road Traffic Act because he wasn’t legally qualified either, so, seeing as you’ve given me legal advice officer, can you give me a copy of your legal qualifications so i can rest assured that the information you have given me is correct...!? Copper: i’m not legally qualified; DBD: well sir, you do realize it’s a criminal offence to impersonate a member of the bar society...!? so what i need from you officer is your name and your number, because i’m going to report you for committing a criminal offence in order to extort information and funds for the magistrates’ court; Copper: there’s been no mention of magistrates’ court; DBD: there’s mention of magistrates’ court written all over you, and i bet you ten to a penny it’s in your pocket as we speak; Copper: no-no-no, it’s not; DBD: okay, get out your note book, with your road traffic offences and your book where you issue fines; so copper gets that out: ok, look on the back of it, where does it say you make payments to..!? Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Services; so therefore, sir, you are extorting funds right...! and giving out incorrect information to extort information and funds for a company you do not work for, that is fraud, sir, right so i need your name and number,

93 | P a g e

because i’m now going to report you, for committing a criminal offence, so if you think you’re going to be in that job for much longer, i don’t think so; and with that he shut off his camera, put it in the case, put back it in his car, and fucked off; I don't know how many times DBD needs to say it get out the car, lock it and put the car keys in your pocket before they get close enough and that instantly gets rid of one of their desires which if you don't comply with will result in them damaging your car under the pretext that you're refusing to do something which you should have no problems doing, all this hiding in the car business is old news once you're out the car you've de-escalated a tonne of shit upon your head and if they want to get in the car they must reach into your pocket in other words lay their hands on you tres upon your property of which fact you warn the guy about before he has a chance to do it

make a cop take a psych avaluation….hes is acting as a cop and you are telling him im not an actor i am a man and i am not in your act..in your court….not the crowns. Go after the man, if you can’t, then go after the man who’s the head of the agency. No need to take down names in the moment a police confrontation is occurring, lest you put yourself in danger.

Because u aren’t part of the legal society tell the officer” i am not eligible for your services.”

For traffic defence..not only do i believe i have the right to access to roads but in your criminal code section2 it seems to read the same “highway” « voie publique » ou « grande route » “highway” means a road to which the public has the right of access, and includes bridges over which or tunnels through which a road es;

If officer won’t give u their names just find out what police department they work at and send him..

94 | P a g e

Write him…u failed to train discipline and monitor your agents who act on your behalf for your benefit i accured a loss (or harm or both)…

Traffic tickets, how to write to the prosecutor Sample letter to a prosecutor… i am man write to you a woman a believe sometimes acts as in the capacity of a prosecutor for (insert-place county city) to inform you that the august 3 rd 2014 activities of officer Williams Terrrroe the man that sometime acts as an agent for the vancouver police department did and does continue to be the constant source of harm injury and loss to i ; likewise your pursuit of case# 1199229292292 does cause harm injury and loss to i ; i do realize that you might not be aware of said costs and this tres against i and hope that you will reconsider your pursuit of said case….i hope to receive written notice of your intent…king regards..(we are eliminating plausible deniability)

Government exist o protect property and i don’t believe there is a man with a claim but if there is i am willing to settle up..

If the prosecutor doesn’t respond…write back…I wrote u a week ago hey this is important here is a copy of the first letter… can u please get back to me within the next 5days to let me know u received these please..and if they still after a 3 rd letter then write to the supervisor..are you the man responsible for this subordinate?

We only want to deal with a man so always flush the man or woman out into the open…only a man is liable a police officer is only a perfection on paper…

Tell the judge that u go by Tater Tot

If you have 10 days to put in a plea respond by noticing them.. that u are only going to be appearing as a man to settle any debt i owe and to answer my acc for hamr or breach of contract and if anyone acts on my behalf they assume all liability..

95 | P a g e

If you go to court ask to face your acc and can they bring them forth…the court is to take notice that this lack of response is dishonarble..

They are all actors!!! Make them say they are a man!!!

We rebut the presumptions by putting notice in to the court… sample letter…… i a man appear before this course solely as a man, without representation, without title defendant, pro se, driver, operator to give notice as follows; i am an idiot in legalese; i do not understand the customs of the legal society nor do i believe any law exist which requires man to know or understand these things; i believe the government exist to secure rights and protect property of man see exhibit a(idiot is defined extensively , everything explaining legalese the right to a trial by jury (canada charter sec. 32), where it says in the constituiont that they are their to protect rights..article 12 of the new hamshire constitution that says the same thing.. The customs of the legal society and included

Simply write ..signed under duress and ur signature…they cant do anything with that..

Handling a traffic stop as a man When driving, have this written down/printed and take it WITH you: I was in lawful possession of my property and I was moving from point A to point B, and I don’t believe any man’s going to come forth and claim that I’ve done wrong, or any man’s going to claim that I’ve done harm to his property while I was moving from point A to point B. Now IF there is a man, please let him know immediately. Please let him bring his claim forth immediately cus I’ve yet to see his claim of a wrong because I want to compensate him way before we get this into a public forum. I advise you to call your supervisor, and someone in your legal department as well, before you contract with me.

96 | P a g e

Give to man in police uniform. Advice him to call legal And if the man in uniform still wishes to contract with us, then we will fill his orders. So as to be always in the act of performing not complying..

U need the cops card so he knows where to our response to this cops complaint.. ask the cop if he thinks i did something wrong? He should say yes… [NOW YOU HAVE YOUR FALSE CLAIM!!! ] continue and remind the police officer that he will have to prosecute this in court. You are going to be moving this complaint against me so i need to properly answer you. Because i want to settle this way before we go into a court room.. explain to the officer the he wants to contract with me and not give me your information but what if i want to change the and conditions of the contract how am i going to get a hold of you. That why u have to give me some way of communicating with you. If the officer says he is only going to bear witness to the worng..to whom did i do wrong? The cop may say u broke a contract do behave in a certain manner and i am the police enforcement officer and i determine who is in breach of contract and u have a contract with the department of motor vehicle and you’re in breach of contract..remind him that u are not operating under that licence at the time of the incident. I have a licence but i was not operating under it at the time..

Cops will have a hardtime following you hence tell him to write the ticket or withdraw is fine. They have ur address so they can write u to stop the proceedings and dropping the charges…

Speeding does guarantee i will hurt anyone. I do that..not a policy!! I can think of a few good reason speeding might save your life!! No thank you mommy state!!

How to handle an arrest

97 | P a g e

Repeat like a mantra “i that your wish and you order?”if all u are doing is following orders this absolves you form everything because all you were doing was performing by following the orders. Everyman has fair and just compensation for any service or anything he performs or any product that he produces. He is entitled for just compensation. We are not anybody’s slave as slavery has been long since abolished and police. public servants.. how can the servant order the master around? If a man a acting as public servant wants to give orders they have to pay just like anybody else.

U don’t need to tell them how much the total is running in advance..just ike the maitrady doesn’t tell u the price of stuff before u pay..u make an order and u pay..

This should let u go faster than lighitning dropping all your charges when u get before the magistrate!! Sound like a broken record!!! Simply explain to the officer the for cops to get paid they follow order and then get paid at the end of the week for falling those orders!!!

Dealing with older charges brought up in statutory court

Plead guilty to everything the learned man of the codes in fornt of u is probably right..u are not arhuing that u broke any of those codes or statutes in fact ur guilty of everything but the problem is we live on a common law land and i have done no wrong, and no man has yet to appear nor do i believe will a man appear to make a claim that i a man have done any wrong…there has been no damage that any of the acts that i have or have not done according to your code. I am an idiot when i comes to legalese , i don’t stand o n legalese and i don’t act under neath any of your codes…i am not a person i am a man and this is a common law land… i am probably guilty of ten thousand things according to your codes before i walk into this court room today from my prison cell..i don’t care!!! Because it has absolutely zero impact on a man and u are looking at a man..in this common law land i we want to see is another man come forth with a verifiable claim, and have him swear under oath or affirmation that i have done something wrong and that i have yet to compensate them…that’s it!! Everything should get discharged…

98 | P a g e

Every traffic court case u are presumed to be guilty….its summary conviction…if u r a citizen of the united states the code applies…sometimes i am a citizen of the united states when i believe it benefits me but at this time i believe that it’s not a benefit to me… so today i am going to stand on the status of man!!! I believe you are looking at a man and since we are in a common law land i am going to evoke the common law because we are in a common law nation and i have done no wrong..and as a matter of fact you have to release me until some man come forth with a verifiable claim that i have done something wrong…that’s the law of this land that you sit opun and stand upon and you’re the united states of America is a part of the land…the land is not part of the united states of America. The land is above the united states . the united state can come and go but the land will never disappear…

Getting your property out of the impound lot

If ur car is in the impound find out who has the authority to hold your car and hence liability too for holding your car and write to them ie.

Dear Gerald greetings, i believe u Gerald gold my property without right see exhibit A. said act is a source of harm to i, post haste i require u to restore said property. Kind regards

I would follow up by going down to Gerald the man personally and tell him the same…

Then immediately file a claim against that man has tresed on property and u require the immediate restoration of property. you go to the sheriff office that your car is worth $2000 grand..i require u to put it in the form of a bond. I will see that man in 30 days in court and if he has a superior claim… he can claim that bond when the case is over… but that is a fair market value for that car so i require u to put a mechanic lien on that car and release that car immediately. And will settle this in court but i need my car now!!

So if at the end of the case i loss i can gie him the bond and pay it of with the bondsman myself or i can give him the car…but right this moment i require the immediate restoration of property

99 | P a g e

Mechanice lien creates a cloud on title on whatever it is you ae liening up.. because people are less inclined to give u money for something u don’t own %100 of.

U go dwon to the county record office and file the notice of completion. It is done afgter the day of final inspection or a certificate of occupancy..or the date of substantial completion U may be able to do this only with the county recorder but i would do it with wet ink…so go into the building when possible

Sometimes they mess with you and say ur car is worth $27000 whne its really $2000 so cry just forget the lien root and just move your case through the court like lightning…

Most of us don’t prepare for the rare chance of getting mugged…when ur using karl method ur basically the inverseof that realtion to them..they are use to people standing up for themselves and knowing how to …so be gentle…..

Once u have the man who is authorized to hold your car write them this..

(because u won your case) Explain them that there is no reason for them to hold my property anymore because it is harming i a man to not have my property at this time and i know you do not exist to cause harm to man i require u to release the property forth with..

Driving your property without registration, and the good samaritan law

Try and give judges a few different ways of looking at your case…

100 | P a g e

Don’t make court scarier than it needs to be as it will elicit to high of an emotion that u don’t want to deal with while you are trying to stay focused on your case and the other players..

If ur trying to get out of jail ..u need someone on the outside with power of attorney that a local court will recognize to submit paperwork on your behalf.

If u have a car…. Write to the attourney general or the local sheriff department and say i have this car full indemnified. Its either in the form of an escrow or bond or some form of insurance policy..that the state requires as a minimum coverage when i take my property out into society. See exibit A . is there anything else u require of i a man or compel to take my property from point a to point b in your state? Please let me know.. Attach proof of the coverage

If they reply you have to get your vehicle ed…

Ask what would be the benefit would i derive from ing it with the state. I understand then benefits the state would derive, i want to know what value i have gained to my property benefits i a man would get. If i with the state i see how the state is $100 richer..and if i with the state my car can be force to comply with statutes that can easily have my property[car] taken from me because i am not in compliance with a code or statute.

I don’t wish for a title to go from point a to point b . i don’t need permission..i pay the roads taxes that pay for these highways..roll with plates that say “private” “indemnified” ”bonded” “insured”

If someone steals ur car …call 911 because u don’t want ot be held liable specially if they kill someone… think dean Clifford…. U can’t take the keys out of the car the cops have to…get your liabilities in order..

101 | P a g e

As a fellow man when we see something wrong its is our responsibility to tell them to stop..and if u don’t stop i am going to have to interfere…

Your license is the registry of your vessel your ship..and it lets them know who it belongs too and who has jurisdiction over it..

Cops might say hey if u aint flying our flag we aint going to help you… that is something we will have to understand as a risk..Ben Franklin put it best Those Who Sacrifice Liberty For Security Deserve Neither.”

A judge may try to try to bait u into the conversation of the reason why they did what they did… like why they took your children.. u don’t care why they did what they did.. do i want to know why the rapist raped their victim as nothing can be gained from such knowledge.

How to address traffic court as a man

If someone is late to a court time..say 1:30 pm and no show… stand up at 1:35 and say i am man robin mitchell am looking for the man or woman whom summons me to appear at 9 am and that u are there to settle any matter of a claim of wrong or settle any verifiable debt..do this 3 times

U then go to the court clerk office and let them know in writing that yo9u were here and that nobody appeared and get that times stamped…

If u do this in traffic court they wont care and suspend your licence… because they are presuming that u are under contract and u ddint appear in court to let them no ur not in

102 | P a g e

breach of a contract.. u have to let them know u weren’t operating under the capacity of that licecne at the time of the stall and that u we’re under a different jurisdiction. They summons the wrong person they summons they licecne driver..and you were not a licecne driver under the time of the stop. They have the wrong person u are a man going from point a to point b with my property on that day and there was no harm or injury to man on that day… if this court believes that i’m an acting as this person drving with a licence well then this court is in error..

A court is a place that people go to play games…

If ur driver licence is suspended u have to cure it.. by addressing the courts and letting them know u weren’t operating under the licence at the time of the incedent

Your good name and your word is the only thing you possess. Don’t throw it around so willy nilly!!! Police officers don’t give out there name so don’t give out yours….they are trained for a reason..maybe you should learn…once people have your name they can throw it around willy nilly too so guard it!!

There are no rules for “traffic stops” or “detentions” They are simply arrest!! Traffic stop is slang!!!

people v McGaughran Vehicle Code sec. 40504, subdivision (a), commands that when a traffic offender such as defendant herein gives his written promise to appear by g two copies of the citation, "Thereupon the arresting officer shall forthwith release the person arrested from custody." (Italics added.) The statute leaves no room for interpretation: it plainly and unequivocally

103 | P a g e

Parking agent puts a ticket on your car, don’t get mad, shake his hand and tell him that you are not going to pay it.. and then take a picture of the ticket on the car… and show him.. he will smile and say he has already done this.. u say..i your case this picture is going to work magic for you…but when i file my claim that you tresed on my property with your property ((my picture) this picture is going to work wonders and my court is going to be higher than your court because we live in a common law land and i know how to evoke a court of record! They will dismiss the ticket and let the ticket agent carry on doing his work because nobody will wake up… nobody has the right to touch your property.. would you let someone put a ticket on your kid? That’s your property just like your car is!! Get it? They cant touch your kid let alone your car!!!!

Jurisdiction regarding traffic tickets, and giving your conditions for a summons

City cops have no jurisdiction over handing out tickets..because who issue the license? The state/province so should a state trooper over provincial police be dealing with this issue jurisdictionally? There are no city licensing agency just provincial are there? Ask him to discharge it because it is outside of their jurisdiction..

And if he gave you a ticket also for speeding which is within their jurisdiction they because they ed the two the second becomes invalid! The whole complaint is flawed if one part is flawed!

That is why we separate our claims and our orders!! Separate as if one part of the claim or order falls the rest of the paper work can stand because its separate.. Just like the divorce and child custody should be separate so that if you want to void judgement on the child custody you don’t have to start your divorce proceeding over again too..seperate!!

104 | P a g e

This is a legal falling and this is another way to chop their complaints down..

I wouldn’t be playing too much brain logic with cops…unless it is funny…

Now if the prosecutor has you scheduled to appear at 1 pm then he should be held liable for wasting your time! Time once it is spent can’t be restored so one need’s compensation for said loss

Give them a warning that next time you will appear under those conditions only and because i don’t believe anyone has jurisdiction over me; if anyone places and order they are going to be held liable for it and if the case starts at 9 it better be wrapped up by 9:15; i am will not wait around to deal with you attorney’s!!

“I’ll appear if you have jurisdiction over a man”” show me where a man is required to have a license to move point a to point b””

If police officers won’t return your property then you can issue you fair warning notice and go after them in your claim and court

Negotiating with public servants, and understanding common law the cops may threaten u wuth 18 years in prison and take all your plants and equipment… what you do is u start to negotiate with your counter offer..sure 18 months in jail well as a man i require $20,000 a month sure and the fair market value for your plants and equipment

105 | P a g e

is $xxxxxxx and for your 10 year fire arm probation $10, 000 per year and for your DNA order i will give $10,000 per ounce and there is a 3 ounce minimum..

Get officer badge numbers when ur taking orders!!

Whenever u are dealing with a traffic ticket u have to remind them (even when they are offering u silly course to go on) and notice show me the law that requires me to have a license for me to go from point a to point b with my apparatus! do you believe i was driving? They will say police officer bob bume U reply “u mean bob bume the man, who is sometimes a cop believes i was driving?” well i believe that driving is something i do with a golf club.. drive is what i use advance my ambitions? So he believes i was driving? How is that wrong? Because u are using a word that is ambiguous”

Long – can be destroyed as well if found in a statute..I long for the days of yesterday..desire? Remind them that one is operating under the law of man not statutes!! Ur silly codes are ridiculous and ten thousand pages thick and changing every day

Shall is like should it implied…that the trick is it implied or expressed IMPLI'ED, participle ive [See Imply.] Involved; contained virtually, though not expressed; as an implied promise.

Expressed EXPRESS'ED, participle ive Squeezed or forced out, as juice or liquor; uttered in words; set down in writing or letters; declared; represented; shown. late 14c., "stated explicitly, not implied, clearly made known" from Old French espres, expres (13c.), from Latin expressus "clearly presented, distinct, articulated precisely," past participle of exprimere (see express (v.)). Also late 14c. as an adverb,

106 | P a g e

"specially, on purpose;" it also doubled as an adverb in Old French. An expresstrain (1841) originally was one that ran to a certain station. Sooo is my name written into that statute or my photo in it somewhere?

I am a man 24 hours and a driver only but 13min so i will stick with man!! U go in front of a jury to prove u are a man not a driver…i could be a driver but i am clearly a man!!

- Using the financial loss argument to restore your property from prison

“I’m sorry you like that I smoke weed, but that is property, are you going to release that weed (property) back to me? or do you have some purpose in keeping it there? Because I believe I have a superior claim to get the full benefit of my property. You claim that’s your property, did that property cause you damage? Oh it causes the tax payer damage? You let a tax payer come forth and actually show you with a bill of particulars in which that weed for some reason caused him $570 dollars of damage, and we’ll work with him through the istrative process, and compensate him on the private. Until some man comes forth, that’s my property, and I want property returned to the proper jurisdiction, or else if the property is not returned, I am incurring a financial loss.”

c.f. 1 Corinthians 7:4 “The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.”

Get the man to it to believing we broke the law, then their complaint becomes a false claim. If we want to answer this court “I require leave of court to file a claim to properly answer this claim before the court.” and he’ll hand you the criminal complaint “this is a complaint I want a claim.”

107 | P a g e

Moving your case on the common law side of the court Their case number doesn’t have any power on the paperwork Now a clerk may take your claim and place it “in” their court vs “at” you court so you have to file a notice that you are on the wrong side of the court.

Simply ask them to move it over to the claim side of the court and get it out of the complaint side of the court. If they say what do you mean by claim reply” u know personal harm claims a tres claim”

The power of a man vs a government employee Policeman have no rights they have duties. Someone can take that awy from you because it’s a privilege.. not a right… Man has right and they trump duties in our society.. so your right to travel trumps his duty to try and fine you specially with no contract!!!

Don’t rely on the constitution only refer to it.. ” not only do i agree but so does your constitution?”

If you get a ticket don’t fight the cop on the street just take it back in less than 72 hours to the prosecutor handling the case and say this is a complaint and that i a man am here to settle any claims of harm….they will say see u in court..and well you know FILE YOUR CLAIM because he says he doesn’t have that!!!! 

Only man has a right to make a claim

A simple way to win in traffic court

108 | P a g e

Sneakily evoking the common law by asking judge “does the prosecutor believe that I’ve broken the law? Do YOU believe that I’ve broken the law? That’s two claims being made here you’ve just evoked common law court of record as a man”

No injury, no case If the injured party cant appear there is no case.. they must appear and say his property has been tresspased During the al gore bush case.. he brought hang chairs…but that injured party is just a person ie county so and so and they won’t be able to show up and testify to anything because they are a legal fiction. Never argue the facts with a police officer..simply ask who did i harm?

In traffic court if you find yourself in fornt of a judge u can ask” is there any reason whys i can’t establish a case in a common law court of record and move the state prosecutor (or the county prosecutor) who is trying to prosecute a false charge of a crime that i drove to fast? Is there any reason i can’t bring him into my case?”He should answer u yes…but hopefully u didn’t wait this long to do this!!

Dealing with checkstops “I a man wish to remain silent; I consent to no searches; I require my lawyer to be present at this time” Sign for DUI stops, registration stops, checkpoints, border patrol inside the US border.

Not to be used for things like speeding . For speeding say “are you a man?” (remind him that he is liable) “are you interfering with a man’s right from going from point A to point B?”

109 | P a g e

Also write “is that your wish and order?”

Cops are taught that "shall" is future tense

Often codes and statues say Shall….because they can’t obligate man to do anything because shall is in the future…

Dealing with the DMV U ask the DMV when they issued u a ticket :”do you believe i am operating under the license at the time of the police stop on (insert date)?” When they say yes

Reply i was not operating under the license when the stop occurred. I was just moving from point A to point B in my property [my car]; did i cause anybody harm by doing such an act when they filed their case? Did anyone files a case or claim against me? Their case was filed in error because you werent operating under the license when i was as a man going form point a to point b in my property [car]; use the id a form of identification only

U can’t go after an officer …he is perfect.. u go after the man or woman

Do you believe I do wrong? someone tries to hand you a citation u say i only answer to claims..citation is not a claim. I thought i was here because someone says i do wrong? Is anybody here say i do or did wrong? Where does it say in your codes or statues that i did wrong? Wrong is a common law term. The state cant say u do wrong because we are it’s creators. U cant turn to god and tell him he is wrong because he will just laugh at you..

110 | P a g e

only another man can say u do wrong..specially with driving without a license. If u don’t have a drivers license how can u even hold me to those rules? What r u going to do take my drivers license away? I don’t have one lol?

a man can move from point a to point b then show the judge you demonstrating how u can move form point a to b in the court room and show him that one doesn’t need a license to do that.. i don’t think that hurt any body judge do you? …judge “no” …..exactly….when i was moving my car from point a to point b was i hurting anybody? Judge”that’s not the point?” reply with “ oh yes it is the point. Because if nobody is here making a claim that i did them wrong or hurt them then what am i do here? U could have hurt someone !!! Again conjecture isn’t a crime…and having a driver’s license won’t stop any harm…

Place ur own claim in and put all your question before the court in your own case file days before the trial so he knows you’re not going to be ambushing him…even at pretrial…

U ride the paperwork and don’t say a word.. they ask u question u say can any one answer the question i have placed before the court?

One day we didn’t have license now we do..codes and statutes change all the time.. so illegal is like feeling they change all the time. One shouldn’t give a rats ass about someone’s feelings …did i hurt someone or not? Not did i hurt your feeling? judges like sense of humor says karl in your writtings…

citation [sahy-tey-shuh n]  

Examples Word Origin noun 1.Military. mention of a soldier or a unit in orders, usually for gallantry:She recieved a presid ential citation.

111 | P a g e

2.any award or commendation, as for outstanding service, hard work,or devotion to duty, es pecially a formal letter or statement recountinga person's achievements. Synonyms: official praise; award; honor, laurel, reward, kudos. 3.a summons, especially to appear in court. 4.a document containing such a summons.

So if an officer is acting on some paperwork ie a warrant.. u ask him who is responsible and if he say the paper told him to do it… then you tell him that’s crazy and that he is liable for everything he is doing.. he nor i wrote that paper..the officer cant swear to anything on that paper. He is liable… what your saying to the officer is that when this is all said and done ..we are going to see that it was a ll a false claim.. and that if he is doing simple what the paper says well that wont stand as protection in the eyes of any court.. so does he really want to be involved in this possible false claim.. it now is about the individual being isolated from police buddy legal world.. you letting the loser of your future case know they will be liable when you come back and hold them to their unlawful actions…lien ‘em up

Require REQUI'RE, verb transitive [Latin requiro; re and quaero, to seek. See Query.] 1. To demand; to ask, as of right and by authority. We require a person to do a thing, and we require a thing to be done.

The government may have authority but they have no right to do it?

If you’re a citizen of them then yes.. they can’t require the man but they can require you (the man and the citizen combined) you is plural…demand the singular i

112 | P a g e

On your licence plate I would put “private” or “not for hire” they all ready have these for sale on line…

If a cop pulls you over ask him if he is giving the orders…if not ask what do they want to do next.. but if they do start ordering one around then send then a bill for services rendered.

To prove financial responsibility, we can get a state bond, put money in escrow, or just give state a cash deposit. Ask insurance company to show us how to do this. (become financially responsible in the eye of the law). Then send proof to secretary of the state (WHO DO WE SEND THIS LETTER TO IN CANADA?) representing all the people, we are then letting all the people know. Address them by their first name, do not address the title, address the man.

“How do I obtain proof of insurance? All documents except the SR-22 or FR-44 can be obtained online by visiting the policy documents sec. of our online service center. If you would rather speak to a customer service representative, please call (800) 861-8380. Also, more states are allowing digital ID cards as valid proof-of-coverage. Learn more about digital ID cards. If you are a GEICO policyholder and you know that you need an SR-22 or an FR-44 please call (877) 206-0215. If you are not sure if you need an SR-22 or FR-44 or just want to learn more, read on for everything you need to know about an SR-22/FR-44. If you haven't ed for online services yet, you can sign up now. What is proof of insurance? To help you on your way, here is an overview of the various types of documents that may be referred to as "proof of insurance:" Insurance ID Card/Insurance Card – the information that insurance ID cards contain vary by state but generally the policy number, policy effective dates, vehicles and policyholders are shown. Use this card to your vehicle or keep it in your car as proof of insurance for law enforcement. Proof of Coverage – a form which shows the vehicle, the policy effective and expiration dates, and the limits of coverage carried on the vehicle. Use this form to show your lienholder or leasing company your insurance coverage. Verification of Coverage (MD FR-19) – a form requested by Maryland as proof of insurance. Use this form when you receive a letter from your Maryland Motor Vehicle istration or a citation that requires you to provide an FR-19.

113 | P a g e

Canadian Insurance Card – Your US auto insurance card is accepted as proof of insurance while traveling in Canada as a tourist; Canadian insurance ID cards are not necessary. Learn more about visiting Canada by car. SR-22 or FR-44 (Certificate of Financial Responsibility) – a certificate mandated by the state that verifies that you have auto insurance liability coverage. Usually, it is required only for certain driving-related violations. If you need an SR-22 or FR-44, the courts or your state Motor Vehicle Department will notify you. Depending on your state of residence, the Certificate of Financial Responsibility form is referred to as either an SR-22 or an FR-44.”

Whatever code we are accused of having broken, print it and bring into court. (exhibit as their code, not ours) it to the facts (speeding etc.) but their code does not apply to us so we cannot have broken them.

. The proper use of non assumpsit - just put it in front of your signature it makes your signature invisible..you are not contracting is what is means.

ASSUMP'SIT, noun [Latin assumo.] 1. In law, a promise or undertaking, founded on a consideration. This promise may be verbal or written; An assumpsit is express or implied; express, when made in words of writing; implied, when in consequence of some benefit or consideration accruing to one person from the acts of another, the law presumes that person has promised to make compensation. In this case, the law, upon a principle of justice, implies or raises a promise, on which an action may be brought to recover the compensation. Thus if A contracts with B to build a house for him, by implication and intendment of law, A promises to pay B for the same, without any express words to that effect. 2. An action founded on a promise. When this action is brought on a debt, it is called indebitatus assumpsit which is an action on the case to recover damages for the nonpayment of a debt.

114 | P a g e

Canada requires a person/class of persons to have license/insurance, but not a man/ [wo]man.

Section 4-Taxes 16pgs

Just ask the IRS where do they get the right to make an assessment of i. ..? let see if they site some code or statute that we can blow apart ie. you making an assessment on the basis that i made a self assessment.. i didn't make any assessment!!! that is a false assessment!!! If the irs asks you how much income u made...pull a Hillary Clinton “I don't recall” [12:20 PM] easy isn't an option...:

<<< What does one do if the IRS sends a request to file package? Does one look for a man or woman in a response letter just like any other legal situation?easy isn't an option..., Today 12:20 PMyes, the very first thing is to find a man/woman to correspond with to help you settle the matter.

whos the man form kahuga county going to come forth and give me the itmeized statement of the bill. i have not yet recieved it to date but as soon as i do i will pay it all. I have yet to receive the exact charges so i can answer them difinitively… they know the rules you don’t have to expain the rules which is it better not be off by a penny because i cent of and we have fraud!! Tender me the bill and the itemized statement of the bill of particulars…

Call the man or woman who is the top dog at the agency and ask” do you believe that i owe this agency a debt?”” if so, how am i in debted to this agency? What sis they provide for me? what was the benefit i received? What was the product? what was the service? And please itemize it and give me a bill of particulars?” no man at th irs has first hand knowledge of your case because they weren’t there..hence everything the irs will say will only be

115 | P a g e

hearsay!! because no man can come forward with that claim because they don’t know how much money u made and u cant be forced to testify against myself… they are caught in a catch 22!! Again!! no man!! No claim!!

And they better not be off by one penny because (just like sSylock and his pound of flesh) or else its fraud!!

Ok folks about a month ago i posted a copy of a Notice of deficiency to the board not only for my benefit but maybe to the benefit of others if a solution can be found. well i sent the following letter in response. Greetings Layne, i, believe you are the man who sent the enclosed letter "NOTICE OF DEFICENCY". i wish to settle this matter. What do you wish from me? Kind regards Mike. I waited 10 days and recieved no response so i sent another letter inquirying if they recieved my first letter and enclosed the letter and repeated what was in the first letter. I recieved the following responses which i will post

King John sent tax collectors in to gotham...they got wise...by acting insane the tax collectors had to move on and call them...incompetent....the birth of the idiot... The trick worked, leading to the saying: "There are more fools through Gotham than remain in it." Villagers were also dubbed the Wise Men of Gotham. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-nottinghamshire-24760791

When we use the SIN # we are saying we are an employee of canada working for playstudios.

116 | P a g e

so hence canada is rightly asking for their cut we put canada in the middle of our employment

Write exempt on your tax forms!!!

First letter to the irs… is this the man or woman assigned to this case? (man on man)

Gov subcontracts to small companies to place boots on cars… so becareful going after the governor..find out who the man or woman is and ask them by what authority do you have to place a boot on my car?

Speed cameras are also subcontracted!!!

Traffic tickets, how to write to the prosecutor Sample letter to a prosecutor… i am man write to you a woman a believe sometimes acts as in the capacity of a prosecutor for (insert-place county city) to inform you that the august 3 rd 2014 activities of officer Williams Terrrroe the man that sometime acts as an agent for the vancouver police department did and does continue to be the constant source of harm injury and loss to i ; likewise your pursuit of case# 1199229292292 does cause harm injury and loss to i ; i do realize that you might not be aware of said costs and this tres against i and hope that you will reconsider your pursuit of said case….i hope to receive written notice of your intent…king regards..(we are eliminating plausible deniability)

117 | P a g e

Government exist o protect property and i don’t believe there is a man with a claim but if there is i am willing to settle up..

If the prosecutor doesn’t respond…write back…I wrote u a week ago hey this is important here is a copy of the first letter… can u please get back to me within the next 5days to let me know u received these please..and if they still after a 3 rd letter then write to the supervisor..are you the man responsible for this subordinate?

We only want to deal with a man so always flush the man or woman out into the open…only a man is liable a police officer is only a perfection on paper…

Tell the judge that u go by Tater Tot

If you have 10 days to put in a plea respond by noticing them.. that u are only going to be appearing as a man to settle any debt i owe and to answer my acc for hamr or breach of contract and if anyone acts on my behalf they assume all liability..

If you go to court ask to face your acc and can they bring them forth…the court is to take notice that this lack of response is dishonarble..

They are all actors!!! Make them say they are a man!!!

We rebut the presumptions by putting notice in to the court… sample letter…… i a man appear before this course solely as a man, without representation, without title defendant, pro se, driver, operator to give notice as follows; i am an idiot in legalese; i do not understand the customs of the legal society nor do i believe any law exist which requires man to know or understand these things; i believe the government exist to secure rights and protect property of man see exhibit a(idiot is defined extensively , everything explaining legalese the right to a trial by jury (canada charter sec. 32), where it says in the constituiont that they are their to protect rights..article 12 of the new hamshire constitution that says the same thing.. The customs of the legal society and included

118 | P a g e

If the irs has garnished your salary…this is causing me great harm as a man and i require a garnishment hearing immediately…

You cannot know the enemy, you can only know your self. If a cop pulls us over and asks for our names, we’ll say you’re the detective, you figure it out. A state cannot convict a man without a live witness in court. Man was made to serve God, in the absence of God we will still seek to serve…..other men, persons etc. Cops can’t make us do anything, they will convince us to voluntarily bring drugs out of our pocket and expose the public to danger; it’s safe on us in private (in pocket), whoever pulls it out of the pocket and into the public, is liable. I will not turn evidence against myself. If you ORDER me to take it out of my pocket, then the order giver is liable for the exposure. Cop asks for ID, I ain’t giving you anything, you’re gonna use it against me. Asking? Telling me? that’s not going to work, ORDER me. I’ll be more than glad to. I’ll do it under a direct order, not voluntarily. They want us to voluntarily enter into the 2D world. People have the right to be secure in their paper and effects.

Also the leters they present u fool u into believe its saying something else..careful “Wotburg Council” is not a man!! Don’t take orders unless it’s a man giving it to you…so you can send him a bill!! Or else your taking the 2D world and bringing it to life!! Don’t make it real make the illusion fall apart quickly!! Look for a man to give you orders so you can make him take responsibility if they are wrong!!” Intro letter to irs” Hi Mr. or Mrs IRS? How would you like me to address you:i don’t believe we have been formerly introduced, let me introduce myself, i am a man and my name is Karl and who are you again? and how do we have any business as i have no recollection?” IRS will have people look like they are testifying…ASK THE JUDGE ”is this woman testifying?”

119 | P a g e

Yes and no answers, flip court to common law, challenge jurisdiction, child

So u say who owes going to come forth from the irs to tell me an exact dollar amount that i owe? [nobody is going to come forth] ..please have someone to the exact amount down to the cent explain how i owe the irs money..? all i want is a man to come by and that the itemized bill detailing what i owe is true under oath and affirmation so i can gladly pay the bill!!!

Doesn’t matter what court you are in …”who is the man on the prosecutor side whose going to come forth and just give me an verified to be true itemized statement of the debt and show me how u arrived at that so i can get this over with and tender them a bill!! I can’t do anything until i get a bill!!! What are the exact charges so i can answer definitively ?? Because if they draw one once one drop more than i owe you and u will get u for making a false claim… but don’t threaten this or any one….

Until they answer that question they can’t proceed??

Ask them for an itemized statement of the bill so you can’t settle the debt as i want to be a honorable man send it forth with so i can settle this so there is no controversy.. They may send u the bill.. Then u ask for an itemized and they may send it.. Then ask how much did coi county have to put out? And how much is this federal grant money was reimbursed? how much did they get form the state reimbursement? Is this pure 100 % coi county tax payer money?

- Property tax, a corporation causing harm to a man

120 | P a g e

If u run a corporation you better make sure to train and monitor your subordinates..because your little monster called corporation is set loose on the public and u are responsible A corporation is created to benefit man and the slightest bit of harm and they cannot appeal when they revoke their charter for harming man..

Forget lets be reasonable its black or white..watch out for their term of art.. They are trying to color the situation..

We are not giving government an inch… or they will take a mile..

You have to give back to society!!! If u aren’t doing anything maybe property taxes might be your way to gicve back to help your localities.. how r the figherfighter going to get gas to get to your house!!!

U do not want to divulge your earnings to the irs… Look for extortion and have them put it in writing becaiuse it is communicating a threat and extortion…but for a person in their legal society it is not ..because they fall within their right to do that to them…don’t succumb they don’t have jurisdiction(authority)

- How to get the name of the man or woman working at an agency that is pursuing you

I got a lovely letter from the irs and i want to know who this man or woman is who has been assigned this case?

They answer whatever name and just confirmed it was a man or woman…!!

121 | P a g e

U get the name and write her … hey are you sue the woman that has been assigned my case?

She should say yes i am the woman ( you now have her in the capacity of a woman) But if she is smart she will say…No i am the agent who is incharge of your case.. in that case u ask her for the man or woman.

Dealing with your employer over IRS garnishment

U have an agreement with your employer for the work you do..u can stop them from sending it the irs and demand it..and if they are afraid of the irs u tell them to talk to me directly and don’t worry..if they call u tell them u don’t want to be in breach of contract with this man and be sued by this man.. it’s his property and i will give what he exactly earned..

do not redirect or relocate any of my property their will be a breach of contract..if someone wants to say i owe a debt they can come to me…

Tactic number one …makes the person confess that they are a man or woman before u get anywhere!!

They say u have been paying this tax all your life… respond with “ i am relooking at my life and realizing everything i looked at that i was doing has been wrong… so now i want to double check everything…soo what is this national insurance tax or whatever tax they are talking about…

122 | P a g e

Ask these silly agent where the law says u have to pay and if they know it have them actually read it to you…then cut it to shreds with wat u know…ie where am i expressly written into it? I am not a tax payer i am not a citizen? I am just a man… done…….

When they say “you” respond with i am not chinesse who is this YU, you speak of? Or “ there is no you as there is no more than just me singular here simple as a man”

Ask who is saying i owe them money? Who you tax revenue lady the priminister who? Whose signed this chase into existence? Chase them demand to speak to who owes you money or who says you owe…

Engaged who ever is coming at you and say u want to pay but before you do i just want to have a chat and see if i can work it out with the (irs or cra) on the private side so i can get my paperwork right with a few letter and a conversation before i cut them a cheque…

You don’t want to say no..fastest way to court!!

Talk like a man… don’t say” can u hand me a bill for what i am lawfully liable for?” Just pretend ur talking to anybody else” can u hand me a bill” Drop the lawful liable and play stupid… please send me the bill? Will not make them want to get legal with you.. keeping it simple… the irs cant send you a bill… so the next question is well then how can i know how much i owe? And who r u? …suzy? So you’re the one who is saying this is true? (god only knows what is true) she should be saying something like they say you owe? Respond with who is this they you speak of? And can u get me in with this they that says i owe them? Maybe there name so i can find them because i think they might be mistaken so i just want to clear this up?

You are trying trap them? So draw them out? play stupid?

123 | P a g e

Did you create the 1040? Do you understand the words on the form? Then why are you doing other than everyone else is doing it? It is just peer pressure…. if they want you to force you because you are completely compromised remind them they are holding a gun and you are not and that’s why you are g it and place your ” NA “ down as your signature… it’s non assumpsit… Means nothing above applies to i a man.. and let them know you put your mark down on the paper and its lawfull..take it to you legal department they will know…

There was 10 years span when there was no commissionary at the irs only an associate commissionare of the irs position because..

You go straight to the top and say who is the top dog of the irs..they should say bob smith…. Then you say i will write a letter to bob smith…. Hey bob i don’t know if you are aware of what is going.. and i am a man named robin am trying to communicate a simple letter and al i was asking was a simple question how is this “frivolous”( if the irs agent has called your process that). please get your subordinates in line regarding this simple matter and i am sure u don’t want to be wasting your time on this simple matter..can u put somebody on this case for me..thanks a lot!!

Don’t waste your time with those seasonal tax agents. .they don’t know anything!! Beside don’t u want to be talking to the top dog whenever things get silly…because they most probably will….be nice as pie when u write these letters!!

Irs is voluntary just watch senator harry reed on youtube tell you!!

Sample letter I don’t know who the united states is /IRS..i have never met him i have never touch it never saw it i never smelt it i never taste it i have no idea what it is i believe it might exist somewhere or in some dimension but i have seen it in the third dimension.where does it

124 | P a g e

exist? I don’t know but my guess is that it is in the hearts and minds of men. Can i touch it ? no. can i talk to it? No Can i see it? no …well then how can i owe it a debt? Will it come into open court and press it on the record?

if the irs disssappera it will come bacl in another form if not stronger so the best deal is to keep the irs and learn to beat them. And keep them still…don’t get ride of them just control them

does government believe it can tell u wat to do with your property?absolutely not unless u let them!!

If i create money or i create wealth and i go to work and i put green dollars in my pocket that’s my property and nobody has the right make a claim for my hard work…nobody but i alone not even a dime!! What does the irs thinks it has done for me? Has it housed me, fed me, clothed me because i only mom and dad doing that for me?i owe nothing to the irs!! Show me where it provided me a service or created a product in which it tendered me and i have yet to pay for! And i u cant then i owe the irs nothing!

If judges say there is contract obligating u in some way u ask where is that contract?is it here? Thye may say no Ask is this some code your coming after me with? They say yes you demand for the law because the thomspon cant be liable and they wont be able to produce it and if they do can thye see if your expressly written in it? Or show me the creator of that law and how they can hold me liable? Show me how he created it for my behalf? And then i will comply and consent…and tender compensation but until then cease and decist or i will hold u liable for making a false claim..

only because this is impossible thing to do 

We can only hold a man liable when he believes, so we try to get them to say.

125 | P a g e

“Do you believe I owe the debt? What do you believe BOB? Oh you do? Then put that on paper and sign it.”

“i don’t recall how mush income i made. No law requires me to know that” we don’t plan on turning states witness on ourselves. We are idiot ,,,so u at the irs tell us since ur the experts!! your relationship to the IRS in regards to common law

Do not sign the 10-40 form (tax season), it’s a confession. Go back with your “confession and avoidance” and explain to them I’m sorry I made an error I entered into a contract and I now rescind and revoke any claim upon that contract.

Understand that we are not any of these fictional entities and that they’ll have to prove jurisdiction.

“I’m just a man, and I’m looking for the regular 10-40 form that applies to man.” The first one they send us back is going to have a OMB number that can only be used to collect information for that stated purpose (having foreign earned income). Write another letter, “look I’m just a man under the common law, and I need to just get the 10-40 form that applies to I a man. Look, I don’t have any foreign income, I don’t do business in foreign banks, I don’t even leave the country. I can’t fill this out under penalty of perjury, because it has an OMB number of this on it, and that OMB number gives me the status of a foreign party. Again, I am just a man, not a foreign party, please help me. Could you send me the correct form? I am just the regular 10-40 form that only applies to I a man.”

The next one they send will say that we are an officer of the government and that I reside in the District of Columbia and that I am a corporate entity and that I am a party by that privileged entity. We write them back again “please, I have to sign this under penalty of perjury, could you please help me? I just need to have the regular 10-40 form that only applies to I a man, none of the fancy ones, I’m not a party to any of these and I have to sign this under penalty of perjury. I’m just a regular man under the common law.” 3 times the charm, and then they’ll leave us alone.

126 | P a g e

What we earn from our personal labour, if we’re not employed by the government, our money is foreign income because it’s foreign to the government.

KARL: letter from the IRS, we write back “I believe there’s no standing obligation attached to my person to comply with such orders/demands. Please show me the law.”

Stranger=foreigner in a system that doesn’t recognize man. “I’m a stranger in these parts.”

IRS is garnishing your wages through your employer

If the irs is garnishing your wages without your permission...that means ur employer is giving the irs ur money..so u can't sue the irs because they didn't do anything as its ur employer that is doing the wrong to u...tell ur employer to cease and desist or u will seek remedy..

For instance if u lend ur car to Bob and u tell Bob to give it back to u when ur done...Bob can't give ur car to the irs because u and Bob have a trust..

401 is voluntarily giving someone your money to do with it whatever they want!!!because u never placed any and conditions on it!! If u Assume it( bear all liability) if you didn’t say u expect this all back when u retire..thats assumption ..because they never said they would give it back!!it’s the IRS btw!!! 401 k is in the same title code 26 sec. 401 sub sec. K!!! YUPPP!!! Total scam!! they can and have at any ime take your money and give you any bs excuse they want and there isn’t a thing oyu can do about it..because u gave it away!! They don’t come after young folks… thye wait till mthe end and then tell you some nonsense about restructuring and there goes your money!! And u cant sue!! Because you unconditionally surrendered your money to them!!! U have no say and they don’t owe you one! It was a gamble form the beginning…its what is typically none as a ponzi scheme…con man have always existed.

127 | P a g e

Just like a casino can prey on you to take your money doesn’t mean they put a gun to your head to come in? so they aren’t liable for your loses….same with the 401k you have no recourse because none put a gun to your head!!

You would probably have to go to a trial by jury to get some help but they will have to bend the law to get you your result!!

Public IRS remedies, 401k's and other contracts

The lynch pin for the IRS bothering to put you in tax court is the assessment….( they have been known to use an istrative courts vs tax courts to get jurisdiction) without an assessment they can’t move against you civilly or criminally..one objection comes to mind… if they wanted to come in to your building the find your records and you obstructed them..but other than that they use the assessment to move against you.. so if the irs is messing with you what u want to do is find the person that did the assessment.. You do this by a freedom of information request (don’t know how this process exactly works) “who is the agent or agents that did the assessment between the years (2010-2013)?” when u get that info you write a letter to the agent and write the regular questions that expose the lie??? Not sure exactly “Can they the debt?” this set you up to do your claim against that agent…. if you have a levy or a lien by the irs on your house it came form an assessment…it didn’t happen by itself…that means someone is on the hook!! And they can’t lien or levy u up unless they have a judgement.. and if they do this, all u have to do is go to you local county court and tell them that the local county recorder’s office has a lien on you and you require an immediate hearing on this matter and u have a right to a trial!! So the irs can’t enforce it on the civil side..but the irs will retaliate and come after u criminally because the underlining assessment is still on the table… and the irs will try and come after u criminally KL “they can come after you but they cant come after i the man so just make sure you separate yourself form them by sepearting i the man form the person....ther is no you.. just i…. ask them who they are coming after? Thye will invariably use the word you to write you..well this sets you up to explain there is no you there is only i a man.. augment your process by doing another freedom of information act request to the director of the irs and ask them for a proof of claim.. what you will get back is a single page answer

128 | P a g e

“there is no proof of claim” signed by the director in blue ink…this places the magistrate in a box. but u don’t need this ultimately because u don’t care about the director of the irs’s opinion… because when u put your claim in they will not be able to bring a verifiable claim to the court and check mate!!

And don’t forget when you bring your claim you also need to place your order!!the claim is what went wrong or what stating and then the order is part two saying how u want it fixed or want you want done!!place them at the same time!!

There is an istrative way that is very powerful … In the late 90’s their was a period when the irs was being horrible..yanking people out of their car and taking their wallets..or going into old folks nursing homes and taking wedding rings off of old ladies…awful awful stuff…so what happened as a result was a new law called “ internal revenue reform and restructuring act of 1998” also know as the tax payer bill of right” the book had a lot of remedies in it.. there is a 911 form is one of these remedy and no longer can a officer do anything without the prior approval of the tax inspector general.ssoooooooooo you can also ask for another freedom of information request for the matching contract that the tax inspector general” and what u will find is when u ask they will respond with” no authority was granted” signed by the tax inspector general… 911 form carefully so read the instructions inparticular it must be filled in somewhere stating what kind of hardship this assessment will cause you..”u wont be able to pay your bills and this will cause you get harm and loss” u fill this with a tax payer advocate in your state..and the advocate has the ability to stop any and all irs functions on that matter including criminal prosecution!! 1203B allegation referral form there is a number of items (12217 allegation referral form is a form that is very serious so becareful and make sure you file it with the commissioner’s complaint department) that there for reporting malicious or fraudulent conduct by irs agents…rumours say when one of those stick it ruins the irs ‘ agents ability to retire..and its for violation of constitutional rights, it could be for threats, false assessment’s.. To make it effective is to take it to your congressman to mail it on your behalf!! They will not help you if you send it to the wrong department!! So get it correct!

Also you should cc J Russel George inspector general of the tax istration..he is responsible for watching over the improper actions of his IRS agents.. he won’t ignore u because he has been on the hot seat in fornt of congress before so he is probably going to respond to you..

129 | P a g e

So the gov. is coming after you for some sort of income tax..”when was the date of the last time you worked?” “ u reply” i can’t ? Its written on the past letter i wrote” gov official ”let’s put donw june 30” reply with” i don’t know how you could interpret that from my response?”gov official” this is just protocol we just round it up in our system when people can’t . Didn’t u right it down?” u remind her”yes i wrote it in the letter i sent u..and if i find that letter and the date is different guess who i am going to sue?” gov official “ are u going to sue the tax office?” u reply”did the tax office fill that information incorrectly?” gov official”no” u reply who do you think that i am going to sue?”gov official should meekly reply”me?”u reply” but since i have you here i ed what the letter said here are the two question on that letter..1 i see that this national tax contribution is a contribution..and when i look up the word contribution it says voluntary? So do i have to pay this if its voluntary?” gov official” well everybody has to pay there taxes?” reply with “that’s nice but who is everybody? Because that is not my name?” gov “u know u have to pay?” reply”what law or statute says i have to pay?”gov official” (starts reading code and speaking of persons)”reply” sorry to interrupt you but who is this person?”gov official” you know ..you ..we..all of us?”reply with” i don’t know about this u we talk because the last time i looke d at my birth certificate my name isn’t spelled that way. So again who are these person you are going on about and what does that have to do with me?” gov official laughing hopefully”well its actually a contribution to your main taxation” reply with” so somehow how you understand voluntary as mandatory? So that means you think its okay to go to mcdonald’s and ask for a beef burger and you instead get a horse burger..and you are okay with this?”gov official”well no” reply with” the more u talk the craier this is all starting to sound..it there anywhere where its is expressly written in there..that means is my name in their? “ gov”no” reply” so then what you are saying is that it’s just implied?” hopefully this is going to be a pleasant experience and its was a good time and in good spirit ask her” i just have one more thing to say” gov officialy” sure” reply “ i just want to wish you a great weekend” gov official should be smiling… its important to kindly help remind this officials that they are on the hook for their actions!(anyone who acts on your behalf is liable)

How to deal with getting a judges full name!! just write a letter to the judge..i require your full name and if not the reason as to why you won’t or cannot and the reasons why and please sign it!!

Tax court, and harm to a man by government

130 | P a g e

In this country you have to forgive me of my tres as you have to forgive me of my debt. U can’t cause me harm that is not your job!! You [judge] have been created for the benefit of man… and i told u that you are going to execute that judgemnet on me a man that it will cause harm to me .. The judge will say but you owe a debt to the irs… u didn’t hear what i said…i said if you execute your judgement it will hurt i a man…(the two aren’t related..they are separate things…. He could ask you to be a slave to them and work it off? But he has decided that the house should be taken to settle the bill.. well ur saying fine i owe the irs …but the house is another issue completely that the judge is creating an judgement that will harm man and he cant… he can judge that i owe adebt..but the judgement cant hurt man because he was created for man’s benefit!!! how is the united states of America or the irs going to be harmed if i don’t take my house away from me? How is it a benefit for them? They are a fictional entity? How can they be changed by my house? They wont be affect in the least? But i will be harmed if you take my house! It doesn’t have arms it doesn’t have legs….it cannot possess it!!

everyone in america pays taxes! A judge my shout out… reply with so native American on reservations, the Eskimos in the arctic circle? everyone form the north pole to the south pole? Cuba are in America as well? Do they pay taxes? he may reply “you know what i mean?” u reply”no i don’t? u judge are implying things and u know very well that you need to be expressed not implied. For good law to be good it must be exact! If you’re going open your mouth in this court you better be dead on” ur going to judge me and you don’t know where the Americas lie…u better get someone else in here before someone gets hurt… specially me!!

The irs doesn’t intimidate…its employees do that…note the difference…if u say the irs intimidates, u are bringing it into existence so don’t!! the irs is just 3 letters on a piece of paper..nothing more…

131 | P a g e

If you’re dealing with the irs u should be in tax court not anywhere else??!!

Prosecutor will name call to draw u in like TAX PROTESTOR ..reply with i think everyone should pay their taxes!! Because if you believe you owe taxes u better pay them!!

U can basically take any judgement in a tax court and flip it saying it’s a completely biased court.. if the irs wanted to it could go to a regular mom and pop court and file a claim and that way i could face and question my acc… they don’t and want you to play in there court with there rules where you have no rights! How fair is that? a jury will eat that up! Tell the jury to find in your favour and if the irs want to face a man to go to a regular court like everyone else and file a claim!! U don’t bring over to your state your file it in my county… you don’t move me to you court? U think it’s fair to have the united states vs bob in a united states court? Is there not a more neutral place than that? like a county court local to me? If they are right they will have judgment in 21 days? I’d urge the jury to tell the United States of America to file in a regular claim court like everybody else has too!! Ask for a trial in another countries courts because the clear conflict of interest that a unite states of america court would have ruling over itself in a united states of america case? Judges recuse themselves for less!!! ask for a change of venue and to take their case to your local county court house!!where my neighbourghs and my peers can judge me!! Just like everybody else!! When u sue someone u have to go to their county and file…so that a jury of their peers can judge them(fro their hood) This is the reason why u need to know the rules of the game being played in the neighborhood your in!! In their courts their rules are designed for them to win…you can’t speak, you can’t ask questions, you cant bring in exhibit…its like asking mommy…she can deny or help at her whim!! “mommy the clock say 7 30” mom reply”i don’t care i say its 9 o clock and i make the rules so if you don’t like the rules i will hold u in contemp of court and take your house and everything in the piggy bank!! And u r going to wish u played by mommy’s rules!!” that is the parallel!! “if the judgment from the irs court is granted by this court and this court executes the judgment and grants them the order and their wish to seize my house, a man will be harmed” This is mafia logic…because i owe u a debt i can break your arm!!! This ‘aint right!!! If a judge thinks this is okay u go banana’s!! because that is an outrage because thia is what the Gambino do to you when u owe them a debt is to harm someone..government (judges)was create by man (us)to protect man and his property(zero not a little not a bit zero not one hair not one drop of blood)!!! How is this any different for the government to walk in with their guns just like the mafia and take whats they want and have no consideration of me,,

132 | P a g e

just because i owe them $5!!? I owe them some piece of paper that not even back by gold or silver?? How is that fair and just!!?? How is that okay to cause me harm!! It is not okay to harm any many not matter what but specially for a debt!!! It’s insane and obscene!! An ing error is no reason to do man harm!! The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA cannot show damages if u don’t give them a house!!! But a man can!! And u must show the harm, the wrong before one has a legitimate case before the court!! There is no damage to the fictional entity!! They will be fine tomorrow and the day after!! They are a 2dimensional piece of paper..nothing will happen to the USA or the IRS!! Because they are just 2 dimensional concepts!! “but everyone has to pay their fair share” : “but that is no excuse to harm man” Like when a girl says stop ..u have to stop or you’re going to jail for harming her… the same rule applies here..u need to stop or this is going to harm a man!! Stop means stop!!!

If you think that just because you are shielded or clocked with a badge or that black robe or some uniform and think u can cause harm to man because of that.. well that is obscene!! That is not why we placed u in that position and function in society” u better have a darn good reason for harming another man!!maybe u were saving the life or harm of a another man!! And it better not be over a debt!!! If i lend someone $20 i cant break his legs for it when he cant pay!! In fact the question as to why i lent that money if i couldn’t afford to lose it? U cant just go over there and demand their house now and break their legs!! It’s obscene!! Even if everyone is paying their fair share, that doesn’t give them the right to break your legs? Society may turns its back to us but not break our legs!! So if u want to shut me out form services like welfare and that fine but u can’t overtly hurt me!!!

Don’t make any deals with the devil because he has every trick up his sleave…the irs will not stop coming after you.. they will use every opportunity to take you home with paperwork!!

If u do anything they ask u to do!!! Because that is instant u are submitting to their request they have jurisdiction!! Don’t surrender no matter what!! Die if u have to before u do anything they ask u to do!!! Not one!!! I WILL NEVER SUBMIT TO YOUR JURISDICTION OR ORDERS, EVER!!!I WILL NEVER SHOW THE WORLD THAT I OBEY YOU, PETETION YOU A

133 | P a g e

PUBLIC SERVANT,,,YOU WORK FOR ME!!! I PETITION ONLY GOD FOR MY RELIEF!! I don’t pray to judges!!

U can send my kids fingers in a box..i am not going to comply!! It will never happen!!

Will Karl was trying to gain possession of his kid he made sure that it happened in another state.. so he had his kid flown out of the state because he had a feeling they would try to plant something on him like 20 lbs. of meth and try and put him in jail for 20 years!!

3 of the last 4 governors of Alabama are in federal prison!!! Know who you are up against!!

Intercourse with the devil/government is dangerous AVOID AT ALL COST!!NO DEALS!!! NO DEALS!!THEY ARE NOT HONORABLE!!!

In tax court the irs doesn’t have to give disclosure!!

But in united states district court under federal procedures the irs has to (as a plaintiff or defendant ) give full disclosure and have all the question he wants answered answered!! If they don’t testify they are going to get sanctions and eventually all their testimony will become irrelevant!! And when irs fail to answer your questions its costing you $1000 a day because its holding up your ability to create a defense for yourself!!! And u really need answer so that you can have your right to a fair and speedy trial!! if i was being evasive with answer then the irs could have all my computers seized to get what they needed…so u ask that all their computer be seized so u can get the answers you seek!! U simply say u want to see if they’re doing this to anybody else, for the greater good of society i want to see who else they may be doing this to!! This can help all the other people who are being maliciously prosecuted by the irs!!I want all their records of everyone

134 | P a g e

who had their house taken by the irs to make sure this didn’t happen to them too! I want to see their case files to see if this is systemic or a pattern or racketeering!!!! the plaintiff is the united states of America( because they are going to be forced to go to district court and pursue you their) so that means you get to ask the united states of America question!! How are they going to answer? So one gets to find out who speaks for America?? Barack Obama?? What man answer’s to that name?? because some man is responsible for coke cola!! So man man will have to answer for the united states of America!!? (very interesting to see who will answer for America in that case)

Does the United States of America have the right to harm to a man if they simply owe a debt? They can’t bring up any contract like the constitution because our names cannot be found on it means the contract is implied not expressed!!It is simple being implied that i am an American/Canadian not expressed… and it must be expressed to be good law! The united states is bound by a piece of paper..the constitution…A MAN IS NOT!!! So where is it written that the creation [the united states of America] has the right to hurt its creator [man] and still be allowed to exist?? Frankenstein had no court no jury and was destroyed immediately when it harmed man!! The land, the people rose up and destroyed the creature!!the creature has no right to complain because it harmed man!!!\

Government can carry on doing what they do but thye better get my consent before they do!!! Let them have the persons of this society for god has no respect for them, then why we should!!

The IRS

First letter to the irs “hi suzy, my name is bob how can i help you?”

135 | P a g e

“hi bob, i’m ing you because u owe money” “hi suzy, how much do you believe i owe?” “hi bob, I don’t believe you owe the irs does” “i apologize i am not sure how i owe mr. or mrs. irs any money?” watch what they ask you to make cheque to non existent US TREASURY ….department of us treasury…i think the department of treasury is trying to dodge liability? KL believes the irs is just trying to slow down our massive economic force by either burning your cheques or blowing up bomb trying to keep us down… We never ask where the money goes that i sent the irs last year? What national debt? Where is this ? where did we borrow this from?(i did and that’s why the lack of ability stops me from paying my property tax and i don’t care that they bundle the firefighters in there because it is either they are going to take it and be able or they aren’t getting one cent of mine)

Only god knows what’s true. If man created it (the irs) then it fake because we don’t know what’s true we are just guessing. Unless god makes it, it’s fraud …..because we don’t know what is true?

In good law there are no synonims….it Karl Lentz not Karl Rudolf Lentz his father…it is exact or it is not..

If one doesn’t believe in god this law stuff won’t work….the courts only fear god ..why else are they behaving?

Where’s the law that says I a man have to confess and tell you everything I did? Where’s it say that I a man have to take pen and paper and confess all money I made this year? I didn’t say CITIZEN, I didn’t say TAXPAYER, I said MAN.

Man is my title given to me by God, you, tax collector, have a tittle granted to you by some other public servant.

136 | P a g e

Let.me.see.the.man. IRS? Bank? Where’s the man who’s surety for the bank? Who has a claim against me? “Are you saying that the man has to be surety for his claim, but the bank doesn’t have to show up for their claim? That I a man is surety for my claim but no one is surety for the bank? We have to have equal footing here, it’s gotta be fair judge.”

Just tell the IRS agent who is assessing us, that “I need your signature on this that says I owe this amount, I’ll be glad to pay it. if you’re wrong I’ll need to hold you liable.”

If someone is demanding of our property (making a claim), they must be demanding it by rights. So we ask “who has that right?” nobody can do it unless they have the right to.

If they show us our statute? Cool, I’m going to need a man to sign on paper that the statute applies to me, in case they’re wrong, I can hold a man liable.

(don’t say/write, but this is what we’ll do: “If I believe the claim be true, I’ll be glad to pay the amount owed; if I believe the claim to be in error, I’ll be glad to take that man or woman who signed for it into a common law court to your claim in front of a jury.”)

I’m not going to stand here and listen to complaints all day, but I love settling claims, I will answer all claims tendered to my person.

If the irs says you are a citizen what does that have to do with one receives stressfull letter form the irs? What does that have to do with me driving with a drivers license? Because at the end they will never be able to producer the acc..(the state) because they aren’t going to appear and testify that i got a citizenship or social security? No they wont be able to testify and neither can their attorney is court” because the plaintiff must appear!! Lawyers can’t testify whether i have a citizenship card or if i rescinded or revoked it!! At your common law court of record don’t answer any questions about tax returns or citizenship and ask if this decision can be appealed, then this decision is not operating under the common law which is unappealable ..u bob(judge) have to protect my right because your oath of office says u must protect said right if i evoke said right the by way of your constitution article 7

137 | P a g e

Citizen is like saying u work for the usa…do you? I do not… So is the irs asking? Or just some agent?? Well if there is no irs then why would i need to answer any questions?let them answer your questions first before u go incriminating yourself… let tehm go first in this little game.. u win because u the nature of a common law court… as they must appear and they cant… so if they cant make u answer in court to those questions then why answer those question outside of court??

If any man has rightful claim to my property let him come to a common law court of record and state his or her case in front of the 12 judges, and maybe they will find for that man… and attorneys can’t testify on their behalf. When standing before the judge ask u “ r u represented” reply with “no, i am here to present my case to the court. I have been aggrieved and i am here to request form the court to create a constructive trust” this is to take all the money between the two and hold it in trust” The judge will say they understand. The lawyers are next in the introductions and then its ones turn again ; tell them your side of the story… and then its their turn and when they go stop the lawyers from talking as they don’t have first hand knowledge of the relationship so they have no say in this man on man case

Dealing with the IRS, and understanding courts of record Say the irs is writing you letter saying they made some assessment You write back “notice i believe you are doing is extortion and i also believe this is fraud . u are trying to claim i owe a debt which i do not believe i owe. Until some man or woman is going to come into court and swear under oath or affirmation in an open court that i owe this debt, ase i will work a settlement with that man.. but until that time i believe you are trying to commit extortion and i also believe what u are doing is fraud and if you don’t cease and desist immediately, i am going to submit a case against you in a common law court of record, because you ae causing me stress. Now if i continue to get letters form you in the mail i a going to charge you $10,000 per letter for compensation for the stress of dealing with each letter, as i see this as harm to me as a man..because you don’t have a lawful claim to my property. THE BIGGEST WORD IN LAW IS WRONG USE IT!!

How to respond to a letter from the IRS

Kl ” it( the IRS) can’t send you anything only a man or woman can.” Is there a signature on the letter from the irs?

138 | P a g e

If not u need to find out who wrote this IRS letter and who is liable for sending it to you? Someone has to make themselves known to me? Because the irs is’nt real? Establish this by stating in earlier letters that you don’t even know if the irs is a man or woman because u never met no IRS remind me of how we know each other please and thx u When the irs asks you to file you don’t give them answer that show your understanding of them at all..come off like an idiot who doesn’t understand or else you are in danger of bringing them to life.. don’t make them real.. you are here to expose the fact that no man or woman is going to show up at the end.. so from the beginning you are trying set that up for the end the jury or the man in the black robe.

Even if you think that u wrote the irs u have to stop and realize u didn’t write to a man or woman… so no u have never written anything to the irs so ignore those past letters.. start a new line of thinking and chant to yourself THE IRS DOES’NT EXIST and repeat till it sticks!!

If someone named bob sue sent u a letter that you own them money and have to file with them.. the first thing you would do is write them back asking them if they are a man or a woman and to remind you how they have any business dealings together. For the life of me your name escapes me. please let me know as soon as possible. Thank you

The IRS does not take you to court

It’s the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA that takes you to court as the plaintiff. The irs works for them and then they report you to them. U invite them to tax federal court is what gets us in trouble…we need to invite them to our court…

Who's the petitioner? In an IRS case we are generally the petitioner. We file the paperwork, that places us as the plaintiff moving the case. The IRS is defending itself against us, IRS is the defendant. Proof of burden is thus on us.

139 | P a g e

Failing to file, and irreparable damages many times irs charges people with failing to file…one must challenge the words ambiguity..what is filing? How is putting pen on paper considered filing? Ask the irs What does failure to file mean? I failed to file my nails on the deck of my boat? What did i fail to file? Am i supposed to go to the irs in the flesh and physically file this in a cabinet? If there is more than one way to interpret that statute it is ambiguous and that mean that it does not stand true. Did government ask u to file ever? They want you write a confession! Don’t turn states witness on yourself..none can force u too. if a judge wants to give you an order tell him you conditionally accept upon a half of front deposit for the cost of how much you want to charge for filling the form how long it may take(time can’t be restored once it is spent), and the judge bears all liability as you don’t know the tax code.

Don’t file…. I think…but what if the irs is holding your money how do you get that back?

Property tax Ask any state after us for property tax to define property, and then define tax, and what is property taxes? And how am I expressly written into that code? Show me.

It’s something that says I have to pay property taxes that sounds ridiculous.

When I say to people is you’re saying I don’t own something? You believe you’re letting me borrow it? lease it? rent it? is that what you believe a tax is?

140 | P a g e

My belief in property is it’s exclusive to me and nobody else within society can make a claim for it. my belief in what property is is obviously not what your belief in property is.

Hi bob Can you please define the word property and the word tax. Are you saying there’s some sort of a code between you and I that I owe you some money? So we buy a piece of land and the government wants to tax us for putting a castle on it. We write them a simple letter. What’s the value of the vacant lot beside mine? Why do you believe you have rights to the equity I put on my land? What makes you believe you can get something from me? technically someone built the roads, technically someone cut the trees, but they’ve all been paid already. That’s like saying I owe a debt to colombus for discovering America. How does the county believe they have a claim to my sweat equity? No one who built those roads were slaves, they all got compensated, there’s no more debt anyone can say I still owe to him. Look if I built a car, and I sell it to you for 20k, I can’t keep laying claim to that car after I’ve been paid. Because I’ve already been compensated. There is no more debt owed to me.

In court if the IRS’ council asks us this question in front of the judge: “is this paycheck here in your bank not considered income?”, do we answer with a question? (since 3sec silence is considered an answer). We say “None of that is income.” (income is for employees of the state/nation, since we are not employed by the state/nation, we have zero income). WE DON’T TESTIFY AGAINST OURSELVES>>>ASK THEM SINCE THEY ARE THE DECTECTIVES DON’T ASK ME FOR A CONFESSION!!!

Income tax is based on a confession The irs is only looking for you to confess, it is a completely voluntary system….if you don’t believe it, then it can’t be true….and if you don’t believe it’s true there isn’t anybody else who can hold you to anything else… If they are asking for a plea deal ask who are they offering the plea to ..i the man or the defendant? Because the state has the authority and jurisdiction over the tax payer hence they can offer them a plea but not a man.

Income tax

141 | P a g e

Income tax is whatever you believe it is.. the irs cannot say what is income only i the man can what I say is income…..it’s what u believe is income define how much income tax u pay..hence if u believe you made income then you have to pay income tax.. u say u have no income then they have to prove differently…. no one can anything and u keep your mouth shut and win. Even when they pull up your bank and point to the deposits.. you stay silent as you don’t have to turn state witness on yourself… “I am not here to confess anything” who says I do wrong? because there are 6 or 7 different forms of ways money gets into your ..they can’t tell what is what, so they need you to confess to what is income.” ask them back if they believe it’s income? they will it ”they have no idea what your income is” they want you to tell them….. don’t confess…

One shouldn’t be interested in how their codes define income… be an idiot.. no law compel me to understand it.. is there a law that says I have to believe you beliefs? No i don’t think so…

now with the irs since they are the plaintiff they have to tell him the nature of his wrong in detail. The IRS cannot say to a man that they did wrong In writing “who is making a claim, not in the past, right now that i do wrong?” If they respond ” yes we claim that you do wrong” . reply with”which of the you are you talking about? Are you talking about “i” the man is doing wrong or i the tax payer is doing wrong? Or i the person filling out the 1040 form? Who are you claiming did the wrong? tax filer or the man? You separate yourself form the person and have the irs state who they are going after..

Section 5- Government taking your kids and divorce and family court child and divorce 15pgs

- Using community based organizations as protection from the government

142 | P a g e

Get ur kid baptized if ur an “ungodly man or woman” and then ask the catholic church for it’s help!! Go to your Mormon if your Mormon. Jew if your jew. Islamic go to Islamic people…Your people!!

Centralized government is trying to move you away from the church!! The church is one of your remedies!!

Never file an injuctionin court!! Because the moment u show up is the moment they will arrest u and emand the baby or the wont let u go…and the injunction could take 6 years before they get to it… never do an injunction!!! Karl says whatever the government tells u to do ..simple rule..always do the opposite!!

When they come for your kids and u tell them to get a warrant and they say they are going to get a warrant…u have 15 min to get out of there and find a place to hide your child fast!! Leave the state or pronvince fast and file your claim from the outside.. fighting florida in florida is insane!! Careful!! When it comes to your kids!!

Say they take your kid and say they want child …simply ask for them to put it in the form of an order and i will pay everything i owe and watch how no man will come forward when u call their bluff….

U can pay any bill because all worth comes from man…his labour can pay the bill if they accept it as payment but right now they only want cash and we are only able to pay with sweat equity..offer to work for them..

143 | P a g e

The mere fact that i am a man means that i am great worth and value..i will perform to compensate you but it will not be with federal reserve notes…what service may i provide with my hands…what service can i provide you? I cannot provide u a promissory note which sounds ridiculous to pay when i can give you the man. The world does not know wealth until he pulls it out of the ground… man is the one who creates the wealth for the world… the world is just the world the moon is just the moon but unitl man shows up there is no wealth.. man creates the wealth… how may i serve you in lieu of federal reserve notes that transfer from my hand which i have a limited liability…because if they federal reserve decides to shut down tomorrow and stops printing money how can i then tender payment?

To be in lieu of something is to replace it or substitute for it. A restaurant that's run out of clams might serve French onion soup in lieu of chowder. The word lieu originally comes from the Latin locus, meaning"place," and its meaning has stayed true to its origins ever since.

U tell them u accept the debt u just want to tender them many offers of service in lieu of federal reserve promissory notes..

How a letter would go

Put your address and their address Dear mike -----,

As the man also known as the secretary of department of children and families; this woman Samantha------- has tresed and continues to tres upon my property; i a man robin Laurence Mitchell require of you to train, supervise discipline and monitor your subordinates.. sign your name in blue ink and thumbprint

If this is my trial then i will do as i wish and let the jury be the judge of the manner in which i conduct myself not you… are u going to tell me that this is my glass of water and you are going to tell me you have jurisdiction over it and you are going to tell me you are going to gain jurisdiction over me and tell me how fast i can drink it?

144 | P a g e

If you are controlling this case judge it miust be the judge trial then!!!so you carry all liability… because u wont let me do what i want this must be your trial so that means again he bears full liability.. if it my trial i can do what i want to defend myself the fact that u wont let me clearly shows me it is your trial..so icant be my property if you are putting all these and conditions on it!!! That iain tmine..its yours judge.

It is mothers property but dad has a vested interest in it…[child] she put the physical labour but he has an interest in it because he house and fed her..

1

if you give it back we can forgive this tres

2

If u don’t give it back this is what we are going to do to you. A dollar a minute for a every second

3

Then give them the order

312 - Understanding your power in court when it's your case vs. when it's not your case

In their courts and rules you can only request not require..because i judges can deny you any question and every answer can be yes and no … In law, interrogatories (also known as requests for further information) are a formal set of written questions propounded by one litigant and required to be answered by an adversary, in order to clarify matters of fact and help to determine in advance what facts will be presented at any trial in the case.

If the irs ask question like did u make money last year u can answer yes and no during their interrogatories…ie the reason being it depends on what they consider money and the never ask that question!!

How much money? Respond that “I don’t know?” so as not to make a confession.. If they want to be specific about everything they would really have to spell it out and they cant because it is too much detail for a question!!

145 | P a g e

S trick==== trick them into giving them their cell number send the picture of the child to fulfill their desire to see the child via email.. u see with your eyes not your hands so whne they don’t leave as thye promise they would after seeing the child you say u are not dealing with them any more as they can’t keep their word and they are dishonorable people… To touch they baby you are going to have to be indemnified, bonded ( makes sure through the bank or a financial advisor that there is something actually attached to it, ensure it’s legitimate funds are there and make sure it is in safe keeping in escort or priest)…a to the maximum that i believe is going to be fair to secure and protect my property from any physical damage you could do to it and background checks because we don’t just let anybody touch our property. Just like if we had a ming vase!!! We would act no less with any other property of i.. who is going to pay if you trip and fall and hurt my property and they are in a wheelchair for the rest of their life??? That is why we need to be protected in that manner… i don’t want to sue you in your courts with your prosecutor and judges and all your friends that runs the state system. Once s discovers it will cost one penny to get the bond or anything else they will leave you alone….to many persons willing to give up their babies out there…)

They don’t know how much it cost you to go get a new driver’s licence so you say give me $300 to hold for that drivers licence because that is what u believe it would cost to replace it… U can see it for free with your eyes but u cant touch my license any other way..u can see my baby from the window in the public commons but they are not allowed to come in to your private property… and that’s all….!!!

in·dem·ni·fy verb past tense: indemnified; past participle: indemnified 1 compensate (someone) for harm or loss. "the amount of insurance that may be carried to indemnify the owner in the event of a loss" o secure (someone) against legal responsibility for their actions. "the newspaper could not be forced to indemnify the city for personal-injury liability"

Write to the top dog like a governor an expect to be ed on to some one else more specific like a director of S

146 | P a g e

See is different than viually inspect…so trick them into using the word “see”!

If you get a letter back from say a governor or someone high up saying something to the effect like we cant do anything for you and if u don’t like it “you should file for an injunction through the courts”…Brilliant attach this letter to your claim of tres and say not only do i believe so does the director of so and so…..

If a s worker wanta anything form you like a note from a loved on saying your fit and they will give you you child back ( reply with the children/ my property isn’t yours to give..we don’t negociate with terrorist) … don’t comply because they are looking for jurisdiction… how can a public servant require of the master public anything? And if it is a man trying to order me i want just compensation and i will not do it because of any threat.. so if they tell me to blink And u will return my child i still wont blink even if i have to staple my eyes shut and never blink for the rest of life..even if it means my life depends on it.. i wont.. Today they ask for one thing tomorrow you are going to want more crap..put your foot down right up front…

S takes your newborn property from the hospital, dependency hearing

If someone takes your kids make it a public record by going to police station and making a complaint.. don’t say anything about a child..just say your property has been stolen form you and if the ask for a description..u say 2 days old 8 lbs 5 ounces… but never your son or child in the report..just property… i u require the emmdiate restoration of property….(u don’t know anything about how the crime was done all u have is hearsay of who may have done it) they may something at the station like “we can’t file this complaint” reply” we cant but “i” can, there is no “we”

147 | P a g e

reply…i am going to write the complaint and i am going to hand it to you and you are going to file it… and then you are going to report it to the proper authorities.. it you’re going to take it go through the proper chain of command ; then the prosecutor; and then the prosecutor is going to determine whether or not thye are going to take the case and move it.sooo take this up the food chain please…

U file a compliant (do it local to where the crime happened) because u didn’t actually see them take your kid..u don’t actually know who did it… But if u actually saw them take your kid you can file a claim and point the man out in a man on man situation..

If S has one kid as is now looking to take your other kid..absolutely hide your property/child with others even the catholic church can help u find home and even medical help.but only the nun’s as the priest are usually drunk by 5…the catholic church is thee biggest helper in world on those matters…(also the jehovaw witness and salvation army) and the state cant do a thing about it!!! The church power!! U can abandon the child with the catholic and they will return it to you whether its 10 years or 10 days no questions asked..dont ever try that with the state.. but family first if possible….

when they ask u where this baby is say u don’t know? if i had 3 dogs and 4 cats don’t expect me to tell you where they are at, at all times..those animals are my property..dont u worry about it..is this your property? Do you even know what property means? And if so do worry about my property i will..is it state property? No…Is it your property? No.. so go to hell and stop knocking on my door asking me question about my property!! I wish to be let alone and u are now tresing .. go..

generally 72 hours after they take your kid they give you a dependency hearing… there is where you will say your child is only dependent on mother and it’s your property and i require the immediate restoration of property….is anybody making a claim that i do wrong? If not then they have no jurisdiction…no claim no jurisdiction.. don’t let them correct u that it is your child…u say no its my property because i create it!! Does the sate believe it has some interest in my property? So no man or woman has claim over it and certainly no creation of man called the s can make a claim for my property…I AM THE CREATOR…if you, man acting as a judge, know where my kid is and it isn’t returned i will surely hold you

148 | P a g e

liable.. and as a judge you are a mandated reporter and i have just report a crime u have a duty and obligation to report this to the sheriffs department and the local prosecuting attourney that you heard form a mom that there is a crime commited.. PUT IT ALL IN WRITING AND TRY AND GET IT NOTARIZED OUT SIDE OF THE COURT HOUSE BUT PREFERABLY TIMESTAMP PAPERWORK AT THE COURTHOUSE IF U GET DENIED (SOME EXCUSE ABOUT YOU NOT BEING AN ATTOURNEY) THE NOTARIZATED DOCUMENT WILL STILL HAVE A LEGIT TIME AND DATE FOR THE STATEMENTS. Keep the original and you copy there’s and sign your document in blue ink so the color copy can pick up the difference..thejudge will know what u are doing with this.. just write the word COPY at the bottom of the page and keep the original…

If s wants to see your kid and they will leave u alone them for their cell phone number and take a picture and send it to her…u see with your eyes not your hands..

If they threaten to kick in the door say they are now communicating a threat… If they say if u don’t open the door they will kick it in” they are now extorting you..

Before the police officer come in they need a warrant signe plus u need a bond in case u preak anything in the house and they need insurance that keep them safe in your house making sure they don’t get hurt in your house making u liable.. and all of this must be cleared and bonds secured away from the situationnbefore they can come in…

I don’t think a single s agent is going to have all those things!!!

The cops are asking you if you are saying NO..u respond that u would love for them to come in under those conditions only.. never say NO!!

Cops:you don’t want to work with us? U: i want to work with you but it seems you don’t want to work with me…(flip it around)

149 | P a g e

Don’t let them leave with you saying no because u are cooperating under your … you are simply making it impossible for them to do their evil work of taking you or your children..

And if they get all of that in order you make some rules ..no shoes..no guns…no robbery..and you leave after you get what they want….

I follow court house rules take of your hat, stand and bow …well now your in my house…

Resolving child issues

How it works with lawyers whenever u put something into the court your attorney writes it up for you and you sign it….

It’s not about getting out of paying child ..it is a matter of control over your life and property and not to place it in the decision making hands of some strange man or woman acting as a judge for you!

Its common law that the girl typically stays with the mother until the age of 14 and then the parents share custody 50/50… boys on the other hand after the age of 5 its 50/50 custody....

The family court system is their to the family law system comprised of counselors, therapist…etc…

Typically one party acc the other so that they can throw in a 3 rd party guardian ad litem and then your are really entangled in the system!!

150 | P a g e

A Guardian ad litem (GAL) is a person the court appoints to represent the best interests of a child in a divorce or parental rights and responsibilities case.

In Ontario the law reads that if you are the child parent and u spend less than 40% of the time with the child then your child should be adjusted accordingly…

Try to settle with your spouse out of court… use a parent or impartial party u can agree on… or let the lawyers bill you to death!!and the gov in your childs life… besides the spouse will look bad when they aren’t playing ball. And more importantly if both parents are sying they are bad parents the state will jump in and snatch your kids ..so someone has to remain honorable….let it be you!

Make sure you place a little safety clause when dealing with your attorney make sure you sign “without prejudice” If u have a contract or have a contract make sure it reads or have it rewritten to say that he agrees that all times he is protecting your rights as a man.

Who ever issued the warrant is liable for it..that is why your child is your issue..u are liable.. a judge does it issue the warrant a man or woman and then you find out the man issued. Special on your home which is your jurisdiction. So they better have that bond..

They will throw judges under the bus

Anybody getting in the way of u raising u child is a third party interloper..because this is private not public..and if u have an existing contract/parenting plan just say i do not wish to live another that contract anymore as i see no more benefit thank you.. so at this time i am

151 | P a g e

not under a licence and i am not under any contract with any public entity…this is private..what my kid does with me is private and none of your concern..

Learn to attain domestic tranquility but under how to keep government at bay…or else

My ancestor that lived in mud huts didn’t need parenting plans!!! No do i!!

If someone give u a order to stay away form your children just accept it and say i am going to demand compensation $1000 dolllars a minute ..send them a bill after complying one day…they will drop that order so fast..

If your government has taken your children just know they are protecting man property so make a claim for it…they [government] can’t make a claim because they got no arms to do so!!!

Even if they adopted your kid and its been 3 years… get your property back and ask how much it cost to maintain it and ask them to tender a bill to you… it might be for $17,000 or whatever figure, u say fine i will pay this but it may take a while as i can only pay ----- a month and they better accept or u know what!!!

Karl explains what's going on with his Alabama case

The united states district court only has the authority to hear civil rights complaints.. on pacer it is list as a civil rights complaint 440..

152 | P a g e

They may choose to convert your claim(360) into a complaint (440) tell them they have tresed on your case that they cannot convert a man claim into a complaint tell the judge you will hold them personally liable if they continue…also let the clrk no to let your case stand until u are ready to move it..u don’t have the capacity and you don’t have the right u tell them to dismiss that case because i am not going to move a civil rights complaint; im not doing it for my benefit and i am not doing it for your benefit; I require u to dismiss this case now …..

i as a man have no civil rights!!! I have rights given to me by god not some civil society!! I wish to have no civil rights!!!they are a burden not a benefit in this occasion!! If i had civil rights i would have duties and obligations to that society!! The only people i have duties and obligations to is my family and god!! And that is enough burden for me!!

When the united states of America bring u into their courts they exercise the article sec. 18 “what ever is deemed necessary and proper to maintain the order of government!!! That’s why you don’t go into there court you go in to your court at this public court house building!!!

Bounty hunters are like the highest law in the land. If you have done wrong!!! Dean Clifford got drag from one province to another to answer an arrest warrant… bounty hunters will lie to find you.. they may things like u robbed a bank ..that is the clue if it a bank robbery its federal crime because its FDIC and that would get the us marshal to hunt you down..

Karl is doing this so he can actually get his case have us stand behind him…because he doesn’t trust what Alabama will do because he is suing them for a lot of money!! He doesn’t want to die!!

If u have an incident where u called cops to ur house because of an altercation and your buddy is beligerent to a cop because they were out of their mind. U basically opened Pandora box.u see in public the cops are hired to maintain order...and that gives them jurisdiction to handle u..but at home u have a foreign domestic. Cops know this is the most dangerous call to go into because of the nature of someone being king of there own

153 | P a g e

castle..so they expect a man to fight real hard then... so it's not surprising to any cop... make sure u stay in honor a offer to pay for the dry cleaning bill.. U can go in a represent ur friend as a next friend.. Write a letter...I did not have my full mental faculties and I assume liability for the matter and if I did cause harm to a man can u please tender me a bill so I can settle a debt. Next time hire a private security firm to handle (like brinks) instead of involving the public or use of public funds for silly matters...u can sign up for a year..this is a nice gesture for the courts to see.. If there is a warrant for ur arrest because u were in a insane asylum. ..all u do is voluntarily turn urself an explain ur solid reason for why jurisdiction weren't there and they should just reschedule ur court date..When police enter ur home they r challenging ur jurisdiction do they should expect resistance r...it's understandable.. And cops should expect it. But no matter wat if u cause damage ur responsible... Man up to your liabilities. ..it doesn't matter that u were under the influence of alcohol. .know one told u to get drunk.. Ur responsible. .. When ur in ur home you're home under your domestic authority. In public depending where ur at the custom may not permit toplessness. ..go to community like San Francisco if u want to do that. The community has the right to say as a whole how they want to behave and hire cops to say this is our territory...the public is saying this area is under there domestic authority... Look at Blackstone commentary and black law 4th edition for domestic authority doctrine

Restore property (kids) from other parent, notice in newspaper, accepting titles I wish for my case to be sealed until I put it before a jury. Until then this case is to be remain sealed, so no one can tres on it. don’t give me any opinions, don’t try my suit on before the jury trial. Make sure we have our own case so we have our own standing, don’t expect respect in their case just like we respect no persons in our court.

- Wish for the government to restore property (kids) if based on a contract Alabama code says “anytime the parent(s) wish for their child to be returned because the child was taken based upon a contract (they usually are), the children must be returned immediately”.

154 | P a g e

Because anytime a man wants to back out of a contract with the government, he can. A man can’t be a slave to the government. Anytime he wishes for the restoration of his property from the government, he can. The code says do not offer the parents contracts and do not hesitate to restore, if they do, the parents should take the agents to court immediately.

Can we use restoration of property to get back our money from the IRS?

When to use a notice, and Karl talks about his case against the DHR Use their forms to get a case number, and then tell them I need to amend my claim, then we put in the amended claim in next day. If they accept our claim, we don’t need to put any notices in; we only need to put notice in when someone is tresing on our rights. If everyone knows how to behave themselves then we shouldn’t put in a notice, that’s like we’re accusing them. They know what to do and what not to do.

Agencies can’t believe, Karl sued DHR because he got a letter back saying “DHR believes it has done no wrong”. It’s talking like a man, so Karl brought it to court to prove in the public that DHR is not a man, and to flush out the MAN responsible for this agency. The Governor of Alabama is the chief executive officer of all state agencies in the state of Alabama. (according to the constitution of the State of Alabama) If he says he’s not in control of the agency, then Karl will make a claim of the agency to snuff out who’s actually in control of the agency. I’ll do what’s necessary and proper to protect my interest, if the governor doesn’t govern it I’ll govern it and make sure that it doesn’t harm me.

Divorce in the public, and collecting a debt If you want to divorce peaceably, and you and your spouse have agreed to separate, and the court is giving you the run-around and trying to get you to get expensive lawyers: write to the secretary of state “hi BOB I believe you’re the secretary of the state, question: I am trying to find the correct agency here in the state of California in which could just handle a simple divorce, and that we are no longer obligated to each other’s debts , what would be the proper agency to communicate with to move this action forward.

155 | P a g e

The state is wishy washy on its position: in marriage a husband and wife are ed as each other’s property, but a breach of contract (if the wife runs away) the state will not go and get her back for you; but if a bank wants to go after you for your wife’s debt then the state will enforce it.

If we have a judgement but can’t collect, we can get a warrant in debt against him so the sheriff’s department can collect for us; or we can put in a lien on their house; or garnish their wages. What is a Warrant in Debt? February 14th, 2012 by Robert Brandt | 1 Comment | Filed under Warrant in Debt What is a Warrant in Debt? As a bankruptcy lawyer here in Alexandria, Virginia dealing with Warrant in Debts is something that I am all too familiar with. A Warrant in Debt is simply a legal document that advises you that someone, called the plaintiff, is suing you in court for money that they claim are owed to them. You are being taken to court in other words. Once a Warrant in Debt is filed it usually means that a judgment and possibly a garnishment is not too far behind! What should you do when you receive a Warrant in Debt? Take a look at the upper right hand corner of the Warrant in Debt. There you will find a date, known as the “return date”, which advises you of the day and time that you are being summoned to appear in court. At that point you have a choice, deal with this matter on your own, or a lawyer. What happens when I go to court on the “return date”? The judge will eventually call the case at which time you simply want to tell him or her that you do not believe you owe this money and that you want to set this case for trial. I repeat: do not it that you owe the money if you want a trial date. At that point a trial date will be given, typically about 8 weeks down the line and usually “pleadings” will be ordered as well. Meaning, the judge will state that the plaintiff is obligated to file Bill of Particulars by such and such a date, and that you, the defendant, the person being sued, must respond in kind with Grounds of Defense, by a certain date. The Bill of Particulars is simply a document in which the plaintiff lays out his version of the facts to his claim that money is owed to him. The Grounds of Defense is a written response to the assertions made by the plaintiff. In this document you are supposed to it or deny each of those assertions made by the plaintiff and also introduce any affirmative defenses you may possibly have. Bottom line: be sure to file your Grounds of Defense with the court and mail a copy to the plaintiff. Failure to do so my result in a judgment being entered against you even before the trial date.

156 | P a g e

What happens if I ignore the Warrant in Debt and do not go to court on the date specified in the Warrant? If you do not go to court then you just made the plaintiff’s life very easy. At that point, a judgment will be entered against you by the judge. What’s a judgment? It is a legal determination by the court that you now do in fact owe the money to the plaintiff. Once a judgment has been entered your credit score takes a major hit. In addition, you have now opened up the door for the plaintiff to begin garnishing your bank s, or better yet, garnishing your wages. The person who sued you can now also record that judgment in the county where you live, thereby creating a judgment lien on your property. That last part, the judgment lien on your home, is something that not even bankruptcy may be able to help you with. How will I find out about the Warrant in Debt? Since a lawsuit is obviously a very serious matter, after the Warrant in Debt is filed with the court, service of process must be executed. What does that mean? That means that you must be legally served with the Warrant in Debt. That means that the Warrant in Debt cannot be merely mailed to you, but rather, the Warrant must either be handed to you by the Sheriff or a third party process server, or it must be posted on the main entrance to your home. The court wants to make sure that you know that someone is suing you and they figure that if someone like the Sheriff personally delivers the Warrant to you or at least tapes it to your front door then you will know you are being sued. Will I always be aware of the Warrant in Debt? In other words, will you always know when someone is suing you? You would think the answer is a resounding “absolutely,” but in fact, there are many instances where the individual will not find out about the Warrant in Debt/the lawsuit until months or even years down the line. All of a sudden, seemingly out of the blue, they will come to find out that their bank has been frozen or their wages are being garnished. Then, upon further inquiry, they will discover that Capital One or some collection agency for instance took them to court 14 months ago and got a judgment in their absence. What happens many times is that the company taking you to court will accidentally, or perhaps not so accidentally, rely on a outdated address of yours in order to serve you with the Warrant in Debt. They then go to court claiming that you were property served with the lawsuit, and voila, a judgment is entered. Is there any way to undo a judgment that was entered against me without my knowledge? Yes! If you can prove that you were served at a “bad address” like your former residence, place of employment, etc. and not your current address where you reside, then a Motion to Vacate the Judgment might be in order. If successful, the judge can determine that the judgment against you should be removed. I fought the Warrant in Debt as hard as I could but a judgment was still entered against me, now what?Well, if there is no sense in appealing this matter from General District Court (which is where Warrant in Debts are filed) to the Circuit Court since you clearly owe this money and have no viable defenses, if you are not “judgment proof,” and if you have a significant amount of debt in addition to the amount you are being sued for, then bankruptcy at this point is certainly something you will want to consider. When all else fails,

157 | P a g e

you have the “nuclear option” at your disposal, which will typically wipe out almost all of your creditors.

The government and your kids If we have disputes between spouses and want to go to court, go in as owners sharing the property that is our kid. When the state be our judge, we are in trouble. Be wary of government benefit or help, there is no such thing as a free ride/free lunch etc. For those in this mess: “Thank you guys but we got this settled on the private side and require immediate restoration of property.”

Restoration of property (kids) “Are you threatening me? That if I don’t do something you say you’ll keep me from my property by force? That’s extortion.” If someone wants u to sign something u don’t want to then say “i want a billion dollars to sign that document” if u want me to carry out your orders to sign then i want fair and just compensation…

In child cases…want u want to do is immediately find out who is in control of the baby… more specifically ask who is responsible is my baby drowns in who is the baby care with? Are they liable? Who do i sue if someone’s drowns my baby.. When u figure that out u say to that person “i WISH for the immediate return of my property!” Then when they don’t comply you go file a claim against the person for tres on your property by way of robbery and there u go..dont put there gov title..just the mans name… Don’t refer to the property as child kid baby offspring anything other than property the government won’t hear you…

158 | P a g e

When filing your claim for property(children), list it as exhibit a. and say i will bring a copy of exhibit a and u will bring it tomorrow and i will make sure the other side gets a copy of it. That way the case can get filed as a claim. They will insist it is a family court u say no where does it say i have to go to family court to make a claim for my property.. they may want to define it as child i define it as property!! Now who is making a claim court clerk? Are you making a claim or am i making a claim?

If clerk’s giving you trouble just mail it ..certified!!

Does filing a claim automatic evoke the common law and Queen’s Bench or is it only at certain buildings?

If we got a standing order for custody, and the other side wants to change it, just hold up the contract and say….no thanks we don’t want to change it. “There is an outstanding order, at this time I do not wish for any third party intervener to find, alter, or change the original order that was established in (insert divorce date). At this time I do not find it to be beneficial for my person to alter or change or modify that order to accommodate that person’s wishe/demand. The order stands as it was written.”

A writ of attachment or a writ of sequestration A writ of sequestration is a prejudgment process which orders the seizure or attachment of property to be maintained in the custody of the U.S. Marshal or other designated official, under court order and supervision, until the court determines otherwise. The purpose of the writ is to preserve the named property pending outcome of the litigation. The order binds the property of the defendant from the time it is issued. The writ of sequestration will lay out what specific powers have been given to the sequestrators to enable them to carry out the sequestration. writ of attachment n. a court order directing a sheriff (or other law enforcement officer) to seize property of a defendant which would satisfy a judgment against that defendant.

U can ask for this in case u gave child services a hard time and u fear they are going to put your children in the worst home they can just for revenge.

159 | P a g e

You order not motion…for them to be moved to somewhere safe!!

Walk in with the rules previously noticed to everyone before the day u show up and take the left side but say I am taking the left hand side table but i want at no time do you think that i am not prosecuting this case my claim that that property is mine. Regardless of where i am seated if a proper doesn’t come forth before this court by 10 am. The magistrate is to recognize and witness to the court clerk that she is to stamp our order and deliver it upon us. Go to the sheriff and say we got an order..he will say that they need a writ of attachment or a warrant in debt.. A warrant in debt is what they call it in Virginia when a creditor is suing you in General District Court. Warrant makes it sound a little worse than it is, but it is bad enough. It is not a criminal law problem—you can't go to jail; but they are trying to make you pay. U may have to get a bond but simply go see a bondsman for the amount required and do it up! When u show up to court one may find themselves saying this “excuse me did u not read rule 2. That says if anybody has a claim that they should make sure that i get one as well as the magistrate..why am i not getting a copy of the claim?? I am going to judge whether or not i share this property or not.. so whatever proposal is being thrown around u see it and find not to your liking…reply with “we have reached an im and now we have a matter of controversy that is going to be standing for all time between us. W are going to have to move this before a trial by jury..does anybody have a problem being here same time next week? If not then get a jury convened and get the show on the road?” does anybody object to that?”

u could hold trial at 3 am if u wanted too…but i say be nice… notice Rules of Court (it denotes the judges and staff have duties, responsibilities and obligations (not rights) to you and you yourself)

One can be in contempt of one’s own court if we don’t follow our own rules!!

160 | P a g e

robin court (lower case to keep all your rights) (use your last name is suggested)

so …… mitchell court at the court of the queen’s bench of British Columbia (as they type is upper lower case or whatever)

one of the rules may be “we are accepting any and all claims to….”

Whomever has been assigned by the clerks court is to witness that no claims have come forth and he or she is to bear witness and take my order and present it to the court clerk and have it file it and return it to me that no claimant has come forth..

Now if the magistrate says they borught forth a clain …well then tell them to look at the rule that says if so then proceed to trial by jury.. show them u know your rules!!!

Citizenship vs. common law, and the merger of equity with common law Citizen means member of a family, being a citizen has duties and obligations, puts you in a hierarchy in the legal society of the state/nation.

1872 the attorneys make a play to take over the whole court system because no one needed a lawyer in common law. Habeas corpus in short is the return of property.

If the property is called “child” or “children” then some 1947 UN doctrine of children’s rights or some legalese nonsense will slip their jurisdictions into our house. Then if we “motion” instead of NOTICE then we have just put ourselves under the jurisdiction of their court.

161 | P a g e

They’ll use tactics like bringing our babies into court and tug at our heart strings to try and make us sign some really compromising documents. Karl, don’t be moved, “I’ll staple my eyelids if you ask me to blink”.

S will make you an offer, and understanding rights to property S will try to strike any deal with you.. they will try and make it super sweet and say things like u let us stick our necks in once a year to see if all things are good….. u sign and u will get burned.. If no one shows up with a superior claim then that property is being held in naked possession by some foreign entity… and U order for the immediate return of property to its proper place of jurisdiction at (insert address) if they don’t do it..sue them!!! U stylize it for them to appear in the robin court; the robin court is going to convene on (date); anybody who wants to bring a claim forth to said court may do so then.

Laws from a different system is irrelevant. Common law doesn’t work in istrative; maritime has nothing to do with family court; codes don’t work in common law.

In a divorce proceeding the attourneys don’t have first hand knowledge of the relationship so they are out by default.. (trinsey vs, pagliaro case)

Understanding neglect and abuse

Neglect – one neglects one work so one can sleep.. we neglect all the time..it is fine don’t be afraid of words

Abuse- is to handle something repeatedly until u can’t recognize it anymore.. i abused the tree trunk to make this chair.

So abuse it to change something from its original form so it’s not recognizable.

162 | P a g e

So how did i transform him from looking like a 3 year old toddler? What does he look like now a roast beef sandwich?” destroy the meaning of their words “so no abuse took place!!!”

And yes i neglect him i don’t spend every waking moment with him? Why should i? i neglect him all the time!! Its not a bad thing!! He needs to be let alone so he can learn and make mistakes!!

Im sure u would like us to be pluggin our kids into some matrix where they are controlled but until its you property and you have a vested interest in it , don’t tell me what to do with my property”

NEGLECT, verb transitive [G. To let, to leave, to suffer to . The sense of the latter words then is to leave behind, or permit to remain; I suspect the Latin To be composed of the same prefix, as n is not radical in the latter. But of this I am not confident.] 1. To omit by carelessness or design; to forbear to do, use, employ, promote or attend to; as, to neglect duty or business; to neglect to pay honest debts; toneglect our interest or policy; to neglect the means in our power. 2. To omit to receive or embrace; to slight. How shall we escape, if we neglect so great salvation? Hebrews 2:3. 3. To slight; not to notice; to forbear to treat with attention or respect. Among people of good breeding, strangers seldom complain of being neglected. 4. To postpone. [Not in use.] NEGLECT, noun 1. Omission; forbearance to do any thing that can be done or that requires to be done. neglect may be from carelessness or intention. The neglect of business is the cause of many failures, but neglect of economy is more frequent and more injurious. 2. Slight; omission of attention or civilities. neglect of due notice and attention to strangers is characteristic of ill breeding. 3. Negligence; habitual want of regard. Age breeds neglect in all. 4. State of being disregarded.

163 | P a g e

Rescue my poor remains from vile neglect

Abuse ABU'SE, verb transitive s as z. [Latin abutor, abusus of ab and utor, to use; Gr. to accustom. See Use.] 1. To use ill; to maltreat; to misuse; to use with bad motives or to wrong purposes; as, to abuse rights or privileges. They that use this world as not abusing it. 1 Corinthians 7:31 . 2. To violate; to defile by improper sexual intercourse. 3. To deceive; to impose on. Nor be with all these tempting words abused. 4. To treat rudely, or with reproachful language; to revile. He mocked and abused them shamefully. 5. To pervert the meaning of; to misapply; as to abuse words. ABU'SE, noun Ill use; improper treatment or employment; application to a wrong purpose; as an abuse of our natural powers; an abuse of civil rights, or of religious privileges; abuse of advantages, etc. Liberty may be endangered by the abuses of liberty, as well as by the abuses of power. 2. A corrupt practice or custom, as the abuses of government. 3. Rude speech; reproachful language addressed to a person; contumely; reviling words. 4. Seduction. After the abuse he forsook me. 5. Perversion of meaning; improper use or application; as an abuse of words.

164 | P a g e

Police and the domestic authority doctrine There is no such thing as domestic violence in a closed domicile… it’s in public when domestic violence occurs ony in there authority in public spaces not on man’s property…

Look up i think sec#84? domestic authority doctrine and domestic violence in corpus juris secundum

One can deny the warrant because it is a different jurisdictional authority when u r on ur property

In Syria the king wouldn’t invite them in.. so America had its hands tided because USA cannot interfere with another’s domestic authority without the invite it’s a NO!! the Syrian king could be killing his women and children and there is nothing they can do…

U just tell the police officer in your defense from accusation of domestic violence on your property“ so you believe this is a public building u believe u have some sort authority of the affairs of the state that operates in these four walls? Is that right? Don’t u think i can’t smoke crack, smoke weed and grow crystal meth in here , is that what u believe as well?

Don’t open the door for officers ..ignore it like kids who want candy at the door.. i don’t see any benefit of opne the door for these kids because i don’t have candy.. just like i don’t see the benefit of open the doors for cops with guns who can potential now rob my house for a robber

Now if they bust into your place without authority.. simply file a claim against them ( they will only have complaints) simple” i am man named robin claim bob a man tresed; bob a man owes me a million dollars in compensation”

165 | P a g e

Never refer to them as officer Bob just simply Bob

If you are trying to get the officers name and they are messing with you.. just write the prosecutor and say don’t i have the right to discovery? Don’t i have the right to have a depose or get a deposition from the officer?

Deposition DEPOSITION, noun 1. The act of laying or throwing down; as, soil is formed by the deposition of fine particles, during a flood. 2. That which is thrown down; that which is lodged; as, banks are sometimes depositions of alluvial matter. 3. The act of giving testimony under oath. 4. The attested written testimony of a witness; an affidavit. 5. The act of dethroning a king, or the degrading of a person from an office or station; a divesting of sovereignty, or of office and dignity; a depriving of clerical orders. A deposition differs from abdication; an abdication being voluntary, and a deposition compulsory.

Some stranger kicks in your doors… u simply would file a claim “bob kick in my door he owes my $1million dollars”

Don’t sue the police department((it doent exist))

Sue each man(not officer) individually Don’t sue men (legalese) Sue each man individually (each officers has about 1.2 million in coverage)

166 | P a g e

And because there are no statutes of limitation and nine officers break into your place You have 9 chances at a $1 million dollar claim just do one at a time until you get one at a jury trial U can be a next friend in England it’s called a McKenzie friend in England U set this up as one of your rules of court

Contracting your kids away through welfare In istrative court (family court) they are just hearing istrating officers. Most kids are contracted away..watch out when u take benefits form the government

they must produce a bond to complete the warrant because you are not part of their world or court system.. if they want to come unto your land, which is your country hence your jurisdiction, they better have a bond!! This is not the court’s jurisdiction,, this is your land and you set the rules there.. -in statute they are just using common courtesy because they are all “honorable” and do not use bonds amongst themselves..plus they are legal fictions so no harm can be done to them…. - but u may require a bond of anyone entering your property just on the basis that if they don’t any harm ( rip your home apart during a search or shoot your dog ) you can claim that bond 

-you may be asked to put a bond if you sue for big money and vice versa you may request a bond…. Because if you are wrong and filed a false claim I can demand the same of you.. if you bear false witness on your neighbor they are going to want fair and just compensation.. Letter that helped get Canadians' kids back

167 | P a g e

-“I require that the law produce the following, the findings of facts and conclusions of law if you believe the answer is yes to any of the following 1. is there a law that states there was nowhere in Canada for a man or woman not fluent in legalese of your legal society to move a claim or evoke the right of trial by jury? 2. is there a law that a man or woman have to belong or hire a member of your legal society to move a claim? 3. Is there a law preventing a man or a woman if they provides justification and or excuses for the robbery of another man’s or woman’s property, to require that said robber to in living voice in open court what moves them to rob said property and or have a lawyer testify on their behalf? 4. is there a law that states that the court clerk does not have to provide their oath of office or their hazard or security bond policy number.. and that they have the right to practice law and read any man or woman’s claim, to judge whether said man or woman has the right to press their claim in a public venue designe for the use of any man or woman requiring justice and the immediate release, return and restoration of their property?

Section 6-Land rights- (Nations) 3pgs

Locke held that individuals have a right to homestead private property from nature by working on it, but that they can do so only "...at least where there is enough, and as good, left in common for others".[4] The proviso maintains that appropriation of unowned resources is a diminution of the rights of others to it, and would be acceptable only so long as it does not make anyone worse off than they would have been before. The phrase "Lockean Proviso" was coined by political philosopher Robert Nozick, and is based on the ideas elaborated by John Locke in his Second Treatise of Government.

Adverse Possession Adverse possession combines the abstract idea of rights in land with the real fact of occupation on the ground in a manner that is inconsistent with the rights of the true owner. An owner who neglects to exercise his rights of ownership and possession over all his land may lose his right by the adverse possession of another. A treser who occupies or squats on land may gain title to it if certain conditions have been met. The conditions which must be fulfilled to perfect a possessory claim to land are actual, open, visable, notorious, exclusive and continuous possession and enjoyment of the land in a fashion which is adverse to the title of the owner. The onus is on the claimant to prove valid possession of the property by meeting all the above conditions, that is, reliance is placed on the strength of the claim, not the weakness of the owner's possession. Against the Crown, the period is 40 years.

168 | P a g e

Definition of Conditions: 1. Actual Possession - The land must have been actually used by the claimants without the approval of the owner. The use must be consistent with the nature of the land and in a manner similar to the use a true owner might make of the land. Isolated and separate acts of tress do not establish possessory title. 2. Open and Notorious - The use and occupation must take place in an open and visible manner so that others, in particular the true owner, might know of or could regularly observe it. The use and occupation will generally be widely known by others in the area. The degree of notoriety will be consistent with the nature of the area in which the land is located. 3. Continuous - The possession must be continuous for the duration of the statutory period (i.e., daily, weekly, depending on the nature and location of the land). A series of adverse possessors may be linked together to make a continuous period, if previous tresers followed each other in close succession in an unbroken chain. 4. Exclusive - The possession must be exclusive, not only with regard to the true owner, but also all others. Random acts of possession by various individuals will not meet the exclusive requirement for a possessory claim. There are several mechanisms for an adverse possessor to perfect their claim, including actions under the Quieting Titles Act, or a claim pursuant to s.37 of the Crown Lands Act.

Law of Common Land - England and Wales[edit] The legal position concerning common land has been confused, but recent legislation has sought to remedy this and remove the legal uncertainties so that commons can be better used and protected. Most commons are based on ancient rights, that is to say common law (coincidence of term only), which pre-date statute law laid down by parliament. The exact rights which apply to individual commons were in some cases documented but more often were based on long-held traditions. A major reform was started in 1965 with a national of common land which recorded the land ownership and the rights of any commoners, and two other significant acts have followed. Owners of land in general have all the rights of exclusive ownership, to use the land as they wish. However, for common land the owner's rights are restricted, and other people known as commoners have certain rights over the land. The landowner may retain other rights to the land, such as rights to minerals and large timber, and to any

169 | P a g e

common rights left unexercised by the commoners. The commoners will continue to exercise their rights, or have a document which describes their rights, which may be part of the deeds of another property. A number of commoners still exercise rights, for example, there are 500 practising commoners in the New Forest,[15] and there is a federation of commoners in Cumbria.[16] In many cases commons have no existing commoners, the rights having been neglected.

Erection of Cottages Act 1588[edit] There was a belief that if an Englishman or woman could build a house on common land, raise the roof over their head and have a fire in the hearth between sunrise and sunset, then they could have the right of undisturbed possession. [17] The belief was actually a fallacy, but to stop landless peasants unlawfully squatting on commons, an act known as the Erection of Cottages Act 1588 (31 Eliz c. 7, long title "An Act against the erecting and maintaining of Cottages"), was introduced.[17][18]

Commons Act 1876[edit] Under the Commons Act 1876 some 36 commons in England and Wales were regulated. The act also enabled the confirmation of Orders providing for the inclosure of common land or common fields and butts

Commons Act 1899[edit] The Commons Act 1899 provides a mechanism of enabling district councils and National Park authorities to manage commons where their use for exercise and recreation is the prime consideration and where the owner and commoners do not require a direct voice in the management, or where the owner cannot be found. There are at least 200 schemes of management made under the 1899 act

The law of property Act 1925[edit] The Law of Property Act 1925, which still forms the core of English property law, has two provisions for common land: 

Section 193 gave the right of the public to "air and exercise" on Metropolitan commons and those in urban districts and boroughs. This constituted about one fifth of the commons, but did not give this right to commons in rural areas, which had to wait for the 2000 CROW act.

170 | P a g e



Section 194 restricted the enclosure of commons, which would now require Ministerial consent.[19]

Commons Registration Act 1965[edit] The UK government regularised the definitions of common land with the Commons Registration Act 1965,[20] which established a of common land. Not all commons have owners, but all common land by definition is ed under 1965 Commons registration Act, along with the rights of any commoners if they still exist. The registration authorities are the County Councils, and when there is no ownership, a local council, such as a parish council is given guardianship. An online database of ed common land was compiled by DEFRA in 1992-93 as part of a survey of the condition and wildlife of commons.[21] The official up to date s of common land are held by the Commons Registration Authorities. The following registration information is held:[22] 

Land Section

This includes a description of the land, who applied to the land, and when the land became finally ed. There are also related plans which show the boundaries of the land. 

Rights Section

This includes a description of the rights of common (e.g. a right to graze a certain amount of sheep), the area of common over which the right is exercisable, the name of the holder of the right and whether the right is attached to land in the ownership of the holder of the right (the commoner) or is a right held in gross i.e. unattached to land. 

Ownership Section

This includes details of the owner(s) of the common land. Entries in this section however, are not held to be conclusive. Unfortunately, numerous inconsistencies and irregularities remained, mainly because a period of only 3 years was given for registration submissions. However, there is there is now an opportunity to clear these up under the 2006 Act, and to add land omitted under the 1965 act.[23]

171 | P a g e

Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 (CROW)[edit] Other than for those commons covered by the 1925 law of property Act, the public did not have the right to use or enjoy common land if they were not a commoner. However, the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 gave the public the Freedom to roam freely on all ed common land in England and Wales.[24] The new rights were introduced region by region through England and Wales, with completion in 2005. Maps showing accessible areas have been produced, and are available online as "open access maps" produced by Natural England.[25] Commons are included in the public access land now shown on the Ordnance Survey Explorer Maps.

Commons Act 2006[edit] The Commons Act 2006 is an important new piece of legislation.[26] The Act: 

Enables commons to be managed more sustainably by commoners and landowners working together through commons councils with powers to regulate grazing and other agricultural activities



Provides better protection for common land and greens - this includes reinforcing existing protections against abuse, encroachment and unauthorised development



Recognises that the protection of common land has to be proportionate to the harm caused and that some specified works can be carried out without the need for consent



Requires commons registration authorities to bring their s up-to-date by recording past changes affecting the s during a ‘transitional period’, and to keep the s up-to-date by recording new changes affecting the s commons registration authorities will have new powers to correct many of the mistakes in the s



Sets out new, clearer criteria for the registration of town or village greens



Prohibits the severance of common rights, preventing commoners from selling, leasing or letting their rights away from the property to which rights are attached

172 | P a g e

[27]

Several hundred square kilometres of ‘waste land’ that was eligible for registration under the 1965 Commons Registration Act was not, in fact, finally ed. As a consequence, it ceased to be recognised as common land. A partial remedy for this defect in the earlier legislation is provided by the Commons Act 2006. Under Schedule 2, 4 of the Act, applications that failed under the original registration process may, in certain circumstances, be reconsidered – offering, in effect, a second chance for the land to be confirmed (‘re-ed’) as common. Land that is re-ed in this way will enjoy the special legal protection afforded to common land. It will also be subject to the public right of access introduced by the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000; or, may qualify as a section 193 ‘urban’ common (in which case, it would also be subject to a right of access for horse-riders).[28]

Fencing[edit]

The windmill on Wimbledon Common.

The act of transferring resources from the commons to purely private ownership is known as enclosure, or (especially in formal use, and in place names) Inclosure. The Inclosure Acts were a series of private Acts of Parliament, mainly from about 1750 to 1850, which enclosed large areas of common, especially the arable and haymeadow land and the better pasture land. The maintenance of fences around a common is the responsibility of the occupiers of the adjacent enclosed land, not (as it would be with enclosed land) the responsibility of the owners of the grazed livestock. This can lead to difficulties where not all adjacent occupiers maintain their fences properly. However the fencing of land within a ed common is not allowed, as this is a form of enclosure and denies use of the land to others. A celebrated landmark case of unauthorised fencing of a common was in 1866 by Lord Brownlow who illegally enclosed 434 acres of Berkhamsted Common to add to his Ashridge Estate. Brownlow had failed to buy out the commoners, so resorted to this

173 | P a g e

action. A public outcry followed, and the Commons Preservation Society found a champion in Augustus Smith who had the inclination and the money to act, and himself held commons rights. Smith hired 120 navvies armed with hammers, chisels and crowbars, who on the night of 6 March 1866, under the aegis of the newly formed Commons Preservation Society (now the Open Spaces Society), felled to the ground two miles of iron railings. Soon after, local people flocked in. Lord Brownlow took action against Augustus Smith and the court case lasted until 1870 when it ended with the complete vindication of Smith.[29]

Controls on development[edit] Development of common land is strictly controlled. The government states that common land should be open and accessible to the public, and the law restricts the kind of works that can be carried out on commons. HM Planning Inspectorate is responsible for determining applications under the 2006 Act regarding common land in England, and several other pieces of legislation regarding commons and greens. All applications are determined on behalf of the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra).[30] Under section 38 of the Commons Act 2006, you need consent to carry out any restricted works on land ed as common land under the Commons Registration Act 1965.Restricted works are any that prevent or impede access to or over the land. They include fencing, buildings, structures, ditches, trenches, embankments and other works, where the effect of those works is to prevent or impede access. They also include, in every case, new solid surfaces, such as for a new car park or access road. [31]

Boards of Conservators and Commons Councils[edit] Some commons are managed by Boards of Conservators for the wider public benefit. However, for areas where these are not established, or an improved systrem is required, The Commons Act 2006[32] provides for the establishment of Commons Councils to manage common land.[33] The Standard Constitution Regulations relating to commons councils were formally approved in April 2010. Commons councils are most likely to be useful where they can improve current management practices. This may be especially so where commons are in agricultural use, but where it can be difficult to reach agreement on collective management. Commons Councils are voluntary and can be established only where there is substantial among those with interests in the land, such as; the commoners (especially those who actively exercise their rights); owners and other legal interests.

174 | P a g e

Commons councils enable decisions to be made by majority voting, so relieving the burden of trying to reach unanimous decisions. They will have the power to make rules about agricultural activities, the management of vegetation, and the exercise of common rights, which are binding on all those with interests on a common. [34]

Roadways[edit]

A parliamentary enclosure road near Lazonby in Cumbria. The roads were made as straight as possible, and the boundaries much wider than a cart width to reduce the ground damage of driving sheep and cattle.[35]

Commons are often crossed by unfenced public roads, and this leads to another problem on modern pasture commons where grazing survives (or is to be reintroduced). Historically, the roads would have been cart-tracks, and there would have been no conflict between their horse-drawn (or ox-drawn) traffic and the pastured animals, and no great difficulty if pastured animals wandered off the common along the roads. However, these roads now have fast motorised traffic which does not mix safely with animals. To continue (or restore) grazing, such roads may need fencing or at least blocking at the edge of the common with cattle grids — however fencing a common is reminiscent of the process of enclosure, historically fatal to its survival, and permission for fencing on a common is a strictly controlled process within the UK planning system. [36]

Public roads through enclosed common land were made to an accepted width between boundaries. In the late eighteenth century this was at least 60 feet (18 m), but from the 1790s this was decreased to 40 feet (12 m), and later 30 feet (9.1 m) as the normal maximum width. The reason for these wide roads to was to prevent excessive churning of the road bed, and allow easy movement of flocks and herds of animals.[35]

175 | P a g e

[11/28/2015 10:46:11 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: if someone says we did do wrong..then next..where is the harm injury or loss? so someone may jump up and claim we do wrong by claiming land.....fine then where is the harm injury or loss...if not then they have no contraversy... discharge this case [11/28/2015 10:55:01 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: http://www.alsa.ab.ca/publicinformation/easementsandrightsofway.aspx [11/28/2015 11:16:09 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: http://homeguides.sfgate.com/writeproperty-deed-1499.html [11/28/2015 11:19:29 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Easements and rights-of-way are usually ed on the certificate of title to the property. They remain with the land and are automatically transferred from one owner to another as the land is sold. [11/28/2015 11:20:14 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: so we go to the local county recoreders office and lookup existing easements on surrounding properties for how to get existing access... [11/28/2015 11:24:20 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: woooooohhh must do homework at the county recorders office...before we squat....i mean claim land... [11/28/2015 11:24:21 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: lol [11/28/2015 11:24:23 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Will a building permit include information about easements? No! It is the responsibility of the landowner to know of any easements or rights-of-way that may restrict uses of land. [11/28/2015 11:30:22 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: It is necessary to review each of these ed documents to determine the actual restrictions on the property. These kinds of encumbrances, liens and interests may not be illustrated on the plan for the property. [11/28/2015 11:33:22 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: You may wish to an Alberta Land Surveyor or legal advisor for assistance. They are knowledgeable about right-of-way and easement agreements. [11/28/2015 11:33:35 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: land surveyors!!! [11/28/2015 11:33:43 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: tehee [11/28/2015 11:35:15 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: At the same time, a purchaser may want to determine whether any builders’ liens have been placed against the easement property. Such liens may affect the ability to arrange financing or to complete a property transaction. [11/28/2015 11:36:38 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: An Alberta Land Surveyor is fully responsible for the accuracy of survey information. Land surveyors carry professional liability insurance as added protection for the consumer.

Names and locations of Alberta Land Surveyors are found in the“Yellow Pages" under “Surveyors — Alberta Land.” For a province-wide list, call the Alberta Land Surveyors' Association or visit the ALSA web site.

Look for power of attorney to make sure they are allowed to represent the bank…the could be just a bunch of attorneys who bought the debt and are third party debt collectors….watch out!!

176 | P a g e

If you have something deemed as a farm you don’t need permits..so whatever structure you put up there it is to aid and assist me in agricultural purposes no matter what the size..

Farmers got rid of daily savings time In state of iowa.

The electrical company may have to install electricity for their liability but u may remove it after ur done…

Or just simply say who says i cant and if so put it in writing… who wants to istrate my property without my consent?

Deed is in the name of a man not the bank!! the mortgage note is in the name of the bank Tell the bank to get their home off your land!!! They can easily do that these days!! Banks can’t own land… And u simply make a claim for your sweat equity that you put into the home..security up keep!!! Those things!! It’s just like if the bank wanted to your car for another loan note..they could come on your property and take it too.. There are all kinds of home moving companies out there…demand they use them!!!as it is interfering with your enjoyment off the land and u are going to start charging them a dollar a day!! Just ask them do you want me to mail it to you piece by piece or are they going to come pick up the whole home? But to get into my land you’re going to need a permit that will cost u a million dollars a day!! because i am the one who owns gives out permits on this land!!

177 | P a g e

Title holder vs. owner, and setting up a nation state

When u pay cash for your land and u go to the solicitor for the conveyancing for the title deed. On that deed they are setting u up for taxes for caring of the roads…

Land deeds in uk… title holder is -------, this document is to identify the owner.. title holder means you’re a lease holder… the man but the owner is the crown….we have to remove the states baby sitting help form the counsil…

Send them a letter like this.. “ i know that the counsil works in benefit of man and mankind but over the last few months i don’t believe that is the case and i don’t feel you have really looked after me, so i have to make a decision to carry on with you or carry on without you, and i have chosen to carry on without you and i have chose to set up my own nation state…”

Note u need to own the land without a loan on it…u need land bought outright..

If u learn to read your land title certificates you will see its wording is kind of tricky..it should reveal that the state is the owner..or the crown is the owner… what u are is the title holder which is no more than a tenant so u have to make a claim that it is your property and bring the crown to court where they can’t appear and thus making yourself the owner..

I don’t care if you recognize me, I’m not part of your nation and I’m not under your domestic authority, I don’t care what your opinion is and you do not have jurisdiction/control over me, if you encroach upon me you’ll be committing tres, and I’m gonna hold you liable as the man.

178 | P a g e

The City orders you to do maintenance on your yard Cities generally have complaints fill out on us, not claims, so they can’t move this in court. If they make an order on us, we can get that order signed by the officer, and charge them for the services rendered for the amount they originally wanted to charge us. If the officer signed as a person of the department, the head of the dept. is now liable for the actions of his employees, because the officer was g on behalf of the office. Because there’s no involuntary servitude in this country, I don’t fulfill orders for free. Fair warning, ask without the threat.

Land is held in allodial > land is held in allodial title, someone gave it a title they can take it away. Titles are not real, and are lower than claim.

ALLO'DIAL, adjective Pertaining to allodium; freehold; free of rent or service; held independence of a lord paramount; opposed to feudal.

Land of the self governing You trying to tell me what to do? I’m self governing, you can’t govern me. But you can give me an order, and I’ll gladly carry out your order for compensation. But I’m not carrying out public servants’ order, no I’m carrying out another MAN’s order. You ordering me as a MAN? Do it. I’ll carry out your order and you’re going to compensate me, here’s the bill. If you think I’m not self-governing, and you’re gonna force me to be governed and directed and steered by your crazy beliefs? And your crazy codes and statutes? You think I’m going to worship and petition unto you like you’re some kind of deity? I only petition god. But I’ll never petition a MAN or PERSON. Petition means you’re inferior and you’re begging a superior being. All my paperwork is self governing. Are you trying to tell me what to do?

179 | P a g e

Land, property, and real estate We can’t own the ground, the ground belongs to the crown; the land is people, owning people is slavery; we can own what we create above the ground; property is not land, we own property we cannot own land; land is possession, I don’t own the land I’m in possession of it?

POSSES'SION, noun The having, holding or detention of property in one's power or command; actual seizin or occupancy, either rightful or wrongful. One man may have the possession of a thing, and another may have the right of possession or property. If the possession is severed from the property; if A has the right of property, and B by unlawful means has gained possession this is an injury to adjectiveThis is a bare or naked possession In bailment, the bailee, who receives goods to convey, or to keep for a time, has the possession of the goods, and a temporary right over them, but not the property. Property in possession includes both the right and the occupation. Long undisturbed possession is presumptive proof of right or property in the possessor. 1. The thing possessed; land, estate or goods owned; as foreign possessions. The house of Jacob shall possess their possessions. Obadiah 1:17. When the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful, for he had great possessions. Matthew 19:22. 2. Any thing valuable possessed or enjoyed. Christian peace of mind is the best possession of life. 3. The state of being under the power of demons or invisible beings; madness; lunacy; as demoniacal possession Writ of possession a precept directing a sheriff to put a person in peaceablepossession of property recovered in ejectment. To take possession to enter on, or to bring within one's power or occupancy. To give possession to put in another's power or occupancy. POSSES'SION, verb transitive To invest with property. [Not used.]

180 | P a g e

Property is two part: the right and the occupation. Gypsies have the occupation but not the right. I may have the right to a thing but someone else might have possession. We take possession of land, not ownership. Everything we build on the land is property.

The law is black and white, legalese is colourful. Man is colourblind. Lawyers like to say “let’s be reasonable”. NO. the law is the law.

I claim possession of this land, does anyone have a higher claim to this land than me?

If you have officers trying to tres continually on your property send them an invitation to come hang out for a simply ission fee of $100 over whatever.. it is no longer is a threat..

What to say when an agent comes on your land when they start an whole lot of question you slow them down and get names first…not agent..names…then if they ask you about something on your property… respond with “did you ask me what is on my property?” because right there he just itted it is yours and exclusive to all others within a society’s control or enjoyment, by using the word property..reply with ” so this means it’s none of your business by itting this is my property and that means you cant make any claim for it…”

181 | P a g e

The quiet title is if you want to claim abandoned property effectively. Just to make sure it’s free and clear before putting a lot of sweat equity into something only to find out someone else has a claim on it.

Ownership and titles Quiet titles is like fighting for the bottom. It puts a bigger bullseye on your back. Anyone who comes with a lien or claims to the house etc. can find you easily. They know the only person they have to go for, they don’t have to go after anyone else. Quiet title is applying for a title from the system, you give the state jurisdiction over you. It clearly distinguishes that you are the owner. Owning means you’re liable for paying all the taxes all the bills. The chances of the rich man going to heaven…camel through eye of needle. Accept no titles, titles given can be taken away at a whim of the bestower.

Instead of acquiring a quiet title, we ask to see if anyone can bring a claim on our house.

- Benefits of the second dimension

Don’t rescind your name.. you birth certificate is prima facie evidence that you could claim the land and its resources… They want you to get rid of your proof…

Section 7-Courthouse proceedings and Rulings -filing claims, notices, dealing with court clerks and judge talk 115 pgs So help me God instead of swearing in… swear no oath and swear no affirmation: ONE CAN TESTIFY AND EVERYTHING IN OPEN COURT… matthew 5

182 | P a g e

33 Again, ye have heard that it hath been said by them of old time, Thou shalt not forswear thyself, but shalt perform unto the Lord thine oaths: 34 But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne: 35 Nor by the earth; for it is his footstool: neither by Jerusalem; for it is the city of the great King. 36 Neither shalt thou swear by thy head, because thou canst not make one hair white or black.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/394/147.html SHUTTLESWORTH v. BIRMINGHAM, (1969) No. 42 Argued: November 18, 1968 Decided: March 10, 1969 - See more at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/394/147.html#sthash.yQTd4Mz5.dpuf

A law subjecting the right of free expression in publicly owned places to the prior restraint of a license, without narrow, objective, and definite standards is unconstitutional, and a person faced with such a law may ignore it and exercise his First Amendment rights. - See more at: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/394/147.html#sthash.yQTd4Mz5.dpuf

Deuteronomy: 19. 16. If a false witness rise up against any man to testify against him that which is wrong; 17. Then both the men, between whom the controversy is, shall stand before the LORD, before the priests and the judges, which shall be in those days; 18. And the judges shall make diligent inquisition: and, behold, if the witness be a false witness, and hath testified falsely against his brother; 19. Then shall ye do unto him, as he had thought to have done unto his brother: so shalt thou put the evil away from among you. 20. And those which remain shall hear, and fear, and shall henceforth commit no more any such evil among you. 21. And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot. - Bible Offline 3 things out of the above scripture ...1 barratry 2 no need to swear since the judges must distinguish..3 reverse the charges for just compensation Where law written I man required to swear oath or affirm testimony?

183 | P a g e

Summons the trick..when you get it in the mail…write back to the address and ask who are you? And who are you to me? just the IRS.. Etymology Edit The word bank was borrowed in Middle English from Middle French banque, from Old Italian banca, meaning "table", from Old High German banc, bank "bench, counter". Benches were used as makeshift desks or exchange counters during the Renaissance by Jewish[9] Florentine bankers, who used to make their transactions atop desks covered by green tablecloths.[10][11] [10:02:32 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Hey Wayfinder....if u have a moment....lovely post on oaths...my question is..how do u address the oath or affirmation moment...specifically wat do u say? [10:06:50 PM | Edited 10:08:53 PM] wayfinder: hey bro, well i'm still working on it, and the only oath i have given was when i was in the Army and one other association. i've never made an oath or affirmation in court as they have only been traffic related. However there are some good points about Oaths both for an against. the following i found in a book, which is a good idea, but i'm still thinking about it: "So, if asked to swear an oath in court, what should you do? If you wanted to be dramatic, you could say, "As a follower of Jesus, all my words are to be completely truthful. Placing my hand on the Bible and saying an oath will not make me any more truthful, for God always demands my complete honesty. If, however, it pleases the court for me to swear this oath as a public record of my intent to speak honestly, I will do so." 40 Questions about interpreting the Bible, by Robert L. Plummer, p. 223 [10:07:02 PM] wayfinder: "Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform your oaths to the Lord.' But I say to you, do not swear at all; neither by heaven, for it is God's throne; nor by the earth, for it is His footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. Nor shall you swear by your head, because you cannot make one hair white or black. But let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No.' For whatever is more than these is from the evil one" (Matthew 5:33-37). [10:08:13 PM] wayfinder: but see the bible is quite young in comparison to other ways of life and teachings, i'm just trying to find what is right and makes sense. but i feel making oaths means some one is doubting you and your truthfulness [10:08:21 PM] wayfinder: i'd wish to call that into question [10:08:39 PM] wayfinder: hence i think the above as a reply is a good [10:08:46 PM] wayfinder: what are your thoughts? [10:10:08 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Beautifully put... [10:12:05 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: My thoughts of late to to use the Robert Menard vs... I promise to tell the whole truth with nothing left out as I see it.. but I can not swear for or take oaths as it is against the word of God. .. [10:13:04 PM] wayfinder: i guess that can make sense too, as it could be offending folk who are christian in your presence [10:13:31 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: My thoughts too... [10:13:41 PM] wayfinder: it could be a trick to get folks to testify against themselves just another nail in the coffin so to speak

184 | P a g e

[10:15:07 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: I luv wat u just posted except tweaking the last line...as it seems to reverse himself in giving into the oath... [10:15:55 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Zach. .my thoughts is that the oath....it's a trip wire test... [10:16:10 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Zact. .. notch zach [10:16:14 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Lol [10:17:01 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Thanks for sharing that [10:17:18 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: And today's oath stuff. Really awesome [10:17:36 PM] wayfinder: "About the year 1360, during the reign of Edward iii. was written a work entitled, "The Prayer and Complaint of the Plowman." This work, although the name of the author is not known, was evidently the production of one of the reformers of that day. It exposes many of the vices and corruptions of the Romish church. One age is to the following import. “ Lord, thou gavest us a command to speak the truth, that our yea should be yea, and our nay, nay, and not to swear at all; but he that calls himself thy vicar on earth, has broken these commandments ; for he makes a law to compel men to swear, and teaches that a man, to save his life, may forswear and lie. So that by the encouragement of him and his laws, men are emboldened to swear and lie, and often to swear falsely.”—Fox, i. 459." [10:18:42 PM] wayfinder: there is so much contrary stuff, the Roman Catholic Church are the Central or 'matrix" of the whole lot so i wonder if it is a test [10:19:08 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Wow.confirmation [10:20:10 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: I don't care if KL swears I'm not going to...this is exactly like the Lord's prayer case...trying to force Muslims to say the Lord's prayer [10:20:28 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: I don't believe is key [10:20:54 PM] wayfinder: i don't think KL swears he affirms [10:21:52 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Well he does not address the importance of this...it's like idolatry and wearing a Catholic cross...it's just wrong..borderline satanic... [10:22:27 PM] wayfinder: that is why Karl says 'Oath **or** affirmation' [10:23:43 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Za tly. ..neither is an option..both are false choices [10:24:23 PM] wayfinder: true [10:24:52 PM] wayfinder: they are choices but you have to make the choice if the obligation exists for them to be imposed upon you [10:25:01 PM] wayfinder: i study zen :) and the middle path [10:26:09 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: No man can impose their beliefs on me...specially if I cause no harm injury loss or broke a contract by not doing so... [10:26:27 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Like your post...who says I am lying? [10:26:47 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: An oath doesn't determine truth of fact [10:26:51 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Jury does [10:27:55 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: This conversation is convincing me of it even more...but I don't know how well the courts will take to my position...lol [10:28:46 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: The middle is beautiful. ..but defining it is difficult to cypher [10:28:50 PM] wayfinder: it is not for them to decide really [10:29:26 PM] wayfinder: it is hard to stay in the middle to, even the teachings of 'jesus' writes about neither walking to the left or right [10:29:32 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Zactly..the judge or magistrate don't. .so why do they insist on this bs formality? [10:29:47 PM] wayfinder: the middle path has been for thousands of years long before Christianity was invented [10:30:03 PM] wayfinder: because it is statutory [10:30:11 PM] wayfinder: it is cermony [10:30:20 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Wats statutory? [10:30:31 PM] wayfinder: it is tradition, custom

185 | P a g e

[10:30:38 [10:30:43 [10:30:52 [10:30:54 [10:31:33 [10:35:16

PM] PM] PM] PM] PM] PM]

wayfinder: Oaths Robin- Easy isn't an option...: The oath and swearing.... Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Ah well then f it Fer sure Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Lol Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Do u see it in statutory? Where? wayfinder: check out the following this is from Aristotle's Treatise on Rhetroic:

On the subject of oaths we may make a four-fold division; for a party cither tenders an oath, and accepts it; or he docs neither; or he does the one, and not the other; that is, lie either tenders, but does not accept it; or accepts, but does not tender it [p]. Moreover, it may happen in a different way from this still, supposing the oath to have been previously taken by this or that party. Now, an advocate does not tender an oath on the ground that men easily forswear themselves; and because the other party will take it, and never repay; but that he is of opinion that the judges, if his adversary does not take the oath, will give a verdict against him: that he esteems the risk which depends on the judges the preferable one, for in them he reposes confidence, but in his adversary, none. But an advocate declines accepting it on the ground of its being an oath for a pecuniary object; [p] However strangely this wrangling for the istration of oaths may sound, at the present day, when they arc uniformly insisted on, yet in the early periods of our own history the evidence for accused persons against the king could not be examined on oath,—nor till the reign of Anne could any one accused of felony produce witnesses on oath. Edin. Review, No. lxxxix, Art. 3, p. 79, 80. It was not till so late as the reign of Anne, that the English courts were authorised to ister an oath to persons called by a prisoner on his defence. [10:35:56 PM] wayfinder: and because, if lie were a worthless fellow, he would forswear himself without more ado; since it were better surely to he a villain for some object, rather than for none; for if he but take the oath, he will gain his cause, if he decline taking it, he will not. Thus, then, his not taking it will be from virtuous motives, not from fear of forswearing himself; here, too, the saying of Xenophanes is in point, viz. that this sort of appeal, made by an impious man to a pious, is not fair, but is just such an one, as if a robust fellow were to challenge an infirm man, either to strike him, or to get beaten himself. 3. If, however, he accepts it, the advocate alleges that he feels confidence in himself, but none in his adversary. Let him also declare, inverting the saying of Xenophanes, that it is fair enough if the impious man tenders the oath, and the pious man takes it; also, that it is surely a strange thing that a man should be unwilling himself to take an oath, in a question about which he calls on the judges to give their verdict on oath. [10:38:18 PM] wayfinder: 4. If, however, he tenders the oath, let him insist that a willingness to intrust the question to the gods is a matter of piety; and that his adversary need call on no other judges, since he throws the decision of the case into his own hands; and that an unwillingness to take an oath, in a question about which he calls upon other people to swear, is absurd. Now, as it is thus plain how we are to speak in reference to each [of the four simple cases], it will also be plain how we are to speak when taking them contly; supposing, for instance, either that yourself' are willing to take the oath, but not to tender it; or, if you tender it, but are not willing to take it; or if you are inclined both to take it and to tender it; or to do neither; for these cases must be made up of those above mentioned, so that our reasonings must also be made up of those above stated. [10:40:05 PM] wayfinder: https://books.google.com.au/books?id=kxHAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA102&dq=Treatise+on+oaths&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiK2cTizqPKA hUh56YKHagjCdYQ6AEIPzAG#v=onepage&q&f=false

186 | P a g e

[10:58:31 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: By taking an oath they treat us like prisoners...guilty...this is much like the dirty trick of ....are you here in person... [10:59:20 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: I must field try this..lol [11:00:10 PM] wayfinder: it does tend to seem like a trick shrouded in cermony, hand on bibles or books, or some thing else. [11:01:08 PM] wayfinder: AHAAAAA you took an oath, you swore, so you must be Roman Catholic, this her is England and we outlawed Romans and Jesuites = you are now GUILTY! [11:01:13 PM] wayfinder: hahaha [11:05:13 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Yes..zactly... [11:07:26 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: Right!

[1:09:24 PM | Edited 1:06:36 PM] Julz: what do you say to a judge who tells you to sit down at court? [1:11:11 PM] Ivory Jett: I don't know. Please tell. [1:11:56 PM] Ivory Jett: "Is that an order?" [1:12:02 PM | Edited 1:14:14 PM] Julz: well if you're the claimer and it's your court just say: if it pleases the court I think I will sit down; [1:12:38 PM | Edited 1:15:12 PM] Julz: it pleases your court [in other words you] that you be seated and rest your legs for a while [1:13:24 PM] Ivory Jett: Why does it need to please the court? [1:13:28 PM] Julz: and at the same time it fools judgy-wodgy into thinking you were obeying him when in fact he is dead wrong [1:14:05 PM] Ivory Jett: Oh... He is not the court. ;). Smart. [1:14:07 PM] Julz: don't forget what court means [1:15:13 PM | Edited 1:16:46 PM] Julz: • “court” means: the aggrieved/claimer–self [Cf. person; status/capacity] and claim [Cf. suit] of i, [a] man [Cf. sovereign] [Cf. 5 Black, Law. Dict. 318]; • accused/wrong doer : ––(a ) has no claim, ––(b ) is part of claimer’s claim; • “claimer’s claim” comprises of all who are present; • “all who are present” are claimer’s followers;

INTERPRETATION ACT RULES OF CONSTRUCTION PROPERTY AND CIVIL RIGHTS Duality of legal traditions and application of provincial law 8.1 Both the common law and the civil law are equally authoritative and recognized sources of the law of property and civil rights in Canada and, unless otherwise provided by law, if in interpreting an enactment it is necessary to refer to a province’s rules, principles or concepts forming part of the law of property and civil rights, reference must be made to the rules, principles and concepts in force in the province at the time the enactment is being applied. Canadian Heritage Home > Canadian Identity > Cultural Diversity and Rights > Human Rights > The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms > Your Guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms > Section 3233 : Application of Charter

187 | P a g e

Section 3233 : Application of Charter Section 32 Section 33 Section 32 Application of Charter 1. This Charter applies a. to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matter within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and b. to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province. 2. Notwithstanding subsection (1), section 15 shall not have effect until three years after this section comes into force. The purpose of this section is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to governments, and not to private individuals, businesses or other organizations. As mentioned earlier, section 32(2) was necessary in order to give governments a chance to amend their laws to bring them into line with the right to equality. Section 15 of the Charter did not come into force until three years after the rest of the Charter became effective on April 17,1982.

Provincial Court continued 2 (1) The Provincial Court of British Columbia is continued. (2) The court is a court of record. (3) The court and every judge have jurisdiction throughout British Columbia to exercise all the power and perform all the duties conferred or imposed on a judge of the Provincial Court, a magistrate, justice or 2 or more justices sitting together, under an enactment of British Columbia or of Canada. (4) [Repealed 2002-37-14.] (5) The court is designated as the youth justice court for purposes of the Youth Criminal Justice Act (Canada) and a judge is a youth justice court judge under that Act by virtue of the judge's appointment under this Act. (6) The court may sit at any place in British Columbia for the orderly dispatch of the business of the court.

188 | P a g e

Ontario Court of Justice 34. The Ontario Court (Provincial Division) is continued as a court of record under the name Ontario Court of Justice in English and Cour de justice de l’Ontario in French. 1996, c. 25, s. 9 (5).

Provincial Court of Nova Scotia 2A (1) There is hereby established a court of record to be known as the Provincial Court of Nova Scotia. The Provincial Court of Alberta The Provincial Court 2(1) There shall be a provincial court for Alberta to be styled “The Provincial Court of Alberta”.

189 | P a g e

(2) Repealed RSA 2000 c16(Supp) s3.

190 | P a g e

(3

191 | P a g e

192 | P a g e

the Provincial Court of Nova Scotia. A common law court of record has never been outlawed in this country. Under CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM vol 25 section 344, Federal District Courts are courts of record. A court of record has the power to fine or imprison for contempt. It proceeds under the common law, not a statute or a code. The tribunal is independent of the magistrate. Sometimes it has a seal, sometimes not. Those are the 4 elements. [12/18/2015 6:47:43 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: [18/12/2015 8:26:54 PM] Dead Beat Dads: "Again you have heard that it was said to those of old, 'You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform your oaths to the Lord.' But I say to you, do not swear at all; neither by heaven, for it is God's throne; nor by the earth, for it is His footstool; nor by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. Nor shall you swear by your head, because you cannot make one hair white or black. But let your 'Yes' be 'Yes,' and your 'No,' 'No.' For whatever is more than these is from the evil one" (Matthew 5:33-37). Thats why you never swear an oath

193 | P a g e

ANd this is the way they also trick you to go against the Common Law GODS LAW ( to swear an go against God) and how they get you into their private world

<<< The thing is, have to dig deeper, as ignorance is in the superficial 'understanding' of the words.

"It remains to be inquired whether this practice, lawful and righ during the whole period of the Patriarchal and Mosaci dispensations, has become unlawful and wrong under the Christian dispensation." [12/18/2015 6:55:28 PM] Robin- Easy isn't an option...: [2:42:33 AM] David Man: thanks ed that's good to know. thank you. belief (n.) late 12c., bileave, replacing Old English geleafa "belief, faith," from West Germanic ga-laubon "to hold dear, esteem, trust" (cognates: Old Saxon gilobo, Middle Dutch gelove, Old High German giloubo, German Glaube)

<<< the following is from my dictionary:

--------------------------------------believe. (denotes belief as grounded on testimony) give assent to, Credo. Have faith in, trust word of, (man); put trust in truth of a statement, efficacy of a principle.

To have a firm persuasion of any thing. In some cases, to have full persuasion, approaching to certainty; in others, more doubt is implied. It is often followed by in or on, especially in scriptures . To believe in, is to hold as the object of faith. “ye believe in God, also believe in me” John 14. To believe on, is to trust, to place full confidence in, to rest upon with faith. “To them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name.” John 1:12 notice cancel title

194 | P a g e

regarding: 'xxxxxxxx'

On this day, December 5, 2015, i: [a] man, Ross, hereby cancel all obligation to the title of 'Defendant' or any such title, as i believe being so bound causes harm to i, a man; i believe i am liable ONLY to my fellow man; i wish to settle this matter out of court; who says i do wrong?

i say all herein be true ------notice idiot regarding: 'xxxxxxxx' i: [a] man, Ross, am an idiot to the Legal Society, its practices and procedures, and the language of legal persons, Legalese, all of which i do not understand i say all herein be true ------notice not ready to proceed regarding: 'xxxxxxxxx' i: [a] man, Ross, am not ready to proceed; i require an additional 60 days to settle this matter out of court i say all herein be true ------notice orders regarding: 'xxxxxx' Any man or woman who directs an order to i: a man, Ross, bears liability i say all herein be true

195 | P a g e

----notice representation regarding: 'xxxxxxx' Any man or woman who acts on behalf of i: [a] man, Ross, bears all liability i say all herein be true Husband is full liability…. Jeremiah 31:31-34King James Version (KJV) 31

Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of

Israel, and with the house of Judah: 32

Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by

the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD:

Ask the judge if he is accusing you i f he starts to attack you along with prosecution..just like jesus with pontius pilot…..watch the judge back down..

matthew 27:11And Jesus stood before the governor: and the governor asked him, saying, Art thou the King of the Jews? And Jesus said unto him, Thou sayest. 12And when he was accused of the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing. 13Then said Pilate unto him, Hearest thou not how many things they witness against thee? 14And he answered him to never a word; insomuch that the governor marvelled greatly.

John 8:1-11King James Version (KJV) 8 Jesus went unto the mount of Olives. 2

And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him;

and he sat down, and taught them.

196 | P a g e

3

And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they

had set her in the midst, 4

They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.

5

Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?

6

This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down,

and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. 7

So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is

without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. 8

And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

9

And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one,

beginning at the eldest, even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst. 10

When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman,

where are those thine accs? hath no man condemned thee? 11

She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin

no more.

The queen is a reflection of us the people…not the other way around..so if the court is free for the queen then so is it free for the people!!! Conusance CONUSANCE, CLAIM OF, English law. This is defined to be an intervention by a third person, demanding judicature in thecause against the plaintiff, who has chosen to co mmence his action out of claimant's court. 2 Wilson's R. 409. 2. It is a question of jurisdiction between the two courts Fortesc. R. 157; 5 Vin. Abr. 588; and not be tween the plaintiff anddefendant, as in the case of plea to the jurisdiction, and therefore it must be demanded by the party entitl ed to conusance, or

197 | P a g e

byhis representative, and not by the defendant or his attorney. Id. ibid. A plea to the jurisdict ion must be pleaded in person, but aclaim of conusance may be made by attorney. 1 Chit. Pl. 403. 3. There are three sorts of conusance. 1. Tentere placita, which does not oust another cou rt of its jurisdiction, but onlycreates a concurrent one. 2. Cognitio placitorum, when the plea i s commenced in one court, of which conusance belongs toanother. 3. A conusance of exclusive jurisdiction; as that no other court shall hold pica, &c. Hard. 509 Ba c. Ab. Courts, D.

Claim of Consuance..is when u have a common law suit before the court and they are talking about tax code…give the man acting as a judge notice to bring it over the the right side of the court…

Claim of consonance I demand that they respect the fact that this is a common law land and if they don’t like working in a common law land as a common law magistrate that i am going to ask for your oath of office…

Ok my mates case which has been going on for just under 12 months now where a firm of solicitors had an order granted against my mate for defamation secured against his house for £18,000, they come and stole his house last December and refused him the right to go in to collect his belongings. They did this as they knew his paperwork was in there to secure a conviction agaisnt a judge who acted outside of his public jurisdiction to work in favour of an officer of the court the solicitor They then to tried to say he broke into the property and caused serious damage to a door lock, however the property at the time was still his property as we had voided the Judges order ANyway he was grabbed by the police, for them to interview him, but he stuck to what i told him in case he was grabbed, and he was then put in front of the Magistrates to start off a trial for damage. Now as this was happening we put in a claim of tres against the judge to which the courts kept throwing out saying we could not make a claim against a judge, we resubmitted the claim stating the claim was against the man who just so happened to preside as a judge, but they still would not accept it, however when they started the trial against my mate for damages we put the claim into that case, they couldnt then throw it out could they? After about two cases where the other side were ordered to put in the facts to show my mate had caused damage, and failed to do so as per the courts order, two trials took place in

198 | P a g e

which one of them they had me removerd from the court as they knew i was the one who had done his court of record for him. Again another pre trial hearing was set and the other side was ordered to submittheir evidence, agaion to which they failled, however each time i kept submitting amended courts of record for my mate which they hated Yesterday was his hearing, i was going to go but my own appeal case was placed on the same day and i couldnt do two case 140 miles apart on the same day in five minutes. He stuck to what i told him to do, keep your mouth shut and put everything on paper The Judge kept refusing his paperwork, and so he got the court usher to give it to the judge who just threw them on the floor and told the usher not to accept anymore of his paperwork My mate then said " i object to this i require the court solicitor to be brought in to have this man removed from the bench as this man cannot act under his PUBLIC oath of office to protect the public. The Judge adjourned, my mate then put all of his copies of his Court of Record on the Judges bench and came out. A Duty solicitor weas called to assist my mate, he wanted to know all the facts of the case but my mate simply said thats not for you to know your job is to make sure that man who cannot adhere to his public oath of office is removed from the bench When court was called back in the duty solicitor went in and had a word with the alleged prosecution and then turned to my mate and said i cannot help you as i am an oficer of the court. My mate then said does that apply to all solicitors to which he said "YES". My mate wrote and alse stated in court that the court takes notice that all solicitors are officers of the court, the court is in session today to hear a case for a solicitor to which is a major conflict of interest. The Judge then turned around and said "case dismised" but tried to cover his arse by saying it was dismissed to to the lack of evidence, and the fact the other side submitted a picture of my mate which had no relevance to the case and told the prosecution to get rid of the picture immediately

> KT = Keith > JP = Judge > BL = Bailiff > BB = Bald Bailiff > FC = Female Clerk > OC = Off Camera (unknown) >>> 0:00 mark >> KT: No… >> JP: Alright, sit down please sir. >> KT: Just Keith >> JP: Pardon? >> KT: Just Keith >> JP: Just which? >> KT: Keith. I'm here to ah… correct a mistake by the court. [inaudible] > First of all, the court has made a mistake. >> JP: Are you Wilfred Keith Thompson? >> KT: Ah… no that's not what I normally go by, no. >> JP: Can I see the information? >> KT: …That's a fictitious entity as in person, legally speaking sir I've tried to > clarify this a few times but apparently the level of incompetence at the… >> JP: So your name is Keith Thompson?

199 | P a g e

>> KT: My name's Keith, that's all, nothing more, nothing less. >> JP: You don't have a last name sir? >> KT: I have a family name, a clan name. But that's irrelevant today. >> JP: So, you are not Wilfred Keith Thompson. >> KT: Okay, one more time, on/for the record, I am Keith... nothing more…nothing less >> JP: Then sit down sir. I'm looking for a Wilfred Keith Thompson. > Please sit down sir. >> KT: Actually I… >> JP: Please sit down sir. (loudly) >> KT: Sorry… can't do that. I served ah… into the court this morning… >> JP: Sir…

Jury nullification occurs in a trial when a jury acquits a defendant, even though the of the jury may believe that the defendant did the illegal act, yet they don't believe he or she should be punished for it. This may occur when of the jury disagree with the law the defendant has been charged with breaking, or believe that the law should not be applied in that particular case. A jury can similarly unjustly and illegally convict a defendant on the ground of disagreement with an existing law, even if no law is broken (although in jurisdictions with double jeopardy rules, a conviction can be overturned on appeal, but an acquittal cannot). A jury verdict that is contrary to the letter of the law pertains only to the particular case before it. If a pattern of acquittals develops, however, in response to repeated attempts to prosecute a statutory offence, this can have the de facto effect of invalidating the statute. A pattern of jury nullification may indicate public opposition to an unwanted legislative enactment. In the past, it was feared that a single judge or of government officials may be unduly influenced to follow established legal practice, even when that practice had drifted from its origins. In most modern Western legal systems, however, judges often instruct juries to serve only as "finders of facts", whose role it is to determine the veracity of the evidence presented, the weight accorded to the evidence,[1] to apply that evidence to the law, and to reach a verdict; but not to question the law or decide what it says. Similarly, juries are routinely cautioned by courts and some attorneys not to allow sympathy for a party or other affected persons to compromise the fair and disionate evaluation of evidence during the guilt phase of a trial. These instructions are criticized by advocates of jury nullification. Some commonly cited historical examples of jury nullification involve jurors refusing to convict persons accused of violating the Fugitive Slave Act by assisting runaway slaves or being fugitive slaves themselves, or for breaking the refusal of American colonial juries to convict a defendant under English law.[2]

200 | P a g e

Juries have also refused to convict due to the perceived injustice of a law in general, [3][4] or the perceived injustice of the way the law is applied in particular cases. [5]There have also been cases where the juries have refused to convict due to their own prejudices such as the race of one of the parties in the case.[6]

A tort, in common law jurisdictions, is a civil wrong[1] that unfairly causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting inlegal liability for the person who commits the tortious act, called a tortfeasor. Although crimes may be torts, the cause of legal action is not necessarily a crime, as the harm may be due to negligence which does not amount to criminal negligence. The victim of the harm can recover their loss as damages in a lawsuit. In order to prevail, the plaintiff in the lawsuit must show that the actions or lack of action was the legally recognizable cause of the harm. The equivalent of tort in civil law jurisdictions is delict. Praecipe From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In law in the United States, a praecipe is a document that either (A) commands a defendant to appear and show cause why an act or thing should not be done; or (B) requests the clerk of court to issue a writ and to specify its contents. In Canada it is used in place of a notice of motion as an application for a desk order that is granted in the court registry without a hearing before a judge. However in the United States Clerks are variously limited to handle minor precepts (typical status adjustments) in the name of the Court (i.e., a Clerk cannot issue any forceful or mandamus writ). History[edit] The word praecipe is from the second-person imperative of the Latin praecipio ("I order"), thus meaning "order [this]." The word survived long after the Roman Empireand found its way into England, where it survived in the English law. Today its function has barely changed since Roman times. The writ was often issued to amend or change a subsequent order or to correct an error that may have been missed earlier. Its appearance in American law is not surprising, as many of the English customs and traditions were ed on.

If you know not the names of things, the knowledge of things themselves perishes; and of you lose the names, the distinction of the things is certainly lost. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------[Cf. “Courts may be classified and divided according to several methods, the following being the more usual: Courts of record

201 | P a g e

and courts not of record. The former being those whose acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled, or recorded, for a perpetual memory and testimony[3], and which have power to fine or imprison for contempt[2]. Error [writ of mandamus, or a writ of error, as opposed to appeals] lies to their judgments, and they generally possess a seal[1]. Courts not of record are those of inferior dignity, which have no power to fine or imprison, and in which the proceedings are not enrolled or recorded. 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal. 225; Erwin v. U. S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231. A “court of record” is a judicial tribunal having attributes and exercising functions independently of the person of the magistrate[5] designated generally to hold it, and proceeding according to the course of common law[4], its acts and proceedings being enrolled for a perpetual memorial[3]. Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc., Mass., 171, per Shaw, C. J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689.” 4 Black's Law Dictionary 425-6 (1951)] Thusly a court of record is a court which must meet the following criteria: 1. it has a seal [Cf. 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426] 2. it has the power to fine or imprison for contempt [Cf. 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231.][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426] 3. it keeps a record of the proceedings “Its judicial proceedings are enrolled, or recorded, for a perpetual memory and testimony” [Cf. 3 Bl. Comm. 24; 3 Steph. Comm. 383; The Thomas Fletcher, C.C.Ga., 24 F. 481; Ex parte Thistleton, 52 Cal 225; Erwin v. U.S., D.C.Ga., 37 F. 488, 2 L.R.A. 229; Heininger v. Davis, 96 Ohio St. 205, 117 N.E. 229, 231] 4. it proceeds according to the other four attributes of a court of record and according to the larger course of common law (not statutes or codes) [Cf. Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426] 5. its tribunal is independent of the magistrate (no judges in a court of record) [Cf. Jones v. Jones, 188 Mo.App. 220, 175 S.W. 227, 229; Ex parte Gladhill, 8 Metc. Mass., 171, per Shaw, C.J. See, also, Ledwith v. Rosalsky, 244 N.Y. 406, 155 N.E. 688, 689][Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed., 425, 426] note that at a court of record a [‘JUDGE’] is a Magistrate instead (in all common law countries), and he is not the tribunal; the tribunal is either You the man who brings the claim, or a fully empowered jury of one’s neighbours [not paid for by the government], assuming you require a jury which you don’t have to, and i wouldn’t suggest except on rare occasions; a Magistrate in a court of record is not allowed to make any decisions, but in a court which proceeds according to equity jurisdiction he has complete and utter discretionary powers to interpret the law as he pleases and in that scenario what the judge says at the end of the day is the law, which brings me to the second point; since only common law is allowed in a court of record which is your court, that's why they have their arraignment process via which they ––(a) get us through pleading to accept statutes [if you

202 | P a g e

choose any of those 3 pleadings you've agreed to the code and to the proceedings outside the common law and inside every other law which includes equity as well as statutes], ––(b) to strip us of our court and have us be in theirs at their mercy;

Tell a bailiff to back off or they will assume full liability as they are interfering with your right to defend yourself.

Affidavits are only done by a man or woman..officers cnat make on because they cant be cross examined on it..they can only make Deposition…

U might be asking the judge “are my unalienable rights completely in tact in this court?” he may refuse to answer with an outburst like: I AM NOT LISTNEING TO THIS DRIBBLE” there are only 3 knds of answer allowed in court “YES” “NO” or”i have insufficient evidence toreply to that” since the judge hasn’t used any of those reply with “ what is not rebutted stands as true, let the record show that my unalienable rights are fully in tact in this court.”any more resistance require the judge to ”i require yourpoint of law to arrive at your lawfull conclusion and facts?” he will be stuck..

If a procsecutor is saying the are representing the queen…. Ask if that is the same queen Elizabeth that is sworn to up hold the common law.... if they answer yes it is...continue with... then she wont mind respecting my wishes to cross examine her as the common law allows for and your legal world believes in as well i think its called habeous corpus if a police officer ignores you are a man and u let the prosecutre know your are a man and then you let a judge know you are a man and the legal system still ignore u and fines you… it is simply robbery by the man acting as judge cloaked in legality, but not the legal society…because they will throw him under the bus…specially a trial by jury….scream this is a robbery and the mandated reports better act!!!

Courtroom Etiquette

Over the centuries the English court system has developed many customs. The customs are not arbitrary and can be summed up into one simple point: Consideration and respect for the interests and concerns of all parties. By following the customs one will have a better chance of bringing into the court a high degree of credibility, respect, and even success for himself.

203 | P a g e

Not all of the customs are covered here. But here are some important suggestions that one should follow: Avoid Judge's Pet Peeves Judges are persons, too. They have preferences just as you do. Click here to read about some of their gripes. Addressing the court Unless you are so invited to do, never directly address the judge or any officer or litigant of the court. You are not dealing with the individual of the court. A court is defined as the person and the suit of the sovereign. During court proceedings you are doing business with the court as a complete entity. Therefor you address the court. When you address the court, look directly at the judge, even if your message is to be acted upon by another member of the court. It is permissible to begin your address to the court with the phrase, "Your Honor." The judge is the chief officer of the court. He is the point for the court. By saying "Your Honor" you are merely getting the attention of the court and opening a communication channel with the court. It is possible to have a court without a judge. In England that would happen if the king himself were sitting on the throne, conducting the proceedings. In America, if the judge were absent, then the jury (if it is not an advisory jury) could either sit en banc, or appoint a judge, or the jury foreman could conduct the proceeding himself. If no jury is present, then the plaintiff (in his sovereign capacity) would conduct the proceedings, and all communication with the court would be through him. Comportment Court decorum is a high priority. When someone is addressing the court, when he has the floor, he is entitled to be fully and fairly heard. You should be like a statue. Nodding or shaking your head, talking to others, reading, or otherwise distracting yourself or others is a grave discourtesy. It is acceptable to take notes when another is talking. You can lose a lot of points in the minds of others who understand court customs (you certainly do not want to lose status in the mind of the tribunal). Attorneys should onish their clients and witnesses to never show any outward response to anything said or done in the courtroom. If the opposition is lying through his teeth, you will get your opportunity to present your truth later. The court, through the judge or other channel, is always the entity with whom you are doing business. It is acting in a sovereign capacity. As such, it receives no direction from anyone, but acts on its own sovereign authority. When addressing the court, it is gross error to say something like, "The court's attention is directed to...." or "The court will note...." It is also gross error to so address the human who speaks for the court. If you want the court to take notice of something, you can properly preface your presentation with, "The court's attention is invited..." or "May it please the court...". Never say to the judge, "Your attention is

204 | P a g e

invited," because you are addressing the court through the judge, you are not addressing the judge himself. It is ok to say, "Your Honor, the court's attention is invited...," because the phrase "Your Honor" serves only to open the channel of communication. The whole idea is that the court is in charge of things. You do not want to do or say anything to challenge the sovereignty of the court--it will be resented. If the court does something that you believe is unfair or wrong, the proper corrective response would be to object, or to make a verbal or written motion. Dress Excepting for the robe, you should dress as the judge dresses. John Molloy's book, Dress for Success is an excellent resource. A best seller, it is in all the libraries and book stores. Wear a business suit, polished shoes, conservative haircut. Your appearance broadcasts your attitude. You can be certain that if you look like a rebel, you will be so treated. It is a discourtesy of major proportions to do as one litigant did in a San Francisco appellate court: A 21 year old, on his way to the beach, walked into the clerks office wearing only bathing trunks and sandals with long uncut hair. His response to criticism: "Hey! I have a right to dress any way I want!" Yes, indeed. But, he didn't get what he wanted from them. Look and talk like a lawyer; speak in formal or court English (not slang); appearance plays a big role in winning your case. What's at stake is your credibility. Are you believable? Not if you sound, act, and dress like a ruffian. Read more about that here. Language In America we are trilingual. We speak three languages: Street English (slang), Formal English (taught in schools), and King's English (not taught in the schools, but used in the court rooms). Although they involve similar sounds, they are quite distinctive in how they convey ideas. For example, in Street English if you think something is really good you can express that thought by saying, "That's really bad!" Or if something's really cool, you say, "That's hot!" Foreigners who have studied Formal English have a lot of trouble understanding local slang. If you're from the neighborhood, then there is no problem. If you want to communicate with someone from another neighborhood, then you use Formal English. Slang is too volatile and localized for communication with folks from other geographical locations. Formal English, because it is widely taught, is the best way to communicate with a stranger. If you want to communicte with the court, then you use King's English, also called the Language of the Court, or the Language of the Law. It is a separate language and should be studied as such. Changes in meaning can take as long as 300 years, so it is useful for referencing precedent. Law schools do not really teach the idea that it is a separate language. Consequently, even attorneys can make crucial language errors. Judges attend special classes (called seminars) where they can be apprised of the the real game. If you want to know what a word means in the court room, look it up in "Words and Phrases," a multi-volume dictionary at the law library. Other useful works are Corpus Juris, American Jurisprudence, and California Jurisprudence. A useful exercise is to start at the beginning of the U.S. Constitution and look up each new

205 | P a g e

word in the legal reference books. You will be amazed how differently parts of the Constitution will read when you become aware of the full legal meanings of words. Even prepositions and conjunctions have been battled over in the courts. Court relations out of court

There are many opportunities for with court personnel outside the courtroom environment. The two most frequent situations are when you file papers with the clerk and when you have with the opposition. Whatever the situation, look your best and be your best. If someone wants to scrap with you, just the opportunity by. Your case is in court, and that's where the fight will be....all according to the rules. I always give them a friendly greeting. And I always am courteous to them, regardless of their behavior. I learned this from the Buddhist leader in southeast Asia. Here's the story: Back in the 1970's and 1980's the Buddhist monks were very upset with the local government. To make their point they would from time to time douse themselves with kerosene and ignite themselves. This great suicidal act encouraged by the Buddhist leader was a major embarrasment to the local government. Normally, the local government had a simple solution for dealing with its enemies. It simply kidnapped and executed them, usually around midnight. As far as the neighbors knew, the victim simply was gone the next day, never to be seen again. However, the Buddhist leader, who everyone knew was behind the suicides, was never touched. He went about the country without the usual bodyguards that normal leaders of the country had. People marveled that he was so troublesome to government, and so unprotected, and that nothing happened to him pesonally. Though there was no definite answer, the speculation was that he was untouched because EVERYONE liked him. The Buddhist leader was so likeable by both friends and enemies that no one really wanted to kill him, despite the trouble he was causing. The lesson to be learned here is that it is important how you conduct your battle. Do it with friendliness and courtesy. Even if your enemy would not hesitate to stab you in the back, treat him (guardedly) as your friend. Let him be the uncultured fool. If the court clerk refuses to file your papers because of some incorrectly perceived error, then do it her way as long as you suffer no significant loss of rights. If you can't see your way to do it the clerk's way, then simply ask the clerk to "FILE ON DEMAND." Normally that stops all argument, but save that for last. Usually the clerks know what they are doing and if you do things their way you will increase the probability of winning. If push comes to shove, you can still file a motion with the trial court for mandamus under 28 USC 1361 if you are the plaintiff, or with the appellate court if you are the defendant. At all times be friendly, even trade jokes. You never know when that may pay off behind the scenes. More than once I have seen court personnel do mysterious turnarounds when I thought I would never get them convinced to do things my way.

206 | P a g e

, the opposition is human, too. They will make their mistakes. Of course, you will take advantage of their mistakes. But always be fair, friendly and courteous. \

We should be wary of the 8 words we chose so they aren’t misconscued such as there their they’re ,,,,,,you and ewe…but what about i and EYE hummm????

Judges aren’t asking you if your are present or absent!! They are asking do you belong to our society in a masked way to make you believ it’s a present or absent statement… they r saying r u playing by my rules trick question of jurisdiction!!!

In court point directly at the man/woman who took your kids, or the man who arrested you. “That man tresed on me and I require immediate restoration of property” “That man tresed against me” Say 3 times in court.

Treat judge like priest, calmly with honour. When an honorable man is judge, he is doing God’s work and protecting man.

Every single time ur dealing with the government call out the man… if gov is sending u a bill ask them who is the man who says i owe this? U want a bill of particulars of either the service they have provided.. but ask for the bill first… then ask for the itemized bill explaining why? If the number changes u have fraud!!!

207 | P a g e

The bill of rights is limiting …. Not everyone wanted the bill of rights because man does not get his rights from them… they argued that man would be confused that government had some sort of control over man…guess what …it did…read

We cannot assume that those who fought against a bill of rights were reactionary, undemocratic, or anti-American, for some of the fiercest opposition came from the most ionate civil libertarians. Some said a bill of rights would not guarantee but restrict freedoms—that a list of specific rights would imply that they were granted by the government rather than inherent in nature. They also ed a maxim of common law, expressio unius est exclusio alterius—the mention of one thing amounts to the exclusion of others. Guarantees of freedom of speech, press, religion, and so on might imply that these were the only freedoms to which citizens were entitled. Others said that the federal government could never be in a position to interfere with personal rights—those protections belonged in state constitutions—and that the Constitution should say nothing about them. “Why,” asked Alexander Hamilton in “Federalist 84,” “declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?” After all, the Constitution does not guarantee the right to food or drink, but no one feels the need to protect them from federal interference.

A constitution is the elements of a body…

Who would care if coca cola had a bill of rights!!??

If someone brought up roe vs wade we would argue are u roe or wade? Who cares about a decision in 1908? The elements of the trial are completely different!!!! Kind of similar isn’t exact.. !!! And we don’t know how to interpret their decision, maybe they stuck their tongue out and the judge ruled against him? I don’t know and we can’t speculate because they have that authority!!

Get away from the word of man…stop reading the constitution or the bible because they were both written by man…god is in our hearts …karl’s concept are common sense from the heart… where god put it…

208 | P a g e

Look for common ground…and write who is in charge of it…hey bob i am going to be accesing this public land and i am the public…and i am going top grow some medicinal plants…do u have a problem with that?

In the USA if the state want to take u to court u ask to go to the court of original jurisdiction so there is no conflict of interest… which is the supreme court of America.. the original court of jurisdiction..

1

U.S. Code › Title 28 › Part IV › Chapter 81 › § 1251

28 U.S. Code § 1251 - Original jurisdiction (a)The Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies between two or more States. (b)The Supreme Court shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction of: (1)All actions or proceedings to which ambassadors, other public ministers, consuls, or vice consuls of foreign states are parties; (2)All controversies between the United States and a State; (3)All actions or proceedings by a State against the citizens of another State or against aliens.

Judges are going to interpret Obamacare…they apparently think they are smater than the congressman who wrote it!!

Cnn politics…article In a moment of high drama, Chief Justice John Roberts sent a bolt of tension through the Court when he soberly announced that he would issue the majority opinion in the case. About two-thirds of the way through his reading, it became clear that he again would be responsible for rescuing Obamacare.

209 | P a g e

"Congress ed the Affordable Care Act to improve health insurance markets, not to destroy them," Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. "If at all possible, we must interpret the Act in a way that is consistent with the former, and avoids the latter."

So even if u master the codes they are going to interpret it however they see fit… Do ask a prosecutor to dismiss their case…u wouldn’t want him to dismiss your case!!! Let them do it on their own…

Legalese.. Nolle Prosequi [Latin, Will not prosecute.] The term nolle prosequi is used in reference to a formal entry upon the record made by a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit or a prosecutor in a criminal action in which that individual declares that he or she wishes to discontinue the action as to certain defendants, certain issues, or altogether. A nolle prosequi is commonly known as nol pros.

When they call us a defendant they call you a what ....remind them that u r a who not a what Corporations exist to benefit man...if they harm a man they will lose their charter (the charter will get pulled and they will no longer be able to conduct business with man)..? Congress and the irs is a what I only speak to a who... Ask the man or woman acting as an irs agent thinks that I owe well says so in writing and if ur wrong by one cent I am going to get u for harming man..

210 | P a g e

- Court trusts; law, codes, and beliefs in court We are not here to dispute a police officer’s story...we are here the as what law I broke... We don't use or interpret their code world. .. They don't care wat we think about their code.. so don't use their hide as your opinion... It's called code for a reason. It's code for something else and we can't interpret it because we didn't go to school for it Man didn't come from the Bible. ..or else how did aboriginal people settle their disputes?

If all parties agree u can do the trial over a phone or skype for the convenience…..

f*ck equity!!! It’s our claim i don’t want a judge’s opinion of how to split something up…

Write to the building manager.. the steward …the chief judge.. Notice... when i hold court i am going to bring forth video cameras into my court.. the courthouse might impose restriction to not film anybody else or the hallway or outside the courtroom or the security booth… Or …during my proceedings i am going to have the aid and assistance of audio and video recording equipment..

For the ease and conviniece of this court it is necessary that i bring recording devices such as audio and video to aid and assist this court..

If the judge won’t allow it ask for the find and facts and conclusion of law

211 | P a g e

If there is concern of liability..i will bear the burden of liability if something goes wrong do you require i to post a certain bond or collateral in case of any harm or claim of any loss?

U better have your belief system tight…the judges are looking at you to see if you believe their bullshit..ask the judge for his POINT OF LAW!!! Judges are trying to fool you with bullshit…. So make sure u repeat 3 times!!!

That’s my property and i have done no wrong!!!

Common law judges consider equity courts arbitrary

Equity and the common law represented opposing values in the English legal system. The co mmon law was the creation of ajudiciary independent from the Crown. Commonlaw courts believed in the strict interpretation of statutes and precedentialcases. Whereas th e common law provided results based on years of judicial wisdom, equity produced results b ased on thewhim of the king's chancellor. Commonlaw judges considered equity Arbitrary an d a royal encroachment on the power of anindependent judiciary. Renowned seventeenthcentury judge John Selden called equity "a roguish thing" and noted that resultsin equity cases might well depe nd on the size of a chancellor's foot.

Guilty…maybe i am…. Since guilt means debt …will someone tender me a bill so i can settle the debt!!

when u bring a claim into court and want to run it parallel the opposition can ask to postpone the court and sty the proceeding for 21 days to prepare….

212 | P a g e

Ask the judge if this a common law land… Is it not true that the legal society does not have jurisdiction over a non legal entity?

Common law not English common law….

Only Canadians can buy land here!!! ( i may have to get my sister to buy it for me and then sell it to the trust)

Stick to your story and don’t change it by one word or it will be perceived as false or unreliable..

If it was Elizabeth Alexandra Mary; born 21 April 1926 then she would never come in under queen Elizabeth because that is a title ..she would come in as Elizabeth alexandra mary as a man not a diminished capacity of the other title…she ‘aint stupid!!! Man is above king or queen because kings and queen serve the people..kings and queen have guidelines but man is unlimited not bound by some rules and obligations which might actually cause harm or burden on me…

Don’t walk into their proceeding and object to them!!! It’s not respectful!! Let them do their little tap dance and sit respectfully!!!(this is church) and then you can get up and do your two step shuffle and they will respect you too…. Don’t limit their capacity by objecting!! As you wish not to be objected to in your turn…

Don’t huff and puff and whine and roll your eyes!!! Sit quietly and respectful as u are in church..god is watching!! Look away and be still as a mouse…like nothing is occurring and if you were unphased by the 2D...ignore all name calling!!! They are looking for der to see if u understand legalese!!they pull your string and u react…u somehow understood their chinesse is what they are looking for…der..jurisdiction!!

213 | P a g e

By objecting you prove u understand what they are saying.. Act like they are talking chinesse to you… and just say what ou would to a judge who only spoke chiness to you… i don’t know what u are saying but are u looking for the legal robin laurnece Mitchell or the man robin ,Laurence Mitchell? Ask questions!! Ur not replying!!!is it true that the legal society has no jurisdciton over a non legal entity? Ask more questions that set you up not replying to them!! get judges right of the bat i can’t understand what you are saying because i don’t speak legalese can we talk man to man? Is this not a Judea chirtina society i am calling you out as a man for assistance!! In this culture you have to help your fellow man!!

Jew didn’t use to charge jews interest..that was for everyone else , outsiders cananites….

They are an honorable society all u have to do is to point out the bullshit so they know you know..and they will let you go…

We don’t care what they are doing..let them do it… so long as when they enter the plea that they know they bear full liability for any burden or charge placed on me or harm that comes to me… so let them do it… they are just playing the bluff card…

If you force me to be the defendant then i am going to require fair and just compensation..

I am man evoke common law not the English Common Law, English capital E Common capital C Law capital L but the common law,common lowercase c law lowercase l but the common law derived from the word of God capital G. signed dean Clifford

U might see a magistrate bow to you!

214 | P a g e

prosecutors will entice u into arguments because if you argue then u bring them to life… ignore them too!!!

A judge will call u pathetic and an idiot to throw u… this is the beautiful end!!! don’t react because you are going home..a real man does not get phased by words!!

Explaining yourself gives them authority…they aren’t mommy so we are not explaining shit to them… You will explain yourself if we are talking man to man!!

Mr. Mitchell!!! Is the name my mother gave me….if u are looking for the legal person with that name that is not i ! i am not a legal person talking man to man!!

When they call ur name… you ask… DID SOMEBODY CALL OUT MY NAME?.......?WHAT NAME DID YOU CALL OUT THE NAME MY MOM GAVE ME OR THE LEGAL PERSON?.......I DON’T HAVE A LEGAL NAME?.......IS THIS A LEGAL PROCEEDING BECAUSE I AM INCOMPTENT IN LEGALESE? I HAVE A GIVEN NAME THAT MY MOM GAVE ME AND ITS ROBIN LAURENCE MITCHELL AND I AM NOT GOING TO GIVE IT TO OYU WITHOUT JUST AND FAIR COMPENSATION…

No one arrested us those police officers tresed upon i a man..now you place your claim before this court that while you address this legal matter i also wish that you address this tress against that man acting as the rcmp at the same time.. He may have arrested the legal person for doing something illegal..that’s fine but the problem is I am a man and that is a tres without and affidavit on file that i have done anything wrong!!

You broke some code…well u don’t understand what that is because u don’t speak legalese…and there is no law that requires me to!! Show me the law because we aren’t in a code land we are in a common law land!!!

215 | P a g e

As soon as they get a ticket their case(compliant) is moving forward where is your case (we get to claim) ? Compliants are not real witness to anything..ie like i thkng he stole my wallet..a claim is real world…he stole my wallet!! they complain we keep it real…

I only understand one werd in legalese..idiot!! Debt an guilt are the same..guilt is debt in german…so clear the man (common law) debt then cover the publics debt… if that has been cleared there is no reason for the court to move forward…no debt no guilt….

"The German word for debt - 'schuld' - is the same as the German word for 'guilt'," he explains. "To get into debt you have done something bad and that describes the German people's attitude quite well."

U can only get your case discharged if you have a claim before the court….that way u can show harm to a man… Otherwise u will only get a dismissal..

If there is a traffic ticket…they can harvest us with the ticket or the court time..either is unacceptable if i am not going after compensation…or else the crown has the ability to fraudulently generate money…

U can only injure your mail box…you can only injury what is replaceable..harm to a man is not replacable…..like your time

216 | P a g e

Immediately attack a lawyer….the only know how to attack not defend!!! They are used to facing punchin bag defendants..you are now armed with rights!!! Go get ‘em for their tres but be as forgiving as jesus!!

When a judge wants to give you a title say thank you because defendant is a lovely title (specially if someone gives you the heavy weight champchip belt ) but you will have to defned it too!!! I wouldn’t want to face the lawyer( the heavy weight number one contender) because he is going to kick our butts!! So say thank for the lovely title but at this time it would be such a burden as it would cause me great harm as a man to bear that title!!

We write these simple claims so we can easily repeat it without changing it when we say it to stay consistent…and the second is to get the lawyers to not take us serious because of its size.. but the judge will take it serious…

It’s a good strategy to think of the legal society as the boyscouts…they have their rules but u don’t care what they do or think about you because u don’t belong to the boyscouts..that’s a total lack jurisdiction that the boyscouts have over you..

Ask the prosecutor if this is your property? (the prosecutor will probaboly do a great job defending his case saying your property the whole time building your case!! Agree that this is my property!!!

You might be to broke to pay for court and u could ask the judge to do a payment plan… and the judge may require financial disclosure…

If it was free people might be frivolous with their claims… paying is just fine to keep the system going…

217 | P a g e

How to screen jurors (framing the “no allegiances” question) ? Reputation is very important, be good and honourable man in court, or they’ll never let you evoke the common law again.

When you’ve consented all the way into prison……. “look Bob, you’re a great judge, and then you for coming down and talking to the other day man to man. But maybe I acted a little in haste to get out of prison. Honestly I can’t live up to those and conditions I agreed that I would abide by. So again I’m talking to you as your fellow man, if I do this, it’s gonna cause me harm; I’m gonna lose income, I’m gonna lose time from my family and I know you don’t want to hurt your fellow man Bob. So can you please see to it that you’re not gonna hold it against me if I have to travel out of the province to see my family or driving my truck, so please write back to me immediately.

If the judge ask u if you are that person..reply with…i believe that person was created and is owned by the province of British Columbia ( if it’s your drivers licence). I can notify the principal if that will help you..I think it’s the secretary of state or the governor or the prime minister of british Columbia..

Tell the judge ..Bob you do see here my common law claim that that man who flashed his blue light in my rear view mirror; he tresed upon me and i require you to hear that matter at this time as well…

Isn’t every piece of id a new person?

I require pen and ink and paper the properly put an answer before the court( so that it can be filed and recorded For all time)..(once it filed he can’t rebut it..) but when it out of your mouth it goes on the record then and only then!!! Judges generally read it out loud…..

218 | P a g e

A person is a man, according to his rank in his society he owe duties and obligations in which he is obliged to conduct and carry out and if he fails in those duties and obligations they may impose upon him. So clearly this legal society is trying to impose on me as a man who is clearly not a legal person…

One must realize there is no legal society in Saudi Arabia but they do have a law society but have no idea what legal is….law is universal legal is for a couple of hundred millions of people…

If you break a banks (private property) window the government cant come after you… maybe the insurance company could show loss and come after you.. but the bank is indemnified and government hasn’t suffered any loss so why is it drag u to court is what u should ask…

Don’t smile at the judge!! Don’t show any emotion or the judge will eat u alive..not even when he has made his judgement because he can still still his mind…wait until you get out of court…. If a judge really wants to spank you he will!!! Be respectful we are in a public setting…

U wont see a prosecutor jumping up for victory..it’s court room decorum…

Judges are trying to make judges of us… they are picking up where mom and dad left off..

Make the judge tell you why he is doing it ..don’t try and spell it out for them…u do this simply by …asking “point of law?”

Prosecutor may say” we feel its unsafe to release this man back into our society” it’s a dirty trick

219 | P a g e

We don’t want to be release into their society.

judges and lawyers and cops HAVE DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS NOT RIGHTS!!!

HEY BOB ACTING AS A JUDGE, THERE IS NO LEGAL CLOAK ON ME!!!

The term void ab initio, which means "to be treated as invalid from the outset," comes from adding the Latin phrase ab initio (from the beginning) as a qualifier. For example, in many jurisdictions where a person signs a contract under duress, that contract is treated as beingvoid ab initio.

It is my wish to go back to the status and standing of what i was before i encountered this court; to that of being a man. I believe you maintain that position in statute in which you would refer to as ab initio..( i am not maintain that position i am saying you are maintaining that position)

Thank you for the lovely summons but I can’t afford to move forward as a defendant but i can make a general appearance and present myself as a man… and there is law that can compel me otherwise!! Man is responsible for the actions of their person

Nice guy means fool!!!

If a man brings a claim then i will become the defendant!!

We are not here to dispute other peoples beliefs!! The officer believes i am operating my vehicle and i was speeding, who cares..we are not here to dispute an officers belief! Al we are going to say is prove it!!! If they say u stole something well then they better bring a third party impartial witness!!

220 | P a g e

The first time any man opens up his mouth you say what man is speaking at this time? Is there a man giving testimony at this time? Has he been sworn in today?...the judge should say nobody is testifying today..

Judges never will testify so ask him to take the stand and testify it to be true!! If he did u would have a chance to question him…so ask away because he is no longe a judge because only man can testify!!

All ask who is summoning..

The judge says …what is your name? reply with my answer is before the court( in the form of a notice or letter u sent during the istrative process)

If they bailiff walks towards you because the judge orders him you say if you touch me i will sue you..u have no right to touch another man!!!i do not give u authority to touch me!!!

They may say we need to escort you out..reply”i have as much right as anybody else to be here and as a matter of fact i was summons here..i was invited here!! The summons is my proof that i have the right to be here”

Are u karl lentz? It depends on who is asking!! And i only have a duty and obligation to answer my fellow man!!! Are u a man speaking to me?

Judge..this case is about the person/ corporate entity ed to you called karl lentz ( he is basically insisting you have this title or any title).. reply with .. look i if you think i am a citizen or defendant , well then i am going to evoke common law, i wish to no longer hold that title as i don’t feel there is a benefit now you are just dealing with the man before you.. so a person appeared for a micro sec and now its gone and a man stands before you..

221 | P a g e

I am a person but that person does not belong to your legal society or crown society… i am just a common law man and i do not have any affiliation to those society.. they may be right but they cannot impose on me as i don’t belong to their society..

Always have two courts going on at the sametime..it is the only way to really have a strong position.. when they read the case at the end they will say “guilty” to your charges on the side and “not guilty” and a discharge for your case( is said last)..

They will have civil code and the code of common law going on at the same time..

We don’t care if we are guilty of the bar society rules because we don’t belong to that society

The judge has no jurisdiction or authority over a man to bind my person under your jurisdiction.. So the judge is going to find me guilty in their world but the only problem is i don’t exist in your world!!

I don’t accept the title of agent …just be a man….

I am a person but person not of your society (sec. 32 of cthe constitution also reads it as well) so you have no jurisdiction and no matter what your society says “we are fat or ugly or not guilty or guilty , we’re rich or we are poor or whatever ele it thinks because it doesn’t matter because u cant hold what u [bob acting as a judge] believe is a person under your jurisdiction and control or hold us liable because i am a man and i have duties and responsibilities to man and mankind and not to your society. We are outside of your society we are idiots and u can’t move somebody who is incompetent….that should be clear beyond a shadow of a doubt!!s

222 | P a g e

Judge ask what ur are doing here then? Reply …i have no clue because i don’t speak legalese and there is no law that requires me to speak in legalese but i have just told u that i have no duty or obligation to speak legalese and this is a legal matter but i do have an obligation to speak to a man ..so i ask is there a man before this court that claims i have done wrong? Now if there is no man with a claim then ther is no point in me to move anything further in through this court and u cant move anything against me i am a man.. Judge….U r free to leave this court whenever you want? Reply i am also free to stay here too because u summoned me…. They summons the man!! And i rsvp and ask where do you feel you have the jurisdiction authority to impose on i a Robin Laurence Mitchell a common law man?

To the prosecutor…..I want the name of the man who thinks they can waste my valuable time and threaten me with these financial charges?

A man and an attorney can be an agent and an attorney bears no liability…

When u tell a judge u can only pay $5 and anything else would cause me and my family great harm and i know this court doesn’t want to cause harm to man…….( don’t budge)…not even if the judge says how about $6 reply with i am sorry but that is the most i can afford at this time…(because it will be seen as you going back on your word if u change ur answer… because ur answer is now wishy washy)

Accept all their charges as to be true..but meaningless because i don’t belong to their society so they cannot impose on me.

Whoever acts on my behalf assumes and bears full liability…[let them do as they please then]

You tell the judge “ i answer the court in writing before i came to court’ i stand on that and i wish to remain silent..

223 | P a g e

The judge might ignore your paperwork…and carry forth….Notice of error is next….

U.S. Citizens on a common law jury?

U want to your jury to consist of anyone who… Is a man and that he owes no duty or alligence other than to his fellow man…and that he understand that simple concept!!

One can hold a court anywhere!!

U r going to establish a court of claims in whatever the locals call a courthouse.. and u are going to bring your court in their…i a man and my court is now at this public building known as a courthouse

I am coming into this public court house and i am going to be filing a claim which if you compare it with a article 3 court it is very similar in that……( we don’t know how to interpret an article 3 court all we are doing is playing a guessing game because we didn’t create article 3)

When u get a judgement for $3000 U need to file a writ of attachment..that person has 14 -21 days to respond and explain why the writ of attachment shoudn’t be placed upon you.. or certain and conditions that your will accepts a writ of attachment ($5 dollars a month or else it will cause harm….) sometimes there are hearings..

Now if they fail to answer to the writ of attachment tell the clerk it on to the sheriffs office and have them execute it…

224 | P a g e

They may call it income i call it wages to stay away from legalese..

Nobody appears in person in your common law court..all masks are off

If you get a license for anything the government has jurisdiction!! They are going to have to come forth and show that by u not folowinig code that u harmed someone… not conjecture!!

To the prosecutor…did you write that statute? Are u trying to interpret that statute? Then why do you bring the man who did and ask him if i violated that statute..and also show me the der with i and that statute?

We are not interested in anyones interpretation… who are we to interpret Picasso work unless the man himself says so himself.. so your opinion or interpretation isn’t relevant unless u are the creator of it!!

I need the address of the majesty so i can send her a letter personally please? Murder is one word.. simple charge very real crime Victimless crime have lots of words like and an artificial heat source to speed the fermentation of an alcoholic beverage without a federal permit… Look for a word that is implied vs expressed..just say u use a natural heat source!!

Give notice to the court clerk….i a man robin Mitchell want you to be aware that there is a criminal complaint appearing in this court on this day at this time and to save the state valuable resources that i wish to have this claim presented to the court at the same time as this case number#------ is being presented to the court and that i wish and require that the court clerk have both cases before the court at that time…for judicial expediency…

225 | P a g e

The judge may tell you that they aren’t ready to prosecute and to come back in 30 days...just ask the judge to put it in the form of writing and sign it .. u now can give him an itemized bill to pay… If elvis can get a reappearance fee then so can i.. if u liked my performance then i am here to perform again!!

Only a man can set a court date..

We come in with our claim into your court and we trump your complaint!!

Is bob the man acting as an attourney trying to dismiss my case …he better have a claim or wait for the jury!!

Don’t sweat the case number!!it’s for the ease of use for the court…just ask what they are trying to do..ie r u trying to dismiss my case!!

We are only surrendering our case to our fellow man!!

We are only here to talk to our fellow man not the attourney general ..is attourney general your first and last name??

Don’t let the clerk change your paperwork…

We present ourselves not represent ourselves..

226 | P a g e

If someone interrupt and gives his opinion u quickly write him a letter saying this case is to remain sealed until it goes before the seated jury!!!

If the us gov had a case on me and i asked u to dismiss their case on me u would laugh and say u cant because it is not your case to touch!! You wouldn’t tell the government not to pursue their case would you? So why would you tell me? All you are offering is your opinion and let it go before the jury as i believe they are going to love my case.. the jury will determine the merits of this case not someone form the legal society!! We are not pleading … i am a man bring it forth to the public… U don’t tell me what i can use in my case…the of society is going to be my judge not you..no harm is going to befall the public but if you believe this case is going to cause harm to a man or woman them tell me what u require for a bond for this case to go before the public then tell me what u wish for the bond?

Don’t accept their wonderful lovely gift of a lawyer…make them co counsil..

Adding Defendants and co claimants in court, appearing as a Person and man

Let anyone be a defendant!! If they want to it they could be called wrong!!

But u can limit because of your limited resource’s… and say u will do them one at a time…

U can also add a claimant as well since they can add defendants..by filing an amended claim!!

U could also just say you are a claimant and the judge will say he doesn’t see your name on the claim..just ask him for the paper and modify the claim right there by adding your name to it and hand it back.. and ask “do you see my name there now”

227 | P a g e

Be respectful in court!!

The courthouse is public no matter how long the bar society has been playing in it for.. There is no queen’s bench building.. it’s where ever the queens is..

Don’t be upset if the judges says the prosecutor can’t answer your question because they have a limited vocabulary and they cant use words like man and claim ..this is a good sign!!

We can’t do this here!!! U say i am doing this here there is no we!!

Are u an officer of this court? (they should say yes)U do know i am not a officer of this court ; i am not a subordinate of this court? I am not a defendant nor do i wish to be anything other than a man!!

The governmnets benefits aren’t something we have to take..thanks but right now if i take that benefit it will harm i a man..

Synonyms aren’t allowed in good law..illegal and wrong are two different things!!it must be expressed not implied!!black and white and nothing in between…

In their case they don’t have to respond in a timely manner because it’s their case(their property)!!!U move ur claim (ur own case) that they are moving a false claim against you!!

Don’t move to fast and miss important steps..

228 | P a g e

A judge may want to give u a moment for discovery… because when you move the irs into your court they are going to be the plaintiff against you in a civil action … you now have the right to discovery…u can hold them in contempt of their court is they don’t provide discovery…use the federal rules and procedures right back on them… in their they need to compensate u monetarily for not providing disclosure..

I can be a citizen in one second and change my mind and be a man in the next second..i can change my mind of being the defendant instantly if i want to as well..u can change your belief faster than you socks and no one can hold u to it.. because we are fluid and dynamic…

The government can only make a complaint like a child..lol!!! man claims!! We are on top of the food chain…

Be responsible and don’t charge someone and amount u cant cover if u lose.. go for $50 and your property!!

Don’t use the word allocution as it will only confuse.. this is simple a moment just before sentencing where they ask if u have anything to say to the court before sentencing…this is where u lay it on thick like the case has no jurisdiction and no man has come forth with a debt or acussation …short and sweet like your closing arguments....(mark walhberg has this moment in “Pain and Gain”)

al·lo·cu·tion a formal speech giving advice or a warning.

The supreme court real job wasn’t to do roe vs wade it was to keep the president and the congress in check… but they only do it with their “opinions” and the president may take it or not..he is going to rely on article 1 sec 18 wat ever is necessary and proper..to by …

229 | P a g e

Supreme court is to be the first court of jurisdiction if the state is coming after a state citizen..how can u possible have a fair trial when the state is coming after you?

Judiciary act of 1789 sec. 31 clearly shows they also believe any claim can be prosecute after the death of the original moving party!!

230 | P a g e

During 911 the insurance companies were only paying out $25,000 for a kids death when they were insured..

Common wealth states move like lighting when there is a warrant on debt they are going to move on you like lightning…

Now if u claim your 22 year old as your property and they go out and do some damage guess who is liable..

But u could write to the secretary of state and tell him “ my property is incarcerated what bond do you require for the immediate restoration of that property to the public at large?”

Everything in our court is done under oath and affirmation If they want you to use their form put it on top of your case and write pg one. And write “for the ease and of use of the court clerks filing purposes only” And then another cover sheet saying this case is to remain sealed until it comes for the before the trial by jury. It is not to be opened And we don’t want the clerk or magistrate or judges opinion..unless someone is going to answer to my claim we aren’t interested… Court and courthouse are different words one is a building and the other is you rights

Blackstone’s, Her Majesty the Queen, claim and notice before the court Blackstone’s Commentaries are just that, commentaries, one man’s opinion. It’s not the word of god. Use for citation only, as exhibit. “not only do I believe it to be true, Blackstone also believed it” No dictionary definition beats the etymology of a word. Doesn’t matter how “supreme” the court building’s named, it’s fictional.

231 | P a g e

“Affidavit” is only ever heard in court (legalese), so it’s not a real word a real man should use. “Notice” is used by man. There’s no synonyms in law, Monarch of Canada does not equal Queen Elisabeth does not equal Crown. This must be expressed stated, not implied. Driver’s license does not equal Identification. United States does not equal the land mass. Every question they ask is an opportunity for us to further build our case, a chance to make our argument stronger. Never bring 2D to life, require only of man, not title or office. Whoever’s holding our property unlawfully/in naked possession. I’ve never ever met the queen in my life, and she’s accusing me of doing wrong? If a Crown can accuse me today, a tiara might accuse me tomorrow. If we don’t put a notice of forgiveness of tres, “I’m willing to forgive anyone of their tres, if they forgive me of my tres.” This is what I a man believe Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our treses, as we forgive those who tres against us, and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. [The 1928 B adds: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever and ever. Amen.]

232 | P a g e

“charges? …does that mean i owe some one a debt?” Judge” yes u owe a debt to society” “okay where is the bill? And who is the man who is going to come forward to say that bill is true?”

JUDGE “no we are not taking testimony here today” KL”are we in a nisi prius court(doesn’t this demonstrate understading? I would stay clear of legalese) KL”notice i am here as a man” judge “not noticed” If the bank is dragging u into their court..u drag the president or whomever is control into your claim in your court at district court and their u will have standing.. A way to get the sale overturned is to go to the sale and be the only bidder then this overturns your case when u file ur claim! note when you’re in front of a judge be absolutely respectful.. don’t snicker and specially don’t ever bring the other side to life by reacting to them!!! They can’t exist if you don’t act like they are their… One must see that they are in a room with nobody in it!! They are all fictions so keep it that way!!!

When a judge is reading a verdict in a case that has both the and the common law case.. what u will find is that the judge will say guilty on what ever the side first and then call you and idiot on the common law side and set u free 

Declatory Judgements… are often written but the judges underling help or some retired judge in a nursing home…soooo keep that in mind as you use them or they are used against you…u might say oh yeah i don’t care what they think …i will take it to the jury!!!and the DJ goes out the window!!

How a man deals with the legal society, court, and government, securing the bond You put in a notice before you enter the court..to the effect” i a man robin, am here to settle all verifiable true debts” Judge ask u how do you plea?

233 | P a g e

Reply with “i believe i got the notice before the court in writing roughly 60 days ago, i am just waiting for the man or woman to appear with a true bill and under oath and affirmation” and then if the judge is baffled turn to him and say “do you need leave of court so you can seek lawful and legal advice so you can understand that notice? We will take as long as required!”

Learn to shut oyur mouth in court..everything you say will be used against you. Cool Hand Luke”sometimes the best hand (in cards) is the empty hand”

60 liened up judges because u dint like decisions.. 70’s a bunch of side drafts The courts are tired of the freeman crap. Keep it clean and not crazy. Careful because most don’t understand jurisdictional shifts in their language…

- Evoking habeas corpus, closing statements

Ask if the writ of habeus corpus has been suspended in this [] court? A judge might say the writ of habeus corpus doesn’t apply here… U reply “ i am evoking habeas corpus because i am a man!! I am electing to pull myself to be outside and out of this case not in this case and now i am standing before this court as a man and habeus corpus is now evoked!!where is the man accusing me of doing wrong? Now i am evoking the image of god before you…man created judge!’

This is easy when you are a god fearing man….we only answer to god and as long as i have not done anything wrong to a man and if i do i will beg for their forgiveness.. we answer to our creator or our equal!!! U can be tired of playing the defendant role… so i evoke habeus corpus and ask is ther a man before his court saying i do wrong? No well then our business is concluded here!!

234 | P a g e

If they threaten to continue the courts proceedings in your absence…u respond” not in my absence but in my unwillingness to be appear as anything other than a man. If u wish me to appear as a man then i will” and if they do then you better hope u (judge) have authority over me [if you actually did harm another man]… it better be your wish and order and i will be glad to execute it…

Judges know how to create a bill and settle a debt..they are honorable people!! They wont welch on a bet…they only have a face so you need to catch them with their words!! They will save his face!!

U can be tired of defending urself up to the last minute and then challenge jurisdiction and move out of the defendant title becoming a man!!

It doesn’t matter if a mna is right or word ..if they say and do what they say they are a honorable man!! Because they can keep their word!!

DON’T DO 20 MIN CLOSING ARGUMENTS THE JURY WILL PROBABLY HANG YOU!! THE JUDGE MIGHT INTERUPT YOU IN THE MIDDLE OF IT TO SAVE YOU FORM YOURSELF!! KEEP IT SHORT U have caused no harm to a man, they tresed upon your property, they have no power, no authority and no right to enter another man’s domicile or stop a man from moving where he wants..never has and never will.. it doesn’t exist; it never has and never will!! What we do in the privacy of our own home is none of anybody’s bizness!!and they should be ashamed of themselves but they still do it anyway!! That simple!!!

Closing statements are supposed to be an impact statement..u could run your opening arguments for days… but not the closing statements… u could bring in for opening statements u can bring in a white board and make flow charts and showing what the hierarchy with man on top of government is and what ur are going to prove and then what the state is going to try and prove…this is the big show!! Reveal the wizard of oz crap that the government is!!

U can turn to the judge and have him interject in your closing statement…his answer to the question “has any man or woman come before this court saying i do wrong?”

235 | P a g e

322 - Licensed attorney vs. non-licensed attorney

Hey judge can u tell me where lawyers get a license.. ask the lawyer beside u if u could see his license to practice LAW… Law is just an opinion..

The bar is a private association and doesn’t want to be licensed by the state so that they cannot be controlled by the government!! They don’t want to have any one establish laws for them..or say who can get in and who cannot!!

Most bar association are private and don’t have a charter with the gov!!

License is how own determines what is legal and illegal!! And only government can do that!! The boyscouts cant issue a licence because they can’t what’s good for society.. thye could only make laws that apply to their ..

Only judges that go against the bar and in favor of man will loss there card..so they have to attack you!!!

We must at the base level realize that there is two worlds at play a 2d and 3d world… since we are 3d we must always be striving to talk to a man and if a 2d entity is in front of you to …do not be insane and talk to a 2 dimnesional being in nothing less than the 2d dimensional world of letter writing.. and that’s how u get out of trouble with government!!!! Do not manifest that 2d world they created into your 3d world because it will only get ugly …

236 | P a g e

Judge issues an order but refuses to sign and date it, conditions of appearance

Give them the conditions of how u are going to be making an appearance. You are letting no what god like entity is appearing before the court.. man is made in gods images and man created judge to serve him and protect his property..the master is showing up to tell his servants what to do. .

When a judges ask me to appear as a defendant cant i just conditionally accept as long as you inform the judge that so long as he bears on fully liability as for the defendant then you will appear as a defendant if not i will simply appear as a man.

Just like akido... never head someone head on who is bigger and stronger because it's there advantage... get out of the strength and attack their weakness... inversely when ur are stronger than someone force them to a head on collision with u so u can win...if they chose to side step a man because they can't face us...then so be it.

I can’t be a defendant because no man has accused me of anything!!!

Evoke god in this land and u are in common law… because we are in his image… for as long as we have it!!

237 | P a g e

If a judge doesn’t recognize your notice..u say this notice isn’t for your court it is notice to the public and world at large!!!( Direct this to the judge also)In your court you are a judge correct? He will say yes… continue with…This is not a judicial notice..this is s a notice and a notice is just a document that a man puts out to the world to bear witness!!i am not giving this notice to a judge!! I am giving this notice to a man and all of mankind stating my order and requirements!!!

There are no false claims because he believes it to be true!!! So what u want to say is will a man in open court testify to what they are claiming to be true!

238 | P a g e

I don’t understand or wish to understand legalese and no law can force me to!!

Just write “i am an idiot in legalese” if they try and put me under their system because u used one of their words, well ur but the word to describe u is incompetent to stand trial!!

If a judge doesn’t allow u to take a required leave of court.. ask him if he understands fully that i REQUIRE Not request and there is a big difference..

We don’t want shit WE “REQUIRE” of you to perform your duties and obligations and place the witness on the stand or we will do it for you!! We are evoking by right by god because we are man!! And you are a judge and u will do it because you have a duty and obligation .. and u will follow my order and fufill your duty and obligation to give me the service ur supposed to provide or we will find somebody else who will!!!i will do the act because require means i have the power and authority to do such an act…

What man or woman is saying that I did something wrong?

Plead guilty [so what if i did something illegal ] and ask who says i a have done something wrong?

Officer cannot testify….because some police dogs have that status of officer!!

239 | P a g e

The whole deal with prosecutors is to make them bring u the man to appear and challenge jurisdiction…

No man will take on the liability in the government to tell me i can’t have gold!!!

Catholic is better than public schools because at least they get closer to their understanding of the system they are in..

People need to unite…

The united states of America recognizez god …. Bring in the resolution to prove it…

CONSTITUTION ACT, 1982

(80)

PART I CANADIAN CHARTER OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:

You only appear man to man in your court in their court u want to ask if there is a man present (they will be no man just person judge prosecutor) so who are u going to talk too because u only know how to talk to a man?

Don’t look for an injured party look for a man. You don’t care about evidence when no man is saying i have done wrong!! Well then u don’t have a case in my court!! This is a godly land a common law land and land of man not a code land!!

240 | P a g e

When judge asks us a question (either for ission or yes/no questions), say “I require leave of court. This is not a request judge, this is a REQUIREMENT” oh you don’t understand the word “require?” can anybody here in this room assist the judge in understanding the word “require”?

When judge asks us “do you want me to put witnesses on the stand?” we say “no we REQUIRE, we want of no man, god provides my wants. We REQUIRE of you to perform your duty and obligation to place our witness on the stand or we shall do it” We have the right by God because I am a man, and you have the duty and obligation because you are a judge person.

The court want u to accept the title of defendant because they can have jurisdiction over you ..they have no jurisdiction over man…

Tell a judge ur not a member of his society so i don’t understand ur legalese ..why don’t u just talk to me man to man? The emperor has no clothes!!

As soon as someone summons you to appear it is an invitation at a certain time and at a certain place... The next thing u do is rsvp and ask them who they are and why they are summonsing you to appear? And who do you believe i am? And who do you think you are to me? I can’t appear as a man but i am incompetent to appear as a defendant…

They will reply with something along the line as you are the defendant in this traffic matter..

Respond with ….i would like too but i am a man and man does not appear in traffic court… because man has no duty or obligation to traffic code..

241 | P a g e

Void judgemnets don’t exist in common law so we don’t care about void judgements!!

Judges get voted in..they don’t always no everything in law!!!

U can at any time challenge jurisdiction? Where is the debt instrument has it been presented to the court?…where is the acc?

Judge ask for your bday..reply …i don’t recall but my mother says i was born oct 28 th 1972..

When to sue a judge

A judge has to be so out of character then u can get him for his performance …it doesn’t matter if u like it or not…but it is still a judge…. U get what u get i depends on the judge you get… u may have to help the train and taught judge to see a different way of looking at things than he may not have known before..but u got what u get

- Benefits of co-counsel, acting in public, an attorney's defense against the IRS

If they give u an attourney allow them to only appears as co counsil and never let them represent you..but u can let them appear with you…

242 | P a g e

When your wrapping up with your closing arguments just clearly show that all the prosecutor has brought is preseupmtion so rip apart all there presumptions… all we ever got was offers of proof but no testimony or proof…

To the prosecutor… Do the courts not have jurisdiction over the defendant or a man? Because doesn’t a man have rights but does a defendant have duties and obligation that u can impose fines and penalties on it? Is this why u are asking me if i am the defendant? The name of the game is to expose the fraud to a jury so it is obvious…

Truth vs. true, conman, how the legal society is controlled, John's IRS case

Truth is what u witness but only god is knows what is true.. Conman is a confidence maker in your fellow man…he who gives confidence to do things you wouldn’t do….good or bad!!

Until i have seen a sworn indictment against me reading that i have done wrong or harm or owe a debt or causing any one a loss?.i do not know who my acc is and what have i been accused of?

Let the everyone in the court room (jury and audience) know that they don’t want you to know that i a man require a written accusation against me a sworn statement and that if the prosecutor doesn’t have this that there is no reason for us to be here!!

Look i am not going to answer any more question because u have failed to produce my acc!! [ your basically using the stand to further your position on the record…]

243 | P a g e

Barter i will answer one more question if you promise to bring my acc so i can face them!!! They wont be able to play that card…if they do then reneg call them a dishonorable person…

If a prosecutor is objecting to your testimony u invite him to take the stand because he thinks i am telling that you are not teling the truth when i am up there trying to not go to prison. Why don’t you come up here and take the stand and bare the same liability under oath????{ they should coward form the proposition}

If you are being objected too..u say i have not objected to them when they were telling there side of the story trying to make me a monster..why cant i know say my side of the story..why am i being interfered with my right to let the people know what i believe so they can judge me on the merit of my beliefs ..so stop calling me a liar!! My belief are hearsay of course they are..if i believe that jesus is coming back that is my belief and yes that is speculation and hear say but it is still my belief..so you have the right to believe what ever u believe but why are u getting in the way of me telling the jury my beliefs!! The prosecutor know very well i get my 5 min to tell the jury what i believe…why is he interrupting and acting in such a discourteous and dishonorable unmanly manner towards you…

Telling a jury to disregard

At the hearing require a trial by jury its your court and they cant have a hearing without your knowledge changing it to a jury trial..put your foot down and require a trial by jury…

Show me the sworn statement…

Are you Robin Laurence Mitchell? You reply with “which one?”…. How can i be a defendant when no one has accused me?

244 | P a g e

If they ask if u r robin laurece mitchell the defendant in this case? You say what case their isn’t a case because their isn’t anyone accusing me of anything? Ask if they have a sworn statement of some harm wrong or loss?

Say if u want me to where the hat of defendant so long as u realize that the defendant is a man and i have the right to face my acc and then i will where that title… so until you bring the man forward that can swear under oath or affirmation that i do wrong…then only and only then will i where that title because i would glad beg forgivenss and compensate that man until he is made whole for whatever his loss is!! But until u bring that man or woman forward i cant hold that title!! I got my cheque book right here and i am beggin you to bring the man forward so i can compensate them…

Do you have any man or woman who can testify that i owe a cent to the irs? I fyou do i will pay that man so long as they can stand behind that claim? Ask the prosecutor if he can tell you how much i owe on the stand? So how can i pay the united states government if no man or woman can tell me what i owe?? How can i write this wrong?? What do you wish of me? Just to put me in a cage? That’s ridiculous? Did i cause someone loss? then why do they want to do this to me?

The inside scoop is that the law firms are told very clearly that if you don’t play ball that they will have every case that they have eve been involved with be overturned!! Their hands and lives are totally entrenched and compromised!!( there is a reason that jesus don’t like lawyers)

That is how settlement are done and also threaten to revers all the settlemnets which means they will have to pay back their winnings… so compromised are that class of lawyers…

Tell the prosecutor “ do you prosecutor believe that there is a sworn testimony that i have done something wrong? If so why not take the stand and say so?”

The judge might say u haven’t given answer to the prosecutors questions then your testimony can be stricken form the record… reply with that u fell u have given a relevant answer and until i see a sworn accusation under penalty of perjury before me how can i say that question is pertinent to me? I don’t know if i am dealing with Shirley temple or king kong..

245 | P a g e

Don’t let them place a order unless it is properly address to you..

I am Robin Laurence Mitchell the man not the defendant

When do i get to cross examine my acc how and by what means do i get to meet my acc? Is there a man attached to this america..who is in control of this entity? And why isn’t he here accusing me of doing wrong to his creation? Where is his signature where is his sworn complaint? Why isn’t testifying on behalf of his entity? If he send me that letter i promise you i will make him whole? Somebody give me an itemized list? Somebody please hand me a bill? What else do you want from me? I want to cooperate i want to answer questions!! Put this in your own words so that it is congruent?

Bill Clinton show up when a hotel clerk accuse him of sexual harsement for flashing her and the supreme court was clear that he had to show up as the number one servant of the people!! Man is still higher than president..president might be the most powerful person not powerful man… the president is there to serve the people…

Give the judge a note” i am here but they won’t let the man in”

Don’t use drivers id to enter the courtroom!!! Careful!! Enter as a man!!! So just put it in writing for the sheriff or bailiff that is going to require it to let u in!!! the power of the written word!! The notice should read..”i a man robinlaurence mtichell will only be entering this courthouse as a man and not as a person” sign it thumbprint it.. don’t be surprised that a judge will have it place as exihibt A i n your case and read it before the court!! THAT’S IS FUCKING CHECKMATE!!!SPECIALLY ON APPEAL!!

If you walk away from the court room of your own free will… your claim will be seen as being abandoned by you as well as your defence….

246 | P a g e

U need to force me out GENTLY out of the courtroom for the record so that the record reflects you have not abandoned your claim..not that u want to fight but for the record to be pushed out the court and u weren’t abandoning your claim..or sit there until they escort u out!!

Indictment is a noun that means an accusation of wrongdoing. An indictment, or a legal document charging you with a crime

taking orders is how you shield yourself form compliance issue that give them jurisdiction... because NO is a sin to say..

Judge: i order you to show up as a defendant... ask for the order it in writting and sign it... so u can bill him..innstead of saying No i will not.....the other possibility is to warn him of the harm it will cause you to be a defendant... but ultimately whne ur pushed or forced into it thats it the card to play..

Don’t answer to Mr. Mitchell… i am robin Mitchell

Don’t answer to Robin l. Mitchell in orders … i only answer to Robin Laurence Mitchell (Or the all caps on orders )

At the beginning the judge announces the case and wil look at the prosecutor and ask if they are ready then they will turn to you and ask you things like “Mr. Mitchell are you ready to proceed” Reply with “ i notice that you are directing your voice at me… but i am not mr. Mitchell, i am a man robin Mitchell and the only reason i am here, is to prosecute my claim against that man over there acting in the capacity of prosecutor for commiting fraud by way of this indictment that is on the record in this case and is also causing me harm as a man. And i require you to move my case at the same time as this case…common law land… blah blah”

247 | P a g e

The judge might say he is not hearing that today we are here for this are u ready to proceed? reply” i notice you directing your voice at me…repeat repeat” if the judge is getting pisssed at you” if you want me to do something different put it in the form of an order in writing sign it and i will carry your orders out”( so as to be performing) He may address u as the defense and repeat…

The man acting as judge may order the sheriff to move you to be move to another courtroom to have your trial so as to preserve your due process rights… u reply with “who is going to tell what i can or can not do at my trial?” they may sneak you out of that court room so as to appoint you a full time counsil and let some other lawyer run you into the ground..

now if the judge wants to proceed without my consent , of his own volition, then the man acting as a judge bears the burden and full liability……and his action or in actions to appoint you this counsel and if this counsil causes any harm to i am man that bill williams known as the man acting as a district court judge is going to be held fully liable for a claim for harm, injury or financial loss due to his actions and inactions… there is a man attached to that person… just because they can move the person the they have to remmebr it is attached like a dog to your truck..u must consider the dog before u drive the truck…

if they ask is if the united sates is ready to proceed…u need to object and ask who is the united states? The prosecutor is the united states?wtf!! if they ask if the government is ready to proceed …..u say which government? Rip down their fraud wall….

Never go into court and bring your drivers licence make sure it goes in as an exhibit…

Note ur drivers license isn’t really yours as it belongs to its creator the government…. How you reply is this to a request for your license…. I can’t give u something i don’t possess as it is literally not mine… i have no right to give it away… this was state issued and put into my custody for care and i am not at liberty to just discharge it to any man or woman on the planet earth who simply ask for it,

248 | P a g e

So it’s not mine to give..but if i give u it what will u give me as a deposit in case u damage it scratch it or break it in anyway..

Only claim what is due, order vs. claim

Don’t claim punitive damages..the courts will asses them on the merits of the case.. they will determine what is outrageous for them to get punitive damages..ie. somebody calling a man a nigger… Better itemized why you are entitled to that money.. a dollar a sec for a child is getting off light….

Keep your claim and your order separate…ie….. i order you to return my property attached to this claim(case#)

We can go into court with our own made up name because we authored it and have full control of it as it is our creation..and not the legal society and its not ed to them either..

If a court has wasted a ton of your time hand the court a bill for $3000 or whatever u see fit..and u may be surprised to see the judge rule for the prosecutor to pay the fine..

If u are ordered to appear in court send them a bill for performance..

249 | P a g e

If u r talking a lot in court a judge will order a psych avaluation…(ur nutz for talking to a 2d entity hence the reason to put it all in writting) But if i he does have him put that lovely order in writing and sign it so you can carry i out.. (so u can give him a bill for following his orders)…hence making the act all performance and nothing is issible as any other than a man carrying out orders!!!!

Bearing false witness against a amn use to mean a death sentence…

A prosecutor brought a false claim that means u can take him for a lot for wasting your time considering he knew in advance because of all the istrative process was done..so he is liable for moving it forward… demand compensation in your claim that you file for wasting your time addressing a false complaint….

We are looking for a man or woman to beg their forgiveness and try and compensate to make them whole… how else can i provide a remedy or a cure?

To appear as a defendant against a society and its member i would be a fool and also would get clobbered so at this time i cant afford to ove forward as a defendant at this time… the same reason i wouldn’t take the tilte of heavy weight champiuon of the world because eventually i would have to defend that title against someone who is prosecuting a win and i would be harmed…so i am trying to avoid harming myself at this time…if u force this title on me it will cause me great harm.. A court is where a game is played..what kind of a game would it be if we make a ridiculous..

A claim means they are in the presence of a man…..to them god!!

U need to be able to look the judge in the face and show him you know this whole thing is fraud.. that’s when they will behave.. but if u believe their threats it will be real…. Just act like u don’t understand chinesse to you..

250 | P a g e

The badge and the robe doesn’t make them immune from prosecuting…

Judge wants appearance in PERSON, collection agency, compensation for appearing

When a judge is asking you to appear in person? U reply what person do you want me to appear as…a man . a prosecutor, as a judge , as a jury member, as a defendant what person? Because i only know how to appear as a man!! I have never been a defendant but i was born as a man so that will be easy for me to do….

The judge may post pone the trial saying they are looking for the person to appear… u reply with the person named robin Laurence Mitchell are in this court at this time but the only problem is that i am a person that belong to the society of the Mitchell family and of man but not a person that belongs to the legal society because i don’t understand the language of your society or its duties and obligations fines or penalties that it may impose on me…

If a judges uses the language “want” to you do something… asking him simply why you don’t “require” of me

You may forget to tell a judge something when you are there..if so just write him back a letter asap(notarize it) explaining you were distracted by whatever personal issue clouded your mind at the time and then proceed to clarify yourself…..and be quick about it…

Act like a man…a judge wants to set a responsible man free…u will discover that they are looking for a man…

I can make either a general appearance as a man or a special appearance as something else…what person would u like me to be? If he says he wants u to appear as a defendant u say u cant move forward as a defendant at this time because i am not competent in that role..but i do play a great prosecutor….

251 | P a g e

Preliminary hearing, court of no record, a corporation charging a man

Preliminary hearings happen before your court date and their can be more than just one their could be several different preliminary hearings until both side agree and the judge is okay with it.. You may need to be the magistrate to make a ruling on certain matters... Can u make a ruling on whether I can show up as a man not a defendant? And do I have the right to evoke common law court man on man..?they should agree with u It is ur chance to state how your are going to fight. .is it a common law case is a complaint and common law case at the same time.. U also want to establish your status as u are going to appear as.. a man....or a man and a person ....or a man and defendant... Also what is going to he discussed at the trial... Now a prosecutor can't stand as a man He might complaint and say things like I don't understand. .Lawyers better answer that way or they will be held liable as a man...the have to play the idiot card as well to protect themselves just like we have too.... A prosecutor can only understand the words of a defendant not of his creator man...just like we can't claim to understand god or at least we shouldn't claim to know God's word. If a lawyer calls ur paperwork nonsense and jobbers. .smile because he is protecting himself....just ask them if their are a man? They can't it that either... for the same liability issue ... Of course some may say they know the word of God. ..doesn't mean I have to believe him or deny him his belief system.. U can deny his belief because his is a man..ur not by proxy deny god ... All courts r courts of record...u want to be more specific.. what u want is the court to record testimony..so ask to be sworn in under affirmation. A magistrate might take.no testimony at ur trial.. that is when u will hear thst it is not a court of record...it is a nisiprius court.? They record but until they record testimony you are not pressing the record.. they are just an istrative court u need a Yes they can have transcripts but no man will aper on the transcript.. a defendant can't testify...

252 | P a g e

One must expect that there are maybe 1 in 10,000 person for every man so everything u do as a man in court should be abosultely strange to the clerks and even judges…

If you lose make an appeal but when ur at the appeal look for rule 41 (wherevere ur at) that says something to the fx … i a man an appealing the ruling and also voluntarily surrendering my appeal so as to be able to get the entire case…sooooo you can now file a claim and drag them into your court…. They won’t unlock the paperwork unless you come in as somebody they recognize..ie defendant or somebody filling a appeal…u may want to go in a s a defendant here so as to be able to get your entire case…then require a leave of court and file your claim and come back and suspend their case until your superior court has come to its decision…… you don need to finish up in their case because you are going to lose… just start it as defendant and hold it in a leave of court request..

It doenst matter about the appeal process in the istrative courts…. Even the SUPREME COURTS DECESIONS can be overturned by the original judge ….soooo that’s is why u wont care about taking the defendants position because the appeal court system won’t give u access to the file unless u do.. so take the position or you wont be recognized any other way to make the judge liable..as he still has control ultimately even in the pseudo appeal process as he can overturn any or judges “opinions” … we must see appeals as a a joke just like the original jurisdiction judge would so see it as a means to an end…

http://judicial.alabama.gov/library/rules_aplt_procedure.cfm

Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 41. Issuance of certificate of judgment; stay of certificate of judgment. (a) Date of issuance. The certificate of judgment of the court shall issue 18 days after the entry of judgment unless the time is shortened or enlarged by order. (1) In the courts of appeals, the timely filing of an application for rehearing will stay the issuance of the certificate of judgment until disposition of the application unless otherwise ordered by the court. If the application is denied, the certificate of judgment shall issue 18 days after entry of the order denying the application unless the time is shortened or enlarged by order. (2) In the Supreme Court, the timely filing of an application for rehearing will stay the issuance of the certificate of judgment until disposition of the application unless otherwise ordered by the court. If the application is denied by the Supreme Court, the certificate of judgment shall issue immediately unless in response to the first application the court substantially modified the original decision of the court, in which case, the certificate of judgment shall issue 18 days after entry of the order denying the application unless a second application is filed or the time is shortened or enlarged by order. (b) Stay of certificate of judgment pending petitions for certiorari to courts of appeals. The timely filing

253 | P a g e

of a petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court shall stay the issuance of the certificate of judgment by the courts of appeals, which stay shall continue until the final disposition by the Supreme Court. Upon the filing of a copy of an order of the Supreme Court denying the petition for certiorari, the certificate of judgment of the courts of appeals shall issue immediately. If the time for the issuance of the certificate of judgment shall have been shortened pursuant to subdivision (a) hereof, the courts of appeals shall grant such relief, upon motion, as may be appropriate. [Amended eff. 3-1-2007.] Committee Comments This rule provides for the issuance of the certificate of judgment on the day following the expiration of time for filing an application for rehearing under Rule 40. However, the rule makes specific provision for relief to be granted to parties when the time for issuing the certificate has been shortened or enlarged. This provision would have primary application when such matters as injunctions, receiverships and child custodies are involved, and envisions the use of bonds or other matters thought appropriate by the court to preserve the rights of the parties while a rehearing by the court is held or while a party applies for certiorari by the Supreme Court of a decision of a court of appeals. That provision is contained in the last sentence of subdivision (b). Committee Comments to Amendment to Rule 41 Effective March 1, 2007 (As Amended November 16, 2007) The amendment to subdivision (a) of this rule takes into consideration that there are times when an application for rehearing may be denied, but the original decision may have been reversed or substantially modified by the ruling of the Supreme Court on the application. This amendment provides that unless the original decision of the Supreme Court has been reversed or substantially modified, the certificate of judgment shall issue immediately upon the denial of the application for rehearing. This amendment is in conformance with the language in Rule 40(a)(3), which provides that no second application for rehearing will be considered unless the court reversed or substantially modified the original decision of the court. The Committee did not amend the rule with regard to the courts of appeals because the 18-day time period before issuance of a certificate of judgment allows time for a petition for writ of certiorari, seeking review of a decision of the court of appeals, to be filed with the Supreme Court. Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 32(b) and Rule 41, effective March 1, 2007, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 949 So. 2d. Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 32(b)(3) and Rule 37, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, amending the committee comments to the March 1, 2007, amendment to Rule 41, Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure, and adopting the Court Comment to Amendment to Rule 37 Effective November 16, 2007, all effective November 16, 2007, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that contains Alabama cases from 972 So. 2

Notice your cases be sealed ..u want this case to remain sealed ; u don’t want anyody to open it; u don’t want anybody to tres your case; and only the parties are to have privy to what is inside this case.; the defendant is going to know; the wrongdoer is going to know; and i the man is going to know the prosecutor

You can get one of those wax seals and seal your claim so that’s it is not opened until it goes before a jury.

254 | P a g e

We don’t care for any clerk or judges opinion as this case is taking on the direct boss of these person. So there is a clear conflict of interest we are trying to avoid. So i only want my fellow man to be view my case… as only a man can understand this case because lawyers don’t understand what we are saying!!!! We don’t belong to their society so they cannot impose upon us!!!

Make sure u have your claims and summons properly served and when u go to court make sure it is filed into the case as well…

Use a process server or a private investigator to server your paperwork…

Take one of their forms that they ask u to use and simply write “see attached claim”

Dealing with clerk..ask them if they are a public servant? They should say yes…follow it with do i look like a public servant or do i look like the public to you?......soooooo you serve the?......checkmate…

U could use the old blackstones the courts are free access to the king and his subjects…. Or simply pay!! The advantage is you know have a contract binding them….make sure the cheque is a not for a licence only for the use of the courtroom and its services.

They more removed your court is the likelier it will be to be not understand common law claims…be forewarned

Thumbprints on the documents!!

Don’t be timid and soft spoken as they will run all over you…loud is not firm…loud is not authoritative or assertive

255 | P a g e

… be the king the boss!!!

If time is on your side use the mail to file your claim as it can take up to a month to get your case number…so sometimes it merits to physically go in and get it right away..

definitions as an exhibit

In proper law there is no synonyms. Attach definition of important words as an exhibit in our docs. When we use a word it only mean one thing and one thing only, it doesn’t “kind of mean something like this other thing”.

“idiot” does not mean “stupid” or “dumb”. See attached exhibit a- Idiot is a word derived from the Greek ἰδιώτης, idiōtēs ("person lacking professional skill", "a private citizen", "individual"), from ἴδιος, idios ("private", "one's own").-

U have to luv being called an idiot by a judge because that means you’re going home

Their case vs. your case, vehicle seizure, compensation for jail time

Harm means blood is spilled on the ground Injury means u knocked over my mail box Accruable loss means paper money or a bank ..

256 | P a g e

In their case they may get a default judgemnet..u don’t care what they put in their case because we aren’t going to bring it to life..it’s not our baby/case because we didn’t create it..so don’t fight their imaginary default judgement and its in their case…u need to make your own case…

U don’t want the man to be nothing more than to bear witness not a judge..

The supreme court has ruled several times that your car is an extension of your home so they need a warrant and probable cause to enter your home.. i would ask for a bond attached?

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, ed by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

If your in jail don’t be suprized getting the bill for medical expenses and being housed in prison!! Especially if you are in the wrong….. if not u did things right with your wish and order and send them a bill for performance…

Direct questions through the presiding judge, canon codes, dealing with court staff We’re asking the presider (presiding judge) a question to obtain a response from the prosecutor (the other side), we require a response from the presider.

“Subject matter/jurisdiction” are questions for the presider (because without jurisdiction the judge can’t preside over the case”, “nature of the charges” are questions for the prosecutor.

257 | P a g e

Make sure our questions are directed clearly. (all in writing).

If we get silence, then add “I’ll place on record that no one has objected to this point. In an absence of an answer this statement is true.”

(2.1-3 TO THE CLIENTk) A lawyer who appears as an advocate should not submit the lawyer’s own affidavit to or testify before a court or tribunal except as to purely formal or uncontroverted matters, such as the attestation or custody of a document, unless it is necessary in the interests of justice. If the lawyer is a necessary witness with respect to other matters, the conduct of the case should be entrusted to other counsel.

2.1-3 TO THE CLIENT then k0 Chapter 2 – Standards of the Legal Profession – annotated Code of Professional Conduct for BC > Chapter 2 – Standards of the Legal Profession Code of Professional Conduct for BC > Chapter 2 – Standards of the Legal Profession 2.1-1 TO THE STATE (b) When engaged as a Crown prosecutor, a lawyer’s primary duty is not to seek a conviction but to see that justice is done; to that end the lawyer should make timely disclosure to the defence of all facts and known witnesses whether tending to show guilt or innocence, or that would affect the punishment of the accused.

Words are like guns, they’re not evil until they’re in government hand.

When we find that a lawyer isn’t responding back, then write “if you’re not responding to this, I’ll just take it as you’re accepting that you’ve done something wrong. We’ll just call it quits. I’ll forgive your treses, you forgive me of mine. I require a response to confirm that you’ve received this in seven days. I require a response or your silence will be construed as tacit agreement.”

258 | P a g e

Do not answer for them, make them guilty by their self-confession.

Sometimes there will be judges from a foreign court try to come in and mess with our case. Remind the judge that he shouldn’t be tresing our property and give him a chance to redeem himself before we seek remedy.

Make sure our cases are sealed.

If we’re dealing with a clerk or a judge, trying to put our claim in etc. and we’re dealing with the clerk. What we say to her is “on that day you didn’t do what I required you to do, so now I hold you liable for your failure for carrying out your duties and obligations, a dereliction of duty.”

Or “one you can confirm that you’ve received this letter, or two you can file my case/set a date for my hearing/whatever I required you to do”

Don’t look for an apology or an ittance of wrong from these persons, instead look for acquiescence.

Give them a way out, a benefit of the doubt. “maybe you didn’t see it that day…..maybe you were having a bad day…….etc…….i’ll give you one last chance to make amends”

Bali suggests that after you have a two dimension rejection, go and have a face-to-face negotiation. They won’t take paper serious, but they’re still human. It’s the “say that to my face” factor. Being physically present is an advantage.

If we’re having trouble with clerk, require their tort claim form and then ask them their name. Write that name on the claim. A clerk sometimes will tell us that our claim will go into the court’s paperwork and it could take up to a month to get a response. “I require your

259 | P a g e

assurance that you’re sending it to me within the designated month that you’ve just said” remind them that “if I don’t get my paperwork when you said I’d get it, I’ll come back again.”

Always think: if I don’t get the answer I desire, what am I going to do about it?

In the united states its been a long standing tradition that the front door is unlocked!! It’s a public building holding the number one public servant!!!

Maybe your courthouse actually has a sign outside saying how to file a claim after hours too

Act like it’s one of your buildings and they will treat u accordingly!!

If u ask for permission they will take it!!!

260 | P a g e

261 | P a g e

I only have a duty and obligation to my fellow man and god…my plate is too full for this court to intercourse with me..

Whne they call out our name in court you say “i the man known as robin is before this court and i the person robin Laurence Mitchell is before this court. [be the man and the person]..you say, your person the prosecutor and your person the judge are holding a trial against my person.. the problem is i have been challenging juridcition the wholetime!! By your person intercoursing with my person it is causing me harm and i wish for you to cease and desist. I don’t enjoy playing this game. I don’t have any comprehension of your crown rules nor can you show me any law the can force me to comprehend your rules as i am not a member of your legal society and i wish to be let alone.but you continue to prosecute and persecute me and i see no claim before this court before we go for sentencing.

And if they have the letter where they try and extort you with those plea deals that’s where you will file your claim of tres and extortion

Then place an order for you to want this case #--------- to be discharged in its entirety

Then place second and sepearte order you order for compensation because of this extortion i have hard harm befall on me. These charges have burden me and i now want them reversed as what i am a charged with i can now ask for the same in kind for the amount of $25000 ( or what ever the actual finanacially fair market value of those charges to be given to her in kind)

in·cur inˈkər/

verb

262 | P a g e

1

past tense: incurred; past participle: incurred become subject to (something unwelcome or unpleasant) as a result of one's own behavior or actions. "I will pay any expenses incurred" synonyms: bring upon oneself, expose oneself to, lay oneself open to; More

Don’t be screaming to judges..they aren’t real and u better be wary of bringing them to life!! Put it in writing!!

Leave their case sealed… don’t bring them into existence…

Don’t intercourse with the second dimension!!! Put it in writing!!

If your reading this off a script how is a judge gonna believe it’s really you!!! Who has this belief? U need to have it or else the judge is not going to rule in ur favor..

Keep your claim short!! So you can it!! And keep it close to your heart no it inside out!!! You can add an exhibit a with the complaint !!! Don’t give away how you will show your evidence!!

Omg...every solicitor will tell you!!! That they owe their allegiance to the court not to you!! But guess wat that means for you if you bring in your court? Their allegence must be to me!!! Hence why they bow out so often when you open your claim from your case.. and why they fight so hard not to be under you!!

If you are looking for how the lawyers and court clerks are supposed to act you need to look into their canon codes in your district… it is the rules to their religion….

Canon

263 | P a g e

CANON, noun 1. In ecclesiastical affairs, a law, or rule of doctrine or discipline, enacted by a council and confirmed by the sovereign; a decision of matters in religion, or a regulation of policy or discipline, by a general or provincial council. 2. A law or rule in general. 3. The genuine books of the Holy Scriptures, called the sacred cannon, or general rule of moral and religious duty, given by inspiration. 4. A dignitary of the church; a person who possesses a prebend or revenue allotted for the performance of divine service in a cathedral or collegiate church. A cardinal canon is one attached to a church, incardinatus, as a priest to a parish. Domicellary canons, are young canons, not in orders, having no right in any particular chapters. Expectative canons, having no revenue or prebend, but having the title and dignities of canons, a voice in the chapter and a place in the choir, till a prebend should fall. Foreign canons, such as did not officiate in their canonries; opposed to mansionary or residentiary canons. Lay, secular or honorary canons, laymen itted out of honor or respect, into some chapter of canons. Regular canons, who live in monasteries or in community, and who, to the practice of their rules, have added the profession of vows. Tertiary canons, who have only the third part of the revenue of the canonicate. 5. In monasteries, a book containing the rules of the order. 6. A catalogue of saints acknowledged and canonized in the Romish Church. 7. The secret words of the mass from the preface to the Pater, in the middle of which the priest consecrates the host. The people are to rehearse this part of the service, on their knees, and in a voice lower than can be heard. 8. In ancient music, a rule or method for determining the intervals of notes, invented by Ptolemy. 9. In modern music, a kind of perpetual fugue, in which the different parts, beginning one after another, repeat incessantly the same air. 10. In geometry and algebra, a general rule for the solution of cases of a like nature with the present inquiry. Every last step of an equation is a canon 11. In pharmacy, a rule for compounding medicines. 12. In surgery, an instrument used in sewing up wounds.

264 | P a g e

CANON-law, is a collection of ecclesiastical laws, serving as the rule of church government.

This is how to call them out Not only is it my belief that you are my fellow man and this is a public building and you’re a public servant and u must abide by what i wish. Not only do i believe but when u have a duty and obligation to the court acoording to your cannon code. Most case an attorneys court is in session but now its my court and u owe me a duty and obligation…and it’s a claim i am putting before this court house and i know u don’t want to interfere with my access to the court house?

Because a lawyer has an allegiance to the court when ur is present they must give u their allegiance as man created them to help man

So simply ask …does not your rigid canon code read something to the effect that… the first duty and obligation of a solicitor or a clerk is to the court?

Ask a judge when u are starting your trial is the court open? They might be a smart ass and tell you the court hours are open 8 to 5 pm ..you reply with your question..i didn’t ask u what time the courthouse is open i was asking when is court open? He should say …when ever u wish??? That should settle down everyone in the court room…follow it with…when can i make that wish? ( the attorunery generals office may not know what u are doing but a good judge will) What is the term of this court from the time i file or the time you are assigned the case and seated? (you can find the answer specific to your court but reading the canons they subscribe to..) they should answer the later the time they were assigned and seated.. Advantage you if you read the canon codes of the court ur prosecuting in… Who filed the claim and notices in to the court? The judge response is you did? So then you ask whose court is this? They should tell u it your court.. Soooooo if i wish to convene my court at 1 am on christmas day? What happens next? You will quickly note the judge asking you to be reasonable about your time requirements The judge response should be the sheriff department would call me up and i would make my way down here…

265 | P a g e

Because we act and move at my leisure…

How the IRS becomes the defendant, and the power of letters

If u belive we are in error u have every right to petition your government for redress…u have every right to have your belief heard… lol PETITION !!!??? mistake u should have filed a claim!!! They tell u to file it at your local district tax court and bang!!! You’re in an istrative court!!

I would send them back the same invitation back to the irs that looks just like theirs, saying you entertain them at any local court here and where they can file their claim that i owe a debt

Fall up with the irs a letter asking them to discharge this case because it is causing you harm and loss as a man and return your whatever property u are still holding for me…and your check should be in the mail!!! But warning it may take a few letters but in Canada they have strict laws that they only have six month to prosecute you..

Walk into court and claim you’re a total idiot and u don’t understand. Who say i did something wrong.. No ..so what your are saying is i did something right? …no… are u saying i did something illegal? Because u do know u are talking to a man? And i don’t care what the legal society thinks? There is no law that requires me to understand any legalese!!! You do realize that it only applies to the legal society right? Did i do something unlawful or break some natural laws to let a man alone? (quiet threat as they are doing this to you). How are u to me how are u trying to intercourse with me..how are u trying to get der here? How do you have any control over me other than the fact that u have a gun? Good day sir and i don’t need an interpret and i still remain completely incompetent and there is no law that exist compelling me to…we are not pro se and no i don’t want that title and u cant force it on me as i am to burden with to many other title to take this on at this time or capacity and if i did it would harm me.

266 | P a g e

Check mate!!

Dealing with government agents, and income tax What law do you have me under? They’ll say “1972 bill of blah blah blah” I guarantee that you’re not going to find my name in signature on that contract. So it neither binds I the man or my person. The law doesn’t have Karl the man, it needs to be expressed, not implied, to be good law.

i claim a wrong of tres see exhibit a 8 sweet words u can stick to.. i will talk about the exhibit all day but i won’t change or talk about my claim!!

If a judge orders u to prison for 15 years u say who is sigin that order because i want just compensation for performance and that is $1 miilion and i want it in advance because i don’t know who you are and u don’t have enough credit with me to do anything other tha put the money upfront before i perform..because i know this court doesn’t have any jurisdiction over me!!! SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS. (See also the title Actions, i Encyc. of Pl. AND Pr. 112.) — The term " special proceeding " is used in the codes of practice of many of the states in contradistinction to "action;" it maybe said generally that any proceeding in a court which was not, under the commonlaw and equity practice, either an action at law or a suit in chancery is a

267 | P a g e

special proceeding.* " The phrase ' special proceedings,' within its proper definition, is a generic term for all civil remedies in courts of justice which are not ordinary actions." '

Always make a special appearance in writing before you get there!!!! As appearing in black laws is giving jurisdiction and u are going to “COME to court”(this has implication) !! when u arrive u challenge jurisdictions!!

When they ae asking u for a plea of not guilty or guilty or no contest…its like like offering u 3 false choices..if u choose any u will fail!! Don’t understand anything the judge says is your first position and second setlle all able true claims is all u are here to do!! U want to act like u are in a common law court as this is how to properly behave there!! This lets the judge know he is in the worng jurisdiction with you and he will now try to pull you into his jurisdiction and its game on!! The reason u should have a confused look about what is going on is to let them understand U DON’T RECOGNIZE OR STAND UNDER THEIR COURTS! 

Karl talks about his Alabama case.

Title 28 Part V—Procedure[edit] This part establishes criminal procedure and civil procedure for the federal courts. The Supreme Court, pursuant to the Rules Enabling Act and upon recommendations from the Judicial Conference of the United States, promulgates the more detailed Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure Chapter 111: General Provisions Chapter 113: Process Chapter 114: Class Actions Chapter 115: Evidence; Documentary Chapter 117: Evidence; Depositions Chapter 119: Evidence; Witnesses Chapter 121: Juries; Trial by Jury

268 | P a g e

A jury trial or trial by jury is a legal proceeding in which a jury either makes a decision or makes findings of fact, which then direct the actions of a judge. It is distinguished from a bench trial, in which a judge or of judges make all decisions.

If a clerk or someone at the court house interferes with our case, they are harming I the man and the person we’re suing. Use a default judgement to flush out the man if they don’t appear in court, cus we can take the default judgement and go collect on them, and the only way they can counter that is by showing up in court to argue. We’ve put the claim into the record, we’ve sent notices to the other party, now we order a summons through a clerk of the court via process server to the other party, the summons states that the other party has 21 days to respond. Go to the clerk, say the summons has been sent out, if the other party does not respond within 21 days I want you to sign the paper work and time stamp it saying press upon the record that the other side failed to appear and failed to answer so I require a default judgement. When they try to arraign us ask “what is the nature of your person whom you seek and do you have a claim. May I settle the claim at this point, is there an outstanding debt that’s due?” if they say “you’re in violation of this code” then we say “who wrote the code? Code is some body’s interpretation of the public law, I can’t hold the company that interpreted the law liable. What’s the public LAW? Where’s the true copy of the public law?” “Where’s your oath of office? If you don’t have one then you work for a private corporation” “all federal courts are article 3 courts under the constitution.” The characteristic of a federal court is a court of record. Nevada: Universal Citation: NV Rev Stat § 1.030 (2013) The common law of England, so far as it is not repugnant to or in conflict with the Constitution and laws of the United States, or the Constitution and laws of this State, shall be the rule of decision in all the courts of this State. [1911 A 532; RL 5474; NCL 9021] Provincial Courts in this sense are courts of limited statutory jurisdiction, sometimes referred to as "inferior courts." As courts of limited jurisdiction, their decisions are potentially subject to judicial review by the superior courts via the prerogative writs, but in most cases there are now well-established statutory rights of appeal instead. Superior Courts[edit] The second is the term "superior courts." This term also has two different meanings, one general and one specific. The general meaning is that a superior court is a court of inherent jurisdiction. Historically, they are the descendants of the royal superior courts in England. The decisions of a superior

269 | P a g e

court are not subject to review, unless a statute specifically provides for review or appeal. The term is not limited to trial courts. The Federal Court of Appeal and the provincial and territorial Courts of Appeal are all superior courts. The more limited sense is that "Superior Court" can be used to refer to the superior trial court of original jurisdiction in the Province. This terminology is used in the court systems of Ontario and Quebec. The difference between the two is also indicated by capitalisation. The term "superior court" is used to mean the general sense of the term, while "Superior Court" is used to refer to specific courts in provinces which use that term to designate their superior trial courts. Is “superior court” the common law court?

A prerogative writ is a writ (official order) directing the behavior of another arm of government, such as an agency, official, or other court. It was originally available only to the Crown under English law, and reflected the discretionary prerogative and extraordinary power of the monarch. Is this used from our superior court in common law?

Superior-level courts of the provinces and territories[edit] These courts (as listed below by province and territory in alphabetical order) exist at the provincial and territorial levels. The superior courts are the courts of first instance for divorce petitions, civil lawsuits involving claims greater than small claims, and criminal prosecutions for indictable offences (i.e., felonies in American legal terminology). They also perform a reviewing function for judgements from the local inferior courts and istrative decisions by provincial or territorial government entities such as labour boards, human rights tribunals and licensing authorities. 

Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (ABQB)



Supreme Court of British Columbia (BCSC)



Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (MBQB)



Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (NBQB)

270 | P a g e



Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Trial Division) (NLTD)



Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories (NTSC)[29]



Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (NSSC)



Nunavut Court of Justice (NUCJ)[30]



Court of Ontario – Ontario Superior Court of Justice (ONSC)



Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island (PESC)



Québec Superior Court (QCCS)



Court of Queen's Bench for Saskatchewan (SKQB)



Supreme Court of Yukon (YKSC)[31]

Furthermore, some of these superior courts (like the one in Ontario) have specialized branches that deal only with certain matters such as family law or small claims. To complicate things further, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has a branch called the Divisional Court that hears only appeals and judicial reviews of istrative tribunals and whose decisions have greater binding authority than those from the "regular" branch of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. Although a court, like the Supreme Court of British Columbia, may have the word "supreme" in its name, it is not necessarily the highest court in its respective province or territory. Most provinces have special courts dealing with small claims (lawsuits for less than a certain amount of money). These are typically divisions of the superior courts in each province. Parties often represent themselves, without lawyers, in these courts

Supreme Court of British Columbia The Supreme Court of British Columbia (BCSC) is the superior trial court for the province of British Columbia. The BCSC hears civil and criminal law cases as well as appeals from the Provincial Court of British Columbia. Including supernumerary judges, there are presently 108 judges. There are also 13 Supreme Court masters who hear and dispose of a wide variety of applications in chambers.[1]

271 | P a g e

Jurisdiction[edit] The BCSC is a court of record, having original jurisdiction in all cases, civil and criminal, arising in British Columbia. The BCSC has inherent jurisdiction under the Constitution of Canada in addition to any jurisdiction granted to it by federal or provincial statute. The BCSC has jurisdiction in any civil dispute, including those matters where the dollar amount involved is within the jurisdiction of the Small Claims division of the Provincial Court. Under the Criminal Code of Canada, the BCSC is included as a "superior court of criminal jurisdiction", meaning that it has exclusive jurisdiction for the trial of serious crimes within British Columbia. The BCSC also hears appeals from the Provincial Court and some istrative tribunals. Appeals to its own judgments are heard by the Court of Appeal of British Columbia. The BCSC is also responsible for call ceremonies for itting lawyers and notaries public where the respective oath of office is istered by a justice. [2][3] Justices and masters[edit] All justices of the BCSC (including the position of Chief Justice and Associate Chief Justice) are appointed by the federal cabinet, on recommendation of the Minister of Justice. All BCSC justices have full jurisdiction over any matter before the BCSC. It is court protocol to refer to BCSC judges as "justices", and in court to address to justices as “My Lord” or “My Lady," unlike in the Provincial Court (and the now-abolished County Court) where the term “judge” is used and the mode of address is (and was) "Your Honour." Masters are appointed by the provincial cabinet, on recommendation of the Attorney General in consultation with the Chief Justice. As provincial appointees, masters do not have inherent jurisdiction. Their jurisdiction is limited to those matters granted to them by statute and the Rules of Court. Masters preside in chambers, where they usually hear interlocutory applications and other pre-trial matters. Masters cannot hear civil trials and do not preside in criminal matters. In court, Masters were formerly addressed as "Master," but in a practice direction issued on September 6, 1991, then Chief Justice Esson advised the most appropriate form of address would be "Your Honour". Masters also sit and hear matters as registrars, hearing such matters as assessments of solicitors fees and s. Judicial districts[edit] The BCSC sits in eight judicial districts called "counties". This is the only usage of "county" in British Columbia, which is a reference only to such court districts and has no similarity to the meaning in other provinces or in the United States or the United Kingdom. Prior to 1990, there existed in British Columbia a County Court, an intermediate court between the Provincial Court and the BCSC. In 1990, the County Court of B.C. merged with the BCSC and its judges became justices of the BCSC. The judicial districts of the Supreme Court have the same boundaries of the counties of the former County Court.

272 | P a g e

The judicial districts are: Cariboo; Kootenay; Nanaimo; Prince Rupert; Vancouver; Victoria; Westminster; and Yale. The Counties of Vancouver and Westminster are collectively one judicial district under the name of the "Vancouver Westminster Judicial District". [4] Within each county, or judicial district, justices are resident in the following locations: Chilliwack; Cranbrook; Kamloops; Kelowna; Nanaimo; Nelson; New Westminster; Prince George; Prince Rupert; Victoria; and Vancouver. The BCSC also holds sittings in the following court locations for which there is not a resident justice: Campbell River; Courtenay; Dawson Creek; Duncan; Fort Nelson; Fort St. John; Golden; Penticton; Port Alberni; Powell River; Quesnel; Revelstoke, Rossland; Salmon Arm; Smithers; Terrace; Vernon; and Williams Lake.

Ontario Superior Court of Justice The Superior Court of Justice is the superior court of general jurisdiction for the Province of Ontario, Canada. It is the successor to the former Ontario Court of Justice (General Division), and was created April 19, 1999. Its predecessor, the Ontario Court (General Division) was the result of the 1990 merger of the previous High Court of Justice (formerly part of the Supreme Court of Ontario), District Court and Surrogate Court. The Superior Court of Justice continues as a superior court of record with general and inherent jurisdiction in all civil and criminal matters. Its seat is at historic Osgoode Hall in Toronto, and the court has 8 regions province-wide. The Superior Court of Justice is a division of the Court of Ontario.[2] (The other division of the Court of Ontario is the Ontario Court of Justice.) All civil matters are disposed of in the Superior Court, with the exception of family law matters that are within the jurisdiction of the Ontario Court of Justice. The Ontario Court of Justice is a lower court that assumed the functions of the former Ontario Court (Provincial Division) in 1999. The Superior Court of Justice has sole jurisdiction in divorce cases and in family law matters which contain claims for the division of matrimonial property. It also hears and custody matters, generally when these have been included in a claim for divorce or where these claims have been ed to claim seeking a division of marital property. The Superior Court of Justice is also the superior trial court with general jurisdiction in criminal matters and hears all criminal cases that are tried before a judge and a jury. Judges of the Court also hear appeals from the decisions of judges of Ontario Court of Justice in summary conviction matters.

273 | P a g e

Branches of the Superior Court of Justice[edit] The Superior Court of Justice has three branches: The Divisional Court[edit] The Divisional Court hears appeals from some judgments and orders of judges of the Superior Court of Justice and reviews or hears appeals from decisions of istrative tribunals. It hears all appeals from a final order of the Superior Court where the award does not exceed $50,000.00. The Divisional Court also hears appeals from Small Claims Court judgments exceeding $2,500.00 (there is no statutory right of appeal from a Small Claims Court judgment of less than $2,500.00). The Divisional Court consists of the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, who is president of the court, and such other judges of the Superior Court as the Chief Justice designates from time to time. Hearings take place before a of three judges except in the case of appeals from the Small Claims Court which take place before a single judge. The Divisional Court is a descendant of the court of the same name in England, which is part of the Queen's Bench division of the EnglishHigh Court of Justice, and hears certain appeals. The Small Claims Court[edit] The Small Claims Court has jurisdiction in civil matters where the amount in issue does not exceed $25,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs. The monetary jurisdiction of this court is fixed by regulation, rising to the current limit from $10,000 on January 1, 2010. The majority of Small Claims Court matters are heard by deputy judges, lawyers who have been appointed for a period of three years by the Regional Senior Justice to hear such cases. As result of court reform, no new full-time judges have been appointed by the provincial government to preside in Small Claims Court. Proceedings in the Small Claims Court are governed by a codified set of rules contained in O. Reg. 258/98 (as amended), the Rules of the Small Claims Court, instead of the complex Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure. The Family Court[edit] In those areas of Ontario where the Family Court branch of the Superior Court of Justice does not exist, jurisdiction over family law disputes is divided between the Superior Court of Justice and the Ontario Court of Justice. Cases which have divorce or property claims are brought exclusively in the Superior Court, and child protection and adoption cases must be commenced solely in the Ontario Court of Justice. Each of these two courts has jurisdiction over child and spousal , as well as custody and access claims.

274 | P a g e

In those places where the Family Court branch of the Superior Court of Justice has been established, there is no divided jurisdiction in family law matters. The Family Court succeeds what was known as the Unified Family Court, which began as a pilot project in Hamilton, in 1977. It has complete jurisdiction over all family law matters in its area, including those matters currently within the jurisdiction of judges of the Provincial Division and the General Division. The Family Court is presided over by a Senior Judge of the Superior Court for the Family Court. The Family Court consists of the Chief Justice of the Superior Court, the Associate Chief Justice (Family Court) the Senior Judge of the Family Court, and any other Superior Court Judge as assigned by the Chief Justice or designate. Judicial Officers of the Court[edit] The Superior Court consists of the Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, currently the Honourable Heather Forster Smith; the Associate Chief Justice of the Superior Court of Justice, currently the Honourable Frank N. Marrocco; 8 Regional Senior Judges; a Senior Judge of the Family Court, currently the Honourable R. John Harper; and such number of judges as is fixed by provincial regulation. The current complement of judges is fixed at 223 judges excluding the Chief Justice, the Associate, the Regional Senior Judges and the Senior Judge of the Family Court. Of this number, 29 are appointed as of the Family Court. In addition there are a number of supernumerary judges appointed as required from time to time.[3] Superior Court Judges are federally appointed and paid by the federal government. There are also provincially appointed judicial officers who exercise certain functions in the superior court. These include masters, assessment officers and registrars. Masters have jurisdiction conferred by the rules of the court in civil and family proceedings in the Superior Court. In civil matters, masters are authorized to hear most pre-trial procedural questions and, as well, deal with specialized matters such as construction liens. Masters carry out case management functions and conduct pre-trials and settlement conferences. The purpose of masters is to undertake work that would otherwise fall to judges and in areas of the province where masters are not assigned, these functions are carried out by the judges of the court. Currently there are masters in Toronto, Windsor and Ottawa. Orders made by masters have the same force and effect as judges' orders although they may be appealed to a judge. Masters are appointed and paid by the provincial government. Masters have existed in the courts of Ontario since 1837.

275 | P a g e

Registrars in Bankruptcy: The Superior Court of Justice also has 5 Judicial Officers designated by the Chief Justice under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act to sit as part of the Bankruptcy Court. Currently there is the Registrar and two Deputy Registrars at Toronto as well as a Deputy Registrar in each of Ottawa and London. Assessment Officers: Assessment Officers (formerly known as taxing officers) review lawyers bills under the Solicitors Act and adjudicate costs awarded to parties by judges or masters if the court does not fix the costs at the hearing of the motion or trial . Black's Law 4th edition, 1891 RECORD, n. A written of some act, transaction, or instrument, drawn up, under authority of law, by a proper officer, and designed to remain as a memorial or permanent evidence of the matters to which it relates. People ex rel. Simons v. Dowling, 146 N.Y.S. 919, 920, 84 Misc. 201. A memorandum public or private, of what has been done, ordinarily applied to public records only, in which sense it is a written memorial made by a public officer. Nogueira v. State, 123 Tex.Cr.R. 449, 59 S.W.2d 831. The act or fact of recording or being recorded, reduction to writing as evidence, also, the writing so made, a , a family record, official contemporaneous writing, an authentic official copy of document entered in book or deposited in keeping of officer designated by law, an official contemporaneous memorandum stating the proceedings of a court or official copy of legal papers used in a case. Shimmel v. People, 108 Colo. 592, 121 P.2d 491, 493. There are three kinds of records, viz.: (1) judicial, as an attainder; (2) ministerial, on oath, being an office or inquisition found; (3) by way of conveyance, as a deed enrolled. Wharton. A written memorial of all the acts and proceedings in an action or suit, in a court of record. The official and authentic history of the cause, consisting in entries of each successive step in the proceedings, chronicling the various acts of the parties and of the court, couched in the formal language established by usage, terminating with the judgment rendered in the cause, and intended to remain as a perpetual and unimpeachable memorial of the proceedings and judgment. State

276 | P a g e

v. Brewer, 19 Ala.App. 291, 97 So. 160, 161. At common law, a roll of parchment upon which the proceedings and transactions of a court are entered or drawn up by its officers, and which is then deposited in its treasury in perpetuam rei memoriam. 3 Steph.Comm. 583; 3 Bl.Comm. 24. A court of record is that where the acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled in parchment for a perpetual memorial and testimony, which rolls are called the "records of the court," and are of such high and supereminent authority that their truth is not to be called in question. Hahn v. Kelly, 34 Cal. 422, 94 Am.Dec. 742. O'Connell v. Hotchkiss, 44 Conn. 53; Murrah v. State, 51 Miss. 656; State v. Anders, 64 Kan. 742, 68 P. 668; Wilkinson v. Railway Co., C.C., 23 F. 562; In re Christern, 43 N.Y.Super.Ct. 531. Courts of record. Those whose judicial acts and proceedings are enrolled in parchment, for a perpetual memorial and testimony, which rolls are called the "records of the court," and are of such high and supereminent authority that their truth is not to be called in question. Every court of record has authority to fine and imprison for contempt of its authority. 3 Broom & H. Comm. 21, 30. Page v. Turcott, 179 Tenn. 491, 167 S.W.2d 350, 354. ATTACHMENT. The act or process of taking, apprehending, or seizing persons or property, by virtue of a writ, summons, or other judicial order, and bringing the same into the custody of the law; used either for the purpose of bringing a person before the court, of acquiring jurisdiction over the property seized, to compel an appearance, to furnish security for debt or costs, or to arrest a fund in the hands of a third person who may become liable to pay it over. Also the writ or other process for the accomplishment of the purposes above enumerated, this being the more common use of the word. A remedy ancillary to an action by which plaintiff is enabled to acquire a lien upon property or effects of defendant for satisfaction of judgment which plaintiff may obtain. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Vermillion v. Kirby, 62 S.D. 489, 253 N.W. 616; Lipscomb v. Rankin, Tex.Civ.App., 139 S.W.2d 367, 369. Though sometimes called an ancillary or auxiliary proceeding, it is in all essential respects, a suit. Farmers State Bank of Lexington v. Lemmer, 130 Neb. 211, 264 N.W. 415, 416.

277 | P a g e

The purpose is to take defendant's property into legal custody, so that it may be applied on defendant's debt to plaintiff when established. John Deere Plow Co. of St. Louis v. L. D. Jennings, Inc., 203 S.C. 426, 27 S.E.2d 571, 572; Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Edwards, 281 Ky. 693, 137 23. W.2d 344, 348. At common law, "attachment" was procedure whereby sheriff was, commanded to attach a defendant who, after being personally served, disobeyed original writ of summons, by keeping certain of his goods which he would forfeit if he did not appear, or by making him find securities who would be amerced if he continued his nonappearance, and, if after such attachment he still neglected to appear, he would not only forfeit this security, but was compellable by a writ of distringas infinite. Grimmett v. Barnwell, 184 Ga. 461, 192 S.E. 191, 194, 116 A.L.R. 257. Execution and attachment distinguished. See Execution. Persons A writ issued by a court of record, commanding the sheriff to bring before it a person who has been guilty of contempt of court, either in neglect or abuse of its process or of subordinate powers. 3 Bl.Comm. 280; 4 Bl.Comm. 283; Commonwealth v. Shecter, 250 Pa. 282, 95 A. 468, 470. Property A species of mesne process, by which a writ is issued at the institution or during the progress of an action, commanding the sheriff to seize the property, rights, credits, or effects of the defendant to be held as security for the satisfaction of such judgment as the plaintiff may recover. It is principally used against absconding, concealed, or fraudulent debtors. U. S. Capsule Co. v. Isaacs, 23 Ind.App. 533, 55 N.E. 832. To Give Jurisdiction Where the defendant is a non-resident, or beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the court, his goods or land within the territory may be seized upon process of attachment; whereby he will be compelled to enter an appearance, or the court acquires jurisdiction so far as to dispose of the property attached. This is sometimes called "foreign attachment." Megee v. Beirne, 39 Pa. 50; Bray v. McClury, 55 Mo. 128. In such a case, the proceeding becomes in substance one in rem against the attached property. St. John v. Parsons, 54 Ohio App. 420, 7 N.E.2d 1013, 1014. Domestic and Foreign In some jurisdictions it is common to give the name "domestic attachment" to one issuing against a resident debtor, (upon the special

278 | P a g e

ground of fraud, intention to abscond, etc.,) and to designate an attachment against a non-resident, or his property, as "foreign." Longwell v. Hartwell, 30 A. 495, 164 Pa. 533; David E. Kennedy, Inc. v. Schleindl, 290 Pa. 38, 137 A. 815, 816, 53 A.L.R. 1020. But the term "foreign attachment" more properly belongs to the process otherwise familiarly known as "garnishment." It was a peculiar and ancient remedy open to creditors within the jurisdiction of the city of London, by which they were enabled to satisfy their own debts by attaching or seizing the money or goods of the debtor in the hands of a third person within the jurisdiction of the city. Welsh v. Blackwell, 14 N.J.Law, 346. This power and process survive in modern law, in all commonlaw jurisdictions, and are variously denominated. "garnishment," "trustee process," or "factorizing." Raiguel v. McConnell, 25 Pa. 362, 363. A "foreign attachment" is a mesne process issued to compel a foreign debtor to appear to the suit of his creditor, while "attachment execution" is a final process issued for the purpose of enforcing a judgment already obtained. Williams v. Ricca, 324 Pa. 33, 187 A. 722, 723. ATTACHMENT EXECUTION. A name given in some states to a process of garnishment for the satisfaction of a judgment. As to the judgment debtor it is an execution; but as to the garnishee it is an original process—a summons commanding him to appear and show cause, if any he has, why the judgment should not be levied on the goods and effects of the defendant in his hands. Sniderman v. Nerone, 7 A.2d 496, 499, 136 Pa.Super. 381. ATTACHMENT OF PRIVILEGE. In English law. A process by which a man, by virtue of his privilege, calls another to litigate in that court to which he himself belongs, and who has the privilege to answer there. A writ issued to apprehend a person in a privileged place. Termes de la Ley.

Using codes in your claim

279 | P a g e

DON’T

Getting everything on the record, and how to deal with a Judge

Anybody who wants to speak at the court ask a simple question have they been sworn in…. watch nobody will swear in… their should be a court recorder.. i would get the transcript after , granted this is if you lose, and file an appeal.. take the original transcript and make a copy .on the copy redact everything the party that weren’t sworn in said… and then at the appealet you say nobody came in and swore under oath that anything they were saying and doing was true..they refused to be held liable for what they just said.. thye only brought hearsay conjecture and speculation before a tribunal and before the court.

I believe that One must be sworn in to press the record…and so does the new hampshire barcode association believes its true

Even in family court u should wish to evoke common law..even if the family judge refused to recognize yor claim in court.. if the judge says he doesn’t want to hear it…that’s fine..u can’t make anybody to anything… u can’t make your husband or wife do anything.. so if they don’t want to hear it just give them an notice of error…

If the judge knows that u are in a common law and that u are evoking your common law case and have him hear your case which is his duty and he still doesn’t want to hear it…u hold them liable and sue the man or woman don’t mention they are a judge in your local county court… they are a public servant whose was derelict in ther duty as a public servant as they subscribed and agreed to in their contract..thye failed to provide the service the were suposed to and i want just compensation… Don’t worry about going to the same court house that is family court because that venue where differnet hats and can handle your claim.

280 | P a g e

Judge want to recuse themselves from cases becaseu of excuse like that they know the person involved.. u respond with.. the person may be the best person you ever met but this doesn’t change the fact that they were derelict in their duty an di will hold her liable for failing to carring out their duty..because of this failure of service is causing me loss and i am going to claim compensation..so they never do that again.. Thye may say that they would unfair because they know the person and u say don’t worry i am sure u will do your job fair and properly and not be derelict in your duty and besides we are going to let the jury decide..front he law and the fact.. ur there just to witness..ur not going to control the flow of the court..its my case i am going to control it.. Can u give me the point on law why you won't? Can u give me your conclusion of law and statements of facts as to why u won't hear my claim? I the history of England the crown has never beaten a man in a common law case.. Judge ask u wat ur doing there after not answering the name game...u say u are a man and your here to help ur fellow man.. Judge may say No your not Reply what's the point of law?and no I a am not a man and wat makes u believe that I am not going g to help my fellow man He might say your trying to be a wise guy..u reply ah wise guy? No I am just a man. ... (play the werd game) Treat the judge like a heckler at your comedy act...flip it on them..don't let the ckler take over the show... Judge threatens u to take a notice out u drop the practicing on the bench ..are u giving me legal advice... If u judge says are u practicing law without a license u reply by asking the lawyer prosecuting u if he has a license .. nobody has a license to practice law...law is just an opinion..how can u get a license e for an opinion that's just nutty...law just like opinions change all the time. If the prosecutor doesn't have a license we should stop theses procediings and shut down this courthouse until everyone has a license....it sounds like all the lawyers should go to jail for practicing without a license. Look out u may not be charged with anything..check ur casefile..then ask the judge how they are going to make a ruling? U just caught a judge with his pants down Its your body u want to do cocain in that's ur biz...where does it say in the law that a man can't put anything into his body. If some one tries to tell u wat to do and be ur daddy well then they have to take care of u.. your going to ask for 1.2 million to cover your expenses in the future since they want to be mom and dad..and pay like mom and dad

Following a judge's orders while remaining in honour as a man

281 | P a g e

Judges ask you to sit down to establish jurisdiction…. Just look around stupidly first and ten point to the seat and ask is anyone sitting there, because i would like to there. No objections or claims this chair? then it’s my wish to have a seat.

there is nothing there for you to talk too… they are in a 2 dimensional world… don’t respond to their order…

On planet earth only a man can wish…

The importance of having your claim filed when entering their court

When u have your claim on file and recorded go into court(or you are going to lose) and give it to the bailiff to give to the magistragte or judge and let them know you don’t care if your guilty of all the charges so what we live in a common law land and there is no man who is going to come forth and say i do wrong. Point out to the judge that all the same people are here for both claim and complaint so lets Hold the claim at the same time you hold complaint trial. They could complain that they got 21 days to answer the complaint but it only 8 words long so they wont have a strong argument..but they could ask for 21 dyas!!! They need to answer a simple did he or did he not tres on the property? U could object and say this is a simple calim that needs to be answered..but most will let it happen because they wont take ur 8 word claim serious!!

You are going to get all the charges discharged because this is a common law land and no man has come forth claiming i did wrong!! U are an idiot and outsider of society a stranger and do not subscribe.

With traffic tickets ur claim would be something like …the man acting as a cop actually stoped me and wasted my valuable time on a charge he claims that i did is something wrong…i haven’t done a damn thing wrong. There is affidavit on file this man just stopped because i was speeding? According to who? I was taking my property from here to there at

282 | P a g e

the speed i thought was necessary and proper to me to function. If man or woman has a problem with that let them file an affidavit.. so since the there isn’t an affidavit on file i require this matter to be discharged.

U may need to teach your judge!!

If they are asking u to plea u tell the magistrate that u require paper pen and ink as well as i require a quick leave of court to properly respond to the magistrate so that nothing ccan be misconstrued for the record..so that if i need to appeal something that someone above you will know exactly what i am doing and tell you “you better back off on this guy” and i and want to make sure that you clerk place this into the record..

There is no counter claim because they aren’t filing a claim against you..they have compliant.. Noone is violating anything..it means they are putting their dick in you.. Intefeered with your right to move form point a to point b ..would be correct

Keep it short and sweet..

We have no civil rights we don’t want them not do we claim them..know bodies tells us what we have god told us wat we have!! We don’t need anyone telling us what we do or don’t have!!

Sometimes a judge will threaten and suggest thing s to you like.. u better not bring this claim of yours into this case or ever in my court house…it’s a suggestion…which is practicing law because it outside of his authority to do. U simple ask the judge are u telling me how i should or should not defend myself??aare you practicing law on my behalf? Are you practicing law form the bench? Because that not allowed!!

283 | P a g e

If a judge starts yelling at you ask why are u yelling at me , as i am stand right here, does your microphone not work? remind him he is in a public setting you know this isn’t private!! Please conduct yourself accordingly as we are in the public forum now..

Who is a public defender actually protecting?

The public defender is placed with the defendant so they cant claim they don’t understand because they have an interpretor.. so watch out for the public defender… Its often the case when they are given to you the first they will ask you to do is to plead guilty… that’s the angle!!you are the sacrifice!!

Give copies of your documents to the clerk, only surrender originals to the jury

If u have a hard time filing in the flesh.. then u send ur paper through mail so that they are forced to sign to prove the courthouse received it..now if the clerk refuse it they will have to send it back with a letter..it usually says something ike you are not compling with proper rules of civil procedure..they might not sign the letter but hopefully u have a typed name but at least u have proof on paper and the signature from the received mail.

It might only take 24 hours for the to reject your claim..next u should write a letter to the man who acts like a clerk and the man act that sometimes acts as the building manager… that case is my property and you’re using my property without my consent that’s theft and that makes it a tres on my case and i am going to give you 3 days to correct your error. (give ur phone number) They may ignore this letter so and not even call you.. u will need to write another letter to the same man who acts as a clerk and the man who sometimes act as the building

284 | P a g e

manager.. because you didn’t do what i require just compensation i may file a claim for $5000 and $500 for every lost day… This should be enough for them to allow your claim to move forward..or else u know what to do next…file a claim against them (probably in a different court) When u get your case in there make sure it has a notice for it to remain sealed…

Just let the man or women who play the parts of clerk and building manager that your paperwork is property and they cant review it or study your property until it goes before a jury.. u have to let them know that it is your property…

Be prepared to explain to these clerks that first of are u speaing legalese or common English parlance Ask them if they know what a complaint is? They probably don’t know? explain your claim is not a complaint because complaint is saying u are whining.. do you does my docs whinning or whailing.. then explain what is property and how the letter is your property because u created those documents i spent my money , i spent my time. Does any body at the court believesthey have and investment in my property? They may describe how it is done for instance you do write your side of the story….blah blah blah..you respond with where do you gfet off telling me how to wirte my claim… they may say everybody does it their way u respond just Because every body does it that way makes it the law? They may say those are the rules of the court.. u say how do the rules of your court apply to a man? I am filing a claim by right. I have to the right to stop the harm that is happening to me. Do you dispute that? They may say it a pleading and you again have to define a pleading for them..it means the action of making an emotional or earnest appeal to someone.

But technically you have to understand it’s their property when u are handing it over to them..you remind them that you are only give them a copy and that u have the original and you will serve that directly to the jury….

285 | P a g e

If a court house it messing with your case get a claim adjuster to get the bond of the court house and give you a estimate of the damage of tres on your CLAIM so you can make your claim for damages for the tres!!!

Sometime building managers aren’t the chief justice and u may be getting the run around from a clerk. U want the chief judge to accept your court into the building… plus look out for clercks trying to convert your case by filling motions…we don’t have motions….look out for judges calling u a plaintiff!!! You aren’t complaing so don’t accept that title!! That is proof positive that they are tresing on your case..show your claims adjuster…specially have a case after u notice the case being common law and they still do this stuff!! Notice of the character of the man the nature is that of a man the character is that of a prosecutor not that of a plaintiff. so watch out for judges trying to flip your case!!! you put in notices that this case is to be determined by a jury not a judge or magistrate.. the magistrate need only serve as a witness the case and find that the facts are in of the claim and to witness the order that we give judges and require them to sign IF they believe that the facts and claim are true and that they need to witness , along with the jury and clerk and to move it on to a sheriff for execution!!

So what you do is build your case up putting all your notices in setting up your common law court then you get the clerk to send off the summons.. that letter goes something like this… hi clerk lady, we just put in a summons into the case and the case is ready to move forward we require you to make two complete copies to be prepared with the summons already in the case to be delivered to the sheriff for execution on the parties through a process service.

If someone has a problem with you stuff tell them to put it on paper so if they are wrong you can go after them [their bond] Their might be a fight before you even get started!!!

we are not putting our court into their court!!! We are bringing in my court at the location of the public court house!!

286 | P a g e

- Pay and ask for endorsement, SSN and bank s, access to the courthouse

Pay and ask for an endorsement on the back of the check and make sure u send a letter asking them to make sure they sign the back of the check . Simply send them a cheque, and require to see the the endorsement on the back, knowing that agencies don't have hands in which to sign. And not accepting a third party to sign for it, you want to make sure the money got to the proper man or woman that you've wronged. timestamp at the court house if that’s here it happened How can the unites states of America sign the back of the check?!!! So if anybody endorse it!!! U go after them by filing fraud for g a cheque that they don’t have permission to endorse!!! Don’t be afraid of your port or your SSN number. U can always turn off the capacity when your want….

Getting justice when the CROWN is charging you, and just simply paying the Queen

How can a man get remedy if the prosecutor is the crown and the court is a the crown and the judge wrks for the crown!!??

If u accept there summons to appear they have to accept your summons and invitation to appear..so appear as a defendant and a man.. u will be able to flip it in the end because u are a man and they trump istrative codes and statues!!!

We have the right to evoke common law.. the creator of thess courts can come forth in a public court housem and tell a judge and prosecutor to hold his horses there because man created u.. and u cant harm your creator and i certqinly know you wish to harm me..bob, joe, suzy!!! If they say im acting as a judge.. well you tell them there acting skills and acting abilities are going to cause me harm as a man. So do u want to put your acting to to side

287 | P a g e

and realize that there is a man before u. have i caused any harm to any man? They should respond NO…well then you should stop before you harm me and i lay a claim against you..

If they say it’s the queen ask then to be specific… they need to be specific of which queen elizbeth… it needs to be specific ..is it Elizabeth Alexandra Mary; born 21 April 1926? If these people realy want to play this lunacy that the queen is charging you with you then u play it with them and pay the queen of england..ask the clerk for the queends address of bucking ham palace and u tell them ur going to write the cheque out to the queen for what eveer the judgment is and you write a cheque for $5 or whatever u can afford at the time and attach a letter “ dear queen Elizabeth, it appears to be a judgemnet on your behalf in your name and i believe they have awarded you $10, 000,000 but the best i can do right now is $5 a week but if you are really hard up to pay your bills and u need me to pay more let me know but if your sitting pretty and you really don’t need more than that; i hope u accept this and i will continue paying this monthly and i will tget to the business of paying this off and i wish that you sign your cheque on the back to endors it just to ensure that the proper funds went to the proper queen elizbeth mary…. ” and make sure it gets sent out from the court house to evidentiate it… all u have to do is get that get from the bank if they evr endors the $5 cheque and turn around and sell that autograph for $20

If she ever cashed a cheque u could move to fraud because she never moved the case at all.. you do this by saying i don’t this charge and challenge the cheque and file a claim…

If a crown wants to say whatever don’t challenge it.. just like a person who see a ufo don’t challenge ..u don’t know…u also don’t need to care… because there is no damage done and there is no man who is going to come forward and claim any damage loss or harm in a common law court!!

Filing fees for a claim, and establishing common law at the courthouse

Do not accept them calling u mister Mitchell because that is not my name.. my name is robin Mitchell

288 | P a g e

If they clerk wants to reject your claim because all they accept is complaints fine because u have a remedy for that..u will go after any man or woman… mailing your claim back to me without a case number is wrong. So if they have a problem with accepting complaints u say i am not giving it to you; i am give it to my public court house and i am expecting you my public servant to record it in the proper section of my public court house. I am not giving u court clerk a complaint!!!

That case number is no more than an identification tab that gets put on your case with your claim so they can locate it when the jury is seated…

Just ask them what they think complaint is…i am not whining… do you see me whining… nor is this a pleading because i am not begging anyone for anything.. then ask them what they think a claim is!!

They w=may say im going to file it for you but your $400 is going to non refundable!! Respond with “ as u know nobody has permission to tres on my case and if that happened i would seek a remedy for that!! but there is no need to talk about that because no harm has been done!! I am a not paying a $400 application fee i am paying for the rental of the room for the duration of that case..it might be a person filing a complaint but not for a man!!! to cover your ass because u don’t want them to use your cheque for der is u put down that it is for a donation and no license in formed..

New Hampshire Bill of Rights (1784) [Art.] 14. [Legal Remedies to be Free, Complete, and Prompt.] Every subject of this state is entitled to a certain remedy, by having recourse to the laws, for all injuries he may receive in his person, property, or character; to obtain right and justice freely, without being obliged to purchase it; completely, and without any denial; promptly, and without delay; conformably to the laws.

Courts might have a tough time accepting all your hand written notices and fillings…and u may find your judge having a hard time letting the Mitchell court into his court..

289 | P a g e

I believe my summons cover’s the necessary points of law(for hand written notes)

What were are in essense trying to do is convert the court over to a common law court before the other party shows up…

If u have a case that was a complaint before and u converted it to a claim ..then success is on the horizon for you…

Sometimes it is just easier to start a brand new complaint than to convert and old one…

Should I file a claim at County or District court?

tort claims act n. a federal or state act which, under certain conditions, waives governmental immunity and allows lawsuits by people whoclaim they have been harmed by torts (wrongful acts), includin g negligence, by government agencies or their employees.These acts also establish the proc edure by which such claims are made. Before the enactment of tort claims acts, government bodies could not be sued without the specific permission of the government. The Federal ver sion is the Federal Tort Claims

district courts are top notch (institutionalized corruption) so you are going to battle with the best!! U could find yourself spending a good 40 min debating with an entire clerk staff..of course when u get to the head clerk its probably only going to take minutes…

290 | P a g e

any controversy (us) that is over $20 dollars can be settled in a court look at article 7 bill of rigths of 7th amendement in the constitution..

u can transfer the case later…(not sure why)

Dismissed charges may be used against you along with your current charges

They will bring dismissed charges to life and offer u plea deals. The can renew the charges!!! Get them discharged!!

- Definition of "dare" in contract law

Black's Law Dictionary 2nd Ed

It is assuming the liability of the debt….

A judge may say i wouldn’t dare!!! U need to say u do dare which means u wiil presume and assume and bare all liability of this contract…

- Accepting charges as a PERSON knowing that you're still a man

291 | P a g e

Go in to court both as a man and as a person..enter as a defendant and then we are going to flip it… If they want you to come in as a defendant fine but accept that everything they charge you with; The defendant may be guilty but who cares because you realize u are talking to a man? Who cares if the defendant is guilty. I am alos my mama’s baby boy, i am also her bitch , but no other man can tell me wat to do…am i a son ..yes… am i a child .. yes…can they punish me …yes..but not a man…and since your not my mom or my dad u cant punish me and dicipline me..unless u think ur my mom dad or creator??

Handling threats and deception from a Judge

Nolo contendere is a legal term that comes from the Latin for "I do not wish to contend." It is also referred to as a plea of no contest.

Never trust a plea deal with a state prosecutor because they can promise u the moon and back but if there is a mandatory sentencing that is applied on that charge too bad they don’t have to reveal that to you..

But if a judge wants u to plea nolo contendere u say u don’t know what it means and if it means i can get out of here then fine. But make sure u notice the courts and write that no man has come forth before this court and made a claim that i a man have done wrong or cause any injury any damage any harm and nobody has accrued a loss and this is a common law land. Where man is the creator of government…man is the creator o fthis court..man is the creator of the position u maintain in this court…judge…and i am a man and i am giving notice to this court that there is a man before this court….and do as you wish…

Judge's orders must be processed the same day, and not knowing their rules of court

292 | P a g e

This is how it works.. Anytime a judge issues an order or motions he may make rulings on from the bench those court clerks have to sit there and makes ure they are all time stamped and filed into the proper casefile the same day or until the morning hours… there is no order that sits on somebodies table overnight…it can’t be done!! The day the judge issue the order is the day it should be time stamped baring it’s a case that goes into the wee hour of the morning..

Dealing with police and courts Our jurisdiction is what we say to them. We know that police’s jurisdiction does not lie past this threshold, if you have jurisdiction past this threshold you would not be standing outside my door, you’d be kicking it in right now. When we’re in our home we are safe, they cannot demand us to answer them.

Don’t invite them in, don’t go out, don’t answer to name. DON’T. ANSWER.

When they ask “are you Robin?”, reply with question “are you questioning me? I require my attorney to be present when questioned, or I wish to remain silent for anything I say may be used against me in the court of law. Are you here in an official capacity as an officer of the court?” they ask “are you Robin?” reply with “I take that as you agreeing to what I just said, as you’re talking to me as an officer of the court. And at this time I wish to be let alone.” They ask “are you Robin?” Reply with “What’s your name? what’s your badge number? I wish you to cease and desist and leave me in peace”

293 | P a g e

If judge is late to court, put in a notice that I was here on time, I have things to do instead of wasting my time here; we’re all summoned to be in court on this date at this time, if you can’t be bothered to show up at the appropriate time, you’re in contempt of court for not showing up on time, not me. (get time stamp, put in record) I did my duty I showed up, now I’m going home.

Your word’s as good as mine, get a third party impartial witness.

Get out of jail……go to court and ask for forgiveness. Just bring the man or woman that I tresed upon, so I can be given forgiveness for what I’ve done wrong. If no man or woman’s gonna come forth and make a claim, I wish to be let go”.

The judges probably just issues warrant as a curtesy for the other people present (so the other people in the courtroom don’t have to wait)

We can witness by hearing something, and testify to what we heard. There are no rules in common law, only rules in statutory.

Show me on the summons papers where does it say that I have to show up on time AND wait until you show up as well. What if you don’t show up? I’m not going to wait indefinitely. You’re late, you’re in contempt of court.

I’ll be glad to appear to any man or woman that he’s done wrong to, but we’ll not appear as defendant, I’ll not play the silly defendant game with those silly statutes. I’ll only appear as man, I don’t have contract with you people, I don’t believe I’m bound by statutes. I’m not part of your society, I’ve never said that I’m an active member of your club. Far as I’m concerned I’m an idiot to whatever you folks wish of me. if you want to talk man to man, I’ll be more than competent. If you want to start on some legal jargon and try to hold me liable for doing something wrong in your little legalese society, I have no clue about the legal society or the or the jargons that you guys use. And I have a belief that there’s no requirement as a man to know any of your legalese nonsense.

294 | P a g e

Make sure when we have an encounter, we have microphones to record for 3 rd party impartial witness.

I am not the person, I can represent the person.

Anyone who wants to come in as a defendant? Let them in. defendants can only curl up and take a beating. But there may be too many, so tell the judge that we don’t have the resources to take on this many defendants.

If a boss wants to enter as a defendant, that’s lovely but not right now. It’s true that they were responsible since they were training the man who injured me, but we’ll get them afterwards. Not right now.

How are they going to explain in accordance to common law, that centralized governments have some sort of jurisdiction over man?

Karl will take position as defendant IF there’s not going to be a man showing up to prosecute the claim. Absolutely have a claim already filed if you are going to go in as defendant.

We can start our own nation just like Indians can make their own nations on their reservations. It will be outside of the government jurisdiction. Start our own court, and when we have a ruling, it’ll be recognized across the land by other courts.

***Find out who is in control of the agency and make them able, then it’s not State vs. man, it’s man vs. man. If they don’t want to take on the liability, then we say “so you’re saying there’s a corporation/ship out there that no one’s claiming? Then I’ll take over that agency/corporation.”

295 | P a g e

Case is surrendered to the court when it’s presented to the public, we can’t deny people from coming into the case, but we can notice the court that “we don’t have the ability to take on more defendants at this time”

If you’re at a hearing then it’s not a judge, it’s a hearing officer.

If they’re denying our mckenzy friend status, then we’ll just become a co-claimant. This will give us standing to speak in that court.

When a man fails to answer your claim Order the judge to get an arrest warrant for the man or woman who has failed to show up An arrest warrant (also officially called warrant of arrest in the Philippines) is a warrant issued by a judge or magistrate on behalf of the state, which authorizes the arrest and detention of an individual, or the search and seizure of an individual's property.

If we go to court and they’re giving us the all caps name, simply write a note to the clerk requiring our name to be spelled correctly. Forcing the clerk who won’t be able to do this unless we require them by writing.

21 days that we wait after we file a claim, is for the other side to defend themselves or file their claim in response.

Watch out for courts resending us paperwork and slipping in the all-caps name again. Check ALL documents. Fix paperwork, send it back to them requiring to amend it. “I’m requiring you to acknowledge these errors” if you can’t fix it, then at least send me a letter acknowledging your errors.

Tell the bailiff that we’re not here for a default judgement. I want him to come in and I want it to be on his record.

296 | P a g e

I require the judge to get the bailiff to get an arrest warrant. They should be familiar with the process they do it to of the public all the time.

Sometimes we’ll go after a public official, and they get their boss involved, we don’t want that. Make it clear we’re going after the man, not the office, and they should be on their way out of our court. The last time the USA was involved, they got away with sovereign immunity in their own courts.

If they want sovereign immunity they can have it, make Mr. United States of America a COdefendant, not THE defendants.

When ur prosecuting someone and nobody shows up that’s a default judgment. Its not a win because a defendant can put it back in play because he would like to defend it after the fact..

A ordinary man on man in court where one man wins and one man loses that is a summary judgement

( if u have a won case that has been discharged).. Make a compensation claim for court cost . it is a sweet threat if a lawyer or prosecutor doesn’t settle down

Mckenzie friend is like next friend in America…. if someone is going to give u a title like that and ur unsure just restate your position… i conditionally accept ur offer for me to be a mckenzie friend to get the show on the road so long as u realize that in doesn’t negate the fact that i am here to present my fathers case to the court

297 | P a g e

Every court is a court of record..u have to expressly under the common law if England or the common law under blackstone edition 4 that u have the right to evoke a court of record in there beliefs which I believe r ur beliefs ( the judge) means it only moves under the common law , where the magistrate is independent of the tribunal. Be specific by wat u mean by court of record Look up court of Rd cord on blackstone sec. 378 or black law 4th edition. where it is only man on man and no officer or agent of the government can not testify unless he takes the oath as a man. U need to be specific because they may have named it the people court or claims court. ..they have several names for that definition... I am evoking a court of record see exhibit a ( ) Or notice that ur vourt defibes what a court of record is.the magistrate and the court clerk is independent of the tribunal and I don't want anybody to review my case until it comes before the jury..the tribunal consist of I the prosecutor the wrong doer and the jury..I don't want any body's eyes on the case in the case, touching the case or tresing on this case. Evoking the Mitchell court and what does that mean...

Be wary of using karl lentz or anyone else letters as a templatized approach.make your own and know what yhe words mean thst ur using...The problem with templates is that once courts catch on the courts will start rejecting your paperwork. ..because u better know what it means u wrote.. and the courts are going to test ur metal...so if u can't handle rejection well they will get u there..u must be prepared for it. .it's like dealing with a woman rejection u....don't get mad get smooth.. Write to them" I believe that I am a man. And I believe that somebody rejected this. Who is the man or woman who rejected this and Interfered with my right to access these courts. Who believes I am a reject?why did they make such a claim? Who tresed on my case?

a return of property hearing you give the prosecutor a chance to make his claim for the property

If u are on parole or have a court of order that doesn’t allow u to leave the state…and have a return of property hearing you are basically saying lets go back to way things were before the contract start…if you were in prison or about to go to prison and you signed your parole contract to stay out of jail then they are going to get rid of your parole and place u back in prison…which was the way things were before u signed..

298 | P a g e

Andy Warhol had a ton of assistant painting his painting for him but it was the artist signature at the bottom that takes all credit but more importantly all liability for it as well… so the only person who signed that document is you? Making u responsible!!

If your are in the middle east and you stole something they cut your hand off… these are the customs of these people…so you better tell them that you don’t subscribe to their customs and beliefe way before they cut your hands off or too late!! same applies with this culture once the cuff are on and you signed the document and haven’t told them that you are a man with all his rights before they interfere with them well too bad for you!!

Man will find himself in trouble not for the things he did but more for the thing he didn’t do!!

We don’t represent our self in court…we present ourselves in court..

Just because some code says you shoot small children in the head doesn’t make it right.. So if your code gives you permission to break in and violate my rights, in time when the dust settles you will see that one man cant tres on another man property… so you make a claim on the man(not the officer) who kick down your door…

a classic thing they do is try and move a queen bench case over to queen bench division.. what you have to do is go down there and find out which man or woman has transferred you case over and ask them what’s the odds of a non crown officer like myself winning in a crown court against the crown? There is the reason we have two court running in this country..we have the crown and Queen’s bench [common law] in case the crown gets out of hand. where does a man have redress when a crown has done wrong? We have the right to go before queen and country…we don’t have to go to a crown court to evoke our right as a man. we have to know how to walk into a court and make a claim to need the building to carry on the peoples business. “the people business needs to be heard, i have a matter that the people need to hear, i am one of the people, this is my court,this is my public building i need to open up shop and run

299 | P a g e

this place..so court clerk i need you to do this this and this……. Senior judge magistrate i need you to assemble this this and this…” we have to give them the order requiring your needs. Its not there job to show oyu how to be a king or queen…that’s our job

When u walk inot a cour u have to know how ot use it.. a quenn would walkm in and ask “where is the officer of this court?” where is the court clerk? Where is the magistrate because i need this court assembled. Magistrate u go seek the jury i need 12… chief judge i need a room get me the this list of witness and get the sheriff or what ever you use to summons these witnesses to appear.. court clerk lady issue summons, i’ll create the orders and u dispatch them forthwith.

Why would the courts teach u to beat them???

Say u go to a court house a t night and you have business and they want to close the doors… u ask what would they do if the queen came here…they should answer they would open the court up for her. She works at the pleasure of the people and i am one of the people and i am coming in… and u go in ..they will say thngs like i am going to get head of security here. U say god bless u because he is the one who gonna make the magic happen. And he knows wats going on and he knows wats i say is true..

None in a crown court will ever sya u did anything wrong!!!

Crown is a creation of man…the creation of man is considered a monster…so you know and he knows (the officer) tha he know his is giving his fellow man up to the monster, to a machine, and he know the crown is going to hurt man..so i am going to hold u liable for it.. As a man u have only a duty and obligation to your fellow man not to the crown…judge has a duty and obligation ot the crown We have to understand that as a man we have no duty to answer to answer any member of the crown..but you do have an obligation to answer any man!!!its that simple

300 | P a g e

We have to understand that the crown is a creation of man and if does harm to us we just are going to pull the plug on our creation. We are going to pull your charter

They are supposed to treat pople with no respect..look at the bible… wat do u expect!!!

The court is a public building and you are going to access this public building and i am going to hold court and i am going to invite my neighborugh to come in here and those ni=eighborughs are going to judge them as a fellow man..

Man created this building for the use of man in the future ..i am that future man and what man is now interfering with my ability to access thes curts? Just tell what what is fair and just and reasonable to pay for access because i understand the court clerk and judges have to get paid and then lets get the show on the road.. its is a slippery road for the crown to set the price for access to justice because it is as important as water that it should be provided for free…if its too much then use the court are free to the people position..but for now just pay wats is fair… occupy a public building..say your not going to cause any damage..and if i do i know what the penaly is that i will go to jail and that i will owe compensation..but the fact that i am the public makes me a crazy animal that is going to destrpoy stuff..i know how to behave like the queen of England. U woyuldnt throw the queen out she woyuldnt have armed guards she would tell u i want to be alone and if i need u i will call for you..ur a public servant and i am the public… i will call u whe i need you and don’t follow me i will call u when i need u.

When we believe a member of the crown has done us worng what court other than a crown court can a man sek compensation or redress? And let him say there is no other court so when a corwn official does you worng you have to go in fornt of the crown and let the crown decide whethere a crown official did you wrong or not…i am going to tell 500 people that they is no justicy for them…..

During one of the days they let people paruse through ..just walk through and whnem u see an empty room make a cliam for it… and say your going to set up a clercks office and run queens bench out of it. Occupy these building and make a people court… because whene the crown gets out of hand because some code has allowed him to shot a baby in the head… we are going to start our own peoples court and drag that man before it and make him anser as a man for shooting the baby…because they will always be liable to man..

301 | P a g e

Public defender, serving notices at hearing, rescind vs. modify a contract

Be prepared for the judge to spend a lot of time trying to persuade us to get a lawyer. Because a lawyer becomes an interpreter of language (legalese) and thus making us competent to take on the person hat (we’ll have understanding).

If we have a lawyer, put a notice into our court file stating that we no longer need a lawyer. Make it official that we’re getting rid of the lawyer.

Be prepared at this point that the court judges and justices and clerks will block us from filing notices into our court. So we use the post office to mail notices to our own court, if anyone prevents us they’ll be committing mail fraud.

Make copies of notices, hand one to the magistrate in court, hand another copy after court to the clerk, make sure it’s time stamped by the clerk.

Lawyers always have a duty/loyalty to the court first before us.

The legal society along the way will always send us letters addressing us “Mr.Smith” or “Mrs.Smith”, we must catch them and correct them saying “I don’t go by Mr.Smith, my name is Robin Mitchell”

A judge may ask “Mr.Smith, do you think blah blah blah”, don’t let them hook us with a “Mr” in our title, we must not answer to that title, always put it in writing and file in a notice, then ask if they’ve received our notice? have they read it? do you need more time to read it?

302 | P a g e

Try not to do more talking in court.

Whatever they ask, we should answer with a question of “did you get my notice about jurisdiction?” “did you get my notice about immediate return of property?”

Lawyer is not our daddy, we are in charge. “I require you to take notice of these notices”. When you have a lawyer, they don’t allow you to make any decisions because you are incompetent.

If a judge is pressuring us to take on a lawyer, we just ask back “are you offering me legal advice?” (because that would make him liable) “do you want to be held liable for your legal advice?”

Is there a law that says I have to have a lawyer? Can you point to the law that applies to I a man? A judge will not break our legs if we don’t take a lawyer.

To get a probation officer was based on a contract/term to get us out of prison. We don’t want to rescind these otherwise it’ll and us back in prison. We should modify instead of rescind.

Go back to the court of original jurisdiction where they had this probation/ placed upon us, and say “at this time I no longer see any benefit of x/y/z, and I want to modify it a little bit. Because doing what you want me to do is causing me injury/harm/loss of property, and I know you folks don’t wanna be a source of harm/injury/loss to a man because that’s why you exist. You exist to benefit man and to help man out. You’re here to help us, not to hurt us.” Write this in a letter, act nice.

Buy land, get a bond for free, they think because of this we’re not a flight risk.

303 | P a g e

Get a process server when sending out your paperwork to the man or woman not the agent or officer u will get an affidavit stating the specific time the man or woman was served If a court ever tells you you’re “not following civil procedures”, then we’re going about this the right way because we are operating in common law. if you are sewing a social worker or government type look out for the protect your team syndrome.. the system will defend itself..and the system includes the court.. u may have a high public official interfere with your case.. Be prepared to fend off these challenges..they will test your metal.. some feel that sending out a ton of preemptive notices is the way to go but…it’s like telling people not to step on your toes before anyone ever stepped on them.. is presumptuous to say someone is going to do something wrong before the do it..so prepare your notices and be thoughtful of what may come but don’t file notices until they actually do some thing wrong…and they will test you… because when u open your case it has no boundaries and anyone can do anything if u let them… so expect them to test your walls… then pull out your walls (notices) and let them see your metal..

U may get the clerk forcing u to use there paperwork.. Simply and kindly and unthreatinglinlyg ask for the bond of the man or woman who is obstructing me from doing my filling.. they will back off until the head clerk comes in and then u will see how they back off.. again testing your metal..

your ar not IN their superior court…you in your court at the superior court

Another way is to write a disclaimer on it for easy of use and then change all the titles….if they still mess with you and reject your paperwork…just file it there way and then modify your claim after the fact…

304 | P a g e

You may find yourself with the clerks offices rejecting your paperwork and sending it back… what you do is mail it in using the post office with ed mail.. Get the post master or post mistress to date stamp your documents… they should start accepting it as this is setting them up for mail fraud as none can interfere with mail being delivered to your court…it is like an address..

The public statutes at large of the United States of America: from ..., Volume 4

The following year, 1775, Franklin was appointed by the Continental Congress as its first Postmaster General, a position he served in until late in 1776 when Franklin was called upon to serve his country in other ways.

The creation of the Post office occurs before the creation of the seat of the government, and is placed in authority over the seat of government.

The Post Office and the International Postal Union

305 | P a g e

The role of the United States Post Office and the Universal Postal Union became a factor in our lawsuits because of several bankruptcies that the United States has been through over the history of the country. When one declares himself a bankrupt, that person is no longer legally competent to conduct his affairs. The court becomes a fiduciary, and appoints a trustee to oversee the affairs of the bankrupt. It does not matter if the bankrupt is a common man, or a nation; except that a nation still has a right to conduct war. Typically the average person anywhere in the world thinks of their Postal System as a part of, and subservient to, their government. However, the postal system in the United States has a different legal history than one would expect. The Post Office and Judicial Courts were established before the seat of the Government. On Thursday, Sept. 17, 1789 we find written, “Mr. Goodhue, for the committee appointed for the purpose, presented a bill to amend part of the Tonnage act, which was read the first time. The bill sent from the Senate, for the temporary establishment of the Post Office, was read the second and third time, and ed. The bill for establishing the Judicial Courts . . . , for establishing the seat of government . . . ” 11[11] Other references to the Post Office my theory of the founding forefather’s views: POST OFFICE 1. A place where letters are received to be sent to the persons to whom they, are addressed. 2. The post office establishment of the United States, is of the greatest importance to the people and to the government. The constitution of the United States has invested congress with power to establish post offices and post roads. Art. 1, s. 8, n. 7. 3. By virtue of this constitutional authority, congress ed several laws anterior to the third day of March 1825, when an act, entitled "An act to reduce into one the several acts establishing and regulating the post office department," was ed. 3 Story, U. S. 1825. It is thereby enacted, 1. That there be established, the seat of the government of the United States, a general post office, under the direction of a postmaster general. 12[12] We need to take notice where the commas are placed on that last sentence. “That there be established, the seat of the government of the United States, a general post office, under the direction of a postmaster general.” When I set off a clause with commas, I make sure that the sentence makes sense without that clause. Taking out the set-off clause, we read . . . “the seat of the government of the United States under the direction of a postmaster general.” [11] Gales and Seaton’s History [H. of R.], p. 928.

[12] Bouvier, John. Law Dictionary. Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of The United States of America And of the Several States of the American Union, With References to the Civil and Other Systems of Foreign Law. In the Philadelphia, by theChilds & Peterson. (1856)

The creation of the Post office occurs before the creation of the seat of the government, and is placed in authority over the seat of government. What is the effect of these legal techniques? The stated position of an object and the sequence of events play an important role in the Universal-Legal-Technology. The effect is that the Government’s later bankruptcies

306 | P a g e

in 1859 and 1929 have no legal effect upon the solvent Post-Office. We can make a case that the formation of the Post-Office before the formation of the government’s operations is a stroke of dumb luck. Perhaps it is ingenious, since communication has a higher value than government itself. If any government fails, the people still have a need to communicate with one another to form a new government. And to this day, the Post-Office is still solvent and operational, ready to fulfill its duty to help the people in their communications; to set a new government should a complete break down of the existing governmental structures occur in the United States. Sounds like a very good back up plan. The formation of the Universal Postal Union in 1874 has another legal effect that is very important to the Universal-Legal-Technology. The Universal Postal Union unites member countries into a single, worldwide postal territory. 13[13] We have already learned that any litigant is going into international jurisdiction every time he goes to any court. Since the litigant needs to establish that his papers are official, he uses a dollar???? postage stamp on the face of the first page. The stamps also invoke postal statutes and the Universal Postal Union jurisdiction. Currently in the U. S., the stamp of choice is the “fox” (discontinued 22 April 2004 or earlier) U. S. dollar postage stamp. The stamp is not drawn in a box, making the forty-five-degree lines unnecessary. The litigant does, however, need to autograph across the stamp, then date the autograph, for two reasons: to comply with postal regulations concerning private mail carriers, and to make a continuance of evidence that the process (paper work) is mail. The continuation of evidence is less of a factor, since the definitions of “mail” and “delivery” can include a clerk at a grocery store handing a customer a receipt for groceries. One can see that Standaring had his shipping clerk wired with the Bill of Lading. The legal writers were forced to make the definitions wide enough to encom the private rural carriers, and private rs that have placed ments on our doorsteps, or in our hands. I have thought about this issue a lot, and I did not find any other better alternative. Any loophole would have devastated many consumers, and caused a plethora of other laws to be enacted to cover the loophole. Additionally, on the back of the first page, we authenticate the authority of the Post-Office with an endorsement, and simultaneously authenticate our identity by placing a postage meter stamp, from a postage meter machine that we have purchased in advance, on the lower quarter of the back of the first page. All commercial papers have endorsements to authenticate their authenticity. Again, we autograph across the meter stamp, and date. The postage meter stamp is better than a regular stamp, and stamps are said to have rendered seals superfluous. 14[14] The purchase of a meter machine requires identification in case the meter machine is tampered with or is stolen. The meter number on the meter stamp can be traced back to the owner (litigant), and therefore authenticates the endorser better than any seal. What are we doing by placing our paper work into the jurisdiction of the Universal Postal Union? To answer that question, we need to look at the structure and finance of that organization. The official aims and purposes of the Universal Postal Union (UPU) are two: to form “a single postal territory for the reciprocal exchange of correspondence”; and “to secure the organization and improvement of the postal services and to promote in this sphere the development of international collaboration.” [15] “The organization of the circulation of the international mail is based on the freedom of transit, . . . as a result, therefore, only by enduring absolute freedom of transit can the effectual universality of the postal territory be attained. * * * Freedom of transit is guaranteed throughout the entire territory of the union. istrations may exchange, through the intermediary of one or more of their number, both closed mails and open mail according to the needs of the traffic and the requirements of the service.” 16[16]

307 | P a g e

“Starting in 1878, the union created a category for territories which were recognized as non independent but which were given all the rights of union hip afforded to clearly independent countries.” 17[17] So the of the union have been operating as sovereign, independent countries, and their currency is based on the gold French Franc. Gold is the acceptable form of money in international jurisdictions, or paper backed by gold. 18[18] When we purchase postal money orders, the money order is backed by gold, not the fiat “money” called Federal Reserve Notes. The FRNs, as some call them, are based instead on a promise to pay a debt. The debt is based only upon the “full faith and credit of the United States,” and lacks any intrinsic value. “Some of the obligations in the convention can, in some states, be introduced into domestic practice without involving a nation’s legislative process or without even reaching the desk of the chief executive. 19[19] The Union also “sets forth the principle that postal istrations are responsible for loss of, theft from, or damage to, insured items, and then goes into detail about exceptions to the principle of responsibility, cessation of responsibility, how the sender is indemnified, and the manner in which responsibility is apportioned between postal istrations.” 20[20] “There was only one instance, according to the Belgium delegate, where the bureau would have any power even approximating the right to intervene in the affairs of istrations, that is in the arbitration of disputes, but in this instance the bureau could act only when requested to do so by an istration.” 21[21] The Functions of the International Bureau for the Universal Postal Union include acting “as a clearinghouse for information concerning postal matters. It also functions as a clearinghouse for international postal s and as a conciliator and arbitrator in disputes over postal matters between istrations.” 22[22] [13] 1997 Encyclopedia Britannica [14] Collon, Dominique, Editor. 7000 Years of Seals. In the London, for the Trustees of the British Museum, by the BRITISH MUSEUM PRESS. 1997. p. 153. [15] Universal Postal Union, p. 73. [16] Universal Postal Union, p. 74. [17] Universal Postal Union, p. 80. [18] The backing of paper does not necessarily have to be gold, it can be anything real at market value like timber, oil, minerals, metals, land, etc. [19] Universal Postal Union, p. 96. [20] Universal Postal Union, p. 103. [21] Universal Postal Union, p. 186. [22] Universal Postal Union, p. 195

So, what we are doing, by placing the postage stamp on our iralty paperwork and endorsement on the back of the first page, is using the authority of the sovereignty of the longest surviving, solvent, governmental authority in the United States. Through the iralty, we are taking the Post-Office and the judicial system back some two hundred years, and simultaneously creating a new territory with all the rights of union hip afforded to clearly independent countries. We are establishing the laws in this new territory with the paper work that we have filed. As we will see later, we are also correcting the errors of the founding forefathers; in that we are also bringing the equal rights that they neglected to give to all the people in the United States. We are eliminating all of the legal deficiencies that handicap the sovereign status of us, the people, within the court. We are guaranteed that all of the parties in the case: the clerk, judge, bailiff, and litigants have the freedom of transit in the iralty court. If the clerk, judge, or other official fails to deliver our

308 | P a g e

documents as directed, or delay them, or obstruct them, that person is faced with several penalties within the postal statutes and iralty statutes. The final advantage is that if we are obstructed, because of the transitory nature of the action, we are in the iralty and can take the case offshore for adjudication in any court in the world.

By getting the post office to timestamp your paperwork your are putting under their jurisdicition which pre dates the constitution… which places it under common law…(this is what a man has to do on America at the united states courts because America was founded by british colonist who were practicing common law… hence invoking common law with the post offices jurisdictional power reinforces your position…sometimes the only way of getting your mail to your court It’s a felony to interrupt the service of mail…the clerks no better bill of lading--- and officially way of doing this, is with the county recorders office and get a certified copy of your paperwork. This makes your paperwork the vessel and the content becomes the cargo. And the county recorder office acts as the customs office for the ship… This is a fantastic way of stablish the common law jurisdiction..

Go to the head clerk and simply ask isn’t it obstruction the delivery of mail whne i am trying to delivery mail to the “Mitchell” court? … you are not delivering mail to their court your delivery mail to your court…

Just make it clear you are delivering mail to your court not their court..what authority do they have to obstruct paid mail from being delivered to your court from the post office not the us postal service ? do i have to report this fraudulent activity to the post inspector/ post master?

Only one form refers to the post office and that is ed mail. ed mail is always held under lock and key. And it’s not more expensive than express mail..it’s about $12 (2015) and u can go back 3 days later and get a certified log of everyone who’s hand has touched that piece of mail

Watch out for them setting up parallel court “in” their court not ”in” your court at their building.. your case is your property because u paid for it.. if they cross those line make sure u put in a

309 | P a g e

notice of property and tres if they want to interfere with your case.. after you serve someone u have to waits 21 days for them to answer your claim or else there room left for a court date after that.. make sure u fill the copies of it into the case.. and then give them notice that the man or woman has been served to the satisfaction of the “mithcell” court. ( u should get a affidavit of service form the process server)..

After you have gotten the affidavit of service from the process server write a letter to the clerk….

Greetings Luanne(process servor name),

I require you to record in case ######### the affidavit of service served upon bob richards(whom evre it was u served) . please know that the man has been served according to the requiremetns of the Mitchell(your court’s name) court. I now require u to set a trial date (make sure that the date aksed for is 21days after the date u served the man) and is she has any questions to please first check with your first chief judge and he doesn’t satisfy your curiosity i will be glad to help you out.. cheers, robin if 21 days es and they man doesn’t answer the claim let the clerk know in writting that you have the right to have a final decision and that u will not settle for a default judgemnet and that they should issue a warrant or a capiuos and have the man brought in to answer this claim…he has to be given due procress which is the opportunity to answer the claim before the court…. look at karl’s interference notice when anyone messes with your case. if someone is interfering with your case( an attorney general protection his minions)ask them if they have any first hand knowledge of the case? Well thank god and we don’t need any more input form you then.. good day

Or tell them that if they continue you will benefit them with their own case.

310 | P a g e

You want to let them know as you go who you are and what the rules are as they break them not sending a million notices which are basically warnings before someone has done anything wrong can be a little off putting… like waring people of steeping on your toes before anyone has stepped on your toe!

Appoint your court a clerk and then ask her to recommend 3 judges for their ability to discern common law and experience in common law… (this lets them know u are going to have a common law case)

Look at filing notices (karls has great ones) for jurisdiction, notice of venue at there vs in, not sure how to get warrants and force them to drag people into courts!!! cant one just get a default judgement take your win and get a sheriff to collect.. this will force the man or woman out to defend themselves which means u have them dead center or they just allow u to do things like getting the sheriff to till tip!!??

Whne they do it to use there is a court form that they fill out that says under penalty of perjury that what is being requested..the arrest is true and relative….. Makes sure u have a notice of interference in your case because of its broad application. And then make a notice much like the above during the istrative side when they are dragging you into court… read how they do their arrest… just to mirror but in a way that doesn’t jeopardize the common law case..

Notice of property in your case..”this case and all of its contents are solely my property..cf.[a bill of lading]” thye can not interfeer with the shipment of cargo…. Just like they cant touch your property…

311 | P a g e

Get the judge to put their order in writing and sign it

Do not contract…say u don’t understand anything in a court room. They may try a trick question: is it u don’t understand or don’t agree? U say i don’t understand and i don’t agree is the proper answer to their false choice question

U can call the clerk’s office to see with your case file number what order a judge has executed in whatever hearing or place in time when it occurred or not ….

If u hold your ground and never agree to anything u will be surprised how little power they have…

that is why they always want you to accept the name.. because if u accept the name you accept the office if u accept the office u become a trustee.. what does a trustee do? They have duties and obligations

a judge is a judge of person within her authority and capacity and dominion over but they have no dominion over man. Only god is our judge.. a your blood is your creation hence your property.. so if a judge is tell you to do something with your property [child] u ask the judge “ our you istrating my property?” if the judge says yes , then tell him to put it in writing and sign it…. And when you see your child next time and u have to leave the scene.. send the judge a bill for complying with his order because u will write him “i saw my property [you know her as my daughter] and stayed away form her.. here is a bill for $1000,000 for following your orders 

312 | P a g e

judges are very aware specially in bc.. if you place and order like to reappear and u get it in writing and signed by the judge and u reappear, well then u can give the judge a bill ..

ask a jugde to give u and order ( its not your judge) as a man to man or woman to woman and say give me a signed order so i can provide a service… if the judge ordered 300 hundred pizza he is liable for it!! If a judge refuses to pay then demand a hearing over the matter…

When u step into the public its all based on contract and breach of contract do u have jurisdiction and authority over me? Do we have der? Yes or no? and money gets exchanged boom it’s done…

All we have to do is waive our entitlement, and if the court questions us, we question the court “by what authority do you have to compel me to accept an entitlement?”

Gratuitously refuse this title, “thank you very much for this lovely title, but I have too much on my plate right now, I have too many titles already I can’t accept any more titles! I already have enough duties and responsibilities and you can’t bind me to this new title. I wish to be let alone”

Don’t answer a single question because any answer creates jurisdiction!!! If u bring to life the second dimension by showing a coherent answer….they have jurisdiction!!

If they pull the strings and the puppet move then they have control.. so if they ask u a question u answer with some weird response “apples, bananas and blue is that some sort of legalese your talking to me in? or are you talking to me man to man?” the judge will never sayyes to being a man so say to them”so then this is off the record? Correct?” the judge may lie and say”no its on the record( but not a court of record)” u reply with “again i don’t

313 | P a g e

understand legalese? And i am not ing your little group here and i am not required to speak legalese and i will not entertain any question in legalese..so if u serve me a question in legalese i refuse to answer?”

If someone puts a plate of pasta before u and u start eating it ..well then your going to be liable for it.. if a judge is serving u a order and you are going along with it guess what? You’re liable!! Careful!! Because even answerinig what your name is can be dangerous!! They want to answer to the name and come up to the front of the court and they are going to assume they have jurisdiction over you… you just have to remind them that they don’t have it by telling them in writing that u never surrender jurisdiction nor have i consent to any title of defendant! When they here that their hold on you disappear plus your early notice to the court will help to!

So if it Cook County vs Tom well it Cook County’s case then…and if its their case u don’t have to try on the clothes or titles… they cant obligate that on you!! Thank you but this would cause me great harm and you would want to cause man harm would you?” so if it there case why would you want to be the defender of it!! Don’t defend their case!! You cant accept that title because ur to loaded with your other titles so there is no room for me to take on their title and none can force me to

Notice the court of the title of idiot that have..own it as it means

Idiot is a word derived from the Greek ἰδιώτης, idiōtēs ("person lacking professional skill", "a private citizen", "individual"), from ἴδιος, idios ("private", "one's own")

A judge can’t be forced to talk… so if you answer question with “bananas orange apples(nonsense)” and the judge calls u an idiot u say hold on i comprehend that! yes yes i am an idiot …i am a private person! How do you have jurisdiction over a private person again?”

If the judge is asking u a whole lot of question..just say “can u put your questions in the form of writing and i also wish for leave of court for 30 days so i can put a proper answer before this court as i need to seek competent counsil!” this is important so make sure its in the from of writing and remind the judge you are not here to argue with him; you are there to

314 | P a g e

argue with the prosecutor or attorney who stole my property!! My argument isn’t with you it’s with the prosecutor!!

- How to speak to BAR , declaratory judgements, and the rules of your court

Lawyers are not taught common law so they will have no idea what it is you are doing!! So you have to lead them down the education road and they will see the logic..u say common law and they are going to run!!play stupid because u got logic on your side!!! They won’t understand how to deal with their opwn con job at that moment!!”

Common law is just the custom of the people at the time

Does some get to face their acc? has anyone been harmed? did i do wrong to you? And how did i do that harm? And when did u let me know about that harm? Is there a a verifiable true bill that i could settle today? Didn’t i try to give you an opportunity to cure and provide a remedy for this situation?

Lawyer”this si a criminal act” reply” oh really so someone made a claim that he harmed someone? lawyer”no” reply “then how do you feel you have jurisdiction ove r him?” who brought the guns and drugs into the public? The police ..until then they were safely secure in his home

Declaratory judgements are just opinions and has no impact on any party..we don’t want to sue any body and u just want an opinion before we think about building up our cases here if we have to litigate each other in a frivolous claim. It’s just a learned opinion…

315 | P a g e

Careful if you bring a false claim before the court! It could cost you dearly specially after a public official!!

a judge has control of the building and everyone in it…you better in writing let the court no well in advance of arriving of your status as a man and what your intention are..because he is there to secure the building!!

Preliminary hearing or dispositional hearing or prescopy day…. Before the trial .. rules of the court don’t need to be established unless the other side ask. The rules are ancient they know how to behave!! The judge will say who goes first and who goes last before the jury!! If lawyers start to talk you go wowowowoww…do you have any first hand knowledge of the incedent? Then you know the rules!!! Shut it!! Can u bear witness? Then shut up!!

Proof of appearance at the courthouse, and contempt charges It is super important to make our appearance well noted, because they will put a warrant out for our arrest for failing to appear. We go to the courthouse on a summons, they tell us no one’s there, we grab a guard or anyone to come with us to the courtroom as witness that we appeared at the appointed time, then we put in a note with the court clerk and get her to timestamp it, then we make copies of that note, file a copy to the case, keep one copy, and send another copy to the judge.

The government has control over us IF WE BREACH THE PEACE when we’re in public space, we cannot breach the peace.

We are a man until we do wrong, when we do wrong be incur a debt, a debtor has duties and obligations, dong wrong makes us a person.

316 | P a g e

Give written fair warning of who we are, what we are, and what we want from that building and what we expect when we walk into that building. When we get a citation/ticket, we immediately write them a notice to let them know who they’re dealing with, DON’T ambush the court. Send fair notice, make claim, go to court as a man.

Judges are there to control the masses.

State your claim vs. present your claim Don’t state claim, just present it. Don’t state anything in their court because they can’t hear us. We present the claim to the bailiff, the judge, the prosecutor. They’ll postpone our trial once we present our claim. It’ll give us enough time to resolve our case. Once we finish the case on our claim, the istrative court judge will probably just follow the judgement on our case to save face.

Once we’re in someone else’s case, they don’t have to hear us talk if they don’t want to. We MUST present our claim!!! Out of respect, we don’t put things into other people’s cases. We’re noticing the court that there’s a claim going on elsewhere.

Everytime we open our mouth, we’re making a new order. So keep our mouth shut!!!

Your file is your property!!!! Is someone denying u access to your property? You have been requiring via letters and physical gone in to the court and they are blocking you form access to your complete true and up to date file so that you know what u are walking into before court… just show them the unfairness of procecutors having access and not you.. would u let the crown go in there? Well this is a public building? Or is this a private organization? And aren’t u a public servant? Then serve me? get them to say there is someone responsible for that paperwork at the building…they better not say your stuff is not being kept safe by someone responsible!!

317 | P a g e

In common law, a right of audience is generally a right of a lawyer to appear and conduct proceedings in court on behalf of their client.

No MP is a VIP because man is a higher title than MP, as they are just a public servant! In service of man!!

Play dirty!! If they say they have a translator for your father u say he speaks a rare from of Punjabi so only you two know…and they can’t say crap….so u can be the translator for your side..

U created an order in voice so here is your “invoice”

place a notice before the court“any place an order today there will be held liable”

at queens bench only man speak so no there is no barrister john doe…its just john doe so keep the titles out of here except that of man…there are no offcies allowed at queens bench!!! as man is only allowed to speak in that court!! There is no iral there is no general!! does that mean that queen’s bench is different than filing a common law claim or is the court become a queens bench court when there is a claim by a man before the court. Or is it at a specific building? As in bc there is no queen’s bench? Is it Supreme Court of British Columbia..if i asked the judge he should say it is queens bench?right?

if there is no plaintiff? And the court is not completethen they cant proceed because the court was not properly assembled because there is a piece missing (the plaintiff must appear)….so is this how you go for a trial by jury so the judge isn’t involved and he just say we cant go forward until it the plaintiff appears..is this how you get your case discharged or dismissed?

Someone says prince diana is suing you? Well i want to see her face to face in court to believe this!!! regina is suing me? U mean Elizabeth Windsor? We’ll she better appear!!!she serves at the

318 | P a g e

pleasure of the people and since bur one of the people it woyld please i a man for her to show up!!! Judges knows regina ? regina who? Therei sa million reginas which one? the crown is just the bar association..he is playing stupid so u play stupid too….dont show understanding that it’s the bar…just call the trump card out…u want to see the plaintiff or they can’t proceed

Were are bringing a claim against wrongdoers

When someone says “they” dismissed our case, don’t accept it, who is this magical “they”? Who has control over this case? Read carefully what’s being dismissed: if they’re dismissing THEIR case, that’s fine; they don’t have jurisdiction to dismiss OUR case, only we can do that because it’s under our jurisdiction and control.

Both America and Canada have federal courts; we don’t deliver our case to the CANADIAN federal court, we deliver our case to a public building, in which the federal rules, NOT Federal Government. Its federal RULES, but we’re going to bring in our LAW.

We are not filing a civil right claim we do not have civil rights, we have the rights of man given by God. A CITIZEN has civil rights. It’s like an Australian coming to US saying “you violated my civil rights”, he has no civil rights he’s not a US citizen. We are not anything other than a man, we have no titles and we accept no titles. I’m a man making a claim against another man.

People need to read their contracts and learn to modify them!!! Employeer give you a contract u modify and send it back and make them not even see what they signed the names too… when he signs his contract and doesn’t realize that if he tries to sue you that the contract screws the company instead!!

319 | P a g e

What to charge for your claim, and tort of outrage Tort of Outrage Law & Legal Definition Tort of outrage is also called intentional infliction of emotional distress. In using this legal claim, a plaintiff alleges suffering mental harm as a result of someone's intentional, outrageous conduct. It involves conduct beyond the bounds of decency, which is considered atrocious and completely intolerable in a civilized society. The plaintiff may recover damages for extreme emotional distress even without physical damage. For example, some cases involve mix-ups in the handling of a deceased person's final remains. A dollar a second if someone kidnapped our kid. Capital crime. Everything else be biblical, if an officer gives us a ticket of $80, we will charge him back for $80. And he’s paid the entire time he’s in court, we shall also be paid when we appear in court by going after the compensation through his bond, or settle it out of court in private, cash; or if you don’t want to do any of these things we’re going to presume non-cooperation from you and go get a warrant in debt and start liquidating your assets to compensate us.

- Denied access to a trial by jury When we require a trial by jury and are denied because it’s only available to broken marriage proposals or something, then that person is literally saying “there’s a special class of people who can have trial by jury? there’s a prejudice against I the man’s right to have trial by jury? It’s the same as getting on the bus and not having the same right as the other man (who paid the same fair) to sit in the same seat? Are you saying he gets special privileges that I don’t get?”

Sometimes it’s the public courthouse that wants to duel with us. In that case we’re bringing our court to the courthouse; just like we are bringing our dance into that dancehall. Court is not courthouse, they’re not synonyms. Our court will appear AT their courthouse, their building.

320 | P a g e

The legal society's dirty tricks If we believe the judge is biased against us, we can ask him to recuse himself, because he has conflict of interest from knowing/being in the same society as the prosecution against us. Make sure that we have our proper title of MAN throughout the paper process, if they keep adding titles to us we put up a fine “if anyone adds to my title of MAN it is considered harassment and tres, it is a burden on I the man, and the treser will be fined x amount.”

Make sure that when we do claims it’s simple and general “tres” “robbery” etc. We go into details in letters to the wrongdoer as exhibits “where’s your verifiable proof of claim that you have the right to forcibly carry off property? Your silence is tacit agreement that you have no right to my property my kid.”

If they start telling us about being a defendant, we just say “what’s that? I’m just a man, I don’t know what a defendant is nor how to be one. I only know how to be a man.”

A four question letter to the prosecutor if our case is getting wishy washy with istrative titles and crap. “1. Am I a defendant? 2. Am I the plaintiff? 3. Is this your case? 4. Is this my case?” “Your silence will mean you tacitly agree this case is in my jurisdiction and in my court attorneys can’t speak”

If we’re not willing to take on the title of “world’s greatest loser”, then we’re not willing to take on the title of “defendant” or “plaintiff”. If those titles start showing up in our paperwork, we gotta object to it and fix it.

When we say stop it means stop..just because u have a licence doesn’t give you the right to do anything that harms a man.. a marriage license does give the wife the right to harm her husband if he says stop!!

321 | P a g e

License doesn’t give permission to harm man , when i say stop it mean now not in 2 min its means now!! I don’t care if you have me by my name or whatever u have to stop because you are harming man!! If one doesn’t stop after hearing the word stop ..ur are obscene and evil!! Everybody knows what stop means!!

When the us government closed its doors for two weeks and nobody cared.. they quickly opened it back up before we figured out we didn’t need them for anything!!

Ruling changed back to discharge, from "in your favor" If we got our case dismissed and we want it to be discharged, we just have to write a letter to the judge saying “thank you so much for your lovely ruling, it’s been a great thing for my family etc. but there seems to be clerical error in the process and someone took your ruling of discharge and misinterpreted it into dismissed. I wish to make sure that the ruling gets an opportunity to cure, and get a ruling that says discharged sent to me. Thank you kindly.”

“defendant prevailed” and “in the defendant’s favour” is not acceptable

Write a letter to the judge after the case was finished and say to the judge that your thankful for everything that he has done and he has made society better but in your case was it was written dismissed when u need it to be discharged because keeping it open causes me stress and harm.. so if u could kindly make it be written as someone has misinterpreted (or minimize)your words so that it reads and is amended to read discharged not dismissed…thx u….(be polite) this is an opportunity to cure before you go after them again!!

“i wish not to speak in court for fear of harm to my body; last time i was here i was found contempt of court; since i cannot understand what is to loud or to soft ; i fear that i may find myself in contempt of court and have harm come to my body; so to avoid that it is my wish that all communication be in writing from here forward; he who acts on my behalf bears all liability.

322 | P a g e

require leave of court for pen and ink so you can write it down..because it there court!! Not yours!! Until you open up your case…. But again shut your mouth and have tight paper work!! they attack you with a piece of paper…u attack back in kind with the pen and paper!!! Nobody is testifying on their side1! Why should you!!! Shut it is key as they are only trying to draw you out!! Don’t convict yourself with your beliefs!!! They won’t convict themselves under oath or affirmation!! So shut it!! It is ridiculous to convict yourself!! you can easily get in contempt of court for simply asking ”is that an order?” so put it in writing!!

If someone like a lawyer says something ridiculous like do you believe this paperwork is going to work for you or do any good?” u respond with” absolutely i believe it is going to work; but is it going to work in your case, absolutely not, it’s an exercise in futility, you guys will think it’s a joke!! but in my court when i open up my court with my own claim this paper work is going to work like a charm! Because in my court it’s going to be exhibit A, because if your court wont respect that common law is the highest law of the land not your silly statutes, you are going to find out, you are going to get a learning, a nice little lesson, when u step in my court”

Charging for wasted time spent at the courthouse Karl doesn’t tolerate any wasting off time…if you find this is a problem then show up and the schedule time say 830 am at court stand up and say “i have been summoned here for an 830 appointment is there anybody here making a claim here or does anybody have any business with me because i am ready to conduct business?is sound body here to do commerce with me? Repeat at 8:31AM repeat at 8:32AM do your final notice to the court and at the end say well nobody is here to make a claim against my you will have to call me to make a new summons for me to appear and there will be a bill for wasting my time!! if you’re late this is what they do to you!! We are all equals here!! Go get your notice time stamped by the clerk of the court and placed into their case ing you were there on time! Hand the judge a bill for $100 an hour …he is getting paid to be here so is the prosecutor…i should be paid too… Maybe this will be a little reminder not to waste my time…if you have me schedule for 830 it better be 830! They want ur money u want respect!! The nature of the case is the claim, the characteristic is the tres, the definition of the tress would be the interference of the right to be let alone or interference of the right to move form point a to point b Usually u want your claim in way before the trial date but you could show up and ask to have your case to be seen as well “ i present my case to the court” they may take it or they

323 | P a g e

may say sorry we need time (usually 21 days) to prepare for this..but they may just greenlight you to get your case started at the same time..

Accept the charges, then require and order the immediate restoration of property

Accept the charges (u pay them 1 dollar a month is the best u can do) and that everything u did is illegal, accept u were doing 50 in and 60, then u say i require and order the immediate restoration of property now…..and shut up!!

- It's a word game

the 3 second rule when it comes to responding to the judge!

I judge is playing and tossing words around so if say “ i wish for this case to be dismissed!” and he comes back with” that will be for another day” you need to come back with “If wish for another day to be today” And he may come back with something else and you have to be ready with your wits.. or he may come back and say “okay i dismiss this case” It’ just a word game.. and they love these words and they have a 1000 years of tradition so they aren’t going to roll over!!!

We will come in as a defendant in their case so long as they come in as defendants in our case… We are guest in their case but they will be guest in our case and there we will prevail!!

324 | P a g e

Never use the word no Say a judge tries to give you a compromising request.. “I think that’s lovely but wouldn’t i lose my ability to move my case before Queen’s Bench?”

Another reply to a tricky situation… “can u please show me the benefit of appearing in your court if you are going to hold me in contempt” So there is a lot of things one can do to handle a judge in an istrative court but its still there domain so they may want you to exercise your full card with your own claim..

eliminate the NO from your language… and try to conditionally accept… and think of writing a letter to a grama who has a lot of money she wants to leave you in her inheritance…”it’s such a lovely offer but can u show me why i would come down if all you are going to do is put me in a cage for two days? Don’t you think it wise and pertinent for me to meet you in a more neutral environment?

Officers and lawyers can not appear at queens bench!!! Accept all presentments and require fair and just compensation Someone wants us to appear? Ok we require to be compensated for our time and trouble. In this society, we gotta accept all presentments. If it would cause us great harm to be out there, offer them to do it in our house.

If someone gives us a presentment that would cause us harm, be honest and reply “thank you for this gift but this would cause me great harm. And you wouldn’t want to harm a man would you?”

325 | P a g e

Queens Bench Anywhere small claims court is, we can make our regular claims in there. We’re going to have a claims court AT the county court.

Is it safe to say that a claims court IS queen’s bench? Or are they different things? If I need to put in a claim against an officer for traffic court, is there a special place that I need to file the claim to access queens bench? Will that simple small claims court suffice? Or will I have to go to a placed CALLED “Queens Bench”? because BC and ON don’t have “queen’s bench”.

Small claims court are going to accept your claim..that is queen bench!! A lot of hippies don’t believe in private property. When people put vested interest in a piece of land or thing, that becomes property. They should have right to secure and protect their sweat equity against tres. We are open to sharing, as long as the guest also put in their sweat equity in order to and enjoy this property.

Originals, and copies of your paperwork I write the letter by hand, (claim). Make copy of my hand written claim, take both to courthouse, get both file stamped; then go up to the people we owe money to, make our best offer, if they refuse, we give them one of the copies with the stamp, they have now been served.

Common law, just looks for a logical process, there are no rules in common law. When we present to jury make sure they understand the logic behind our actions, we are fine.

A judge doesn’t talk about the law, he only interprets the facts to adhere to the law. A jury can CHANGE the law.

326 | P a g e

If a judge starts talking about “process blah blah”. We say “I don’t know what you’re talking about, I’ve never heard of such a thing, am I required to know about such a thing? Is that something YOU have to abide by? Hmm judge person? What about I a man? I’m a simple man abide by logic. I abide by unwritten rules, I just changed one inside me right now, and I’ll change it again in the future.”

Sneak their official form into you claim as one of your exhibits blank And when the clerk say it needs to be filled out you point to the sign on the desk that says you cant give legal advice and ask are u giving me legal advice? Should poop a pickle!! If the clerk was right then the judge will throw it out when he sees it and the courts just ate my money..so i will take that chance!! File on demand if you have to

In the event a Sonoma County clerk determines that a document should not be filed for any reason, he/she shall advise the person attempting to file the document of that reason. If the proffered document is a pleading prepared by a party, the attorney of record or person proceeding in propria persona attempting to file the document may then request the document be “filed on demand,” in which case the document shall be accepted for filing and will be stamped “Filed on Demand”. This policy does not apply to documents which a party requests the Clerk to issue (e.g. Writs, Summons, Abstracts); in such circumstances, the Clerk will require compliance with applicable statutes.

Judge ask u if your name is john doe You say pardon me? I cant understand He asks again U again still can’t understand looking puzzled Could you write the name down?

327 | P a g e

The judge writes the name down( it will be in all caps) U say “I'm not the author of that name”

Bring the law into the court, Queens Bench, and being placed in a dock

I need to see the enrolled law brought in and they will have to unroll the law and read into the court... and then you are going to ask where are you expressly written into it….and show me where i am bound and where i am a signatory …..or show me where my representative signed on my behalf.. or show me where i am defined in that law..because i believe ur in error!!

Bring ur case at queen bench not in…watch out for queen bench division..not the same…

Queens bench is hidden so its gonna take some searching around..

U want ot placed in the dock because that is where man needs to go to be protected from the retorique. The place and surround u with a curtain and they talk about your person so be happy…in Canada it’s a partial dock it doesn’t go all the way to the ceiling..

- Objecting in statutory court creates der

Objecting in statutory is like saying u understand enough to reject the idea!! Require leave of court and file a claim. You can’t react to the other side you can’t show any level of understanding..put on your idiot hat!!!

Changing your complaint in to a claim

328 | P a g e

Let your complaint die..dismiss it and let it sit there forever and die of natural cause and file a claim..

12b6 is when the other side answer you! If the other side hasn’t answered u then all he has is a case number so let it die..

Now if they haven’t yet..just go to the clerk with your case number and tell them that nobody has answered yet to you and you want to amend the claim y striking everything off the case number and placing your claim in it. Lucky…

But if they have already answered you have to beg them to amend it ……gulp!!

- CROWN still pursuing after Queen's bench win, and fee schedules

The judge knows that if u win in queen’s bench u simply remind them that common law court decision are superior courts and that if they continue they are harming a man!! Simple warning to drop their case!! Don’t threaten!! Don’t use kidnapping Use some one do me wrong and i want fair and just compensation

Be JURY reasonable… would a jury award u that much? Ultimately this could be in front of the jury! Be a good man..not an opportunistic man!

1.

Opportunistic adjective exploiting immediate opportunities, especially regardless of planning or principle.

329 | P a g e

"an opportunistic political lightweight" ECOLOGY (of a plant or animal) able to spread quickly in a previously unexploited habitat. "opportunistic populations colonizing new substrates" o MEDICINE (of a microorganism or an infection caused by it) affecting patients only or chiefly when the immune system is depressed. o

If a cop u gives a ticket for $50 make your fee $50 in your claim.. the judge should laugh and maybe we can change the system… The right to queen’s bench is for the people as well as to the King [Queen]. Tomlin's Law Dictionary 1811 Vol 2 of 6 Page 139 Every Court of record is the king's Court, in right of his crown and dignity, though his subjects have the benefit of it ; and therefore no other court loath. authority to fine and imprison ; so that the very erection of a new jurisdiction, with power of fine or imprisonment, :sakes it instantly a Court of record, The free use of all courts of record and not of record, is to be granted to the people : The legit and town are the king's Courts, and of record. don’t reduce your status to that of a pauper… this is by right!!

In and at court in regards to your claim

If you place your claim IN the court u just surrendered jurisdiction to them… If its AT your in control and can require a jury..and nobody is to open that case or view that case or interpret that case until u get to try it on before a trial jury or the man in the black robe..

If you are in this scenario u require leave of court to amend your claim but you may be denied 

Change the claim from IN black it out and put AT

it’s a trial!! They are here to test you!!

330 | P a g e

How to run your claim at the same time as their complaint When we’re making the claim and there’s an existing case going on on the istrative side, say “can we merge the two cases to save the court’s limited resources. That way the public doesn’t have to be burdened to hear two cases.”

Getting your claim into court, and dismissing your previous case Writing vague claims is like getting a prepaid stamped envelope from the post office. So now all we got to do is deliver it to the other side. Don’t get fancy with exhibits, just put the 2 sentence 1 page claim in there, don’t raise any red flags in the system. Get a case number, the stamp from the court clerk. NOW go home and put in the exhibits and whatever else we may need (just photos of the kids, not even the names). And then serve it. If you served a complaint instead of a claim, or a bad claim and you want to modify it, you gotta BEG the other side to change it now because they got all dressed up for something that you don’t even want to prosecute anymore. If you want to dismiss your complaint, find the rule in their court that says you can dismiss your own complaint. ONLY if you filed a COMPLAINT, don’t go around dismissing your CLAIMS people. Dismissing the case will suspend it, and if you never re-open it then it’ll just die off. Dealing with jurisdiction in court “sir, before we proceed, may I address the crown or may you present to the crown, let me give you a piece of paper in writing. (written: I will appear and I will answer when you show you have jurisdiction: how does you the crown have jurisdiction over I the man?)” Judge will ask prosecutor: do you care to answer this? Prosecutor will say: I need 30 days to submit a proper answer to the court. Judge asks us: does that satisfy you? Us: sure. Give’em 30 days.

A final judgement from the court is required before jail time

331 | P a g e

If we didn’t get an order in writing, and the judge just verbally tell us to go to jail. When we file for an appeal, we have to have the casefile, the transcript, the FINAL ORDER, and then we submit our initial brief. The appeal court can’t make a ruling if one of those 4 elements are missing.

Calling the Queen to the bench

When they are pitting u in some case Regina vs the man ask the question is this the same regina as in Elizabeth mary alexander born the 21st of april 1926? sample”hello jim, thank u for all your recent exhibits and disclosure regarding the tres robbery that occurred at my home. This is a further benefit to helping i claim against Regina or majesty the Queen. We had forgotten how much you had stolen and again appreciate your efforts in bringing it to our attention. You do know that i am a man and have the right to require of you to bring your complaint before Queen’s Bench and before a trial by jury in a court of record. This is a common law land where a man makes the law the rules of the court. The rules of the court is i get to cross examine my acc and i know u will be sure to have Regina present on March,xx,xxxx so i can exercise said right to see what man or woman i have done wrong”

Make sure everyone gets a copy… Now if you want to file this in their istrative court you find a way to use one of their forms to attach it to…so you tell her u wil pay $1 for every form they got… because ur trying to find out which one u can use to attach your complete letter so they get it in the file so everybody knows.. after that request the clerk may surprise u and hand u the affidavit letter or something along those lines..hint hint

Avoid anything that embeds your file u want to attach it…

332 | P a g e

Note: don’t describe the titles of the man in the claim, it’ll only complicate the case. Failure to perform, and making a claim for equity

Gentleman loses case and house because attorney/lawyer fails to show up at hearing. Make a claim “I a man (name) claim wrong by the acts of David Wright; I tendered David Wright $2000 to perform a service; by David Wright’s failure to perform that service I have accrued a financial loss; I claim compensation of the damage (value of house lost)”

We’re not going to mention that he’s an attorney, we’re not going to call it “malpractice”, because the clerk will do their best to slip this in and slow down the process. We definitely want a trial by jury, not a trial by judge, because judges will want to protect lawyers. Judge may even find in favour of lawyer.

How do we go after a judge if this is such a buddy system? Won’t other judges protect this judge?

Whoever moves the court (the claimant) must set the rules in the beginning, and it cannot be changed in that court during this case. We don’t care about precedence, these are the rules that we’re going to follow here in my court.

When we are in an istrative court, we file our own claim to take over as a superior court, set up our own rules. Then the judge is going to look at the contract and see what’s expressedly written between I and the other party; he will take into consideration who wrote the contract, who’s liable, who signed it etc. was there any fraud in factum or fraud in inducement? The judge is going to figure out who’s screwing over whom, and if we don’t like his interpretation of the law (contract), call in a jury. Say “hey I don’t trust your judgement

333 | P a g e

bob, I think you’re in collusion with the other party who wrote this contract. I want a jury.” Judge says “fine, want a jury to interpret this? Fine! I want to jury to interpret the fact, and I’ll interpret the law” we say “no the jury can do both, the contract is the law. Does this contract exist? Is my signature on there? if I’m not party to the contract then it’s an unconscionable contract, how can I be held liable for it?” “is this a conscionable contract? Yes or no?”

Unconscionability (known as unconscionable dealing/conduct in Australia) is a doctrine in contract law that describes that are so extremely unjust, or overwhelmingly one-sided in favor of the party who has the superior bargaining power, that they are contrary to good conscience.

Jury of your peers When there’s a ridiculous law interfering with our right, we demand a jury of our peers. Because the customs practices policies and beliefs of the people that are indigenous to that district demands that the law gets ignored back from Washington, that we have to live like because this is what’s necessary and proper for our own survival. And that’s how we by the federal court.

A void judgement vs the judgement is void Say “it’s a void judgement”, a judgement that has never existed. Don’t say “judgement IS VOID”, because when we say “the judgement IS” we acknowledge the existence of the judgement!!! Don’t do that!!! It never could’ve existed based upon the way it was allegedly created, because an attorney brought it to life, and an attorney can’t do that. From the date that it was created, there’s been a void judgement controlling this case, there’s been a void judgement interfering with my rights, it’s interfering with my property.

Statutory grand juries are 23 not 25. Common law is supposed to be 25.

334 | P a g e

So anytime we get arrested for a felony, first thing to do is to demand to be indicted. Get an indictment from the grand jury. So now we want to present our story, our side to the grand jury. Prosecutor’s not going to allow you to address the grand jury, but I Say “I have the right to present the evidence, all the evidence, not just the prosecutors evidence, MY evidence as well.” And if they won’t allow us to do it, WE can actually hand down an indictment, a complaint or a claim to the grand jury. And if the feds are coming after us, we could go after the feds, and tell the grand jury to investigate the feds. And then accept all OUR evidence and then they’re going to investigate OUR claim against the feds. Because the grand jury is an independent organization.

Say we put twelve balloons in the air, and they charge us with 12 felonies, put this infront of a grand jury, they’re going to laugh. Misdemeanor felony? Put it infront of a grand jury! They’re all ridiculous charges. I’m not answering to any of this nonsense. Rule 57. Declaratory Judgment These rules govern the procedure for obtaining a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. §2201. Rules 38 and 39 govern a demand for a jury trial. The existence of another adequate remedy does not preclude a declaratory judgment that is otherwise appropriate. The court may order a speedy hearing of a declaratory-judgment action. Notes (As amended Dec. 29, 1948, eff. Oct. 20, 1949; Apr. 30, 2007, eff. Dec. 1, 2007.) Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1937 The fact that a declaratory judgment may be granted “whether or not further relief is or could be prayed” indicates that declaratory relief is alternative or cumulative and not exclusive or extraordinary. A declaratory judgment is appropriate when it will “terminate the controversy” giving rise to the proceeding. Inasmuch as it often involves only an issue of law on undisputed or relatively undisputed facts, it operates frequently as a summary proceeding, justifying docketing the case for early hearing as on a motion, as provided for in California (Code Civ.Proc. (Deering, 1937) §1062a), Michigan (3 Comp.Laws (1929) §13904), and Kentucky (Codes (Carroll, 1932) Civ.Pract. §639a–3). The “controversy” must necessarily be “of a justiciable nature, thus excluding an advisory decree upon a hypothetical state of facts.” Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288, 325, 56 S.Ct. 466, 473, 80 L.Ed. 688, 699 (1936). The existence or nonexistence of any right, duty, power, liability, privilege, disability, or immunity or of any fact upon which such legal relations depend, or of a status, may be declared. The petitioner must have a practical interest in the declaration sought and all parties having an interest therein or adversely affected must be made parties or be cited. A declaration may not be rendered if a special statutory proceeding has been provided for the adjudication of some special type of case, but general ordinary or extraordinary legal remedies, whether regulated by statute or not, are not deemed special statutory proceedings. When declaratory relief will not be effective in settling the controversy, the court may decline to grant it. But the fact that another remedy would be equally effective affords no ground for declining declaratory relief. The demand for relief shall state with precision the

335 | P a g e

declaratory judgment desired, to which may be ed a demand for coercive relief, cumulatively or in the alternative; but when coercive relief only is sought but is deemed ungrantable or inappropriate, the court may sua sponte, if it serves a useful purpose, grant instead a declaration of rights. Hasselbring v. Koepke, 263 Mich. 466, 248 N.W. 869, 93 A.L.R. 1170 (1933). Written instruments, including ordinances and statutes, may be construed before or after breach at the petition of a properly interested party, process being served on the private parties or public officials interested. In other respects the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act affords a guide to the scope and function of the Federal act. Compare Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Haworth, 300 U.S. 227, 57 S.Ct. 461 (1937); Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. Wallace, 288 U.S. 249 (1933); Gully, Tax Collector v. Interstate Natural Gas Co., 82 F.(2d) 145 (C.C.A.5th, 1936); Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. Plummer, 13 F.Supp. 169 (S.D.Tex., 1935); Borchard, Declaratory Judgments (1934), im. Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1948 Amendment The amendment substitutes the present statutory reference. Committee Notes on Rules—2007 Amendment The language of Rule 57 has been amended as part of the general restyling of the Civil Rules to make them more easily understood and to make style and terminology consistent throughout the rules. These changes are intended to be stylistic only. Ask the man in the black robe ”is it not true that man only has to answer to claims?””then what r we doing here?” “i’m not here to be part of this istrative hearing as i am not competent to speak, none can force me to understand either” “u think i should get a code decipher, no thank u i don’t trust than one bit as they have swear an oath to up hold the rules of the court and the codes and statutes first before the client. Unlike common law which it is the first rule to protect the client” There is no contract between me and the other side judge will say is this true? they will reply no sir judge should say outraged u say “if there is no contract court then there is no law before the court””they are filing a false claim”frivolous Simple claim 1. i (your name) claim the wrongdoers tres against my property. See exhibit a 2. there is no law that exist which binds i to the wrongdoer. 3. i require the delivery of all said property to be under my jurisdiction, no later than april 18 xxxx 4. i will place a charge of $1000 per day per said treser and said agency for any failure in the restoration on said date… 5. if the placement of said property does occurs on our before april 18 xxxxx i will forgive those who tres of their debt as i would wish of others to forgive me of my debts and treses.. 165 - Handling a traffic citation There are like 28 different types of law..which one are u moving under? Don’t ask the judge what law ur moving under u ask the prosecutor So ask for a bill of particulars…and one thing u need to know is what law is this? What law are u relying on? You stay the matter in court until they show you the law.. they can’t force u to be competent when ur not ready..

336 | P a g e

So when they hand u a ticket for $100 that is prima facie evidence 1. Prima facie evidence is a legal term used to mean that you have enough evidence to prove something by pointing to some basic facts, but that your proof can be refuted. So not only is it worth $100 but also my time my resources my energy not only am i going to claim all the equity in that citation i am going to ask for damages for wasting my time and all that jazz166 - Understanding debts, and a summons to appear

Know what to say and do before going in to court Stick to the script of the claim, and practice being in front of the judge. Writing is 1, acting is 2. If ya don’t know what to do/say, keep yer mouth shut and stick to the paperwork.

The court refuses your claim, enforcement of judgements, and maxims of law Letter: “As far as I know this is a public building, and everybody has a right to access this public building. And I believe there is a court clerk assigned to this building and the court clerk is to accept all filings. And I expect the court clerk to carry out their duties and obligations to perform their job in which they’ve been assigned.” Send this as certified mail, no need to send as ed. Get a green card proves that it’s been sent.

“summons” means someone’s granting us the power to drag someone off the street into court. The only other way we can have that power is if they’re on our feet (imminent danger).

If I filed my claim in a common law court of record, and I ask for a trial by jury, (for traffic), can I during preliminary hearings before the trial, establish with the magistrate that there is no injured party? Can a case be dismissed at that point? Can they actually proceed to trial by jury even without the plaintiff appearing?

337 | P a g e

Verdict is witnessed by the judge/magistrate, and signs it. and then the court clerk signs it and seals it. Then the county sherriff’s office and get a writ of attachment. Tell the sheriff what we want him to seize. Once we get a judgement then we can get a writ of attachment. Maxims do not apply across the board uniformly, they are to be used in context of situation. i.e. he who hesitates loses vs look before you leap.

It has to be expressly written into the contract or codes or rules…or forget it… Isn’t that ur signature on that driver’s license ..did u see me sign that? and there is no you’re there is only i!!

A judge doesn’t allow any word mistakes but a jury will let words slide as they don’t know generally speaking

Ideally stay on your one sentence and don’t deviate form it… they are seeking wiggle room by one word.. keep it simple and ride the paper work and shut your mouth… Don’t explain yourself anymore…

Make sure they drag the defendant to court so that it was by way of oath and affirmation where it was witness by a magistrate… or else the default judgement can come back and haunt you years from now…their children’s children can pick up the claim because there is no statutes of limitation in common law..

Behaving like a lawyer using case law, evidence and facts are used to get permission…as a man u want to face a man and that will kill most cases that are brought by government.. so the key is not to act like a lawyer because they operate from a position of weakness..BE A MAN!!

File a claim

338 | P a g e

Serve it Order judge to hold off proceeding of the inferior court until superior court has rendered it decision then send him your rules of court then u go to court and ask “is there a proper verifiable true claim before the court?” they will say “yes” then u ask “ where is the man or woman that i have done harm?” they will reply” he/she is not here but their lawyer is” then you tell the lawyer to not say anything as its rule number 2 lawyers can’t say anything unless they first hand knowledge then turn to the magistrate and say “ i came here to see a valid claim before this court..and i have yet to see one…the lawyer is here and he doesn’t have first hand knowledge and the man that say i do wrong is not here… i order that this case to be discharged immediately without prejudice… if u want to leave it open and stay in honor go for a dismissal of the case with prejudice..so that they can stay proceeding for sometimes up to 7 years or whatever it is in the area you live and then i want the case closed and all equity in the claim and it should be given to us.. burn it or stick it on your mantle.

You may find yourself having done everything correctly and they’re still ignoring you… this is when you bring the OR ELSE!!!

You write a nice little notice to the magistrate..”if you try to take this any further you are going to be personally liable for acting outside the capacity of your office and i am going to sue you and hold you directly liable and it’s going to cost you $xxxxxxxx…

If they continue and rule against you u make a claim the man who is magistrate and also include the initial claim at that time too…

Or

“Is there a verifiable true claim before the court?” “now all these charges that u burden me with by placing them on me, i am now going establish what this burden was? I say it was $500 a day for placing that burden on me.. now i am going to discharge it on you for making a false claim.

339 | P a g e

u charge your credit card the charges are financial burdens!!

If you ask everyone one of the people “do you believe i broke the law?” and they all answer yes they are now evoking the common law because only a man can make a claim or have a belief..and when u ask to see that claim and they can’t produce it…u have them all under oath or affirmation making a false claim. Everyone is liable for committing perjury!!”

“Ignorance of the law is no excuse, if he orders another man to do something he has to pay the bill” They assumed it!! Not presumed it… but none of this applies unless u first establish that u are a man in that court and have filed a proper claim in a superior court of record and common law!!

Back off from their frivolous claim or their will be a demand for compensation

Keep ur claim short and sweet don’t explain the situation as the correspondence between the two of you will be evidence it… they won’t be playing stupid…. include the correspondence as exibit a, b,c and so on..

If they want a bill of particulars then u may give it or u may just say u know and i know what u did, i will see u in court in front of the jury..

Every court is a court of record, traffic, probate, maritime, iralty, natural, absolute etc. We must say “IN this court of record AT common law.” Or “law; common”

Laws are just customs and practices of the people, when we go to “traffic” court, we’re in their customs. When we file a claim, we are bringing our own law our own customs.

340 | P a g e

We must expressely say we are in common law. “I believe that I’m in a court of record and it’s my belief that it operates under common law, see exhibit A [blacks law]”

Say u have an istrative court in session like a ticket at court tell them your court ie mitchell court has just been made aware that it is being challenged and require leave of court for 30 days so as to file my own claim in a court of record so as to properly heard before the court about the matter. after u filed you claim and served whomever ask the court to the cases the superior and inferior courts and suspend the inferior court until the superior court has rendered its decision?

“Every man has a property in his own person. This nobody has a right to, but himself.” John Locke Does anyone else has right to that property is what it boils down to!! None is going to more for your child than you..period.. so u don’t need the help!!

So after you filed your claim and have your court Send a notice tell them the robin court will be holding a preliminary hearing for the return of the property; if there are any claims that come forward the trial by jury date will be set one week from now…and if none comes forward this man in the black robe before us or a representative of this venue or whomever the clerk assigns to sit before us; they will serve as witness that if nobody comes forward that they are to take my order for the property of 1 2 3 4 also known as children are to returned to its original place of origin and proper jurisdiction by 1am

341 | P a g e

you take that order stamped and signed and take it to the sheriff and u say help me regain my property please 

- You choose when to move your case, and the state will try every dirty trick

When one has established themselves “IN” their own common law court at queen bench with you own claim…ie. the robin court. It means ur are the queen moving her court at her wishes.. so if you need to postpone events feel free and take no guff about how the court won’t be pleased as it’s is not their court it’s your court and robin gets to say who is pleased and who isn’t pleased.

You reply “thank you we will take that under royal advisement (whatever they say ) under consideration and the court is not amused with its need to change property to child because when i say something is mine ITS MINE i am the royal before the court” which means you are not confused y there misdirection bs and will send a real strong message that they are in front of royalty… but if you change your story then you ARE NOT THE ROYAL BUT AN IMPOSTER”

Note: when u appear at court in your court it makes the public officials stand on edge as you are like the queen herself showing up… so don’t be surprised when the top dog shows up talk to them (their best judge)… but the rest of the lawyers and the judges are freaking out because they are wondering how did the queen get out of her tower in London…..she is here but we would like to get her back to the tower in London….they want to gently back her up the stairs into the tower and shut her there but we don’t want to piss her off because she might be the queen with a little amniesia.. but if they move you to the wrong side of the court they will eat u alive…don’t play ball with the devil NO BARGAINS!!

Consent decree: A consent decree is an agreement or settlement to resolve a dispute between two parties without ission of guilt (in a criminal case) or liability (in a civil case) and most often refers to such a type of settlement in the United States.

Do not go for the consent decree!!

342 | P a g e

Provost Marshall and how to use them to get in and out of a state??

A license doesn't negate a trial by jury, and stick to what you say in court Priviliges don’t negate rights…just because i have a marriage (privilege) contract doesn’t mean i have lost the right to a trial by jury in this matter of controversy (whatever it may be)

There are many layers to marriage..there is the common law side , the church side, civil layer of marriage. A judge may only be addressing the civil side of the matter until you evoke the common law!!

After you filed your claim as a prosecutor say “ i robin and my case are now at court. I now present i and my case to court(don’t forget this presentment)” don’t take judges offer for a free lawyer just repeat yourself!! By doing this one is showing it is etched in stone..one is making their bond ..one’s giving their word… not one word is being taken away and not one word is added(bible)

U may have to do this a thousand times!! In biblical times if u changed your word you were killed!! Sometime u have a bond just for the case , just in case there is a false claim before the court..

OJ Simpson could have asked for a bond of $15million dollars be put up just in case this is a false claim ( as his verdict would have shown) and he would have been able to recoup his losses..

Opening a common law court by writing a letter Where’s your legal bases?’

343 | P a g e

“we apologize for any confusion, as the aggrieved, our lawful basis is that we require the use of this venue as a court of record to seat a jury in which we move our claim before, also to determine and render a verdict as to who has the lawful right to tender the order to istrate our property?

Priviliges don’t negate rights…just because i have a marriage (privilege) contract doesn’t mean i have lost the right to a trial by jury in this matter of controversy (whatever it may be)

There are many layers to marriage..there is the common law side , the church side, civil layer of marriage. A judge may only be addressing the civil side of the matter until you evoke the common law!!

After you filed your claim as a prosecutor say “ i robin and my case are now at court. I now present i and my case to court(don’t forget this presentment)” don’t take judges offer for a free lawyer just repeat yourself!! By doing this one is showing it is etched in stone..one is making their bond ..one’s giving their word… not one word is being taken away and not one word is added(bible)

U may have to do this a thousand times!! In biblical times if u changed your word you were killed!! Sometime u have a bond just for the case , just in case there is a false claim before the court..

OJ Simpson could have asked for a bond of $15million dollars be put up just in case this is a false claim ( as his verdict would have shown) and he would have been able to recoup his losses..

The one bringing the controversy into the court will lose

344 | P a g e

If at the time u can’t afford to pay any more than say $30 on a $50 monthly/payment and they credit card company or whomever it is they have brought controversy and the moment they bring it in to a court room they are going to lose..they should have accepted the best they can do…..

If any man believes they have a claim on my property, let them come forward with their claim now or forever hold their peace.

Try to get our claim under one sentence.

Avoid “jury trial”, go for “trial by jury”

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. [2]

JURY TRIAL A jury trial or trial by jury is a legal proceeding in which a jury either makes a decision or makes findings of fact, which then direct the actions of a judge. It is distinguished from a bench trial, in which a judge or of judges make all decisions. Jury trials are used in a significant share of serious criminal cases in almost all common law legal systems,[1] and juries or lay judges have been incorporated into the legal systems of many civil law countries for criminal cases. Only the United States and Canada make routine use of jury trials in a wide variety of non-criminal cases. Other common law legal jurisdictions use jury trials only in a very select class of cases that make up a tiny share of the overall civil docket (e.g. defamation suits in England and Wales), while true civil jury trials are almost entirely absent elsewhere in the world. Some civil law jurisdictions do, however, have arbitration s where non-legally trained decide cases in select subject-matter areas relevant to the arbitration ' areas of expertise. The availability of a trial by jury in American jurisdictions varies. Because the United States system separated from that of the English at the time of the American Revolution, the types of proceedings that use juries depends on whether such cases were tried by jury under English common law at that time, rather than the methods used in English or UK courts in the present. For example, at the time English "courts of law" tried cases of torts or private law for monetary damages but "courts of equity" tried civil cases seeking an injunction or another form of non-monetary relief. As a result, this practice continues in American civil

345 | P a g e

laws, even though in modern English law only criminal proceedings and some inquests are likely to be heard by a jury. Counter-claim puts us back into their system as defendant, always only file claims. Never be a plaintiff, never accept the title of plaintiff, only be a man, wronged, aggrieved party. Plaintiff puts us under the istrative jurisdiction. Never be “pro se”, pro se means you agree to adhere to all their federal court rules and regulations If they file paper work with us under these unwanted titles, we file paperwork objecting to that title, to cease and desist as we find it offensive and harmful to I a man and my person. We bring that statutory case over to the common law court and keep it there and we are going to resist every temptation every bribe and every threat from everybody in the system will continue to insist on, and if they do, we are going to offer them to pay the man a lot of money in compensation if they continue with that game. “cease and desist OR ELSE”

Chief magistrate is the highest officer in the courthouse holding the bond for the entire building and its operations and everyone hired there; and the court clerk is the highest of the clerks of the courthouse; both these people must be informed before we put in any claims into the public. Because they are there to protect us and we must exhaust all private avenues before we can bring the matter into open court.

“hey BOB, aka chief magistrate, If you do not control, train, monitor, and discipline your subordinates, I’m going to have to add you to my suit”

Holding the officer, attorney, and judge liable for making a false claim against you Don’t say we didn’t break the code. Just say we have no contract with the state, hence there is no broken contract when we disobey the code. Common law must only demonstrate one thing: harmed or injured party or breeched contract. There is no code or statute in common law.

346 | P a g e

“hey Bob (judge), Do you know the difference between legal and lawful? You do? Then dismiss the jury because I don’t need one. If you’re competent in law, I’ll take your word on it. I never sat down, I’m still standing in common law. And I never relinquished control this court to anybody, and if you believe I did, I’ll appeal it, and I’ll be back in 30 days. Or you can let me present the law to the court. Case dismissed? No discharged! Dismissed means you can bundle it up and use it as a securitized instrument to collect and trade on the open market, to help benefit the county and generate funds, that’s fine but no one better drag me back into this court again ever, under that ticket under that claim.”

“judge BOB do you believe that I broke the law? Lawyer/prosecutor BOB, do you believe?” ok now we just unshielded these men from their persons, they are now liable as men holding beliefs that we broke the law.

Don’t let a judge/officer presume that we are citizen/resident. “are you going to testify under oath/affirmation in open court that I’m a citizen and resident?”

A judge will never be able to that I am a resident or that I’m in the capacity of a citizen.

If we actually owe a debt, and we leave the court losing, then to stay honorable we must try to settle with the man we owe a debt to, with a payment plan of our own.

When judges/lawyers/attorneys try to play word games and try to move our claim into inferior courts: “He uttered a forged instrument which has interfered with my right to property”

Common law court scenario: Judge: what are you here about?

347 | P a g e

Us: (restate our claim as we have written in the filed claim, exactly word-for-word what was on our claim) Otherside: legalese blah blah blah Us: He uttered a forged instrument which has interfered with my right to property Otherside: we didn’t utter a forged instrument Judge to all of us: would you like to stand on your positions? Us: this is my claim, it’s my law before the court, the court’s to determine whether my law’s good law; not anybody else’s law, you can’t bring that code nonsense in here, that’s not what’s before the court at this time, not his interpretation, this is what I say the law is. He interfered with my right under this law. All he has to say is did he or did he not tres against I a man.

(On my claim’s front cover is: Tres: forgery Verified claim. That man created a false document i.e. ticket, that led to I a man’s harm. At the beginning of the doc: I all here to be true. At the bottom of the doc: verifiable claim.) Certification is a way to skirting liability, it’s lawyer trick. Certified means no liability. Verified means liability. We want liability.

Attorneys are not competent to testify. We are incompetent in istrative court. When they send us for a psychological evaluation, the ironic thing is that the very psychologists they send us to will not be able to determine our legal competency that the court is looking for. It’s a baseless request. “What are you trying to ascertain with this competency evaluation? If it’s my legal competency, how can a psychologist who has no legal training make this determination? What law say I a man must be legally competent?”

“sorry for any inconvenience, but I’m incompetent to engage in any intercourse in commerce with you folks. I’m just not competent to enter into such a foreign agreement. I don’t even know who created this code statute stuff, I don’t understand it, I don’t comprehend it, I’m not party to it. I cannot accept this wonderful benefit of this gift at this time, because it’s going to cause me harm.” (not understanding it, not comprehending it, protects us from being held under their codes)

348 | P a g e

“government was created by man and is supposed to be of benefit to man, and not cause man harm. Thank you for your gift, and I accepted it at the time believing that it would be of benefit, but now I realize it’s causing me harm. So please kind person on the other end of this letter, kindly take back your gift”

Customs > laws > rules Customs will always win (jury) Laws are of man Rules are of persons, and are made to be broken.

Comprehend COMPREHEND, verb transitive Literally, to take in; to take with, or together. 1. To contain; to include; to comprise. The empire of Great Britain comprehends England, Scotland and Ireland, with their dependencies. 2. To imply; to contain or include by implication or construction. If there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. Romans 13:9. 3. To understand; to conceive; that is, to take, hold or contain in the mind; to possess or to have in idea; according to the popular phrase, I take your meaning. God doeth great things, which we cannot comprehend Job 37:5. It is not always safe to disbelieve a proposition or statement, because we do not comprehend it.

I require only verifiable claims, not certifiable, because if no man’s going to appear don’t waste my time.

Certification is useful in postal stamps, because they can now that our document exists and was sent out/delivered on this date.

349 | P a g e

Claim must be simple and clean to be in common law. Don’t get fancy with the codes and statutes nonsense.

When we’re in istrative court, it’s a hearing not a trial. And in a hearing, the guy in a black dress is a hearing officer, not a judge. Do not invoke habeas corpus, just order for property to be returned to the proper jurisdiction.

- Understanding habeus corpus, jurisdiction, and holding a hearing officer liable

It basically means bring the body forward…the equity and common law courts were fighting over which court the body belongs in… So they got tired of moving around the body and merged the courts…so now all u have to do is move your claim to the right side.. Again jurisdiction has control of that property or the man…

Jurisdiction is who has control of that property. i.e. structure for return of property: “I claim that property is in the improper jurisdiction; that property belongs in this jurisdiction at (insert our address)” whenever we put in an order “hey man in black robe, hearing officer of the inferior istrative court, if you deny my change of jurisdiction over this property, I’m going to require your findings of facts and conclusions of law (fof, col). And I demand this property to be returned to this proper jurisdiction (address). But if you say this is denied, which you have no standing and no right to deny, if you believe you do, Bob Jones, hearing officer over this matter. I believe you’re the magistrate over this matter.” (Don’t say we’re going to hold him liable right now, it will sound like a threat and extortion. Be polite)

350 | P a g e

If one’ claim stands unrebutted it stands as true!!

- Working with the court to get what you require If they insist on using their forms or use all capitals. Just say that u will do this because…so fill it out and put this note on it “ i a man am using this form for the courts clerk ease of filing purposes only; this does not negate the claim or any documents evidence or affidavits or orders or rights or testimony attached within this or anything else within my claim. This doesn’t affect the contents of this case”

Our name is something i use to intercourse with society. It is just a tool… we could just use anonymous if we wanted.. all the court is that u testify under oath or affirmation is all we want to clear up..who did what to do? Let’s hear it in open court verifiably so..

- The court cannot try a case against you until you're ready

Compare to Virginia supreme court rule 7b:4b Rule 7B:4. Trial of Action. (a) Method of bringing action. A civil action in a general district court may be brought by warrant, summons or complaint directed to the sheriff or to any other person authorized to serve process, requiring such individual to summon the person against whom the claim is asserted to appear before the court on a certain day to answer the complaint of the plaintiff set out in the warrant, summons or complaint. (b) When action heard. If all parties appear and are ready for trial on the return date of the warrant, summons or complaint, the court may proceed with the trial of the case.

351 | P a g e

If you nor ready the judge cant force one to “duel” if the private istrative side is still trying to work things out and not bring it before a judge because you would rather settle it on the private the judge must agree to give you the time u need..

Certify vs , and understanding jurisdiction

Certified is saying only that someone believes that piece of paper exist.. is when they can say what is true on the paper in open court and press the record..

The only answer you accept in court is a verifiable answer as one of your rules

Notice the court don’t motion them!! Ur in power not them

Only a man who you have caused harm can have authority over you… jurisdiction is who has jurisdiction or authority to move my body? Am i stepping on someone’s toes because that gives them the jurisdiction to get me off their toes…

Usually the prosecutor is bring the claim on behalf on someone… just like a trustee for his grantor..but u are simply insisting that the grantor show up.

“Are we in article3 court?” (only in US) article3 courts are common law courts in the US.

As a man we do not need to give our name in the claim.

Hold court as they come to arrest us with a signed warrant, inform the officer that I am a man not the person. If they still arrest us then we are contracting with them.

352 | P a g e

Where do you derive the right to ister my property without my consent? “we have the right from the codes” codes only give you obligations, duties, and privileges, only a man has rights.

How to handle an arraignment Don’t say anything during arraignment to the judge/court, just “require leave of court to respond” ; “I a man (name) am here to settle any verifiable claims” We are not interested in judges explaining code to us, we still don’t understand it. it’s not our contract. There’s no statute of limitations on a man.

What if we’re from China and came to a common law country, what is our legal person if we don’t have a birth certificate?

- Attorneys are powerless in a common law court We don’t need case law to our argument, we bring our own law into the court with our claim. You say you didn’t do me wrong, ok, let’s take this in front of a jury.

Lawyers and “representatives of the state” don’t have first hand knowledge of the case and thus cannot address the jury.

The courts are free for us to use

353 | P a g e

Every Court of record is the king's Court, in right of his crown and dignity, though his subjects have the benefit of it ; and therefore no other court loath. authority to fine and imprison ; so that the very erection of a new jurisdiction, with power of fine or imprisonment, :sakes it instantly a Court of record, The free use of all courts of record and not of record, is to be granted to the people : We are the king’s subjects.. and as we are considered equal to the king u may see i as the king too..so long as i get in for free….

If you are having prolems with the clerk write a nice simple letter “i believe i have chosen a simple method to move my case through the court; i have chosen to appear before a federal district court in the capacity of a man aggrieved; making simple wishes and demands to order to order the restoration of my rights to seek compensation for said wrong. That being said i present to this distric court of Alabama my case; i a man wish and respectfully demand of this court 1. To file my suit 2. To give me a case action number 3. To deliver enclosed summonses to the wrong doers 4. Please time and file stamp my original copies to the suit and mail it back to my address5 it is my wish to not be charged a fee and i do not want to diminish my capacity to that of a pauper; it is my wish for my standing to remain as that of a man aggrieved; i do not believe i have been presented a bill for services rendered; i don’t believe any officer in this court can claim a debt: i do believe this court was created for the use of man and those of mankind to settle contentious matters in a civil matter without a fee; i declare i appear before this court to seek the restoration of my rights that are secured and protect by the united states constitution and as all of the officers have bound themselves to the constitution; i as a man call upon the officers of this court to perform their duties; that being said if the office of this court believes i am in error of this belief; i have enclosed a filing fee of $350 demanded of me by the clerk of the court for the matter of controversy between i and the governor of the state of Alabama; has gone on for too many years; so take this money so we can move this case now: for once this case is settled everything can be returned; if you wish to to allow me to proceed feel free to return the $350 to me at my said address.

If a clerk of the court is giving one a hard time .. go to the head clerk which is the head chief judge . and talk right to his secretary. This is an exparte conversation as it will go directly to the judge as she is his representative.

One of the positions is they haven’t done anything for you yet..

corpus juris secundum second edtion section 7 4 4 all federal courts are courts of record must get book to

354 | P a g e

corpus juris volume 25 under federal courts section 344 what it says” Federal district courts are courts of record.” Supreme court of the united states is the highest court of the usa but not of the land… the common law is the highest law of the land (people)

If they some nonsense about we don’t do common law courts and it doesn’t no longer exist. Reply with “When did we become me? We is not me and when did they outlaw the common law and i need you to show me..i hear u saying we don’t do common law anymore but can u show me… (they may show u a code) Respond with that’s a code ..when did u throw away YOUR constitution? Because it clearly says in your contract between the governments that they will not interfere with the rights of man… and if anyone interferes with their rights that they have the right to sue the wrong doer.

Amendment VII(7) In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

We are not a party to it because once u sign a contract u relinquish certain rights for privileges.. so i don’t want a privilege from anyone as it interferes with my rights as a man..

If they don’t show up it’s a nihil dicit judgement as u get to face your acc in a common law court of record..

If we’re the prosecutor, they need to just answer to us, because it’s our court, our rules. They want to ask questions? Get their own claim and their own court. No claim against me? My court, my rules.

Case. We determine what’s in our case, how to set it up, what the rules are. The defendant is just one piece of our case.

“Is there a verifiable criminal complaint against me? are you not going to bring the witness? Is anyone going to be testifying? No? then I’m filing a claim against you, because you’re

355 | P a g e

saying that I’ve done wrong/I’ve committed crime, but not bringing any injured party to court. To move court you must have a plaintiff, and the plaintiff must appear in open court. His attorney can be there but the plaintiff MUST be there. so you’re filing a false claim, and what you wished executed on your brother will now fall on you.”

“if a plaintiff shows up and testify under oath or affirmation that I’ve done him harm, I’ll compensate him right now.”

No matter who charges us, never come into court as a defendant unless we’ve harmed an actual man or woman. Nihil dicit is Latin for "he says nothing"; a judgment for want of a plea. The name of a judgment which a judge may render against a defendant who failed to plead and failed to answer a plaintiff's declaration or complaint within the prescribed time limit. The defendant failed to say why the court should not issue the judgment against him. The failure to say constitutes an ission of the justice of the cause of action against the defendant; it does so more strongly than a mere default. You would be held liable to the judgment as if you did not appear in court and the plaintiff/prosecution receives whatever you're seeking from the Judge.

Blackstones commentary PRIVATE WRONGS. BOOK III. Ch. 23. But in both these instances the jury may, if they thing proper, take upon themselves to determine at their own hazard, the complicated question of fact and law; and, without either special verdict or special case, may find a verdict absolutely either for the plaintiff or defendant.

Queen’s bench are courts of record. 1) 2) 3) 4) 5)

generally has a seal has power to fine or imprison for contempt keeps a permanent record of the proceedings proceeds according to the common law (not statutes or codes) has a tribunal which is independent of the magistrate (judge)

356 | P a g e

there is no vs., because he’s not a defendant, he’s a wrong-doer. We are the aggrieved party prosecutor. A man, (name) prosecutor | robert benton , chairman of the DHR, a public servant, a man, a wrong-doer I’m not fighting the man, I’m just making a claim because I’ve been wronged and I require compensation. I’m not fighting, I’m not bringing a controversy into this court or public. I’m saying I want compensation for I believe I’ve been done wrong by these people. If they want to come forward and say I’m making a false claim let them come forward. Prosecutor just means I’m pursuing. I hope you don’t answer my claim because I’ll just get a “nihil dicit” (he says nothing) judgement against you. (note: we are not using the latin here, the judge will just call it that). More powerful than a default judgment.

No notice of court, no judicial notice, just “notice”

The state cannot take your kids without proper adjudication and a court order Attorney general states that the state of Alabama has no right to take any child within its borders into its custody, the only children they have control over are those who have been adjudicated in their care.

“Do you have a court order?” no they only have a complaint.

If you accept a lower monetary counter offer, your case will be dismissed We’re suing someone for 10mil, and they offer us 1mil, we conditionally accept your offer of 1mil dollars but that does not negate the fact that there’s still an outstanding balance between us.

357 | P a g e

If we accept their lower offer unconditionally, our original claim of 10mil is a false claim.

Attorneys try to play the word “reasonable”. If lawyers get us to change our claim by 1mm or 1 minute, our claim becomes untrue. That is my word and I am sticking to it. Jacob’s father blessed him and did not go back on his word, even though he meant to bless his other son. My claim stands true until another man can come forth with a verifiable claim that I filed a false claim. I shall not be moved. That’s my word and I’m sticking to it.

When you say it’s the “order of court”, “court” means the jury+the plaintiff+defendant, not the judge. No “a”, “the”, “this” court, just “court”. AT the STATE OF ALABAMA’s court case stylized as JU2001832 to be known to the world as void from the beginning (stay away from “ab initio”, it’s latin/legalese) and all of its subsequent orders ought to have no force of operation.

Don’t use “pro se”, we are not “pro se”, it is legalese. I’m just an aggrieved man. AGGRIE'VED, participle ive Pained; afflicted, civilly or politically oppressed. Don’t use “deemed”, that’s legalese.

Obtaining the facts and evidence from the other side before trial If we are denied access to evidence/casefile. We’re trying to get discovery and lawyers are blocking us. They might say they don’t give evidence until day of trial. This is not true. Don’t let them make us assume this. Some lawyers won’t even prepare a casefile against us (lazy), presuming that we’ll get a lawyer or be appointed one and be sold out.

“I need to see the evidence in order to prepare proper defense and to obtain competent council. I will also not intercourse in a trial by ambush.” Whenever we talk to a person we should also put it in writing. (notice)

358 | P a g e

“how am I to obtain competent legal counsel unless they know how to set a retaining fee? He needs to know what you folks are going to present to the court so he can set a fee.”

Don’t actually get a lawyer, but this is a way to delay the trial or get the file ordered from the court from the guy in the black robe, then the judge will write the plaintiff and order them to give him their whole case. Then he’ll have jurisdiction and control over the state’s claim. Then judge BOB will write us and tell us that he’s got the copy of casefiles.

“i require discovery” lady says we call it disclosure not discovery, follow the rules “notice to order full disclosure [cf. motion for discovery]”

Plaintiff makes claim in his court, then he turns his claim over to THE court, and argue his case before THE court against the wrong-doer, then THE court decides.

'ARGUE, verb intransitive [Latin arguo, to show, argue accuse or convict.] 1. To reason; to invent and offer reasons to or overthrow a proposition, opinion or measure; as, A argues in favor of a measure; B argues against it. 2. To dispute; to reason with; followed by with; as, you may argue with your friend, a week, without convincing him. 'ARGUE, verb transitive 1. To debate or discuss; to treat by reasoning; as, the counsel argued the cause before the supreme court; the cause was well argued. 2. To prove or evince; to manifest by inference or deduction; or to show reasons for; as, the order visible in the universe argues a divine cause. 3. To persuade by reasons; as, to argue a man into a different opinion. 4. Formerly, to accuse or charge with; a Latin sense, now obsolete; as, to argue one of profaneness. We go to court to argue our case. Do not go to “small claims court”, it diminishes the capacity of our court. Always be in our common law court of record at queen’s bench.

359 | P a g e

It is my wish not to film anything other than my courtroom proceeding..this is tot avoid them telling u what u cant film so as to not look complying …

Kalr likes to hide his rules in notices Ie.. notice this is what i consider jurisdiction Notice this is what i consider the venue ….ths what i consider is the plaintiff, defendant, respondant The notices are the rulez

…sneaky

Nobody objected to the notices

Nobody should refer to me as a plaintiff will be in contempt of my court, as i am a claimant under my court!! Because in my court my name is defined as claimant.. u cant call me anything else as i am clearly defined in my court!!

A plaintiff in French is a nagging

plaintiff (n.) c. 1400, from Anglo-French pleintif (late 13c.), noun use of Old French plaintif "complaining; wretched, miserable," tell the judge calling u plaintiff as this is like calling you names and ur insulted..i am not wretched and that i a man find this highly insult and u will be in contempt of court.

Warn the prosecutor too.. that by pursuing this falling claim you are wasting and trying tto harm me a man and that he should cease and decist before you have to file a claim against him too..

360 | P a g e

If the state is placing charges against i a man then go to the head prosecutor and send it to states attourney general “i believe there is a state procesutor assistant the attouirney general who is going to be prosecuting this case, in a ____(insert whatever court you’ll be at).. i believe he is moving in eror..i am giving you fair warning for him to cease and desist or i am going to have to file a claim on my own…”

Legalese definition of "suffer" Means u accetted it and allowed it to happen.. u had all the ability to stop him and u didn’t Stay away from this word.. don’t say u suffered at the hands of the police!!we did not accept and do nothing to protect ourselves from the police beating !!

Suffer SUF'FER, verb transitive [Latin suffero; sub, under, and fero, to bear; as we say, to undergo.] 1. To feel or bear what is painful, disagreeable or distressing, either to the body or mind; to undergo. We suffer pain of body; we suffer grief of mind. The criminal suffers punishment; the sinner suffers the pangs of conscience in this life, and is condemned to suffer the wrath of an offended God. We often sufferwrong; we suffer abuse; we suffer injustice. 2. To endure; to ; to sustain; not to sink under. Our spirit and strength entire, Strongly to suffer and our pains. 3. To allow; to permit; not to forbid or hinder. Will you suffer yourself to be insulted? I suffer them to enter and possess. Thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbor, and not suffer sin upon him. Lex.19. 4. To undergo; to be affected by. Substances suffer an entire change by the action of fire, or by entering into new combinations. 5. To sustain; to be affected by; as, to suffer loss or damage.

361 | P a g e

SUF'FER, verb intransitive To feel or undergo pain of body or mind; to bear what is inconvenient. We suffer with pain, sickness or sorrow. We suffer with anxiety. We suffer by evils past and by anticipating others to come. We sufferfrom fear and from disappointed hopes. 1. To undergo, as punishment. The father was first condemned to suffer on a day appointed, and the son afterwards, the day following. 2. To be injured; to sustain loss or damage. A building suffers for want of seasonable repairs. It is just that we should suffer for neglect of duty. Public business suffers by private infirmities.

Be prepared this is a life style…a mind set..the judge is really going to test your metal!!! Be ready!!!

108 - Want vs. require in court

I judge may like to slip this word in to gain jurisdiction..”do you WANT me to call u a witness?” if one says “yes” u just said he is your daddy because no man wants for anything god provides for all!!! U REQUIRE he bring s the witness to the stand as he is your servant!!! Not the other way around!! Forgetting the judge works for u coulkd be costly!!!

This man works for you DON’T FORGET IT!!!

Sorry, I'm from a foreign culture We may come from a foreign culture where our behavior is acceptable there but not here, once we discover this, we ask for forgiveness and that should be all we need to avoid criminal charges. It’s like the African guy who impregnates his 8 year old niece, gets off free because it’s a beautiful thing in his culture.

- Answer the second dimension with the second dimension

362 | P a g e

Because our birth certificate is the 2D entity they’re really after (it’s the security interest instrument) so they can actually take their charges out of that certificate. (as a last resort) the 2D requires a 2D response, so we respond in writing.

Your confession grants jurisdiction When judge talks fast at us saying “do you understand you’re waiving your rights when you sign…………when you……….etc”, we say “I don’t understand anything of this legalese you’re saying nor can I be compelled to. I’m just here to settle any verifiable true debt or claim against me, and to ask forgiveness of any man or woman I may have harmed. Who is my acc so I may face them?”

“who say I do wrong?”

“are you telling me that 18kg of cocaine in my back trunk is wrong? BOB? If that’s your belief then I require you to put it in writing and sign your name that I did wrong, and then I’ll sign my name after that.” (non assumpsit)

Don’t let judges funnel us into saying we do wrong (when no one’s harmed.)

Reducing your public defender's role to that of co council Don’t get rid of a public defender, reduce them to co council instead and we’ll speak for ourselves. Co councils are a great asset, tell whoever’s moving the case on us (the prosecutor) that we’re going to take our attorney that they gave us and make him our cocouncil, so that way he can’t enter contracts without our consent. He can just sit there and translate the legalese for us. “Ok you just sit there behind me and when I need you I’ll let you know, I don’t require for anyone to act on my behalf. I can do this all on my own, but thank you for giving me this public defender, but now I’m going to reduce his role to that of a co council.”

363 | P a g e

When in arraignment: we’re looking for a claim, for injured parties, for damages, for anybody who wants to say that I’ve done something wrong, I’m here to settle any verifiable true debt. We do this in writing, not with your mouth.

Your right to cross examine your acc I don’t believe any man or woman in this court has jurisdiction or control over me; And I don’t believe I’ve harmed any man or woman in this court room; I don’t believe I’ve injured any man or woman’s property in this court room; and I don’t believe I’ve lie to any man or woman in this courtroom (breach of contract); so I don’t believe anyone has a claim that I’ve done anybody in this courtroom wrong; if any man or woman steps forward with a proper verifiable true claim I will be happy to compensate them;

If the prosecutor says the plaintiff is the STATE OF ALABAMA, then the STATE OF ALABAMA must appear, so that I can cross examine my acc.

a trial by jury doesn’t allow a compliant to be heard by the jury…so the prosecution has his hands tide. If u don’t open ur own case all u will be doing is saying their case sucks…DON’T!!! that’s just rude…Just show your case has merit not there by bringing your own case before the court… then ur not saying anything bad about their case…

How to deal with a psych evaluation

If a judge ask u to take a psych evaluation Write the judge to explain why he wants the psych eval done is it to 1. Determine whether i am competent to answer question in court in legalese 2. Or that i your trying to deduce that i am delusional or psychotic or psychiatric in nature? Please tell me what the concerns or information you are tyring to gather about my mental state? and what are u trying to derive

364 | P a g e

from the psych eval? What is the benefit for me or the court? is this an order and if so am i going to be compensated for carrying it out?

If the court request anything from you find out is it an order and r going to be compensated for it and what is the benefit for me and them and what are they trying to accomplish with it?

no man can order another man around without compensation as slavery is not allowed..

Providing a product holds you liable Take donations to avoid liability as its more a kin to a prayer.. if your prayer doesn’t work oh well!! Churches take donations…wink wink

Filing a claim against a complaint Make sure when u file your claim you have to make sure you served the side properly after that you take the evidence that you served then properly and give it to the clerk for the judge to create a case file number for you so that your court is there trumping their court. U are setting it up so both courts are there to be heard at the same time? Just showing at the trial without proper notice, 21 days before they appear to answer for themselves in open court filing a claim on the spot is considered ambushing your opponent.. give proper notice..

don’t file counter claim or counter complaints you are filing a claim against their complaint.. if somebody is complaining that i do wrong to a man or woman..i am filing a claim that they are filing a false complaint and that theya re wasting my valuable time resources as well as the courts valuable time and resources because they are never going to be able to prove their complaint is true. That’s the mind set as one approaches these situations

365 | P a g e

the letter would go more like this:

-the claim itself should read: there is some man named bob who has filed a complaint that i done wrong to the state of north Carolina; I don’t know who the state of north Carolina is; maybe bob can come to court and explain more clearly to me but for me to make my special appearance I want to be compensated for my lost time because this is a frivolous complaint that has no merit; and i require to be let alone.

Judge may ask you if you want to work in the best interest of the child or do some parenting course or do some stupid thing or another(they are trying to contract with you)..just say “no thank you ! i a man require immediate restoration of property”… -they will send back a letter telling “you” to appear in court. -letter two is a reply stating “ hold on a minute see exhibit A, the previous communications i sent you; it clearly states that i am an “I” not a “you”. -now take your claim to the clerk who has the original complaint and hand them your claim and for the court clerk to file this in bob’s case as my response because I don’t know who bob or Canada are…

Paying you court fee..how would you like to apy the $80.. u can offer them if u cant afford the lump sum $1 a day for the next 80 days and they will accept.. generally it’s the best you can do. Be honorable folk. The right to self govern is a responsibility and judges want to see someone who is true and real.

On the record On the record only happens with the spoken word under oath or affirmation in an open court…in viva voche Elvis Presley can’t make a record until he signs it Record means verbal

366 | P a g e

In legalese (istrative courts) they can take the written word as on the record but not a court of record moving under the common law. The legal world can twist their words anytime they want because it’s their term of art.. they have the right to do whatever they want to do with it. We don’t have a license to understand the words of their society.

We don’t understand their legalese as they don’t understand our common law gibberish. Hence why the lowly clerks have no clue as they aren’t trained to…don’t get mad be understanding ur presenting what looks like gibbersh with your common law common law and common sense are sadly none too common...

Man doesn’t answer to legal gibberish. He only answers to another man, hence a claim better be on the table or a signature on a order..

On one’s day in court that’s when one presses the record.. The do it under affirmation not oath..but u can do it on oath..my belief say affirmation is for me.. So you utter for the record (repeat your claim word for word) and then you ask the other side to speak for the record and the other side can’t create it because it doesn’t have a voice..

Who is this mystical magical ‘THEY’ u mean some man named bob in a black robe.. If he gives u an order get it ion writing and sign it then send him a bill he is not your judge he is the cases judge?

Dismissed vs discharged

367 | P a g e

Dismissed is it can go away for a while but can come back; discharged means it’s gone forever. We can’t sue anyone if it’s dismissed, because the case is still open, we still need to finish it. if it’s discharged, it’s then a false charge, and we have cause.

- UCC in court No government created a baby. So they can’t say they have a vested interest. They weren’t in bed with you… Trying to get you property (child) using ucc is strange because that is someone else’s belief system. We didn’t create the ucc so use don’t know what it means.. we aren’t licensed to use their language..ucc is intellectual property of someone else u have no permission.. in fact judges want you to use it because they have a license to interpret for you….STAY CLEAR OF UCC!!

Just ask for your property!!!

If an attorney say accordin to some code blah blah or statute you broke the code… So you ask him are you going to take the stand and testify that that is exactly what it means? he’ll say “no” Reply” well then that’s just your opinion then isn’t it?’” U: Did u write that code? Att; No U:do you have the person who wrote the code here? Att: no U: because the code was written from the public law do you have law before the court?

368 | P a g e

Att: no its rolled up in sacramento somewhere u: no public law where the code came from .. u don’t have the guy who wrote the code and u wont swear that this is exactly what the code means… your simply giving me ur opinion of what he wrote…

- Finding the plaintiff If the state is coming after you for whatever.. send a letter to the plaintiff asking if they are going to bring the state of texas to court so i can cross examine my acc?” Simply ask the court clerk “Do you have the plaintiffs address so i can properly sever them a proposal so i can settle the matter before going into open court, because i don’t know who they are?“ You sent it to me and you sent this letter obviously to them.. so what is the address or post office number i can send this to?” In Texas u would send a copy to the govern and the secretary of state..not sure for Canada is the equivalent the premiere and the attorney general?

The plaintiff must appear works whether you are the defendant or a man with all his rights..

Treat letter like google de gup.. u cant really make heads or tails of it except a date and an address.. So u just want to inquire more details form the plaintiff..

- Court of original jurisdiction and the supreme court Supreme court decision always go back to the court of original jurisdiction..and the original judge can ignore those rullings!! In istrative hearings a judge can gtake 10 years if he likes to come up with a ruling and there is nothing u can do about that because u bound yourself to his rules .. he may

369 | P a g e

argue that he is taking his time because he doesn’t want to make a mistake and take forever (you the man and person)

How to refer to the man in the black robe KL likes to look around like he is bored out of his mind.. because he has put his paper work in..he doesn’t want to have a convo with the judge.. if the judge ask you a question reply with”u talking to me BOB” he will reply”u can call me judge” U reply “ i have only one judge and he is God” “ur not my judge” “ur the case’s judge which you preside over, not over me” HE IS JUST A MAN LIKE US NOT OUR JUDGE

- Judge vs civil istrative hearing officer Civil istrative hearing officers deal with contract disputes between the state and the person holding the license/permit. This policy officer here says you breached the contract broke the code #so and so, did you or did you not? Yes? Then you need to be penalized for your breach. If you wanna keep operating under this piece of plastic you’re gonna pay the fine. But if you tell me you’re a man going from point A to point B then I don’t have jurisdiction over you. But if you want to be a card-holding member of our little society, you have to operate under our rules.

The whole gambit is to let the court know they have no jurisdiction over us.

Asking about jurisdiction, and when to speak in court How do you believe you have jurisdiction over me? through a license? A permit? A franchise? How? how do you believe you have the right to bring me forth before your tribunal? When did you believe you acquired that power/right/authority?

370 | P a g e

Don’t open our mouth in istrative court, everything in writing. Proves we’re competent. Never show any sign of competency/understanding in their court. We’re idiots in their court. When we’re in our court, we are competent.

Rights are property, and when to speak in court

My rights are my property like my heartbeat my dreams my aspirations my goals they’re all part of my property, a subset of my property, and governmenrts only exist to protect private property. when my rights are tresed upon I a man am harmed.

When we claim “property” we cover all things. Rights, children, land, name, time, animals etc.

Are you talking to me as a man? No? You’re talking to me as a public servant? I don’t require any of your services at this time. Please let me alone. The law doesn’t say anything, the law reads, that little book you have? You’re interpreting the law. You know you’re talking to a man, and I a man am telling you that your interpretation of the code is tresing on my property. Put that in front of a judge/jury in a common law court of record, we’ll see how they believe what you interpret the code reads.

I want that person to come across the room and point to me and say that I did him wrong. I wish to meet the plaintiff and settle it with the man. I want to compensate whomever it is that I’ve done wrong. Anyone else I don’t want to hear it.

When the court is open it’s in session, anything filed is in closed court. Open court is open to the public to witness. “out in the open”

Take vs. present a notice

371 | P a g e

Don’t ever say “take notice” in our docs, always say “I a man present you this notice”

Understanding orders in court All orders come from the plaintiff/claimant/prosecutor or the defendant/wrong-doer, not from the judge. Attorneys can only propose orders, he can’t place an order before the court. I a man can place the order. When the judge/jury comes back, they’ll make a decision on whether to recognize the order Cus the lawyer doesn’t want to have any liability, anyone who places the order is liable for that order.

If we come in as the defendant, we must accept all orders of the court (orders proposed by attorneys/lawyers then recognized by judge/jury). We cannot bill the order. If we come in as I the man, we can bill the orders.

A minute order is when a new fact has come up and has just made us aware that we need to amend our order.

There must be a real party of interest when we sue, no imaginary characters like officer/captain/santaclaus. A judge is just a guy watching two guys do a pistol duel. He’s just there to referee/keep the agreed-upon rules of the game.

We make a claim, they’ve been served (denied or ignored), there’s a controversy. We go to court.

- Competancy and habeus corpus I can’t enter into your court without competency to understanding the charges. Everyone has the right to know what they’re being charged with.

372 | P a g e

Habeas corpus is suspended for Guantanamo bay because they’re charged under treason or felony, which are not protected by habeas corpus.

An incompetent, or idiot bares no liability Incompetent simply means you don’t understand exactly what is going on at this time nad that u don’t believe you’re going to be held liable or that one is bound by the rules of court because you are not competent to provide a proper answer at this time. They can’t make someone who is incompetent answer a question. Husband is the bondsman for the wife.. he holds all liability for his wife and children Next friend is a status where u can help the incompetent and idiots.. Idiot cannot be contracted with because its unethical… one cannot take advantage of or capitalize on someone less fortunate.

Show that you're making your best effort If you get a judgment that saying you are only able to pay $30 dollar a month because of hard times…. Make sure you pay back with your best effort…pay $30.07 and the following $30.13 and next one $30.05… this really shows you’re best effort…because the next mont you may only be able to give $13.08 and an apology that you have historically tried to pay the best i could but this month i can’t but i promise to keep trying my best to pay you back…. they will have to forgive you…

373 | P a g e

Come in with the person (paper) and say do all you want with the person but you cannot do anything to I the man. I will not put up my body to bond this defendant out of jail but what i will do is put up this piece of paper. I will put up federal reserve notes or security instruments. This is a birth certificate is a security instrument i hope u get what u need out of it. Is that going to be enough for the defendant to be released.

Latches as opposed to laches The statues of limitations lache you. Once you believe you’re “latched” instead of lached which is fake, then you put yourself under their spell/jurisdiction.

Public law vs. code I didn’t write the code, did the judge write the code? State prosecutor? No? is the person who wrote the code present today? Is the person who wrote the contract present today? If the code/contract is in error who’s going to be held liable? How can I answer to a code that nobody here wrote? And you guys are gonna just guess what that code means? No I need to know exactly what that means, who wrote this thing? I require that you bring the law before the court, not the code.

Bill->votes by congress->signed into public law-> enrolled sitting in library of congress, 12345 pages long, and the code is a few sentences.

We don’t want the code, we want the actual public law. Insist on the law being read into court. I wasn’t party to the law, did you sign it? Are we gonna have anyone come forward and swear to any of those signatures on the law? Is anyone here a signatory on that law? I need to face them.

Restoration of property Point across the room and say “that man/woman touched my property, see exhibit a,b,c,d, (4 kids)” don’t give them our kids’ names (names are things of value), just use photographs as exhibits. Include in claim. “I want property returned now”

374 | P a g e

What is the common belief of the people, if it’s in our favour, then trial by jury; sometimes we want just the judge to carry the letter of the law in our court. Don’t bring in a jury if you have to educate them in open court.

The courthouse belongs to us Building manager of the court house is the chief judge, steward of the public court. He’s keeping the court for the people, waiting on the people, preserving the court in a manner that will function efficiently for when the people/king/queen/crown/sovereign appears and needs to hold court. He’s there in service of the court, he’s not the court. If they try to point out that it’s public policy of the building that we can’t do that, but do you realize that the king has arrived in court? Are you trying to tell the king what he can or cannot do in his realm? In his kingdom? In his castle? The judge is just the building manager, who do you think he’s managing the building for? I have now arrived. Just ask the manager“do you say I do wrong?” because wrong is the worst word you can say to a man. Doing wrong is itting that you know better but still doing it wrong, with deliberate intent. Hold steadfast, yes or no did I do wrong? If he says I do wrong, then where’s the damage who’s been harmed, not speculation/conjecture, show me where the actual damages the present damages which is by me doing what I did. Don’t tell me it could go wrong, not conjecture/speculation, can’t accuse me of wrong due to a speculation/conjecture, it must be an actual event that has occurred/is accuring. Don’t tell me in speculation that it MIGHT occur. This is MY court, this is the PEOPLE’S building. If the queen can hold court 3am in the morning, so can we, we are equals before god. Our court will run a full year of 365 term, it can be convened at anytime during that year day or night. Ask judge “is the term of my court one year? Starting when?”

Holding court is future tense. Always holding court is lining up all the ducks in a row, holding court is imagining explaining this in future in open court.

375 | P a g e

How to move your case through court Give proper notice to the other side Give fair warning if they didn’t heed our notice that they’re gonna be sued and that I’m going to move a claim and I’m going to do it by trial by jury, and that I’m gonna occupy a public courthouse, and I’m gonna require the magistrate and the public building manager (chief judge) to inform the staff at the courthouse that I’m coming in. and I’m going to present my case in open forum in an open court before trial by jury. Tell the building manager that I need to use the room and that they have rooms available any time of the day cus I know the court’s open 24/7 365, make him fully aware that he knows that I know the court’s open 24/7, not 9-5. I know in 21 days there should be a room available, if not I’m gonna hold it in the hallway.

Obviously the defendant’s gonna be summoned to appear, and they’re not gonna appear. If the defendant doesn’t show up, and we get a default judgement, they have the right to contest the judgement. That’s ok, our case is tight. Sheriffs are used to carry out levies.

- Do you believe I do wrong? someone tries to hand you a citation u say i only answer to claims..citation is not a claim. I thought i was here because someone says i do wrong? Is anybody here say i do or did wrong? Where does it say in your codes or statues that i did wrong? Wrong is a common law term. The state cant say u do wrong because we are it’s creators. U cant turn to god and tell him he is wrong because he will just laugh at you..

Come in with the person (paper birthcertificate) and say do all you want with the person but you cannot do anything to I the man. I will not put up my body to bond this defendant out of jail but what i will do is put up this piece of paper. I will put up federal reserve notes or security instruments. This is a birth certificate is a security instrument i hope u get what u need out of it. Is that going to be enough for the defendant to be released?

376 | P a g e

How to reclaim your status as a man File our notice of error: We made a mistake of answering as a defendant before, because we do not have the capacity. We were just made aware that we’re not the defendant. I’m sorry I wasted the court’s time and energy. At once time I thought it was a great benefit to be a defendant, at present I maintain that I hold constructive possession of said article, constructive possession (one time I believed it was in my best interest to possess this thing), now it’s become constructive tres ( I wish it to be gone but it won’t leave). I on this date believe I’ve erred back on (date). For I believe I was in a state of disequilibrium and incapacitation to have made such a wish, for the go between is to bind my person with said article, so today august.19th I wish for the immediate removal of said article from property and I.From this date after whomever he or she sayeth said article is to remain about thy person will be the causal agent of tres to property and will be held liable for monetary compensation for damages. From day forth (date) whomever comes and says that that article is to remain on my person on my property will be the cause of tres on me and my property and will be held liable for compensation.

- Public law vs. code I didn’t write the code, did the judge write the code? State prosecutor? No? is the person who wrote the code present today? Is the person who wrote the contract present today? If the code/contract is in error who’s going to be held liable? How can I answer to a code that nobody here wrote? And you guys are gonna just guess what that code means? No I need to know exactly what that means, who wrote this thing? I require that you bring the law before the court, not the code.

Bill->votes by congress->signed into public law-> enrolled sitting in library of congress, 12345 pages long, and the code is a few sentences.

We don’t want the code, we want the actual public law. Insist on the law being read into court. I wasn’t party to the law, did you sign it? Are we gonna have anyone come forward and swear to any of those signatures on the law? Is anyone here a signatory on that law? I need to face them.

377 | P a g e

Latches as opposed to laches The statues of limitations lache you. Once you believe you’re “latched” instead of lached which is fake, then you put yourself under their spell/jurisdiction.

The courthouse belongs to us Building manager of the court house is the chief judge, steward of the public court. He’s keeping the court for the people, waiting on the people, preserving the court in a manner that will function efficiently for when the people/king/queen/crown/sovereign appears and needs to hold court. He’s there in service of the court, he’s not the court. If they try to point out that it’s public policy of the building that we can’t do that, but do you realize that the king has arrived in court? Are you trying to tell the king what he can or cannot do in his realm? In his kingdom? In his castle? The judge is just the building manager, who do you think he’s managing the building for? I have now arrived. Just ask the manager“do you say I do wrong?” because wrong is the worst word you can say to a man. Doing wrong is itting that you know better but still doing it wrong, with deliberate intent. Hold steadfast, yes or no did I do wrong? If he says I do wrong, then where’s the damage who’s been harmed, not speculation/conjecture, show me where the actual damages the present damages which is by me doing what I did. Don’t tell me it could go wrong, not conjecture/speculation, can’t accuse me of wrong due to a speculation/conjecture, it must be an actual event that has occurred/is accuring. Don’t tell me in speculation that it MIGHT occur. This is MY court, this is the PEOPLE’S building. If the queen can hold court 3am in the morning, so can we, we are equals before god. Our court will run a full year of 365 term, it can be convened at anytime during that year day or night. Ask judge “is the term of my court one year? Starting when?”

Holding court is future tense. Always holding court is lining up all the ducks in a row, holding court is imagining explaining this in future in open court.

What is the common belief of the people, if it’s in our favour, then trial by jury; sometimes we want just the judge to carry the letter of the law in our court.

378 | P a g e

Don’t bring in a jury if you have to educate them in open court.

Restoration of property Point across the room and say “that man/woman touched my property, see exhibit a,b,c,d, (4 kids)” don’t give them our kids’ names (names are things of value), just use photographs as exhibits. Include in claim. “I want property returned now”

When they tried to sue the WWF, they changed the name to WWE. The judgement could not be collected. That’s why a judgement without the ability to collect means nothing.

How to move your case through court Give proper notice to the other side Give fair warning if they didn’t heed our notice that they’re gonna be sued and that I’m going to move a claim and I’m going to do it by trial by jury, and that I’m gonna occupy a public courthouse, and I’m gonna require the magistrate and the public building manager (chief judge) to inform the staff at the courthouse that I’m coming in. and I’m going to present my case in open forum in an open court before trial by jury. Tell the building manager that I need to use the room and that they have rooms available any time of the day cus I know the court’s open 24/7 365, make him fully aware that he knows that I know the court’s open 24/7, not 9-5. I know in 21 days there should be a room available, if not I’m gonna hold it in the hallway.

Obviously the defendant’s gonna be summoned to appear, and they’re not gonna appear. If the defendant doesn’t show up, and we get a default judgement, they have the right to contest the judgement. That’s ok, our case is tight. Sheriffs are used to carry out levies.

Don’t run into court with a claim, do the proper paperwork and file. Until we’ve given them notice that they’ve done us wrong, and that they still continue doing us wrong after the notice. For instance, ignoring the notices that we’ve just sent them, so we make a claim that

379 | P a g e

hey if you don’t back off you’ll be harming me. Explain our claim in the istrative process before you file it at a court, we order them to stop because they’re tresing. If they don’t stop causing us harm we’ll be requiring compensation.

Prosecuting the prosecutor If someone brings a false accusation upon us, we can bring a suit to them for making a false claim against us. The state is a fiction, so it’s only the prosecutor, BOB the man who is harming us, full liability. Where do you get the right to bring this false claim against I the man?

When facing off with a state council, they will have an edge over us, it’s their word over ours. If we’re in istrative court, preponderance of evidence goes to the state in istrative hearing. Issues of preexisting contracts do not need to be evidenciated. To make it 50/50, and to require state to provide evidence (contract etc) we must evoke the common law by filing our claim against the prosecutor and serving them. Creating your casefile number, they can’t create it until we’ve gone through the proper notifications. We may need leave of court of minimum 30 days to properly file the claim. Anyone who enters a plea on my behalf bears full liability for the plea.

Don’t speak legalese. In court it’s 3 seconds for anyone to answer a question. The jury is to take the 3 second silence as an answer.

- Jury of your peers in common law Kalr first saw jury written down on the manga carta. It just a right to be judge by your fellow knights as a king may not know the custom of your area… so he ask the surrouinding neighbourghhood of people and ask them if this is how they roll out here..if the defendant or man has always acted. The jury can set a king straight in court of the custom and practices of the local people. So if law conflict the jury over rules it… A man wants to strive to put like minded people on his jury so they rule in his favour

380 | P a g e

. that a intregral part of common law. custom even trump common law as what is common law might not be stand up to the great customs of your people… ie. one goes into a strange land and one offend’s them with your custom.. and they take u to court you have a right to fill that jury with your peers so as to show u ment no harm just practicing your custom. And that u did no wrong… wrong is when you know better and still do keep chanting i did no wrong judge says guilty not guilty you just repeat i did no wrong… any man claim here i did wrong? judge repeatsguilty not guilty again i repeat did i do wrong is there anybody claiming here i do wrong and that i have not compensated them come forward or forever hold your peace? obviously write this down don’t say outloud!!!

Knowing who you are in court

Civil servants believe they have the power…when the truth is the people have the power… the legal society knows it cannot notice the court or testify in court under oath and affirmation or provide evidence and fact before the court of a common law court… They get you by bringing in “you “ bob and the legal fiction

Play stupid… does that code say i did some man harm.. well then i don’t know about know code..i apologize if i hurt your code if you bring him here i will apologize to them..

Realize the judge is not going after you it the prosecutor you have to take issue with as he is bringing his case The judge is simply the ref…

381 | P a g e

Set judges straight in writing” where do you believe you get the authority over i the man?” the judge will quickly reveal to you that he has no authority over you as a man… so where does the prosecutor derives his authority over i the man? And the prosecutor should say “i have no authority over you a man either” Then close by saying “then is there anything else i can help you with today because i stand here as a man before i go home?”

“do you believe i a man has to get a license to move from point a to point b?”

do this all in writing!!! Work out everything in the pretrial so that by the time you get to trial u have one question…where did you get the authority?

*Beg for forgiveness if you do some one wrong in court…it’s how you can get off

Watch out for the “YOU” if you go along with you then the judge has jurisdiction over you… (the man and the defendant)

if you tell a judge he is doing wrong…that’s like saying they knew better and still did it. There is no excuse for doing something wrong…

‘I am man claim wish or require….” Now maybe your claim has validity maybe some one come forward with a higher claim and then maybe you both can share or not..but a man claims. If a judge ask “is this you bob?” and bob says yes well then the judge has der. Because on his sheet it has joe listed as the defendant…

382 | P a g e

It’s a word game. You is plural…one must respond “i am a man not a you”

Pleas and confessions

If someone is offering u a plea deal it is because u already confessed some where down the line…u might now but u did…what u did or di d not sya may have led to your confession… They may ask immediately the person for a plea deal not the man.. they can enter a plea on behave of the defendant but not the man…. People can enter a plea on your behalf but that makes them liable Because you are a man. in there case you are the defendant..who cares whats in their case..it’s what’s in your case So what u say is if you don’t stop with their case I am going to file my own claim against them!

Habeus corpus - simply means bring the body - I would like to know why I am in here Basically who said I did wrong..i want to face my acc by right and authority… no acc no testification no case.. hence why they are waiting for you to testify against myself.. they can’t compel you to turn states witness on yourself. Although that is all the irs is asking of you..to voluntarily confess…

Evoking the common law U don’t claim the common law u evoke it..”I claim…….” Automatically evokes the common law Filing a complaint is legalese

383 | P a g e

Making a claim is common law!! now if someones comes in a makes a counter claim then you will bring one piece of proof The he will bring one piece of proof then I will bring another piece and son on and so forth Until one of the two wins

- Putting the prosecutor on the stand - so u want to put the prosecutor on the stand after you have claimed your court. Careful … a man want for nothing u require them to place the prosecutor on the stand - then ask them “do I owe you anything?” The prosecutor will say “no” Respond with “Who told you to come in here and take my money? where is he I want to cross examine them? Who is that guy? The prosecutor “I work for the state” ask back” where is that state? Don’t I have the right to cross examine that state? this should make the judge laugh.. because this is the trick revealed like a boss u can’t accomplish this unless you make a claim so you can prosecute the prosecutor.. or else u will be in contempt of (their) court..!!! the prosecutor is the agent for the principal “the state” what you require is to see the principal…guess what I don’t think the state is going to show up… will they be wearing pants or skirts? What’s does the principal “the state” claim I owe? What are the damages? What’s do they claim I did? What loss have they incurred? benefit of dismissal is to keep one self-honorable..what one is saying is that if really did something wrong It gives them some time to make a counter claim.

It goes something like this” I wish to have this case dismissed without prejiduce so that any man wants to come forward at anytime in the future for the next 10 ,000 years and move a claim against me doing wrong, I would be more than glad to justifiably compensate that man for anything I have ever done wrong to him as I am here to compensate all but if any man makes a false claim I want to seek compensation from him for me making me waste my time answering a false claim….

384 | P a g e

If they make claims of harm ie my eyes are itchy and my nose is running because of those chickens.. then tell them to hand u a bill… show me a doctor bill of your damages… I am sure you’re not just making a false claim now!!!??i’m sure u have proof u can back up… basically where the harm? where is the loss? where is the damages?

- Dealing with the second dimension in court - if someone has got you contractually pinned down and there is no way out…u have a warrant in debt and they are threating to garnish your salary just simply notice that says I can only pay __( insert what you can truly afford) per month or year because anything more would harm you the man at this time and if I run into more money I will pay this debt off as fast as I can… Because none can the bill you are answering to the bill not the man… hint hint

Never say no in court..if anything do a conditional acceptance like Gordon hall

If a Judge asks one “if the prosecutor would like to proceed?” respond with “ i would like to proceed right to dismissal and if you don’t want to dismiss it with prejudice if not I would like to get some sort of of scheduling fee for me reappearing here and have to come here and take time off work and reappear ..so again I would like to proceed to a dismissal with prejudice because I will come back here if they have a bonafide case against me but if you don’t , I am going to require a scheduling fee, because every one else in the room is getting paid to be here except me and this should be all fair and just as we should all be getting a little something for being here.

Talk to judges on a first name bases.

I don’t care what it says in the 2D fictional world, I’m holding the car in the 3D real physical world. Someone has to come in and claim that what I’m physically in possession of, they should lawfully be in possession, not me. Until then they have no case.

385 | P a g e

The plaintiff must appear in court, so if the state is the plaintiff, mr/mrs state must still physically appear, not just by council.

If the plaintiff accuses us of something, even if we’re already a defendant we have the right to face our acc and cross-examine the plaintiff. Require leave of court and put it in writing. Calm and collected, writing this way we gonna look scaarryyyy.

Understanding judgements When our claim is before the court, require the judge to make the other side answer this claim. Because now the claim is in open court, they have one more chance to argue or contest or deny this claim or forever hold their peace. If not, I demand and require this court to recognize that my claim is a true claim. Once the court recognizes the claim as true, we get our judgement, and we can sell it to a company that buys judgements.

If a prosecutor got a judgement, he has to find a way to execute it, the judge doesn’t execute judgements. The same applies for us, we have to get our judgement and then collect on our own.

A judge is there as witness that our case has merit. And that judgement is for the claimant. The judge has no authority to execute his own judgements.

***Karl presumes something is afoul when he hears judges executing their own judgements by telling the guards to take someone into custody for judgements the state wins. The states should be executing their own judgements, this puts the judge on the side of the state. (conflict of interest)***

If this should happen, ask the judge : you took the proposed order, you converted it INTO an order, and then you rendered judgement, and now you’re the one who’s gonna execute the judgement? Because if I got a judgement of $1Mill against the state of Alabama you would tell me to go collect the judgement on my own.”

386 | P a g e

All the judge is supposed to say is the judgement for the prosecution, next case.

Legal vs Lawful. Legal is code, Lawful is “harm no man”

Never let anyone call u a petitioner… calling u that is them claim godly authority over you. Petition is to pray to a deity.. Petition -don’t be like marc stevens who files complaints!! You want to file claims and be a man!!! -don’t make proposal like lawyers.. order, require and wishes because it’s your court and you’re a man

Thumb print vs. seal - the lentz court requires the magistrate; it come to the attention of said court that the services of _______(insert name)magistrate are available to serve their court; if _____(name) believes he is qualified to ister the affairs of a court of record; his honorable service will please said court..” signed dated and thumb printed. Done - ignore gold seals.. just use thumb prints… gold seals have finger prints of it. Man trumps seal… Man trumps person because he created them.. so man turmps seals for the same reason..

Federal rule 26B-to move your party’s claim that the defense is that get to know any description and nature of any condition or location of any document or anything they can touch or tangible and the location of any person who has knowledge of the wrong… you only compare this rules because its their rules and decision.. you don’t want to use their paperwork.. [cf. Federal rule 26B]

387 | P a g e

How to write to a judge-

The letter should go like this-

Bob, Greetings,

I hear your going to be the civil hearing officer presiding over this matter that’s going to come before you on ______(insert date here ), you go on to explain the rules of your court,

-watch out for “AT” the queen bench in your writings and filings NOT “IN” …as you are in your court at their building.

Don’t use their paperwork for filings as it gives them jurisdiction..you lost control of any aspect of you.. -you’re applying which means your begging..dont!! write your own forms and letters uniquely..so as not to lose status.. - you basically are saying your understand and consent to everything in their world by using their paperwork. DON’T!

-don’t be like marc stevens who files complaints!! You want to file claims and be a man!!! -don’t make proposal like lawyers.. order, require and wishes because it’s your court and you’re a man

- Using "shall" to beat tickets Breaking code = breach of contract. Policy-man enforces policy. They’re presuming that you are under that code, and they’re trying to contract with you (ticket). Gov can’t order a man to do anything …..without just compensation because they cannot compel a man to do

388 | P a g e

anything; they can only propose, and “shall” is a proposition. Until we are under Napoleonic code, then we screwed.

Shall: Shall and will are two of the English modal verbs. They have various uses, including the expression of propositions about the future, in what is usually referred to as the future tense of English. The traditional prescriptive grammar rule stated that, when expressing pure futurity (without any additional meaning such as desire or command), shall was to be used when the subject was in the first person (I or we), and will in other cases. In practice this rule is commonly not adhered to by any group of English speakers, and many speakers do not differentiate between will and shall when expressing futurity, with the use of will being much more common and less formal than shall. In many specific contexts, however, a distinction still continues.

We cannot break a code that uses the word “shall”. Require officer to read code in open court. “Ok I shall”

Attorneys and the supreme court Attorney’s don’t have belief system they use precedent and case law.. They say things like “ i don’t believe this but the Robert’s court of 2006 judge Scolia ruled in blah blah blha…!!” they have to go to someone above them who has established the position of the supreme court

But when as a man establish our position before court we are representative of god.

Attorney’s establish position man has beliefs in court..

To govern is to maintain a positon. As a govern on a boat it maintains the position so you don’t have to steer…

389 | P a g e

The supreme court makes a decision between the president and the congress. The supreme court is not supposed to make ruling between me and bob. Because that’s not within their jurisdiction..

I a man is not under the rule of the supreme court..

It could take u a good 12 years to get a ruling in the supreme court but it always go back to be tried at a court of original jurisdiction…and the judge of that case could say that is a lovely ruling you have there from the supreme court of Alabama but you know what i am going to disregard it because ur in my case ur in my court house my jurisdiction my realm and i am telling u…it means nothing.. the judge is witness an asshole in front of him he won care about how good his supreme court paperwork is he will judge against him…supreme court decision are a waste of time

The constitution and the courts A man doesn’t have to stand up to anybody or anything, a man just makes his claim and somebody has to counter his claim. We didn’t write the constitution/bill of rights/ charter etc. we weren’t there. so don’t cite the constitution. Since we can’t bring in anyone who signed the constitution etc. to testify under oath, to what that document means. To cite that doc we’re not a party to is insane. Imagine your kid coming up to you saying “the constitution says I can stay up past 9pm” you’ll laugh at him. He’s under your domestic jurisdiction, in your house. Not the constitution.

Lawyers are allowed to use the constitution because they cannot voice their opinion, they can only uphold a position from a higher entity than themselves.

A man can be a judge, but a judge can’t be a man.

Just file your paperwork and let that speak for itself.

390 | P a g e

Understanding federal courts Federal means: to pledge. A contract, an agreement. I pledge that I’ll show up at the pledged place to meet this man over this matter. I pledge to meet you at this court in a civil matter.

Smith court meet AT queen’s bench. They’ll modify it to “FAMILY court meet IN queen’s bench”. This will screw us over.

We must be very aware of our paper work and if they’re being changed.

Authenticated certified complete copy of a case file to date. If it’s stylized as an istrative court file (federal/district/family court) then we write back “I’m not addressing this court I did not move my claim in this court why is this court tresing in my court?” how do you believe that the US district court has any right to be in the district court? If you have a claim against me get your own case file. Is this not a public court house? Where two people from different states can meet? So is there a reason you won’t allow me to see the jury and let the jury hear my claim? Is there a reason why you deny me access to this public building?

Call the judge by his first name. he’s not my judge, he’s not my magistrate/honour, he was assigned as magistrate by the US district court, I didn’t assign him. I asked him if he would like to be the magistrate of the lentz court, so I have to presume he does not want to. So he has nothing to do with the lentz court and the lentz court has nothing to do with the US district court. (no affiliation)

Payment options for filing a claim

Your claim is private between you and whomever while you’re doing your istrative process and settle the matter.. But once you file your claim with the clerk and she gives u a case number, it’s public.

391 | P a g e

Say to the court clerk “i require to file a case in the public court house” and show that the other side has been served. clerk says “civil or criminal” Reply” i don’t know about civil or criminal i just know this man done me wrong and under the common law i have the right to use this court house to have this matter heard and tried before the jury ” “They respondent has 21 days to respond so anytime shortly after that i require a jury to be seated and would appreciate it greatly if you could get me an empty room for the trial .” She say it cost $80 You can work out a payment plan or You can use “the courts are free to the King and his subjects” KL says but i would rather pay that have anybody says they did anything for free for me as there is always something attached to it..

How to avoid a trial by ambush

Summons should have the entire case (which there should be a complaint or claim) attached to it… this is a common tactics of the clerks they will keep this info from a defendant.. press the issue and get them on the record saying there is no more paperwork showing up at the trial.. they will throw u under the bus.. they will magically give u the rest or be held liable.. because u have them on the record and there better not be anything new on the day we show up to court.. u have to that evil walk around us!!! Thye need to give u a case with a suit inside of it.. If it went to court and they showed up wth that paperwork you would tell the judge that it was inissible as u were not given any of the documents when i asked the clerk. As a judge he should know that any time you summons someone to court they must be given full disclosure!! Just tell them u got it on tape that the clerk say there is nothing more in the file..

Now if the prosecutors doesn’t show up? There will be a order placed for an arrest warrant for them to show and will be dragged in before this court to answer to it..

392 | P a g e

If we accept the fines and swear to pay a dollar a month till infinity.. cant they come after all that i have in of inheretence for my kids if i die because i still owe them? Do we place a lien to protect our selves next or a trust? I don’t want ot take that debt into the next life..i prefer to move for a discharge…what do you think karl?

If you went to uses Hale V. Hinckle ..just ask are u hale or hinckle..well that is a different case and different circumstance that they may be kinf of similar but they are different..so lets focus on this case and its particulars…this court is not interested in what people said in 1902..at that trial one of the contestants may have stuck his tounge out at the judge and that’s is what did it..we don’t know? so lets not use it!!

If a judge at the beging call him by his name ..man to man conversation with him.. “to be clear as a man to man conversation you want to be called your honr or judge” but now that i am calling you your homnr but know that i am only talking to you as a man” so when i say ‘your honor’ you know i am only talking to you as a man” Section 8-Judgements—mortgage, border crossing, liens, bonds, warrants in deb, judgement collection and odds and ends & WEED. 13pgs

What is ARMS? Anything that a man wears for his defense, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger, to cast at or strike at another. Co. Litt. 1616, 162a; State v. Buzzard, 4 Ark. 18. This term, as it Is used in theconstitution, relative to the right of citizens to bear arms, refers to the arms of a militiaman or soldier, and the word is used in its military sense. The arms of the infantry soldier are the musket and bayonet; of cavalry and dragoons, the sabre, holster pistols, and carbine; of the artillery, the field-piece, siegegun, and mortar, with side arms. The term, in this connection, cannot be made to cover such weapons as dirks, daggers, slung-shots, sword- canes, brass knuckles, and bowieknives. These are not military arms. English v. State, 35 Tex. 476, 14 Am. Rep. 374; Hill v. State, 53 Ga. 472; Fife v. State, 31 Ark. 455, 25 Am. Rep. 556; Andrews v. State, 3 Heisk. (Tenn.) 170, 8 Am. Rep. 8; Aymette v. State, 2 Humph. (Tenn.) 154. Arms, or coat of arms, signifies insignia, i. e., ensigns of honor, such as were

393 | P a g e

formerly assumed by soldiers of fortune, and painted on their shields todistinguish them; or nearly the same as armorial bearings, (q. v.)

Your signature didn’t create the money..your signature and their signature and the and condition created the wealth.. say the mortgage is $1,000,000 lets replace that creation or contract for a $1 million and convert it into a diamond ring i gave the bank( the $1 mill mortgage contract they hold) so i pay them monthly for that diamond.. i exect at the end of the that i will get my diamond back so it can stop being used aganst me… but what the banks are doing is from almost day one under their power of attourney term in the contract have gone and sold your mortgage without u knowing it… well then why are u paying the bank? Should n’t u be paying the holder in due course, which is the person holding your diamond? That’s the trick u want to pay the holder in due course because when ur done u want your diamond back and the bank will not be able to produce it..so u will be able to stop paying the bank…but i am sure the holder in due course does still have a beef!!! Not sure what to do with that

look into master status on license...

Remind boarderguards that ur are moving at ur leisure and not in a commercial capacity because it please me to do so… i don’t need paper work or licenses to move.. Universal Declaration of Human Rights - the United Nations 1948 ….Article 13. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.  (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. 

State: an organized political community living under a single system of government

394 | P a g e

Don’t forget about being a valuable member of society….because they will be the people you will call upon as character witness!! Make sure when u get them to RELINQUISH a bond for the amount you say is fair and you have had the bond verified and at another location or in escrow and then and only then can they come in … they could come in with the bond and potentially leave with that bond saying “you wanted a bond but you didn’t say for how long?” and they could strong arm you and leave with it!! holding that is key and the only control you have!!

If u should find urself stuck at the parole level you need to go back to the inciting moment of the incident and make you claim that they never had jurisdiction… no way around this fact!! Go to the beginning!!!

Be careful what you wish for, what is the timeframe for lawful action against a wrong, understanding contract law, and making it clear that it's your medicine and not marijuana Karl Lentz explains to Mark the dangers of rescinding a contract made with the court in regards to his probation. Doing so could result in him going straight back to jail. Karl says that he's got to go further back to challenge the fact that they never had jurisdiction over the man because no man is going to come forward and say i did anything wrong in the first place. He reminds him of Greg who was stubborn and sent a fourth notice in after working with Karl to have his ankle bracelet taken off immediately, even though Karl warned him against taking such actions, and he wound up straight back in jail. Public servants are there to carry out man's wishes so be careful what you wish for. Karl refers Mark back to the earlier part in his talkshoe where he speaks about the CROWN taking you into a CROWN court with CROWN lawyers and a CROWN judge and how he could have used what he said there as his defence. He goes on to explain that if it was him in Mark's situation and the CROWN wanted to charge him with something he would say that he wants it dealt with immediately. If a wrong has been committed it must be taken care of right away, and if he needs to compensate someone he did a wrong to he'll do it now. Not in six months or a year like in statutory court, but now. If they say that's not how we do things around here, then you move your claim against them right away. Like a man in Canada did. He was charged and arrested on saturday and came in on monday with the bill for following all of the officer's orders and they dropped all the charges. Mark says that he may have made an agreement with the court to do urine tests and all that, but no longer wishes to do that. Karl recommends that he ask the prosecutor for a trial because at that point you were processed without a trial and then bring yiur claim into it and flip it…..!!. He explains that even if you didn't write up the document that got him released on probation, he signed it last and in contract law that means that it's his document and that he's fully liable for it because he had the option to make changes to it, but signed it the way that it was. Karl Lentz tells Mark that he should have made it crystal clear to the prosecutor and judge that he has no marijuana, just his medicine. If anyone wants to say that he does have marijuana, let them put their

395 | P a g e

hand on a bible and swear that's what he has is marijuana , and that he, a man, is not allowed to have marijuana.

The cops take your car … file a claim against the man who took your car… he stole your car.. by way of theft… He will say he is an officer..i don’t care if you are an officer what are u doing in another mans car? Primary and foremost you owe a duty and obligation not to cause harm to your fellow man. Did you enter that man cars without his permission…? Then you are liable!!!

The only time the warrant works without a bond is if we’re BOUND (if we’re “defendant” or “citizen” etc.). but because we’re not part of this big happy family/nation, I’ve got my own family/nation, so I don’t recognize your warrant.

Don’t file any idols (flags/seals/symbols/crests etc.)

When ur selling your car privately and its $5000.. ask the man to get a bond for $5000 and if the bond is called in because he didn’t pay.. then the bondsman can chase u around. If u don’t do this u could be left with just a few payments on a vehicle and the person could write your car off and now you have to chase this guy into court toget a judgement and then a warrant in debt. Save yourself the headache get a bond.. The bondsman sets his own rate.. they have to work that out with the bonds man..

And then u can start accepting payments without using the bank and its can be set up as a private contract so government can’t even look at it.. set fine for disclosing the details of the contract to anyone other than the two parties g the contract.

Understanding void judgements

396 | P a g e

Void judgment just means it never existed. That nobody has the jurisdictional capacity to make such a judgement against I the man. And I can’t be held liable. File a void judgement in the same court the judgement was first placed on us. We basically make a claim that they had no jurisdictional authority to make such a judgement against I. the other side can challenge our belief, that the judgement they had rendered against I was a legitimate judgement and should stand as true. We’re asking the same judge that he has no jurisdiction over us.

Don’t play around with void judgements, don’t do appeal courts. Pull them into the court of record with a claim.

Presscopy hearing - Don’t use this term…just use the word order or just notice the individual and ask him to answer to your claim. ie. tell the clerk that “i” would like to place a notice with the court i would like for you to summons the defendant to appear and explain why he should or shouldn’t appear let him demur let him answer… send him a notice…”look dude u stepped on my toes here is the bill see exhibit a ( the hospital bill) here is the itemized statement bill see exhibit b and i want compensation of this much money see exhibit c ( how much you want) it is also a preliminary hearing a week before the trial..this is where one sits in the judges chambers and work out the rules and claims and arguments. presscopy is an old term …it’s more like a demur

Demur DEMUR, verb intransitive [Latin To stay or delay.] 1. To stop; to pause; to hesitate; to suspend proceeding; to delay determination or conclusion. On receiving this information, the minister demurred, till he could obtain further instructions. 2. In law, to stop at any point in the pleadings, and rest or abide on that point in law for a decision of the cause. Thus, the defendant may demur to the plaintiffs declaration, alledging it to be insufficient in law; the plaintiff maydemur to the defendants plea, for a like reason. DEMUR, verb transitive To doubt of.

397 | P a g e

DEMUR, noun Stop; pause; hesitation as to the propriety of proceeding; suspense of proceeding or decision. All my demurs but double his attacks.

How to handle a lien If one feels someone has placed a lien on you in error. One can require a hearing and they can make their presentment to the court… if someone says u have to pay child . write back saying that you only have access to only 30 dollars a month and if there is anything else of value in which you will accept as payment for the debt. (this make u stay in honor) In which 1. U claim is true 2. And that you believe i owe to you and now you are claiming is past due.

Anyone comes at you telling you that you owe a debt.. you say what you can honestly pay… the best u can do..and they have to accept that…because to do more would be to cause harm to i the man

This will stop garninshment this will stop warrant in debt.. all debts!!

Or you can conditionally accept upon proof of a verifiable claim

398 | P a g e

How to reclaim your status as a man File our notice of error: We made a mistake of answering as a defendant before, because we do not have the capacity. We were just made aware that we’re not the defendant. I’m sorry I wasted the court’s time and energy. At once time I thought it was a great benefit to be a defendant, at present I maintain that I hold constructive possession of said article, constructive possession (one time I believed it was in my best interest to possess this thing), now it’s become constructive tres ( I wish it to be gone but it won’t leave). I on this date believe I’ve erred back on (date). For I believe I was in a state of disequilibrium and incapacitation to have made such a wish, for the go between is to bind my person with said article, so today august.19th I wish for the immediate removal of said article from property and I.

From this date after whomever he or she sayeth said article is to remain about thy person will be the causal agent of tres to property and will be held liable for monetary compensation for damages. From day forth (date) whomever comes and says that that article is to remain on my person on my property will be the cause of tres on me and my property and will be held liable for compensation.

a man is a bondsman holding the bond for the defendant Like u holding the liability for your child The quiet title is if you want to claim abandoned property effectively. Just to make sure it’s free and clear before putting a lot of sweat equity into something only to find out someone else has a claim on it.

Trial of the regicides

Karl learned from this movie how to answer properly in court by watching the attourney who was on trial was the only one would answer the court correctly by requiring leave of court and a pen and piece of paper write down his answer and place his proper answer before the court..WRITE YOUR RESPONSE AND SIGN IT!! when u say i require leave the judge will ask “How long?”…

399 | P a g e

only a man can require means To demand; to ask, as of right and by authority. lawyers request because of their diminished capacity and status..lol

Irreparable..stay away form this word..it means they cant fix the problem with monetary compensation because it would be futile. Stay awy from the four syllabels words

The quiet title is if you want to claim abandoned property effectively. Just to make sure it’s free and clear before putting a lot of sweat equity into something only to find out someone else has a claim on it.

How to cross a border as a man port (at border patrol on a flight you have a contract) and driver’s license are the same deal… if an agent ask u for one’s port.. reply with the classic “do you require me to have a port to move form piece of land to another? So you as a man are going to interfere with my right to move from this point on planet earth to over that gate to the other point on this planet earth? Rental cars have contracts and operate under contracts that require driver licenses diminishing your capacity. They may sauy the DHS is preventing you…well you say if i a man in this common law land drag this matter before the court your telling me the DHS will testify that i cant cross!!?? And attorneys can’t make a claim in that court… the plaintiff must appear and tell me i can’t go from point a to point b because i am causing harm…who am i in the DHS causing harm too? Who is incurring financial loss?

Just claim the man status and opt out…

Understanding a common law lien Common law lien does not have to be recorded..its in your head and if any one ask where it is recorded reply with” i will press it on the record wherever i am summons to appear…

400 | P a g e

It is the most superior lien you will ever have… This works well for protecting against credit card companies macy’s things of that nature because you know they are never going to be able to press the record and the man will be able too 

How to remove a misdemeanor and the need for a third party impartial witness By having a misdemeanor places on our name it’s causing I the man harm. If you don’t remove it I’m gonna have to make a claim against the man who’s in control of that. If someone’s doing something/not doing something according to their policies and procedures, and it’s doing I the man harm, then sure it might be their policies and rules put there for benefit for society and general good, is still doesn’t negate the fact that it’s causing I the man harm, and that you need to cease and desist immediately. Misdemeanors info can be found at vital statistics, so file our notice with them first. If they respond back with “you need a court order”, at that point we pull the man out of the person and say BOBBY at this point you’re telling me NO right? You a man and you understand that this is causing me financial loss but you don’t care. So now you’re making yourself liable for causing me injury/financial loss. Is that how you’re going to stand in court? I’m giving you fair warning, is this your story? Are you just gonna sit there and follow orders knowing that you’re hurting a man? You have to stop. You’re intentionally doing wrong. You can’t hurt a man just because someone told you to, and I’m telling you you’re hurting I a man!”

Seizure is a good thing Seized means all lawful remdies were exhausted..ie trial by jury happened and then seizure to place..so it’s a good thing… Stay away from Seized use robbed me of property and require the immediate restoration of property. See exhibit A

SEIZE, verb transitive 1. To fall or rush upon suddenly and lay hold on; or to gripe or grasp suddenly. The tiger rushes from the thicket and seizes his prey. A dog seizes an animal by the throat. The hawk seizes a chicken with his claws. The officer seizes a thief. 2. To take possession by force, with or without right. At last they seize The scepter, and regard not David's son. Milton.

401 | P a g e

3. To invade suddenly; to take hold of; to come upon suddenly; as, a fever seizes a patient And hope and doubt alternate seize her soul. Pope. 4. To take possession by virtue of a warrant or legal authority. The sherif seized the debtor's goods; the whole estate was seized and confiscated. We say, to arrest a person, to seize goods. 5. To fasten; to fix. In seaman's language, to fasten two ropes or different parts oof one rope together with a cord. To be seized of, to have possession; as a griffin seized of his prey. A B was seized and possessed of the manor of Dale. To seize on or upon, is to fall on and grasp; to take hold on; to take possession.

Notice of recission Rescission is an equitable remedy and is discretionary. A court may decline to rescind a contract if one party has affirmed the contract by his action (see Long v Lloyd [1958] 1 WLR 753) or a third party has acquired some rights or there has been substantial performance in implementing the contract.

“I a woman (name) claim that there exists a contract also known as a safety plan between the parties of (name) and Harrisburg social services department see exhibit A; I declare henceforth from this day (date) the world is to take notice that said contract 1) provides no benefit to neither I nor my person and is a causal source of harm 2) it lacks the capacity to compel performance from I or my person 3) it lacks the power to force I or my person to be bound to perform under any and all of its and conditions.

Herein let it be known that if there be any man or woman who wishes to make his or her claim known that said contract has capacity to bind I or my person let them come forth now with a verifiable claim and deny said notice or forever hold their peace”

Yes there’s a contract, at one time I thought it was a good contract, now 1 I don’t see any benefit, 2 there’s no one on this planet who can force/compel me to perform, 3 no one can bind me to it. if someone believes they can bind me to it, let him make his presence known to court.

402 | P a g e

Who thinks they can harm a man and get away with it?

Make a claim. Give the public servant notice, putting them on notice, “back off and do your job public servant, I do not require your services at this time. Let me alone”

Affidavits

Affidavits are just paperwork that’s filed but not sworn in on the record. It maybe one day one man or woman may show up and en viva voce and press the record, until then it’s just the written word of man, not the spoken word of man. So it’s not true. And can be denied. If I’m ordered to speak this into court I will.

That’s why visa cards can give affidavits. If we ever see a 2D entity on affidavit, we just have to say “I wish for the man or woman who sworn that affidavit to come to court and speak this into the record. If no one comes forward then it is untrue.” This document has no spine, no backbone, it won’t stand up in court.

“affidavit” is their mystical magical word, let’s not use it. it’s legalese. For us, it’s a CLAIM. We don’t want them to mistake us as one of them, by using their language. Always claim ignorance when they throw legalese at us. “an affi what? Daffy duck?, oh you mean a statement that is true? You mean a claim?”

Non acceptance of your best effort payments means the debt no longer exists

Do our best effort to pay, they decline it, case closed. I tried to pay, you refused to take my payment, see exhibit A, B, C etc. The UCC says its too but its not ours too use..U may [cf.] What else do they want i sent a payment that they didn’t accept it.

403 | P a g e

Case closed there is no more controversy.. They are trying to collect something that doesn’t exist..the debt is gone because as soon as they said they refused to accept ISABELLA DESANTOS one’s payment then its game over. One has the right to be let alone.

Motion for sanctions This is legalese.. this is to maintain status quo .. the existing order to be held. And claim its frivolous and place sanctions for more silly behaviour.

Order a lien or garnishment to be lifted You get a lien… U don’t know this person who lien you up You write i am going to require u to come to court and explain why you put the lien on me in the flesh as i have the right to face my acc before the court where the lien has been recorded. You write i order the lien to be lifted; if there is a man who wants to make a counter order and said the lien not be lifted let him come before the court now or forever hold their peace. This holds true for garnishments. You have the right to have a trial and face the man or woman who has liened or a garnished salary thy property.

Using a process server It is worth the money using a process server. They do great documents, look professional etc.

404 | P a g e

How to restore your weed from the police Police officer take your property [weed] say “ i a man require the immediate return of property, unles u bob(policeman) have a vested interest in it’ do you have a receipt proving u bought some of this?or did the county buy some of this?or you think i didn’t pay taxes on it? Show me your vested interest in it??!! Because i would be glad to compensate anyone with a vested interest” Tell the cop” if you have a vested interest in this property bring a claim forward.” They may say “it’s a controlled substance” show your ignorance and lack of understanding of their words and right form the beginning and say” yes it was in my control in a plastic bad in my car until this man robbed its was under my control” “how was it not under control was it out there in the public causing a menace?” “it was under my control not out in public and under my authority my power” “it wasn’t out there in the public hurting anybody was it?” “that’s my property”

“if any bank try to foreclose on any more people in new York state, the attorneys are gonna have to come forth under oath and affirmation in open court, and swear that everything that the bank is saying is true. And any attorney is going to be held liable to damages”

Private contracts, and declaratory judgements Small clause in contract to keep it private “Anybody who brought this into a court has to pay a million dollars to the other party.” They want to settle this? It must be settled in a private education process, not public.

If the party doesn’t show up, get a summary judgement. In law, a summary judgment (also judgment as a matter of law) is ajudgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial. Such a judgment may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case.

405 | P a g e

No one can force anyone in a private contract to disclose anything publicly. Nobody can force somebody to disclose the information of a private contract into the public regardless of what that contract is about. No power on this planet can force open a private contract where the parties involved don’t want it opened. i.e. marriage contract, the state can intervene because the state is part of the contract through marriage license.

If we have the ability to be there at the beginning to write the contract, put severe penalties into the contract for disclosure. If we have a controversy that truly exists, between I and someone who really doesn’t want to come forward and get involved, we’re just going to propose this complaint where we just whine about something to a man in a black robe, and the man in the black robe just says “if this controversy ever appears in this court, and if what you’re saying is true and accurate, HERE is what this court would decide: this ruling is not binding on anybody, it’s just an opinion of what this court may do if these parties were to appear before us.” Then we can take that and go to the other side to scare them, “this is what would happen if I were to sue you, so let’s settle this privately”

Call their bluff, require the original note (contract for mortgage), the contract is the law, bring the law before the court. Offer to pay in full if the note can be produced. Don’t accept a COPY, require the wet-ink original. The copy will have all the routing numbers and fiken numbers are redacted (blacked out). Redact rɪˈdakt/Submit verb past tense: redacted; past participle: redacted edit (text) for publication. "a confidential memo which has been redacted from 25 pages to just one paragraph" censor or obscure (part of a text) for legal or security purposes. We can go to the attorney general or the bank “where are those numbers? What did you do with it? I want those numbers to see what was been done with this note through the commercial process to know what you’ve done with it. did you monetize it? did you securitize it? what did you do with the note? Who has possession of it? has anyone made a claim on it to the insurance company? If so have the IRS or Treasury Dept. claimed a loss?” Dereliction of duty claim

406 | P a g e

So government worker isn’t doing their job… well file a claim.. “they have a duty and obligation in which they ascribe too. This lady named Susy xxxx . Suzy xxxx has been in dereliction of duty in which she is failing to perform a service or function in which society pays her to perform. By her failure to perform in a duty in which she is acquiring public funds to do her job she is causing i a man harm”

When u drag them before a court u ask her before a jury how she can collect income from the public and not perform the job asked of her?

U go to small claims court but don’t file a small claim..don’t let them minimize ones claim..it is just a claim!!

Don’t call anyone..write letters!!! Use a process sever to even serve letters..

If ur car gets damaged because of pot holes. U can sue the city for being derelict in their duties!

Ascribe: verb (used with object), ascribed, ascribing. 1.to credit or assign, as to a cause or source; attribute; impute: The alphabet is usually ascribed to the Phoenicians. 2.to attribute or think of as belonging, as a quality or characteristic: They ascribed courage to me for something I did out of sheerpanic. DERELICT, adjective [Latin To leave.] Left; abandoned. DERELICT, noun 1. In law, an article of goods, or any commodity, thrown away, relinquished or abandoned by the owner. 2. A tract of land left dry by the sea, and fit for cultivation or use.

407 | P a g e

- Process servers, and using a box on your paperwork

Use a process server pay $50 and stop messing around.. using a box around your documents is to say nothing is to enter this doc and nothing is to leave this document!! It’s a line of demarcation. No more marks, its trapped, its sealed. U could fill the entire thing with squiggly lines if u didn’t trust the people.. U can also put squiggly lines going down so that if anybody adds to the document u can see the wrote through the line.. Everything is negotiable…..

IF UR AR CHARGED WITH UTTERING A FORGED INSTRUMENT FROM A PUBLIC TRUST ALL U HAVE TO DO IS SYA IT WAS DONE FROM A PRIVATE COMMON LAW TRUST AND SINCE IT DOESN’T HAVE TO BE ED AND THE BENEFICIARIES DON’T HAVE TO BE NOTIFIED YOU CAN GET OUT OF It.None is claiming harm or loss or injury in common law!!

Dealing with garnished wages

Send a letter to the pay roll lady and ask for the court order… if they don’t have a court order then u make a claim against the company and sue.. because they have no right to release to anyone without a court order.. so they are liable. They cannot discharge your property without consent! That was a contract between u and them…and u have never allowed any third party interloper to istrate in my property

extra goodie...The City of London has a unique political status, a legacy of its uninterrupted integrity as a corporate city since the Anglo-Saxon period and its singular relationship with the Crown….

The monarchy of the United Kingdom, commonly referred to as the British monarchy, is the constitutional monarchy of the United Kingdom and its overseas territories. The monarch's title is "King" (male) or "Queen" (female). The current monarch and head of state, Queen Elizabeth II, ascended the throne on the death of her father, King George VI, on 6 February 1952.

408 | P a g e

This basically shows us that someone has titled The Queen which means she has been crowned having somebody else has crowned her and you look no further than the crown and who is the crown well who titled her last look at her coronation. She is the monarch of the crown but not the crown itself!!! The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the 4th day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament), the Archbishop standing before her shall ister the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,

so vatican titled her queen and that makes them the power. as they are the king and queen makers!!!

London is a city state of who?? ROME

rome is money and government that operates under the crown is operating under commercial and that is iralty law (canada and usa clearly do both are common law nations)

The powers generally understood to belong to the Attorney General at common law have been summarized as follows: 1st. To prosecute all actions, necessary for the protection and defense of the property and revenues of the crown.

409 | P a g e

Man, a Creature endued with reason. Used in a lose sense, for any one;

a male-child grown to ripe age, and full stature; or a name of sex set against woman, Act.8,3.

This word [Man] cometh of the Hebrew “ish”, in respect of heat, valour, nobleness and dignity, whereby man excelleth; also of “”, which signifieth earth. This latter is given to the baser sort, and the former to the noble sort of people, Psal.49.2. & 4.3. see Isa.2.9.

Also note, that man is sometime called enosh, which is, a doleful sorrowful man, a wretched one, to put us in mind of our misery, as Adam noteth our mortality, that we are earth, &c. Psal.8.4, & 9.20. where the Original word is Enosh, that is, silly or sorry man.

Both man and woman; better sex used for both sexes. Psal.1.1. Blessed in the man.

One complete and full of true knowledge of God, and of holiness, without any least want or defect. Eph.4.13. To meet together to a perfect man. In 1 Cor.13.11. It signifieth one of a constant and perfect age in Christ. Also, Eph.4.13. Where the Church is likened unto one man of ripe age, to declare the unity thereof, and that every member of the Church feeling it self unperfect, must strive to full perfection, which doctrine every one should apply himself;

The body which is but one part of a man. 2 Cor.4.16. 'Though our outward man perish.' (see temporal and eternal man)

410 | P a g e

“Here then is the great difference betwixt the Temporal and the Eternal, That the one is the end, and the other but the means; the eternal is the end of man, but of the temporal, man himself is the end. The eternal is man's utmost perfection, and his perpetual happiness : the temporal only to be made use of, for obtaining the eternal; so as the eternal, being our end, is to be loved and desired for itself, the temporal to be made no of, but as it may conduce to the obtaining of the eternal.

Interloper INTERLO'PER, noun One who runs into business to which he has no right; one who interferes wrongfully; one who enters a country or place to trade without license.

Don’t ask if u can take pictures u are a man u don’t ask this is your castle!! When asked “do you have any Canadian or US money?” We say “why would I have bob’s or suzie’s or anyone elses’ money in my possession? If I had someone’s money I’d give it back to them. I only have my own property.” They ask “how much money do you believe is here?” (dodge it like a politician, don’t answer their question, answer the question we wished that they would’ve asked) We say “all I know is that I exist, and only God knows what is true. I don’t know what’s on that table. The only truth I know is God. How much money do YOU believe is there?” Don’t confess, try to bring out the man. Keep it funny.

411 | P a g e

When u do get your claim in place an order asking her to show who the claimant is? (point to you acknowledging you the man because only a man can make a claim)” Simply invite the mortage company to your court and they will know the rules of engagement which are to produce the original wet ink signature note. U don’t have to explain the rules to them…if they don’t produce it that’s there problem because you are going to be requiring to see that original note!!

- Foreclosures

What debt? The debt is paid?

That places the burden on the banks to show they have incurred a loss..they can’t!! say you paid of the mortage ages ago.. they will say that’s not true because this piece of paper say its not… reply “let me see that piece of paper grow vocal cords and say that in open court? (you have the right to face your acc)” ask the lawyer if they will in open court that you owe them?” the lawyers will say “no way”

the other more honorable strategy is to pay them what you can pay? Make them an offer..and u know if they refuse your best offer!!!!”” it will be your house..but stay honorable offer again your best and if they still which i doubt they will..but if not take the house and get out of there

the other tactic is if you blow this banking system they will come back and want land rights or they will just bugger off to Africa and level the playing field out and turn America back in a third world nation..( Speculation but food for thought when using this stuff) ( i personally would like to see it without the 1 % in control…we might be pleasantly surprised)

If you have exhausted all remedies with them to pay your best effort!! Don’t forget your equitable claim for all the sweat equity you placed in the home for security of the building and up keep.

412 | P a g e

If a bank is trying to sell your house… well they are in essence saying the own the house because you can’t sell something you don’t own.. so then this is when you send them the bill for all the up keep!!

If they want to be owner and make you squatter…well turn yourself into a security guard and bill ‘em!!

When u file a clain your putting there complaint as exhibit A and exhibt B your taken property and if its intangible like oyur reputation maybe placing an affidavit stating that your reputation was sullied by this act” also get a witness to testify as to the changes that have happened to you as a result of this incident.like u lost clients!! And show the cause and effect…get a witness!!show the actual loss!!

If your reputation was sullied you better prove it…bring in the someone who wouldn’t work with you after the fact!! Don’t bring in no spread sheet because that speculation and circumstantial!!you need the voice of man… Bring in the party that left you!!

So if you have employees just fire them without a reason!! The moment u have a reason they have a lawsuit to counter it!! Don’t give them something to counter!!

The banks probably have actuaries predicting when is the best time to pull this mortage scam off again like they did 60 years ago because people are forgetful

Why don’t drug dealers ever find out the game all the way to the end? The play it up until the cops arresting them? then what? You’re at the mercy of a lawyer and the system!? Unless ur jonh gotty…

413 | P a g e

People need to read their contracts and learn to modify them!!! Employeer give you a contract u modify and send it back and make them not even see what they signed the names too… when he signs his contract and doesn’t realize that if he tries to sue you that the contract screws the company instead!!

“How much money do you believe is there?” they are trying to get you to convict yourself!!! Avoid the land mine!!

what’s in front of you is my property and i know that there isn’t any other man here that can make a claim for that property” They could just take the money and beat the crap out of you but some will play the game honorably!

Regarding bonds and mortgage

If you have a mrogtage with a bank and you have used those promissory notes to pay off your debt…make sure after they have received the payment to send them a letter with your needs … Hello bank,

i require for my records that the payment has been tendered in full and that there is no longer an outstanding debt.

thanks or ask them if Joe ( or whomever is the man or woman) debt has been satisfied yes or no? if no why do they believe the debt is not satisfied after you sent them the following intrustment exhibit a [the promissory note] ..it is really important to me so please get back to me immediately. it hurts not to ask so ask!!! make sure you send them a blank envelop with a blank piece of paper with an envelope with a stamp on it..

this is also a practice to be used when dealing with correspondence via the courts…just ask the clerk to place everytihgn thing including your empty envelope with your address on it

414 | P a g e

back in to a time stamped court envelop and they will send it out in their outgoing box… if you are dealing with several people make sure you sned them all their own personalized version and cc everyone else.. yes they will get 3 letters of the same letters just with different names…

- Karl's encounter with the Canadian border patrol, and recognizing extortion

Government agents like to arrest u without pressing charges. Simply let them know u don’t need a rest.. If the insist of giving u a rest… u say no that everything that i do form this point forward is against my will and wishes and u will have to order me to to anything.I am more than willing to do what ever they want because ur going to get compensated..because ur a man and i am a man and i have done no wrong.. and two u have a gun.. Ask them after its all said and done did i carry out all your orders? Get a nice yes from them and recorded it if u can !! They have no power over you…they have power over visitors because of the immigration act so don’t take the title of visitor citizen or traveler..always just be a man…

Karl thinks human and man is the same thing???

Officer think that immigration act or other acts give them the right but it actually gives them duties and obligations..not rights to do wat they want over man … Does the immigration say what?? U mean it reads? Did u create it? Do u know what that means? Do u want to be held liable for this a a man that ur sure it applies to a man?

Show me where the immigration act expressly says u jim smith to touch me robin Mitchell??

415 | P a g e

When making a lawyer your co counsil don’t let them speak for you.. most will recuse themselves..they were only there usually to throw u under the bus..

Some prosecutors want to threaten u saying if you do this now it will be beter thsn if u waut six months when we are going to do whatever their threart is…IF THEY PUT IT IN WRITING AND TRY TO ALL U DO IS FILE A CLAIM OF EXTORTION… In Canada they put it this extortion in writing. And if u fell for this u file a claim and say u only acted before of the fear the extortion created… Plus all these deals are false because a judge can turn around and sentence u whatever they want

When they are trying to sell your house at an auction make sure you go.. and witness that you were the highest bidder not the bank and when the lawyer goes and testify differently because the bank won’t appear and no will the lawyer , he will be up poop creek without a paddle because he will lie that he was at a auction that you and 5 other witness will attest he wasn’t at!! - Obstruction of justice charges “I have the right to remain silent until I have an attorney present OR I see the charges brought before me, because I know anything I say right now can be used against me” we are presuming that when the police lights are on we are under arrest. “I require to be taken in front of the magistrate right now, wake him up”

If we get charged with “obstruction of justice” ask them who or what is “justice”. I didn’t see anyone named Justice that I obstructed. How did I get in the way of him or her? Are you saying I obstructed a word? Did I obstruct a verb or a noun? If I got in the way of justice, I’m sorry about that. Who’s this justice so I can compensate them? I was just moving my property from point a to point b, and I sure don’t like it if someone gets in my way. Show me the damages that justice incurred from my obstructing him or her. Please specify how much of his or her justice did I obstruct? Show me the bill of particulars so I can compensate this justice, and show me how you arrived at those numbers. How can I give you back some justice? (this is all in writing)

In the court room we are in public domain, so we are under public control. They have jurisdiction of the area over wrong-doers.

416 | P a g e

Maritime law? What are we on a boat?

Does a snail need a permit to dig? They are self-governed as I am. Order me to speak so I can be compensated, I don’t have to talk to any man I don’t want to.

If ur the primary lien holder..ur first in line first in time…so ask for the debt so that u can use it to collect on your debt…this will freeze them in line..because ur goig to have the lien on your sister property which they want behind ur established lien with her..go to the records office and make it official..ur beats there and u still remain to be paid $1 million before they get paid..u ll testify in any court and ur sister will back it up..so how can they get you if u block them… Sherriff must execute warrants on debt or they become liable for the debt because they are perceived to be working with the person… If your government has tresites with another nation they can extridict you…but notice that native amiercans never get extridicted because there is no treaty allowing such extridictions of their people whne they run into the reserves!!

If u owe a ridiculous debt just make a payment plan that wont harm you!!!

When asked “do you have any Canadian or US money?” We say “why would I have bob’s or suzie’s or anyone elses’ money in my possession? If I had someone’s money I’d give it back to them. I only have my own property.” They ask “how much money do you believe is here?” (dodge it like a politician, don’t answer their question, answer the question we wished that they would’ve asked) We say “all I know is that I exist, and only God knows what is true. I don’t know what’s on that table. The only truth I know is God. How much money do YOU believe is there?” Don’t confess, try to bring out the man. Keep it funny.

417 | P a g e

Where’s the law that says I a man have to confess and tell you everything I did? Where’s it say that I a man have to take pen and paper and confess all money I made this year? I didn’t say CITIZEN, I didn’t say TAXPAYER, I said MAN

Collection agencies …just do the same thing…look for a man or woman and then you are good… …ie… who is the man or woman who is trying to communicate with me?

Do sweat anybody listening to your phone calls in prison… u just tell them to testify in court as a man…bob( guard listening in) do u say that me talking on the phone caused u some harm? He should say” NO the united states doesn’t allow …” respond with” the united states who is the united states a man or woman???or can u show me the injury harm or loss to the united states?”

If charged with assault apologize…..

An application form for a credit card is not a contract! A form can not have duel purposes as every form has to have its only individual capacity. There is no such thing as a Dual prupose form in good law.. so simply ask for the a”credit agreement” that u know u have never signed and can never produce and will send u bugger off letter “i require that u send us the authorization for the standing order” Much like insurance companies..they run a rackets of not actually providing u with insurance protection because no contract was ever produced… now u can ask for the contract ( don’t stop paying or youll be in dishonor) and bring the insurance company to court if they don’t produce the contract because u are actually driving without insurance and they will say they cant find the contract when ur insurance gets to crazy for them… use the same lawful play back at them and hold them liable for not providing a service and collecting money from your bank …give them 14 days to pay it back or this is Fraudulent Practices!! So how ever long u have had insurance and paid it without getting the service u ask for the lump sum of it back… KL – PERSON KL: a person is a man, no, no, a person is a man, a man isn’t a person. A man could be on Gilligan’s island, and live on a private island and he’s got no duty, he’s got no title ascribed

418 | P a g e

to him in which he can be imposed in which he fails to perform that duty. No. a person is a man, but no, a man does not have to be a person. Guest: a person is a man. KL: wait, wait, like a man can be a judge, but a judge is definitely a man – person. Do you see what I’m saying? A person is a man, a judge is a man, Guest: I heard on like one of your shows before, I think you are talking about like that show, what you are saying there. But it comes down to what you believe. Right? ----------------------------------------------KL: I had to do that when Bali went to court. Because he kept saying he’s a man, and they kept saying is the person known as, and he kept saying he’s a man. Is the man is the person – Oh, shit. They were like fine if the person is failing – will not appear at this time, * they were like, like when’s the next date on the docket, it was oh, hell no. I’m jumping up and I’m going to say no, the person known as Bali Mann is here. I said I aint playing this f’ing game. I said, I’m not coming back to merry old England man, in 3 months, 6 months, I aint doing it, we are getting it done today. So we jumped up or I jumped up and said can I aid and assist this court? They were like who the hell are you? I said, oh I’m from the United States, I’m here to aid and assist the court blah, blah, blah. And then I just basically said he is a person, there is a person known as Bali Mann in court today, and I said, but I said I think, I’m trying to what her title was but she was the lady (legal adviser probably) I don’t know, Bali probably knows what her title was. But (maybe a legal adviser if it was magistrate court, should be a legal adviser) Well, ya, there was a jurist that sat up high, and a magistrate that sat on a lower level, ya, so she was either a court clerk, right, she was somebody. But all I is when I, he is a person, but the only problem is he is not a person within your legal society. I said you are not following me are you. Okay, a person is a man, who owes a duty and an obligation * to society and if he fails within those duties or obligations within that society, that society may impose upon him. I said the only problem is he does not believe that he is a person within the legal society, he is in a society but it is not the legal society. And this is a legal matter before this court today, and this court has no jurisdiction over the man. Yes they have jurisdiction over the person, but he is here to inform the court that he is not that person. So, the lady is like okay, I’ll go tell the judge all this. And ya, tell him I wrote a law dictionary, so * just doesn’t think I’m some crack pot *. You are there in person but not a person to their legal society. I am a person to society, but not to your society. This is a legal matter, I am not a person within the legal society. And if you give me a chance I’ll explain it to the court today. And like I said the judge knows what the f I’m doing.

KL: what Bali was doing in court was hysterical. It was funny, he got the one trick, pulled the rabbit out of the hat. And then the judge want and said something else, and Bali, ah, he said I’m not a person I’m a man. And Bali, again he pulled the rabbit out of the hat. And then the judge said something else. Had nothing to do with the answer that Bali was coming up with next. And Bali, pulled the rabbit out of the hat, again. And it’s like, Bali go to the next trick, go to the next trick, go to the next trick. And he didn’t know how to do anything other than

419 | P a g e

pull the rabbit out of the hat. It’s like holy shit. It’s like oh dude, he doesn’t know what the f – he’s f’ing freezing up here. And then that’s when I jumped up. And I said may aid and assist this court. And the court clerk said and who are you? I said I’m the next friend, I’m the next of – next friend for the man before you at this time. And they said hum, and how to wish to aid and assist this court? I said you’re looking for the person known as Bali raj Mann? Yes. The person known as Bali raj Mann is now present before this court. Bali is like looking at me, like no, I thought I was only man. I said shut the f up, I got this. I said I’m not coming back to f’ing merry old England cause this guy is about to f’ing reschedule this trial in six months, and I aint coming f’ing back. It’s over today. I’m going the f home. I didn’t come all the way over here to postpone this shit. I came over here to finish this f’ing thing now. That’s the way I do things, I want it done and I want it done now. I’ve got to get back home, I have too much shit to do. I aint go time to play this f’ing game with you people. So the court said how is this person before the court. The person is before the court as well as the man. The person and the man are both before this f’ing court. HOW IS THAT? If a person has duty and obligation according to his rank within a society, which he has certain duties and obligations which he must behold, and if he fails within those duties that he ascribe to, the society may f’ing impose upon him, such as penalties, fines, jail , death, whatever. The only problem is the person in whom you seek, is not a member of the legal society. And I believe you have a legal claim, legal criminal complaint against this man before the court this day. Yes. Well this man is an idiot at legalese, he does not speak legalese, he is not a member of the legalese (LEGAL SOCIETY), nor is any of the other individuals in this court summons to appear today a member of your society. Thank God their skin is brown. It’s going to make my job a lot easier to prove to this court, that they are not proper Englishmen. They have no duty or obligation to act in any way, in any manner your society subscribes, cause they do not ascribe to your society, because they are Punjabi. I guarantee you if they violated or committed any crime against the Punjabi society, they will be dealt as such. But is said you have no jurisdiction, control of Punjabi. Because he is not of your society. They are idiots when it comes to legalese. But yes the persons you seek before the court, but persons of the Punjabi society, not of the legal British, UK, crown society. Yes, they are persons, but not to your society, not to their society, but to their own society to which they have done no wrong. And I said there is no man, that is going to come forth to this day and take that stand and testify, today that I have done anything wrong to any man of any society. Persons yes, man no. and this is a common law land? Yes. Than they invoke the right to have the f’ing man come forward move their f’ing case against them. And that will never happen. So are they guilty as charged? You better believe it. But are they guilty of doing anything wrong. No, they owe no debt to no man. And they have no debt to the crown, because they can’t be guilty, they can’t hold a debt to the crown because they don’t even know the crown, the rules, the bylaws. They don’t ascribe, there’s no document that’s going to prove they are a member of the legal society. (That’s right) So then the judge is like, and who are you again? It’s like my name is Karl Lentz.

Person is a man / man is not a person Judge is a man / man acts as judge

420 | P a g e

Homeowner's Association issues, your property on someone else's property

…u sign you’re liable…

Section 9- Glossary

421 | P a g e

I found a cool definition of Common Law in a 1765 Dictionary by Nathan Bailey: Common Law, is either 1. Simply the Law of the Land, without any other addition. 2. The Law more generally before any Statute was made to alter it. Or, 3. The King's Court, distinguished from both inferior Courts. Constitution CONSTITUTION, noun 1. The act of constituting, enacting, establishing, or appointing. 2. The state of being; that form of being or peculiar structure and connection of parts which makes or characterizes a system or body. Hence the particular frame or temperament of the human body is called its constitution We speak of a robust or feeble constitution; a cold, phlegmatic, sanguine or irritable constitution We speak of the constitution of the air, or other substance; the constitution of the solar system; the constitution of things. 3. The frame or temper of mind, affections or ions. 4. The established form of government in a state, kingdom or country; a system of fundamental rules, principles and ordinances for the government of a state or nation. In free states, the constitution is paramount to the statutes or laws enacted by the legislature, limiting and controlling its power; and in the United States, the legislature is created, and its powers designated, by the constitution 5. A particular law, ordinance, or regulation, made by the authority of any superior, civil or ecclesiastical; as the constitutions of Justinian and his successors. 6. A system of fundamental principles for the government of rational and social beings. The New Testament is the moral constitution of modern society.

Corporation CORPORATION, noun A body politic or corporate, formed and authorized by law to act as a single person; a society having the capacity of transacting business as an individual. Corporations are aggregate or sole. Corporations aggregate consist of two or more persons united in a society, which is preserved by a succession of , either forever, or till the corporation is dissolved by the power that formed it, by the death of all its , by surrender of its charter or franchises, or by forfeiture. Such corporations are the mayor and aldermen of cities, the head and fellows of a college, the dean and chapter of a cathedral church, the stockholders of a bank or insurance company, etc. A corporation sole consists of one person only and his successors, as a king or a bishop.

422 | P a g e

propriety play noun pro·pri·e·ty \prə-ˈprī-ə-tē\ Simple Defi nition of PROPRIETY Popularity: Top 20% of words 

: b e h a v i o r t h a t i s a c c e p t e d a s s o c i a l l y o r m o r a l l y c o rre c t a n d p ro p e r



: t h e s t a t e o r q u a l i t y o f b e i n g c o rre c t a n d p ro p e r



p r o p r i e t i e s : r u l e s o f c o rre c t s o c i a l b e h a v i o r

     Full Defi nition of PROPRIETY plural pro·pri·e·ties 1.

1 o b s o l e t e : t r u e n a t u re

2.

2 o b s o l e t e : a s p e c i a l c h a r a c t e r i s t i c : peculiarity

3.

3 : t h e q u a l i t y o r s t a t e o f b e i n g proper o r s u i t a b l e : appropriateness

4.

4 a : c o n f o rm i t y t o w h a t i s s o c i a l l y a c c e p t a b l e i n c o n d u c t o r s p e e c h b : f e a r o f o ff e n d i n g a g a i n s t conventional r u l e s o f b e h a v i o r e s p e c i a l l y b e t w e e n t h e s e xe s c p l u r a l : t h e c u s t o m s a n d m a n n e r s o f polite s o c i e t y

423 | P a g e

Imprison. To put in prison; to confine a person or restrain his liberty, in any way.”; “Imprisonment. The act of putting or confining a man in prison. The restraint of a man’s personal liberty; coercion exercised upon a person to prevent the free exercise of his powers of locomotion. Ex parte /ˌɛks ˈpɑrtiː/ is a Latin legal term meaning "from (by or for) [the/a] party". An ex parte decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the controversy to be present.

Statute STATUTE, [Latin , to set.] 1. An act of the legislature of a state that extends its binding force to all the citizens or subjects of that state, as distinguished from an act which extends only to an individual or company; an act of the legislature commanding or prohibiting something; a positive law. Statutes are distinguished from common law. The latter owes its binding force to the principles of justice, to long use and the consent of a nation. The former owe their binding force to a positive command or declaration of the supreme power. statute is commonly applied to the acts of a legislative body consisting of representatives. In monarchies, the laws of the sovereign are called edicts, decrees, ordinances, rescripts, etc. 2. A special act of the supreme power, of a private nature, or intended to operate only on an individual or company. 3. The act of a corporation or of its founder, intended as a permanent rule or law; as the statutes of a university.

424 | P a g e

PETI'TION, noun [Latin petitio, from peto, to ask, properly to urge or press.] 1. In a general sense, a request, supplication or prayer; but chiefly and appropriately, a solemn or formal supplication; a prayer addressed by a person to the Supreme Being, for something needed or desired, or a branch or particular article of prayer.

no man is your god …you give the judge an order as you paid for oyur court and he is your servant. And if he gives you an order you hand him a bill.. Deny simple means not true...it doesn’t mean they don’t accept it..it means they are calling you a liar. So challenge them to say that in court that you are lying… If someone ask u to be a defendant say thank you but I can’t accept that title as I am incompetent in legalese as I don’t belong to your society and great harm will come to me if I do.

Mister, as a title of courtesy before a man's Christian name, mid-15c., unaccented variant of master. As a form of address, without a name and with a tinge of rudeness, from 1760.

Jurisdiction JURISDIC'TION, noun [Latin jurisdictio; jus, juris, law, and dictio, from dico, to pronounce.] 425 | P a g e

1. The legal power of authority of doing justice in cases of complaint; the power of executing the laws and distributing justice. Thus we speak of certain suits or actions, or the cognizance of certain crimes being within thejurisdiction of a court, that is, within the limits of their authority or commission. Inferior courts have jurisdiction of debt and tres, or of smaller offenses; the supreme courts have jurisdiction of treason, murder, and other high crimes. jurisdiction is secular or ecclesiastical. 2. Power of governing or legislating. The legislature of one state can exercise no jurisdiction in another. 3. The power or right of exercising authority. Nations claim exclusivejurisdiction on the sea, to the extent of a marine league from the main land or shore. 4. The limit within which power may be exercised. Jurisdiction, in its most general sense, is the power to make, declare or apply the law; when confined to the judiciary department, it is what we denominate the judicial power, the right of istering justice through the laws, by the means which the laws have provided for that purpose. jurisdiction is limited to place or territory, to persons, or to particular subjects.

Deny DENY, verb transitive 1. To contradict; to gainsay; to declare a statement or position not to be true. Wedeny what another says, or we deny a proposition. We deny the truth of an assertion, or the assertion itself. The sense of this verb is often expressed by no or nay.

Write a letter to your secretary of the state…” hey lady, I have a bond here that covers the bare minimum 10 20 10 which is the minimum required insurance for the state of illinios for insurance. I don’t need you licence, I don’t need your registration. Here is your notice and if a cop stops me I am going to give him your number and we are going to work this out in two seconds. Or you can send me a letter stating I am free and clear of any obligations . if you think you are going to burden me with all this nonsense or you think my position is not true

426 | P a g e

let me know.. ,y next letter will be to file a claim and drag u in to court and get this cleared up..” This might be a notice u have to file… Notice if there is any paperwork or any orders stylized karl lentz petitioner or karl lentz petitioner please address that to the clerk of the court ______(insert name) (not court clerk as clerk court is the underling) as she is the one who has created that legal fiction as I gave her no authority to do so on my part…..she is liable

Fraudulent Practices (IFI Guidelines define) as: “Any act or omission, including a misrepresentation, that knowingly or recklessly misleads, or attempts to mislead, a party to obtain a financial or other benefit or to avoid an obligation.” Deposition- In the law of the United States, a deposition is the out-of-court oral testimony of a witness that is reduced to writing for later use in court or for discovery purposes. It is commonly used in litigation in the United States and Canada, where it is called examination for discovery, and is almost always conducted outside of court by the lawyers themselves (that is, the judge is not present to supervise the examination). In other countries, testimony is usually preserved for future use by way of live testimony in the courtroom, or by way of written affidavit.

es·top eˈstäp/ verb LAW past tense: estopped; past participle: estopped 1. bar or preclude by estoppel. Make sure you get a chance and really listen to Karl Lentz in his own voice express the concepts via the Craig lynch series or the full talkshoe episodes. But after that I urge you to dig deeper and listen to these noteworthy people to help round out and give you more insight ..Bill Thorton, Richard Cornforth, Dean Clifford, Kurt Kallenbach, The Informer, and Frank Collins .....I recommend u watch them in that order and don't ask me why..... "Each time a man stands up for an ideal, or acts to improve the lot of others, or strikes out against injustice, he sends forth a tiny ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a million different centers of energy and daring, those ripples build a current which can sweep down the mightiest walls of oppression and resistance." Robert F. Kennedy

427 | P a g e

June 6th 1966 Capetown Now go and tell everyone you love…

428 | P a g e