Semi-annual Report Jul-dec 2009 5y2w1p

ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR

ZPI PHILIPPINES, INC. PROPONENT’S NAME MONITORING PERIOD COVERED: JULY-DECEMBER, 2009

I.

BASIC PROJECT INFORMATION AND UPDATES

ECC Control No/REFERENCE Code No: ECC-4A-2001-562-112 Project Title: ZPI PHILIPPINES, INC. Project Type: Manufacturing of Plastic Injected Parts Location: PEZA-Cavite Economic Zone Rosario, Cavite Project Coordinates: __________________________ Project Stage/Phase: (i.e. construction; commissioning, etc.) Operational Person: Ms. Leilani Sasaki EMP Approval:  During ECC Application Stage  Updated after ECC Issuance; approved on _________n/a_________ Changes in Project Design (if any): _________________________________________ ____________________________N/A_______________________________________

II.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table II-1. Summary of Major Findings for the Monitoring Period Condition / Requirement / Commitment

Compliance with ECC Compliance with EMP Implementation of appropriate & effective env’tal impact remedial actions in case of exceedances Complaints Management Realistic and sufficient budget for conducting the environmental monitoring and audit activities ability - qualified personnel are charged with the routine monitoring of the project activities in of education, training, knowledge and experience of the environmental team Others . . .

Compliance Status & Summary of Actions taken Complied

Recommendation/Co mmitment for the next reporting Continuous monitoring.

Complied None

Continuous monitoring There is no exceedance.

None Complied

There was no Complaint.

Accredited PCO and attended training for EMS concerns.

Reporting

-

There were no major activities that affect and influenced the monitoring parameters during the monitoring period. Since the Standby Generator Set (450 kVA-capacity) was categorized as small source, it will be tested every other year with 3 sampling runs for air quality. Ambient quality will be tested every year. Test sampling was done last October 22, 2009. The next sampling will be after two years for air quality.

1

ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR

III. A.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Compliance Monitoring Table 1. Summary Status of ECC & EMP Compliance ECC/EMP Condition/Requirement Categorization

1)

Project coverage/limits/

2)

Components

3)

Other sectoral requirements mandated by other agencies to be complied with

4)

EMP and updates as deemed required

5)

Conduct of baseline, compliance and impact selfmonitoring

6)

Multi-sectoral Monitoring (as may be required)

Relevant ECC Condition/s (if any) #/s Requirement Description The production capacity Shall not exceed Ten Million 1(opera (10,000,000) pcs. tional Of Plastic Parts for phase) electronic and telecommunication products per annum 2(PreInjection Machine; operatio Generator Set nal (standby) phase) 1(PreLicensing & operatio Permits: Annually, nal submitted to PEZAphase) EHSD ECC Monitored and conditio complying n Settings of baseline are integrated to N/A the EMS based reports.









Continuous monitoring

N/A

1(Preoperatio nal phase)

SMR/CMR



8)

Institutional arrangements necessary for implementation of environmental management measures

N/A

Standard DENR requirement on transfer of ownership

2(Set on ECC Conditio n)

ISO Certified by Certification International (a third party auditor): EMS 14001 & QMS 9001 Written notification within 15 days from such transfer to the DENR-R4A office

Production Capacity for: 1st quarter = 240,769 2nd quarter = 167,783 3rd Quarter = 256,732 4th Quarter = Expiration of Permit-ToOperate: Aug. 27, 2010 All clearances: Licensing and Permits has been secured Continuous monitoring

None

Regular reporting

REMARKS



N/A

7)

9)

Status of Complianc e ( if complying)

Not required in the ECC Submission of CMR for approval and evaluation for the period of JulyDecember 2009



Integrated Quality management System



There is NO transfer of ownership

10) Standard DENR requirement on abandonment

N/A

None

N/A

11) Impact Mitigation Plan or Construction/ Contractor’s Environmental Program

CM Table #2 (ECC conditio n)

Maintenance & Monitoring of the Mitigation Plan and its Implementation

Aspects and Impacts are monitored and under the EMS based program of the proponent

N/A

None

N/A

None With established Emergency Response Team and its

12) Social Development Plan (SDP) 13) IEC Plan 14) Contingency/Emergency Response Plan or equivalent Risk Management Plan

2



N/A 

N/A Documents and records are well secured.

ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR Implementing guidelines. 15) Abandonment Plan (when applicable)

N/A

16) Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMoP)

-

17) (Others)

-

None

N/A

Summarized EMP on Air Quality, Water Quality, Toxic & Hazardous Waste and Solid waste management. -



Complied with the monitoring report; Test Samplings and Results.

-

-

For the Submission for the Reporting of CMR of the proponent for the period of July-December 2009, and all the condition on the ECC was complied.

B.

Impact Monitoring

Table 2. Summary Status of Environmental Impact Management and Monitoring Plan Implementation

Monitori ng Objectiv e

Envt’l Aspect

Envt’l Impact

Monito ring Param eter

Sampling & Measurement

Stn/ Locn To determi ne Air Quality

Air Emission of standby power generator

Air Pollution

SOx, NOx, TSP, CO

CO=10 6.50

SO2=128 .26 NO2=925 .02

To determi ne Air Quality

Comply with RA 6969

Delivery and business Air truck/vehicle pollution that produces/gene rates Air Emissions and Dust

Plant Operation

Health hazards Soil and water pollution

TSP, SOx, NOx,

Compa ny Truck Compa ny Vehicle

Numbe r of accide nts and oil spills Storag e

Inside the plant site

3

Envt’l Mgmt. Measure

Remark s (EQPL* commit ment, if any)

Results Previo Curre us nt CO=286. 30

Parkin g Area

Stan dard / EIS Predi ction

SO2=20 .84 NO2=7 4.63

CO=5 00mg/ Ncm

NO EQPLs. Continu ous monitori ng

SO2= 1500 mg/Nc m NO2= 2000 mg/Nc m

Emissio n Test Conduct ion Before registrat ion. Checkin g and monitori ng of Vehicles function . Provisio n of Protecti ve and safety devices/ equipm ent

Continu ous monitori ng

Continu ous monitori ng

ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR facilitie s of hazard ous waste

Proper storage of hazardo us waste Treatme nt of hazardo us waste

To manage solid waste generat ed

To conserv e natural resourc es

Plant operation may result to solid waste generation

Health hazards

Use of electricity for lighting, air conditioning, & other office equipment.

Depletion of natural Resource s

N/A

Ambient condition

Health hazards

Total suspen ded particu late, μg/Nc m

Generation of noise due to operation of machine

Soil and water pollution

Noise pollution

Vol. of solid waste genera ted recycle d, reuse and properl y dispos ed

Decibe l

Implem entation of solid waste manage ment progra m Provisio ns of waste bins

Inside the plant site

Continu ous monitori ng

Continu ous monitori ng

Inside the plant site

18 μg/Nc m

26 μg/Nc m

Outsid e the plant site Inside the plant site

25 μg/Nc m

13 μg/Nc m

Outsid e the plant site

Continu ous monitori ng

64.21 dB

70d B

55.34 dB

70d B

Continu ous monitori ng

*EQPL-Environmental Quality Performance Level

o

Alert or Red Flag - early warning

o

Action Level-point where management measures must be employed so as not to reach the regulated threshold or limit level, or to reduce deterioration of affected environmental component to pre-impact or optimum environmental quality

o

Limit Level-regulated threshold of pollutant (standard that must not be exceeded); point where emergency response measures must be employed to reduce pollutants to lower than standard limit.

o

NOTE: Section on EQPLs may be filled out as a Proponent’s draft commitment or after these have been established and mutually agreed upon among Proponent, EMB and other MMT . Otherwise, only the LIMIT Level shall be the reference for regulatory compliance. This means that environmental management measures are formulated at the “ACTION level” so as not to exceed this regulated threshold.

Table 3. Report on Status of Environmental Budget Allocations and Expenses

4

ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR Budget Expense Item*

Direct from Co.

Actual Expenses

Budget for MMT

Direct Co. Expense

MMT expenses

A. Implementation of Management Plans & Programs 1) Environmental Impact Mitigation Plan 2) Social Development Plan 3) IEC Plan 4) Enhancement Programs (if any)

√

N/A

√

N/A

N/A N/A Re-used materials

N/A N/A

N/A N/A Re-used materials

N/A N/A

N/A

N/A

B. Implementation of Monitoring Plans 1) Self-Monitoring 10,000 10,000 2) Environmental Monitoring Fund (with N/A N/A N/A N/A MMT) 3) Environmental Guarantee N/A N/A N/A N/A Fund TOTALS 10, 000 N/A 10, 000 N/A *For mining projects, equivalent cost items shall be adopted, e.g. SDMP in lieu of SDP.

IV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A.

Compliance Status All the conditions set under the ECC of the proponent was complied and attained. There were no exceedance of plant production and it is shown on table 1. All Effluent and emission was conformed through the standards of DAO 2000-81. Before the registration of the company vehicle and delivery truck, emission testing was done. According to the DENR Memorandum released last July 2008, that any diesel generator set rated at 301 kw to 599 kw should be tested once every other/second year that consists of three (3) sampling runs. The Generator Set owned by the proponent was under the small source which should have a three sampling runs of testing, this was done Last October 2009 in compliance to the permit for industrial facilities with air emissions. ZPI Philippines, Inc. is certified to Integrated Management system, the programs set under the ISO 9001 and 14001, was align to the EMP under the conditions of the ECC. The program set under EMS (Environmental management System) is continuously and properly monitored. There is Segregation of the solid wastes, conservation and reduction of energy and water consumptions. On the Hazardous Waste management, provision of locations and area are done, properly maintenance and posting of guidelines on how to avoid human health and risk. Provision of proper PPE (personal protective equipment) and training under Hazardous Waste Management. B.

Environmental Management Plan Status ⇒ EMP of the proponent is consistent in complying with the Implementation set under the ECC conditions. The stated mitigation/enhancement measures are scheduled. EMP is monitored and maintained through the company wide programs for improvement and enhancement, such as:





 o

o



AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT: o Test sampling for the standby generator set. Records of data gathered and monitored are secured; also the sampling results are well secured for legal and future references. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT: o Records of laboratory and sampling results are well secured for the reference and basis for the monitoring. TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT: Storage for hazardous wastes is provided to avoid contamination to other wastes such as residual and Compostable materials. Hazardous wastes are monitored and maintained before final disposal (of any toxic/hazardous wastes for treatment) to any treatment facilities that treated the hazardous wastes. It is properly labeled according to its classification and segregated to other untreated hazardous wastes. Accumulation of hazardous wastes is very minimal. A record from the previous monitoring is well secured. Uniform manifest form of the TSD facility and the waste generator is issued by the LGU for security purposes. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT: o Solid wastes are segregated through the provided trash bins, and it is integrated in the proponents Environmental Management System. It is 5

ANNEX 3-1 PRO-FORMA PROPONENT COMPLIANCE MONITORING REPORT (CMR): Semi-annual Module 5 of SMR monitored by the disposal committee; Residual wastes are hauled and disposed every month or by call as scheduled by the peza-accredited residual haulers. C.

WORK PLAN FOR NEXT MONITORING PERIOD

Seeking for accredited Transporter, treater, storage and disposal facilitator for the Final disposal of the hazardous wastes.

PREPARED BY:

NOTED BY:

Engr. Robert E. Ulatan/PCO____ Name/Position

Mr. Katsuhiko Sasaki/CEO(Gen.Mgr.) Name/Position

_ ZPI PHILIPPINES, Inc.___ Proponent/Company Name

ZPI PHILIPIPPINES, INC.___ Proponent/Company Name

_____Jan. 15, 2009______ Date

_____

6

_Jan. 15, 2009____________ Date